Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
47,155
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
47,155 results for “evaluations”
DCASE 2024 Task 9: Language-Queried Audio Source Separation | Evaluation Set
<p>This is the <strong>evaluation set for Task 9, Language-Queried Audio Source Separation (LASS), in DCASE 2024 Challenge</strong>. </p> <p>This evaluation set is meant to be used for Task 9 at the scientific challenge DCASE 2024. This split is not meant to be used for training LASS methods. This split is meant to be used for evaluating LASS methods in the final testing & ranking stage. All audio clips are sourced from Freesound, uploaded between April and October 2023. Each audio file has been segmented into 10-second clips and converted to mono 16 kHz.</p> <p>This evaluation set consists of<strong> evaluation set (synth)</strong> and an <strong>evaluation set (real)</strong>. </p> <p><strong>== Evaluation set (synth) ==</strong></p> <p>This evaluation set is created using 1,000 audio clips. Each clip is annotated with three captions describing the content of the clip. We created 3,000 synthetic mixtures with signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) ranging from -15 to 15 dB. Each synthetic mixture includes one natural language query and its corresponding target source. We used annotated tag information to ensure that the two audio clips used in each mix do not share overlapping sound source classes. The original audio files used to create these mixtures are not released. The mixtures and language queries are available for evaluation.</p> <p>The audio files in the archives:</p> <ul> <li>lass_evaluation_synth.zip</li> </ul> <p>and the associated metadata (including audio filename and text queries) in the CSV file:</p> <ul> <li>lass_synthetic_evaluation.csv</li> </ul> <p><strong>== Evaluation set (real) ==</strong></p> <p>This evaluation set consists of 100 audio clips. Each audio clip contains at least two overlapping sound sources. For each audio clip, we manually annotated their component sources using text descriptions, so that each clip can be used as a 'mixture' from which to extract one or more of the component sources based on a text query. Each audio clip in evaluation (real) was labeled with two such text queries.</p> <p>The audio files in the archives:</p> <ul> <li>lass_evaluation_real.zip</li> </ul> <p>and the associated metadata (including audio filename and text queries) in the CSV file:</p> <ul> <li>lass_real_evaluation.csv</li> </ul>
Evaluation of flood hazards in data-sparse coastal lowlands: highlighting the Ayeyarwady Delta (Myanmar)
<p>This folder includes datasets that were produced to assess flood hazards and exposure in the Ayeyarwady Delta in Myanmar by applying the new standardised, integrative approach of Seeger, K., Peffeköver, A., Minderhoud, P. S. J., Vogel, A., Brückner, H., Kraas, F., Nay Win Oo, Brill, D. (2024):<br>Evaluating flood hazards in data-sparse coastal lowlands: highlighting the Ayeyarwady Delta (Myanmar). Environmental Research Letters.<br>The README includes the names of files to be used for citation as well as a brief explanation when necessary. All processing details are given in the paper and related supplementary material.</p>
Experimental evaluation of genetic variability based on DNA metabarcoding from the aquatic environment: Insights from the Leray COI fragment
<p>Intraspecific genetic variation is important for the assessment of organisms' resistance to changing environments and anthropogenic pressures. Aquatic DNA metabarcoding provides a non-invasive method in biodiversity research, including investigations at the within-species level. Through the analysis of eDNA samples collected from the Peter the Great Gulf of the Japan Sea, in this study we aimed to evaluate the identification of Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASVs) in marine eDNA among abundant species of the <em>Zostera</em> sp. community: <em>Hexagrammos octogrammus</em>, <em>Pholidapus dybowskii</em> (Teleostei: Perciformes), and <em>Pandalus latirostris</em> (Arthropoda: Decapoda). These species were collected from two distant locations to produce mock communities and gather aquatic eDNA both on the community and individual level. Our approach highlights the efficacy of eDNA metabarcoding in capturing haplotypic diversity and the potential for this methodology to track genetic diversity accurately, contributing to conservation efforts and ecosystem management. Additionally, our results elucidate the impact of nuclear mitochondrial DNA segments (NUMTs) on the reliability of metabarcoding data, indicating the necessity for cautious interpretation of such data in ecological studies. Moreover, we analyzed 83 publicly available <em>COI</em> sequence datasets from common groups of multicellular organisms (Mollusca, Echinodermata, Crustacea, Polychaeta, and Actinopterygii). The results reflect the decrease in population diversity that arises from using the metabarcode compared to the <em>COI</em> barcode.</p>
