Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,516
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
2,516 results for “Seri”
Figure 5 from: Ziegler A, Mirantsev G, Jangoux M, Kroh A (2014) Historical aspects of meetings, publication series, and digital resources dedicated to echinoderms. Zoosystematics and Evolution 90(1): 45-56. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.90.7201
Figure 5 - Conference logos from selected national, regional, and international echinoderm meetings held from 1978 to 2013. (A) 3rd International Echinoderm Conference, Sydney, Australia, 1978. (B) 5th Florida Echinoderm Festival, Tampa, Florida, USA, 1999. (C) 1. Arbeitstreffen deutschsprachiger Echinodermenforscher, Greifswald, Germany, 2001. (D) International Conference on Sea-Urchin Fisheries and Aquaculture, Puerto Varas, Chile, 2003. (E) 3. Arbeitstreffen deutschsprachiger Echinodermenforscher, Ingelfingen, Germany, 2004. (F) ACIAR-SPC Asia-Pacific Tropical Sea Cucumber Aquaculture Symposium, Nouméa, New Caledonia, 2011. (G) 2° Congreso Latinoamericano de Equinodermos, São Sebastião, Brazil, 2013. (H) 5. Arbeitstreffen deutschsprachiger Echinodermenforscher, Stuttgart, Germany, 2013.
Figure 6 from: Ziegler A, Mirantsev G, Jangoux M, Kroh A (2014) Historical aspects of meetings, publication series, and digital resources dedicated to echinoderms. Zoosystematics and Evolution 90(1): 45-56. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.90.7201
Figure 6 - Flyer announcing an informal gathering of the Friends of the Echinoderms during the 2010 Meeting of the Geological Society of America in Denver, Colorado, USA. Image courtesy Ronald L. Parsley.
Figure 3 from: Ziegler A, Mirantsev G, Jangoux M, Kroh A (2014) Historical aspects of meetings, publication series, and digital resources dedicated to echinoderms. Zoosystematics and Evolution 90(1): 45-56. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.90.7201
Figure 3 - Group photo of the participants of the 1st European Conference on Echinoderms, held 1979 in Brussels. 1 Chantal De Ridder, 2 Michel Jangoux, 3 Claude Massin, 4 Anneliese Strenger, 5 Charles W. Walker, 6 Mrs. Hulbert, 7 Alan W. Hulbert, 8 David Nichols, 9 Mrs. Vasserot, 10 Robert F. O'Brien, 11 Anke Burkhardt, 12 Helge Hilgers, 13 Alfred Goldschmid, 14 Mrs. Goldschmid, 15 Richard M. Pagett, 16 Alan M. Raymond, 17 Raimundo Pidal, 18 Jean Le Menn, 19 Michel Huet, 20 Jean-Michel Vasserot, 21 Maria de Natividade Albuquerque, 22 Konrad Märkel, 23 Sebastian Bachmann, 24 Heinz Splechtna, 25 F. Jensenius Madsen, 26 Mrs. Guille, 27 Alain Guille, 28 Hubert Caspers, 29 