Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,441
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
2,441 results for “extinct”
FIGURES 1–2 in News from Baltic amber: a new tribe of extinct Paleogene ironclad beetles (Coleoptera: Zopheridae: Zopherinae)
FIGURES 1–2. Zopheromimus auriborussiensis sp. nov., holotype, No KAM 8325/2: 1—habitus, dorso-lateral view; 2— habitus, ventro-lateral view. Scale bar = 1 mm.
Figure 1 in Effects of roost specialization on extinction risk in bats
Figure 1. Proportion of roost types used by bats aeithin each International Union for Conseroation of Nature Red List category (IUCN 2013) (CR, critically endangered; EN, endangered; VU, oulnerable; NT, near threatened; LC, least concern). Bars shoae the relatioe importance of a particular roost type for bats aeithin a gioen red-list category. For example, aehereas 2 critically endangered and 224 least concern bats use caoes and creoices, the bar for the former is larger because only 3 bats ooerall are considered critically endangered, aehereas 304 are considered of least concern. Only the most commonly used roost types (i.e., those aeith the largest number of data points) are included.
Late-Quaternary megafauna extinctions have strongly reduced mammalian vegetation consumption
<p>Scrips and data for recreating the results and figures in the paper Late-Quaternary megafauna extinctions have strongly reduced mammalian vegetation consumption<br> DOI: 10.1111/geb.13723<br> Journal Global Ecology and Biogeography:<br> <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/geb.13723">https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/geb.13723</a></p> <p>The three folders work as stand alone R-Studio projects, for estimating metabolic rates, densities, and the finally calculating total carbon consumption and creating summary statistics and figures. They require PHYLACINE v. 1.2.1 (https://zenodo.org/record/3690867) to be in another folder next to them.</p>
FIGURES 7–10. Semanopterus kingstoni new species, holotype. 7 in A new, but possibly extinct, species of Semanopterus Hope, 1847 from Lord Howe Island, in the southwestern Pacific Ocean (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Dynastinae)
FIGURES 7–10. Semanopterus kingstoni new species, holotype. 7, ventral habitus; 8, prothoracic leg; 9, metathoracic leg; 10, posterior.
FIGURE 4. a in A new species of Lethrinops (Cichliformes: Cichlidae) from a Lake Malawi satellite lake, believed to be extinct in the wild
FIGURE 4. a. Lower pharyngeal bones of Lethrinops lethrinus, 128mm SL, BMNH 2023.1.11.49-50 (left); Lethrinops lethrinus 84mm SL (unregistered, bottom right); Lethrinops chilingali 69mmSL (unregistered, top right); b. Distribution of Lethrinops lethrinus specimens examined (●), unconfirmed records: juveniles or not examined (Q) and Lethrinops chilingali (●).
FIGURE 2. Lethrinops chilingali. a. Holotype, BMNH 2023.1.11.1 in A new species of Lethrinops (Cichliformes: Cichlidae) from a Lake Malawi satellite lake, believed to be extinct in the wild
FIGURE 2. Lethrinops chilingali. a. Holotype, BMNH 2023.1.11.1; female 70.9mm SL. b. Paratype, BMNH 2023.1.11.2-21; mature male, 81.2mm SL.
FIGURE 3 in A new species of Lethrinops (Cichliformes: Cichlidae) from a Lake Malawi satellite lake, believed to be extinct in the wild
FIGURE 3. Comparisons of Lethrinops lethrinus and Lethinops chilingali. a. holotype of L. lethrinus, BMNH 1893.15.15., 118.5mm SL. b. paratype of L. chilingali, BMNH 2023.1.11.2-21, female, 60.7mm SL; c. L. lethrinus apparent female alive in aquarium. d. L. chilingali apparent immature male alive in aquarium. e. mature male L. lethrinus. f. mature male L. chilingali. The shorter snout L. chilingali is evident, and the more broken midlateral stripe can be seen in the live specimens.
Body size and geographic distribution of foraminiferal specimens during the Frasnian-Famennian (Frasnian), Guadalupian-Lopingian (Capitanian), Permian-Triassic (Changhsingian), Triassic-Jurassic (Rhaetian), and Cretaceous-Paleogene (Maastrichtian) mass extinctions.