Software Sustainability Evaluation Data
<p>This is the evaluation data for our paper on Software Modelling for Software Sustainability at STAF 2024. </p>
Measuring avian bill size: Comparing and evaluating 3D surface scanning with traditional size estimates in Australian birds
<p>Unidimensional measurements for estimating bill size, like length and width, are commonly used in ecology and evolution, but can be criticised due to issues with repeatability and accuracy. Furthermore, formula-based estimates of bill surface area tend to assume uniform bill shapes across species, which is rarely the case. 3D surface scanning can potentially help overcome some such issues by collecting detailed external morphology and direct measurements of surface area, rather than composite estimates of size. Here, we evaluate the use of 3D surface scanners on avian museum specimens to test the repeatability of 3D-based measurements and compare these to traditional formula-based methods of estimating bill size from unidimensional measurements. Using 28 Australian bird species, we investigate inter-observer repeatability of surface area measurements from 3D surface scans. We then compare 3D-based size estimates to formula-based size estimates to infer the accuracy and precision of formula-based measurements of bill surface area. We find that morphometric measurements from 3D surface scans are highly repeatable between observers, without the need for extensive training, demonstrating an advantage over unidimensional measuring methods, like callipers. When comparing 3D-based measurements to formula-based estimates of bill surface area, most formulae for estimating size consistently underestimate surface area, and with considerable variation between species. Where 3D scanning is not possible, we find that a commonly used cone formula for estimating bill size is most precise across diverse bill shapes, therefore supporting its use in interspecific contexts. However, we find that incorporating an additional unidimensional measure of bill curvature into formulae improves the accuracy of the calculated area. Our results reveal the high potential for 3D surface scanners in avian morphometric research, especially for studies necessitating large sample sizes collected by multiple observers, and gives suggestions for formula-based approaches to estimate bill size.</p>
Reproducible Evaluation of Open-Source Tools for Prostate Segmentation on Public Datasets
<p>Segmentation of the prostate and surrounding regions is important for a variety of clinical and research applications. Our goal is to evaluate the generalizability of publicly available state-of-the-art AI models on publicly available datasets. To compare the AI generated segmentations to the available manually annotated ground-truth, quantitative measures such as Dice Coefficient and Hausdorff distance, along with shape radiomics features, were analyzed. Our study also aims to show how cloud-based tools can be used to analyze, store, and visualize evaluation results.<strong> </strong></p> <p>Three open-source pre-trained AI prostate segmentation tools were evaluated against expert annotations, on three publicly available MRI prostate collections, available in NCI Imaging Data Commons[1]. Two pre-trained models originate from the nnU-Net framework[2], the last pre-trained model originates from Prostate158 paper[4]. ProstateX[5], QIN-Prostate-Repeatability[6] and PROSTATE-MRI-US-Biopsy[7]. Expert annotations of the the whole prostate gland, peripheral zone (PZ) and transition zone (TZ) of the prostate are available for ProstateX collection, whole prostate gland and PZ for QIN-Prostate-Repeatability collection, and whole prostate gland for PROSTATE-MRI-US-Biopsy collection.