Henri Termier, 30 Genevieve Termier, 31 Mrs. Roman, 32 Jean Roman, 33 Edwin Van Impe, 34 Jean-Guy Ferrand, 35 Robert Delavault, 36 Mrs. Huet, 37 Yulin Liao, 38 Jovanka Mitrović, 39 Norman Millott, 40 Mrs. Millott, 41 Ricard Martínez, 42 John E. Binyon, 43 Edward P. F. Rose, 44 Duncan Heddle, 45 Michel Philippe, 46 Jean-Pierre Féral, 47 Daniel Fournier, 48 Solveig Sjögren, 49 Monique Guillou, 50 Ms. Bacallado-Aranega, 51 Jacques Guillou, 52 Mrs. David, 53 Juan Jose Bacallado-Aranega, 54 Bruno David, 55 Celso Rodriguez Babio, 56 Mrs. Monteiro Marques, 57 Myriam Sibuet, 58 Enrico Tortonese, 59 Michel Roux, 60 Peter A. Voogt, 61 Gustave Cherbonnier, 62 Reimund Haude, 63 Mrs. Paterson, 64 Mrs. Durkin, 65 Ailsa M. Clark, 66 Radu Sukarno, 67 Michael K. Durkin, 68 Richard P. S. Jefferies, 69 Lesley I. Messer, 70 Ester Ryberg, 71 David G. Stephenson, 72 Edith Bricourt, 73 Guy Coppois, 74 Michel Demargne, 75 Christopher R. C. Paul, 76 Erhard Höbaus, 77 Pierre Magniez, 78 Alain Bidar, 79 Geoffrey Q. Case, 80 Lydie Dupont, 81 M. De Waal, 82 Wolfram P. Tertschnig, 83 Unidentified person, 84 Gerardo Gustato, 85 Aagje J. Van der Plas, 86 Anna Villari, 87 Derek E. G. Briggs, 88 Vasco M. A. Monteiro Marques, 89 Megumi F. Strathmann, 90 Rob C. H. M. Oudejans, 91 Peter M. Jost, 92 Unidentified person, 93 Gordon L. J. Paterson, 94 Paula F. Dehn, 95 Hussein Kamel Badawi, 96 Roland H. Emson, 97 Paul A. Tyler, 98 Grace S. Y. Lim, 99 John M. Lawrence, 100 Andrew B. Smith, 101 Ilana Ferber, 102 Haruo Kanatani, 103 Desmond B. Johnson, 104 Iain C. Wilkie, 105 Jaume Gallemi Paulet, 106 Kurt Traer, 107 Bent Hansen, 108 Jan J. S. Broertjes, 109 Richard R. Strathmann, 110 Tine Valentinčič.
Figure 4 from: Ziegler A, Mirantsev G, Jangoux M, Kroh A (2014) Historical aspects of meetings, publication series, and digital resources dedicated to echinoderms. Zoosystematics and Evolution 90(1): 45-56. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.90.7201
Figure 4 - Impressions from a poster session organized during the 1st European Conference on Echinoderms, held 1979 in Brussels. (A) Jan J. S. Broertjes, Haruo Kanatani, Peter A. Voogt. (B) Guy Coppois, Chantal De Ridder, Edith Bricourt, Lucie Jangoux, Robert Fenaux, Lucienne Fenaux. (C) Mrs. Monteiro Marques, Vasco M. A. Monteiro Marques, Gustave Cherbonnier, Lucie Jangoux, Solveig Sjögren. (D) Alfred Goldschmid (background), Tim Bowmer, Claude Massin, Jean-Pierre Féral, John Costelloe, Brendan O'Connor. (E) Richard M. Pagett, Iain C. Wilkie, Alan M. Raymond, Roland H. Emson. (F) Raimundo Pidal, Ricard Martínez, Enrico Tortonese, F. Jensenius Madsen, Bent Hansen.