<p>This dataset is about body size and geographic distribution of foraminiferal specimens during the Frasnian-Famennian (Frasnian), Guadalupian-Lopingian (Capitanian), Permian-Triassic (Changhsingian), Triassic-Jurassic (Rhaetian), and Cretaceous-Paleogene (Maastrichtian) mass extinctions.</p> <p>Foraminiferal body size data collection</p> <p>First, we collected published papers with foraminiferal images from the Frasnian (382.7-372.2 Ma), Capitanian (264.28-259.51 Ma), Changhsingian (254.14-251.902 Ma), Rhaetian (208.5-201.3 Ma), and Maastrichtian (72.1-66.1 Ma). Second, we measured two primary axes of specimens, such as maximum length and height in a conical or cylindrical shell. For some specimens, where there is no way to measure the length of both axes, we calculate the length of the unknown axis based on the aspect ratio of the type species. Third, we used the test volume as a standard indicator of body size, taking into account the diversity of foraminiferal morphology. Finally, the test volumes were calculated on a logarithmic scale with base 10 due to large individual differences, and the specific calculation is shown in Feng et al. (2020).</p>
Figure 8 in Osteological comparison of casque ontogeny in palaeognathous and neognathous birds: insights for selecting modern analogues in the study of cranial ornaments from extinct archosaurs
Figure 8. Examples of modern casque analogues suitable for specific non-avian dinosaur ornamentation comparisons in the context of (top row) development, (middle row) structural composition, and (boưom row) homologous structures. Each skull shown in right lateral view. Grey regions depict non-ornamental elements, and orange-highlighted regions depict ornamental elements for each represented species (see main text for relevant osteology); neognathous birds surveyed from the literature collectively represented by hornbill illustration (lowest less).
Figure 7 in Osteological comparison of casque ontogeny in palaeognathous and neognathous birds: insights for selecting modern analogues in the study of cranial ornaments from extinct archosaurs
Figure 7. Illustrations of bony cranial anatomy among exemplar dinosaurs with skull ornamentation, i.e. Saurolophus osborni (paired nasals, prefrontals, and frontals; Bell 2011), Protoceratops andrewsi (paired parietals and squamosals; Dodson 1976), Stegoceras validum (paired frontals and parietals; Schoư et al. 2011), Citipati osmolskae (paired premaxillae, nasals, and frontals; Clark et al. 2002), Carnotaurus sastrei (paired frontals; Paulina Carabajal 2011), Monolophosaurus jiangi (paired premaxillae, nasals, lacrimals, prefrontals, and frontals; Brusaưe et al. 2010), Numida meleagris (paired frontals), Macrocephalon maleo (paired frontals and parietals); Casuarius casuarius (mesethmoid, median casque element, paired nasals, paired lacrimals, and paired frontals; Green and Gignac 2021). Each skull shown in right lateral (top) and dorsal (boưom) views. Grey regions depict non-ornamental elements and orange-highlighted regions depict ornamental elements for each represented species.
Figure 6 in Osteological comparison of casque ontogeny in palaeognathous and neognathous birds: insights for selecting modern analogues in the study of cranial ornaments from extinct archosaurs
Figure 6. Three-dimensional renderings from micro-computed tomography data of a developmental series of Casuarius casuarius: A, TLG C025; B, TLG C037; C, TLG C031; D, AMNH SKEL 963; E, AMNH SKEL 962 (see Table 1). Skulls are shown in (top) less lateral and (boưom) dorsal views. Casque elements specific to Casuarius casuarius are indicated by colored cells [dark red (X) = element not participating at specified age; dark green (✓) = element participating at specified age] in the table, and grey cells indicate bones that do not contribute to bones in the species represented in this figure, but do contribute to others in the study. Dashed line divides specimens without (less) and with (right) casques developmentally present.