</p> <p>We rely on the DICOM standard to encode our segmentation and radiomics results. The DICOM standard aims to achieve interoperability and FAIR[10] principles. Encoding our results in DICOM representation allows us to leverage DICOM-reliant tools, such as Google Cloud Computing tools for storage,computation, analysis and visualization. Open-source DICOM-based visualization tools such as OHIF[8] viewer can also be used to look qualitatively at the AI and expert annotations and the referenced images.. DICOM Segmentation objects are used to encode the AI models predictions, using dcmqi[11], DICOM Structured Reports on the other hand are used to encode radiomics features[3] extracted from the AI and expert annotations, using dcmqi and highdicom[12]. </p> <p>This dataset is organized in three parts: </p> <p>AI_SEGMENTATIONS_DICOM.zip, AI_STRUCTURED_REPORTS_DICOM.zip and EXPERT_SRUCTURED_REPORTS_DICOM..zip. All zip files contain DICOM objects only, sorted based on DICOM attributes, following this pattern:</p> <p>PatientID/<br> └───Modality-%StudyInstanceUID/<br> └───%SeriesInstanceUID-%SeriesDescription.dcm.</p> <p>AI_SEGMENTATIONS_DICOM.zip contains all the pre-trained AI models evaluated segmentation results, encoded as DICOM Segmentation objects. AI_STRUCTURED_REPORTS_DICOM..zip contains firstorder and shape radiomics features extracted for the AI segmentation results, such as Segmentation Volume, encoded as DICOM Structured Reports. EXPERT_SRUCTURED_REPORTS_DICOM.zip contains firstorder and shape radiomics features extracted for the expert annotations (for ProstateX, QIN-Prostate-Repeatability and PROSTATE-MRI-US-Biopsy collections) stored a DICOM Structured Reports objects.</p> <p>Code repository containing evaluation cloud-based notebooks and results/metadata .csv tables is available here:<br><a href="https://github.com/ImagingDataCommons/idc-prostate-mri-analysis">https://github.com/ImagingDataCommons/idc-prostate-mri-analysis</a></p> <h2>Additional Notes</h2> <p><strong> </strong>This project has been funded in whole or in part with Federal funds from the NCI, NIH, under task order no. HHSN26110071 under contract no. HHSN261201500003l.<br>https://portal.imaging.datacommons.cancer.gov/</p> <p>nnU-Net: <a href="https://github.com/MIC-DKFZ/nnUNet">https://github.com/MIC-DKFZ/nnUNet</a> <br>Prostate158: <a href="https://github.com/Project-MONAI/model-zoo/tree/dev/models/prostate_mri_anatomy">https://github.com/Project-MONAI/model-zoo/tree/dev/models/prostate_mri_anatomy</a><br>Pyradiomics: <a href="https://github.com/AIM-Harvard/pyradiomics">https://github.com/AIM-Harvard/pyradiomics</a> <br>Highdicom: <a href="https://github.com/herrmannlab/highdicom">https://github.com/herrmannlab/highdicom</a> <br>DCMQI: <a href="https://github.com/QIICR/dcmqi">https://github.com/QIICR/dcmqi</a> <br>Github repo: <a href="https://github.com/ImagingDataCommons/idc-prostate-mri-analysis">https://github.com/ImagingDataCommons/idc-prostate-mri-analysis</a></p> <h2>Related information</h2> <p>ProstateX - <a href="https://doi.org/10.7937/K9TCIA.2017.MURS5CL">https://doi.org/10.7937/K9TCIA.2017.MURS5CL </a><br><br>QIN-Prostate-Repeatability - <a href="https://doi.org/10.7937/K9/TCIA.2018.MR1CKGND">https://doi.org/10.7937/K9/TCIA.2018.MR1CKGND</a><br><br>PROSTATE-MRI-US-BIOPSY - <a href="https://doi.org/10.7937/TCIA.2020.A61IOC1A">https://doi.org/10.7937/TCIA.2020.A61IOC1A</a></p> <h2>References </h2> <p>[1] Fedorov A, Longabaugh WJ, Pot D, Clunie DA, Pieper S, Aerts HJ, Homeyer A, Lewis R, Akbarzadeh A, Bontempi D, Clifford W. NCI imaging data commons. Cancer research. 2021 Aug 8;81(16):4188.</p> <p>[2] Isensee F, Jaeger PF, Kohl SA, Petersen J, Maier-Hein KH. nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation. Nature methods. 2021 Feb;18(2):203-11.</p> <p>[3] Van Griethuysen JJ, Fedorov A, Parmar C, Hosny A, Aucoin N, Narayan V, Beets-Tan RG, Fillion-Robin JC, Pieper S, Aerts HJ. Computational radiomics system to decode the radiographic phenotype. Cancer research. 2017 Nov 1;77(21):e104-7.</p> <p>[4] Adams, Lisa C., Marcus R. Makowski, Günther Engel, Maximilian Rattunde, Felix Busch, Patrick Asbach, Stefan M. Niehues, et al. 2022. “Prostate158 - An Expert-Annotated 3T MRI Dataset and Algorithm for Prostate Cancer Detection.” Computers in Biology and Medicine 148 (September): 105817.