Figure 2 from: Ziegler A, Mirantsev G, Jangoux M, Kroh A (2014) Historical aspects of meetings, publication series, and digital resources dedicated to echinoderms. Zoosystematics and Evolution 90(1): 45-56. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.90.7201
Figure 2 - Group photo of the participants of the 1st International Echinoderm Conference, held 1972 in Washington, DC. 1 Lucienne Fenaux, 2 Harrell L. Strimple, 3 Thomas A. Ebert, 4 Jacqueline E. Moss, 5 Fu-Shiang Chia, 6 Alfred B. Chaet, 7 Sylvia Broderick, 8 Allahverdi A.-H. Farmanfarmaian, 9 Stanley E. Blake, 10 Michael H. Salazar, 11 Judith Eastwood, 12 Thomas F. Phelan, 13 Albert Breimer, 14 Christina Strimple, 15 John C. Ferguson, 16 Jennifer Nielsen, 17 Charles W. Walker, 18 Porter M. Kier, 19 Richard H. Chesher, 20 William C. Austin, 21 Bertha M. Cutress, 22 Charles Major, 23 Christopher R. C. Paul, 24 Ilana Ferber, 25 David L. Meyer, 26 Donald B. Macurda Jr., 27 Dennis W. Burdick, 28 Gerald J. Bakus, 29 Robert S. Carney, 30 F. Julian Fell, 31 Donald Broom, 32 Robert L. Singletary, 33 A. John Jordan, 34 Lawrence W. Coady, 35 Ailsa M. Clark, 36 Andrew C. Campbell, 37 John M. Lawrence, 38 Jeremy D. Woodley, 39 David G. Atwood, 40 Lowell P. Thomas, 41 John H. Dearborn, 42 Michael A. Kyte, 43 David L. Pawson, 44 Irving Gray, 45 Alan S. Horowitz, 46 David N. Emerson, 47 George D. Sevastopulo, 48 Richard L. Turner, 49 James Sutton, 50 James C. Brower, 51 Frank J. S. Maturo, 52 Edward P. F. Rose, 53 David Nichols, 54 Douglas H. Fenner, 55 W. Ross Ellington, 56 Donald P. Kelso, 57 James Sprinkle, 58 N. Gary Lane, 59 Michael LaBarbera, 60 John P. Eylers, 61 D. Keith Serafy, 62 Elizabeth M. Sides, 63 Dana Scott, 64 Maria Elena Caso, 65 Frank Jeal, 66 Jerald A. Halpern, 67 J. Wyatt Durham, 68 John M. Warn, 69 Dennis R. Kolata, 70 Ronald L. Parsley, 71 Richard U. Gooding, 72 Bruce M. Bell, 73 Gordon Hendler, 74 John S. Pearse, 75 Richard R. Strathmann, 76 Thomas S. Hopkins, 77 Stephen E. Stancyk, 78 John Caldwell, 79 Unidentified person, 80 Frederick H. C. Hotchkiss, 81 Aage M. Christensen, 82 Juan C. Castilla, 83 Fred C. Ziesenhenne. Image courtesy John M. Lawrence.
Figure 1 from: Ziegler A, Mirantsev G, Jangoux M, Kroh A (2014) Historical aspects of meetings, publication series, and digital resources dedicated to echinoderms. Zoosystematics and Evolution 90(1): 45-56. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.90.7201
Figure 1 - Impressions from two social gatherings organized during the first official echinoderm meeting, the Symposium on Physiology of Echinodermata, held 1963 in Washington, DC as part of the 16th International Congress of Zoology. (A) John B. Loefer, Richard A. Boolootian, John M. Anderson, Allahverdi A.-H. Farmanfarmaian. (B) Dennis J. Crisp, W. Randolph Taylor. (C) George P. Wells, Friedrich Krüger. (D) Hans O. Brattström, Wolfgang Wieser, Williamina A. M. Courtney, C. Ladd Prosser, unidentified person. (E) Jeremy D. Woodley, Lary V. Davis, Thomas S. Hopkins, John S. Pearse. (F) John M. Anderson, Aage M. Christensen. Images courtesy Mark Boolotian and Richard A. Boolootian.
Figure 3 from: Miller J, Beentjes K, van Helsdingen P, IJland S (2013) Which specimens from a museum collection will yield DNA barcodes? A time series study of spiders in alcohol. ZooKeys 365: 245-261. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.365.5787
Figure 3 - DNA concentration (log10 transformed) for specimens in the time series study that yielded or failed to yield a successful DNA barcode sequence arranged by A body size B year collected. Successes (filled circles) and failures (while circles) partitioned into destructive (red) and nondestructive (blue) DNA extraction methods.