Figure 5 in Osteological comparison of casque ontogeny in palaeognathous and neognathous birds: insights for selecting modern analogues in the study of cranial ornaments from extinct archosaurs
Figure 5. Three-dimensional renderings from micro-computed tomography data of a developmental series of Macrocephalon maleo: A, UAZ MM005; B, UAZ MM003; C, UAZ MM004; D, UAZ MM002; E, UAZ MM006 (see Table 1). Skulls are shown in (top) less lateral and (boưom) dorsal views. Casque elements specific to Ma. maleo are indicated by colored cells [dark red (X) = element not participating at specified age; dark green (✓) = element participating at specified age] in the table, and grey cells indicate bones that do not contribute to bones in the species represented in this figure, but do contribute to others in the study. Dashed line divides specimens without (less) and with (right) casques developmentally present.
Figure 3 in Osteological comparison of casque ontogeny in palaeognathous and neognathous birds: insights for selecting modern analogues in the study of cranial ornaments from extinct archosaurs
Figure 3. Three-dimensional renderings from micro-computed tomography data of immature (A) Numida meleagris (TLG NM002), (B) Macrocephalon maleo (UAZ MM003), and (C) Casuarius casuarius (TLG C004). (Immature specimens are figured to emphasize clearer suture lines.) Broad cranial casque paưerns divided into geminal (sampled neognaths; N. meleagris and Ma. maleo) and disunited (sampled palaeognath; Casuarius casuarius). Skulls are shown in (top) lateral and (boưom) dorsal views with elements that will contribute to the fully matured adult casque false coloured (maroon = nasals; green = median casque element; blue = mesethmoid; orange = lacrimals; purple = frontals; yellow = parietals).
Figure 2 in Osteological comparison of casque ontogeny in palaeognathous and neognathous birds: insights for selecting modern analogues in the study of cranial ornaments from extinct archosaurs
Figure 2. Three-dimensional renderings from micro-computed tomography data of adult neognaths: A, Gallus gallus (PMG GG001); B, Numida meleagris (TLG NM007); C, Macrocephalon maleo (UAZ MM006); along with palaeognaths: D, Dromaius novaehollandiae (TLG E167); E, Casuarius casuarius (AMNH SKEL 962). In order to determine the cranial bones contributing to casques of ornamented taxa, the cranial osteology of non-casqued neognathous and palaeognathous relatives was used for comparison; (A) G. gallus and (D) D. novaehollandiae, respectively. Micro-computed tomography image data of the two non-casqued taxa were collected via a 2010 GE phoenix v|tome|x s240 high-resolution microfocus computed tomography system (μ-CT) housed in the Microscopy and Imaging Facility of the AMNH and a 2018 Nikon XT H 225 ST μ-CT system housed at the Micro-CT Imaging Consortium for Research and Outreach. Scanning parameters were 110–121 kV, 130–457 μA, ranging from 84.52–101.94 μm, 200–267 ms exposures with isometric voxel size at resolutions, W target, and none or a 0.125 mm filter.
Figure 1 in Osteological comparison of casque ontogeny in palaeognathous and neognathous birds: insights for selecting modern analogues in the study of cranial ornaments from extinct archosaurs
Figure 1. Photographs of adult: A, helmeted guinea fowl (Numida meleagris); B, maleo (Macrocephalon maleo); C, southern cassowary (Casuarius casuarius). All three species possess osseous casques dorsal to their orbits and neurocranium. Photos by T.L.G.
FIGURES 1–5 in Discovery of a new extinct spider wasp (Hymenoptera, Pompilidae) from Eocene Rovno amber
FIGURES 1–5. Holotype of Paleogenia waichertae Loktionov, Lelej et Perkovsky, sp. nov., ♁, SIZK K-3286. 1, habitus, total dorsolateral view. 2, head and antenna, frontolateral view. 3, propodeum and metasoma, dorso-lateral view. 4, meso- and metatibia and tarsi, lateral view (arrow points hypopygium). 5, apical portion of metasoma, hypopygium and legs part. (arrow points hypopygium), ventral view. Scale bar 1 mm (Figs 2–5 not to scale).
The Role of the Glutamatergic System in the Extinction of Conditioned Reinforcement Processes
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00926900. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 2.
The Link Between Mental Imagery and the Reduction of Fear in Imaginal Extinction
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03989518. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Targeted Extinction of Drug Cues During Sleep - Olfactory Cue Reactivity Task
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05189379. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 6.
Fear Conditioning, Extinction and Its Recall in Anxious Youth
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02631785. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 5.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.