</p> <p>[5] Natarajan, S., Priester, A., Margolis, D., Huang, J., & Marks, L. (2020). Prostate MRI and Ultrasound With Pathology and Coordinates of Tracked Biopsy (Prostate-MRI-US-Biopsy) (version 2) [Data set]. The Cancer Imaging Archive. DOI: 10.7937/TCIA.2020.A61IOC1A</p> <p>[6] Fedorov, A; Schwier, M; Clunie, D; Herz, C; Pieper, S; Kikinis, R; Tempany, C; Fennessy, F. (2018). Data From QIN-PROSTATE-Repeatability. The Cancer Imaging Archive. DOI: 10.7937/K9/TCIA.2018.MR1CKGND</p> <p>[7] Natarajan, S., Priester, A., Margolis, D., Huang, J., & Marks, L. (2020). Prostate MRI and Ultrasound With Pathology and Coordinates of Tracked Biopsy (Prostate-MRI-US-Biopsy) (version 2) [Data set]. The Cancer Imaging Archive. DOI: 10.7937/TCIA.2020.A61IOC1A</p> <p>[8] Open Health Imaging Foundation Viewer: An Extensible Open-Source Framework for Building Web-Based Imaging Applications to Support Cancer Research. Erik Ziegler, Trinity Urban, Danny Brown, James Petts, Steve D. Pieper, Rob Lewis, Chris Hafey, and Gordon J. Harris</p> <p>[9] Clark K, Vendt B, Smith K, Freymann J, Kirby J, Koppel P, Moore S, Phillips S, Maffitt D, Pringle M, Tarbox L. The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): maintaining and operating a public information repository. Journal of digital imaging. 2013 Dec;26(6):1045-57.</p> <p>[10] Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJ, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A, Blomberg N, Boiten JW, da Silva Santos LB, Bourne PE, Bouwman J. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific data. 2016 Mar 15;3(1):1-9.</p> <p>[11] Herz C, Fillion-Robin JC, Onken M, Riesmeier J, Lasso A, Pinter C, Fichtinger G, Pieper S, Clunie D, Kikinis R, Fedorov A. DCMQI: an open source library for standardized communication of quantitative image analysis results using DICOM. Cancer research. 2017 Nov 1;77(21):e87-90.</p> <p>[12] Bridge CP, Gorman C, Pieper S, Doyle SW, Lennerz JK, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Clunie DA, Fedorov AY, Herrmann MD. Highdicom: A python library for standardized encoding of image annotations and machine learning model outputs in pathology and radiology. Journal of Digital Imaging. 2022 Aug 22:1-9.</p> <p> </p>
Data results of usability evaluation of a geo-temporal crowding visualization platform
<p>Data results of usability evaluation of a geo-temporal crowding visualization platform.</p> <p>NASA-TLX was used for assessing the cognitive load of performing one task with the platform.</p> <p>SUS and UEQ were used for asessing the usability of performing three tasks with the platform.</p>
Fig 4 in Evaluation of Gardi Bangana dero and Sahar Tor putitora with Rohu Labeo rohita and Naini Cirrhinus mrigala in polyculture at different stocking combinations
Fig 4: Growth of Sahar at different polyculture treatments
Fig 3 in Evaluation of Gardi Bangana dero and Sahar Tor putitora with Rohu Labeo rohita and Naini Cirrhinus mrigala in polyculture at different stocking combinations
Fig 3: Growth of Gardi at different polyculture treatments
Fig 2 in Evaluation of Gardi Bangana dero and Sahar Tor putitora with Rohu Labeo rohita and Naini Cirrhinus mrigala in polyculture at different stocking combinations
Fig 2: Growth of Naini at different polyculture treatments
Fig 1 in Evaluation of Gardi Bangana dero and Sahar Tor putitora with Rohu Labeo rohita and Naini Cirrhinus mrigala in polyculture at different stocking combinations
Fig 1: Growth of Rohu at different polyculture treatments
Fig 6 in Evaluation of Gardi Bangana dero and Sahar Tor putitora with Rohu Labeo rohita and Naini Cirrhinus mrigala in polyculture at different stocking combinations
Fig 6: Dissolved oxygen (mg/l) variation at different polyculture treatments
Functional responses in habitat selection as a management tool to evaluate agri-environment schemes for farmland birds
<p>The folder "functional_responses.zip" contains data analyzed for "Functional responses in habitat selection as a management tool to evaluate agri-environment schemes for farmland birds"</p> <p>The raw LPIS/IACS data are owned by the Saxon State Ministry for Energy, Climate Protection, Environment and Agriculture; they hold sensitive information and hence cannot be made publicly available. They can be requested from the agency for research purposes.</p> <p>Processed data are retrievable from .RDATA in "rdata_mixed_model" and "rdata_functional_responses" folders.</p> <p>"rscript" folder contains R functions of JAGS codes (jags_code.R), data processing (process.R), utility functions (utils.R), and figures (figure_all.R or figure_all_by_sp.R).</p> <p>Dg: Common whitethroat (Curruca communis)</p> <p>Fl: Eurasian skylark (Alauda arvensis)</p> <p>G: Yellowhammer (Emberiza citrinella)</p> <p>Ga: Corn bunting (Emberiza calandra)</p> <p> </p> <p>If you have questions regarding data, please contact ryo.ogawa@uni-bonn.de.</p>
Figure 4 in It's a Trap! An evaluation of different passive trap types to effectively catch and control the invasive red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) in streams of the Santa Monica Mountains
Figure 4. Mean crayfish catch per trap by sex. Bars indicate standard error.