Figure 2 from: Miller J, Beentjes K, van Helsdingen P, IJland S (2013) Which specimens from a museum collection will yield DNA barcodes? A time series study of spiders in alcohol. ZooKeys 365: 245-261. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.365.5787
Figure 2 - Sequencing success for the time series study of 31 spider species frequently collected in the Netherlands. Data for each species arranged horizontally along a time axis (year of collection). Small circles represent standard destructive extraction; outer circle represents nondestructive extraction. Red small circle and blue outer circle indicate successful sequencing, unfilled circles represent failed attempts; half-filled circle indicates mixed success among multiple specimens for that species and year. Solid horizontal lines extend from the present to the oldest successful DNA barcode based on destructive extraction for each species; where nondestructive extraction yielded successful DNA barcode from older specimens, this is indicated by a dashed line. Data are arranged according to a neighbour joining tree (A) or by species body size (B). Spider families and major lineages (Orbiculariae and 'RTA' clade) are indicated in A. AGE Agelenidae AMA Amaurobiidae ARA Araneidae CLU Clubionidae COR Corinnidae LIN Linyphiidae LYC Lycosidae PHI Philodromidae PIS Pisauridae SAL Salticidae THD Theridiidae THO Thomisidae ZOR Zoridae.
Figure 1 from: Miller J, Beentjes K, van Helsdingen P, IJland S (2013) Which specimens from a museum collection will yield DNA barcodes? A time series study of spiders in alcohol. ZooKeys 365: 245-261. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.365.5787
Figure 1 - A Sequencing success profile for specimens included in this study. Data are species attempted, all specimens in the study including the time series, and fresh specimens collected in 2010 or later. Success expressed as a percentage appears on the blue (success) portion of each bar B Sequencing success rates for fresh (collected 2010 or later) and older specimens grouped by decade. Data given for all extractions regardless of method, and also partitioned into destructive and nondestructive extraction methods. Total number of specimens attempted and the subset of specimens attempted using nondestructive extraction given in parentheses. Note that the relatively high success rate for nondestructive extractions of specimens from the 1960s is based on two successes out of four attempts.
Figure 5 from: Miller J, Beentjes K, van Helsdingen P, IJland S (2013) Which specimens from a museum collection will yield DNA barcodes? A time series study of spiders in alcohol. ZooKeys 365: 245-261. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.365.5787
Figure 5 - DNA barcode sequencing success for fresh specimens (collected 2010 or later). A Specimen body size not significantly different for successful vs. failed DNA barcode sequencing attempts (one-way ANOVA, F (1, 216) = 1.45, p = 0.230). Boxes are 25–75% quartiles bisected by the median, whisker lines drawn to the largest/smallest data point less than 1.5 times the box height, outliers less than 3 times the box height shown as circles, more than 3 shown as stars. B Most of the fresh specimens included in this study belonged to one of two clades: Orbiculariae (ORB) or the 'RTA' clade (RTA); only a handful of specimens represented older phylogenetic branches, such as haplogyne (HAP) spiders; no mygalomorph spiders were included; success expressed as a percentage appears on or above each bar. Success rate for Orbiculariae vs. 'RTA' clade specimens not significantly different (χ2 = 2.18, d.f. = 2, N = 220, p = 0.337).
Figure 4 from: Miller J, Beentjes K, van Helsdingen P, IJland S (2013) Which specimens from a museum collection will yield DNA barcodes? A time series study of spiders in alcohol. ZooKeys 365: 245-261. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.365.5787
Figure 4 - A DNA concentration (log10 transformed) for specimens in the time series study that yielded or failed to yield a successful DNA barcode sequence ranked by DNA concentration; symbols as in Figure 3 B Box plot showing difference in DNA concentration for specimens extracted using both destructive and nondestructive methods; species arranged by size (Araneus quadratus, Tegenaria atrica, and Dolomedes plantarius excluded). Sample size in parentheses, boxes are 25–75% quartiles bisected by the median, whisker lines indicate minimum/maximum values (where n > 4).
Figure 1 from: Gouraud C, Frahnert S, Gamauf A, van der Mije S (2016) Review of the type series of Pterocles exustus Temminck, 1825 (Aves, Pterocliformes, Pteroclidae) and designation of a lectotype. ZooKeys 580: 145-152. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.580.7892
Figure 1 - Pterocles exustus Temminck, 1825. Lectotype RMNH.AVES.87615. Photograph courtesy of Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Streamwater dissolved organic carbon, discharge, temperature and precipitation electrical conductivity time series and associated site information for eight European headwater streams.