Benchmark results for RDF load time evaluation (RiverBench)
<p>Benchmark results of an RDF load time evaluation.</p> <p>Benchmark code: <a href="https://github.com/Ostrzyciel/rdf4led-riverbench">https://github.com/Ostrzyciel/rdf4led-riverbench</a></p> <p>Input data: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12073223">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12073223</a></p> <p><strong>Please see the README.md file for a detailed description of the data format.</strong></p>
Genotypic data from: Lab-based evaluation of the reproductive performance of trojan (MYY) brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis)
<p>Evaluating the efficacy of the use of trojan male brook trout with two Y chromosomes (M<sub>YY</sub>) requires a better understanding of reproductive performance. We measured the reproductive performance of hatchery age-0 and age-1 M<sub>YY</sub> brook trout compared to hatchery XY males using laboratory crosses. Offspring of XY males had higher survival than offspring of age-1 M<sub>YY</sub> one day post-fertilization but not offspring of age-0 M<sub>YY</sub>. We found no detectable differences in survival from eyed-egg to the juvenile-fry stage. However, size-at-age differed, where offspring of age-0 M<sub>YY</sub> were 3.6% smaller in length and 25.2% smaller in weight than those of XY males. For crosses fertilized by both M<sub>YY</sub> and XY males, we found that a significantly higher proportion of offspring within families were sired by M<sub>YY </sub>versus XY males. These results show, under controlled conditions, evidence for possible fitness advantage for M<sub>YY</sub> under sperm competition, but a possible fitness disadvantage associated with early growth of their offspring. Overall, our results hold promise for the use of M<sub>YY</sub> brook trout to serve as an effective eradication tool. </p>
The evaluation of climate change competitiveness via DEA models and Shannon's entropy: EU regions case
<p>Supplementary materials for the article titled “The evaluation of climate change competitiveness via DEA models and Shannon’s entropy: EU regions case”.</p> <p><span>The data was collected under project provided by the National Science Centre, Poland; Grant No. 2019/35/B/HS5/01548.</span></p> <div> <div> <div> <p> </p> </div> </div> </div> <p> </p>
Inputs, results data and analysis script for the evaluation of the PDG-Arena forest growth model on beech-fir stands
<p>Supplementary files for simulations in Rouet et al. (2024): PDG-Arena: An eco-physiological model for characterizing tree-tree interactions in heterogeneous and mixed stands (doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.09.579667" target="_blank" rel="noopener">10.1101/2024.02.09.579667</a>).</p> <p>This repository is an archive of the github repository PDG-Arena-extra (release v1.0.3), accessible at <a href="https://github.com/camille-rouet/PDG-Arena-extra/tree/v1.0.3" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://github.com/camille-rouet/PDG-Arena-extra/tree/v1.0.3</a>.</p>
In silico mock communities for evaluation of taxonomic profilers across prokaryotes and viruses
<p><em>In silico </em>mock communities generated with CAMISIM for benchmarking the performance of taxonomic profilers across prokaryotic (50 communities), eukaryotic (30 communities), and viral communities (10 communities) of the human microbiome. Metagenomes were generated using CAMISIM (Fritz et al., 2019), which simulates 2.1 Gb of Illumina 2 ×150 bp paired end reads with the default HiSeq 2500 error profile and a mean insert size of 200 bp. To assess profiling performance for a range of sequencing depths, the 50 <em>in silico</em> metagenomes were also rarefied with seqtk (-s100) to sequencing depths of 20, 5, 2, 1, 0.5, 0.25 and 0.1 million read pairs. Counts are provided for rarefied metagenomes.</p> <p><strong>Prokaryotic communities<br></strong>For prokaryotic benchmarking, 10 body site-representative prokaryotic metagenomes were simulated for each of the following five body sites: adult gut, infant gut, oral, skin, and vagina. Genome accession ids for prokaryotic species found in each human body site were identified from published literature (Bäckhed et al., 2015; Proctor et al., 2019; Saheb Kashaf et al., 2021). </p> <p>Adult Gut: pro_gut_adult.zip<br>Infant Gut: pro_gut_infant.zip<br>Oral: pro_oral.zip<br>Skin: pro_skin_1.zip, pro_skin_2.zip, pro_skin_3.zip<br>Vaginal: pro_vaginal.zip</p> <p>Downsized counts: </p> <p><strong>Eukaryotic communities<br></strong>30 eukaryotic <em>in silico</em> metagenomes comprising up to 200 randomly sampled genomes from a set of 113 eukaryotic species (See Supplementary Table 2 from the paper) corresponding to the eukaryotic species within both CHAMP and MetaPhlAn 4 (Blanco-Míguez et al., 2023) databases.</p> <p>Eukaryotic data is deposited here: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12090449" target="_blank" rel="noopener">doi: 10.5281/zenodo.12090449</a></p> <p><strong>Viral communities</strong><br>10 viral communities were simulated with 95% of the reads from bacteria and 5% of the reads originating from phages. Each community consisted of 200 randomly selected bacterial genomes from GTDB with species-level annotation and 200 viral genomes from the Gut Phage Database (GPD, Camarillo-Guerrero et al., 2021). </p> <p>Counts: phage_communities_counts.zip<br>FastQ, forward reads: camisimu_[1-10].fq.1.gz<br>FastQ, reverse reads: camisimu_[1-10].fq.2.gz</p> <p><strong>References</strong></p> <p>Bäckhed, F., Roswall, J., Peng, Y., Feng, Q., Jia, H., Kovatcheva-Datchary, P., et al. (2015). Dynamics and Stabilization of the Human Gut Microbiome during the First Year of Life. <em>Cell Host Microbe</em> 17, 690–703. doi: 10.1016/J.CHOM.2015.04.004</p> <p>Blanco-Míguez, A., Beghini, F., Cumbo, F., McIver, L. J., Thompson, K. N., Zolfo, M., et al. (2023). Extending and improving metagenomic taxonomic profiling with uncharacterized species using MetaPhlAn 4. <em>Nature Biotechnology 2023 41:11</em> 41, 1633–1644. doi: 10.1038/s41587-023-01688-w</p> <p>Camarillo-Guerrero, L. F., Almeida, A., Rangel-Pineros, G., Finn, R. D., and Lawley, T. D. (2021). Massive expansion of human gut bacteriophage diversity. <em>Cell</em> 184, 1098. doi: 10.1016/J.CELL.2021.01.029</p> <p>Fritz, A., Hofmann, P., Majda, S., Dahms, E., Dröge, J., Fiedler, J., et al. (2019). CAMISIM: Simulating metagenomes and microbial communities. <em>Microbiome</em> 7, 1–12. doi: 10.1186/S40168-019-0633-6/FIGURES/5</p> <p>Proctor, L. (2019). Priorities for the next 10 years of human microbiome research. <em>Nature 2021 569:7758</em> 569, 623–625. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-01654-0</p> <p>Saheb Kashaf, S., Proctor, D. M., Deming, C., Saary, P., Hölzer, M., Mullikin, J., et al. (2021). Integrating cultivation and metagenomics for a multi-kingdom view of skin microbiome diversity and functions. <em>Nature Microbiology 2021 7:1</em> 7, 169–179. doi: 10.1038/s41564-021-01011-w</p>
Datasets for evaluating SCEMENT: Scalable and Memory Efficient Integration of Large-scale Single Cell RNA-sequencing Data
<p>This resource contains pre-processed A. thaliana root , the H. sapiens aortic valve datasets, PBMC Covid atlas and public 10x datasetse used in the paper, SCEMENT: Scalable and Memory Efficient Integration of Large-scale Single Cell RNA-sequencing Data. The raw datasets provided in the links below are pre-processed for quality control with respect to both cells and genes. </p> <p>A. thaliana datasets are sourced from the following locations at <a href="https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa/sc/home">Single-cell Gene expression Atlas </a>and <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/">Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO)</a>:</p> <ol> <li>E-GEOD-121619 : <a