<p>This dataset (in Microsoft Excel format) provides the underlying data described in the Science Advances paper, "Long-term rise in riverine dissolved organic carbon concentration is predicted by electrolyte solubility theory", by D.T. Monteith, P.A. Henrys, J.Hruška, H.A. de Wit, P. Krám, F. Moldan, M. Posch, A. Räike, J.L. Stoddard, E.M. Shilland, M.G. Pereira & C.D. Evans, It includes the following spreadsheets: 1) A "<strong>readme</strong>" page providing the information above; 2) <strong>Site data</strong>. including site physical attributes and information on data sources; 3) <strong>Temporal smoothing</strong>. Detailing the temporal smoothers applied to the electrical conductivity and air temperature data for modelling purposes; and 4) <strong>Input data</strong>. Multi-decadal time series of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations for a range of intensively monitored headwater streams, together with data for the following variables used to model DOC, i.e. associated stream discharge measurements, and temporally averaged precipitation electrical conductivity and air temperature data. </p>
Data attached to Radio Science paper "Model to Scale Rain Attenuation Time Series with Link Elevation Angle for LEO Satellite Based Systems"
<p>Data attached to Radio Science paper "Model to Scale Rain Attenuation Time Series with Link Elevation Angle for LEO Satellite Based Systems"</p>
FIGURE 3 in Pleurothallis mark-wilsonii a new species from the subsection Acroniae series Amphigyae from the Western Andes of Colombia
FIGURE 3. Photograph of Mark Wilson.
Time series of mesozooplankton data at LTER-MC in the Gulf of Naples (1984-2015)
<p>The present dataset contains the abundance data (ind. m<sup>-3</sup>) of total mesozooplankton, main groups and copepod species from the Long Term Ecological Research station MareChiara in the Gulf of Naples (st. LTER-MC, 40°48.5’ N, 14°15’ E) over the years 1984-2015. Zooplankton samples were collected by vertical tows in the upper 50 m using an Indian Ocean net (200-µm mesh, 113-cm mouth diameter) and fixed with buffered formaldehyde (2–4% final concentration). In the laboratory, the samples were concentrated and resuspended in filtered seawater to a volume of 200 ml to remove the formaldehyde. Aliquots ranging from 1/4 to 1/32, according to the sample density, were initially taken using the Huntsman beaker subsampling technique and successively with a large-bore graduated pipette after careful mixing. Aliquots were transferred to a mini-Bogorov chamber (10 ml) and examined under a stereomicroscope and all zooplankton taxa were identified and counted. The entire sample was checked for the presence of rare species. The copepod abundances reported here correspond to the whole population (adult females and males, and copepodites).</p>
FIGURE 1 in Rubus lentianus, a new species from Austria and Germany-another piece of the puzzle from a European hotspot of Rubus series Radula
FIGURE 1. Holotype of Rubus lentianus (LI—No 03455388).
FIGURE 4 in Rubus lentianus, a new species from Austria and Germany-another piece of the puzzle from a European hotspot of Rubus series Radula
FIGURE 4. Distribution map of Rubus lentianus.
Time series of electrical conductivity, temperature, relative stream stage and total pressure recorded in surface water and streambed sediments of River Erpe and River Ammer, Germany, and the Sturt River, South Australia
<p>Time series of electrical conductivity (mS cm<sup>-1</sup>), temperature (degC), relative stream stage (cm) and total pressure (hPa) recorded in the surface water and in streambed sediments (depth in cm) of River Erpe and River Ammer, Germany, and the Sturt River, South Australia.</p>
Landsat time series classification training data
<p>Data for the paper </p> <p>Hankui K. Zhang, Dong Luo, Zhongbin Li, Classifying raw irregular Landsat time series (CRIT) for large area land cover mapping by adapting Transformer model.</p> <p>It stores the daily raw Landsat ARD annual good quality surface reflectance time series for 1985, 2006 and 2018 for CONUS with 7 land cover classes. Details are in the paper. </p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.