title="E-GEOD-121619" href="https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa/sc/experiments/E-GEOD-121619/results">https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa/sc/experiments/E-GEOD-121619/results</a></li> <li>E-GEOD-152766 : <a href="https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa/sc/experiments/E-GEOD-152766/results">https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa/sc/experiments/E-GEOD-152766/results</a></li> <li>E-GEOD-158761 : <a href="https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa/sc/experiments/E-GEOD-158761/results">https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa/sc/experiments/E-GEOD-158761/results</a></li> <li>E-GEOD-123013 : <a href="https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa/sc/experiments/E-GEOD-123013/results">https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa/sc/experiments/E-GEOD-123013/results</a></li> </ol> <p>H. sapiens datasets are obtained from the NCBI database : <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA562645/">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA562645/ </a></p> <ol> <li>GSE152766: <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE152766">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE152766</a></li> <li>GSE158761: <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE158761">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE158761</a></li> </ol> <p>All COVID atlas datasets are from: <a href="http://covid19.cancer-pku.cn">http://covid19.cancer-pku.cn</a> . covid_atlas_data1.zip contains the h5ad files and covid_atlas_data2.zip contains the Seurat rds files.</p> <p>PBMC datasets are from the following public sources:</p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td>Dataset Name</td> <td>Chemistry Version</td> <td>Web Link</td> </tr> <tr> <td>10k Human PBMCs, 3' v3.1, Chromium X</td> <td>v3.1</td> <td><a href="https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/10k-human-pbmcs-3-ht-v3-1-chromium-x-3-1-high">https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/10k-human-pbmcs-3-ht-v3-1-chromium-x-3-1-high</a></td> </tr> <tr> <td>20k Human PBMCs, 3' HT v3.1, Chromium X</td> <td>v3.1</td> <td><a href="https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/20-k-human-pbm-cs-3-ht-v-3-1-chromium-x-3-1-high-6-1-0">https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/20-k-human-pbm-cs-3-ht-v-3-1-chromium-x-3-1-high-6-1-0</a></td> </tr> <tr> <td>10k Human PBMCs, 3' v3.1, Chromium Controller</td> <td>v3.1</td> <td><a href="https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/10k-human-pbmcs-3-v3-1-chromium-controller-3-1-high">https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/10k-human-pbmcs-3-v3-1-chromium-controller-3-1-high</a></td> </tr> <tr> <td>Healthy PBMC Chromium Connect (channel 1)</td> <td>v3.1</td> <td><a href="https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/peripheral-blood-mononuclear-cells-pbm-cs-from-a-healthy-donor-chromium-connect-channel-1-3-1-standard-3-1-0">https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/peripheral-blood-mononuclear-cells-pbm-cs-from-a-healthy-donor-chromium-connect-channel-1-3-1-standard-3-1-0</a></td> </tr> <tr> <td>Healthy PBMC Chromium Connect (channel 5)</td> <td>v3.1</td> <td><a href="https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/peripheral-blood-mononuclear-cells-pbm-cs-from-a-healthy-donor-chromium-connect-channel-5-3-1-standard-3-1-0">https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/peripheral-blood-mononuclear-cells-pbm-cs-from-a-healthy-donor-chromium-connect-channel-5-3-1-standard-3-1-0</a></td> </tr> <tr> <td>10k PBMCs from a Healthy Donor (v3 chemistry)</td> <td>v3.0</td> <td><a href="https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/10-k-pbm-cs-from-a-healthy-donor-v-3-chemistry-3-standard-3-0-0">https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/10-k-pbm-cs-from-a-healthy-donor-v-3-chemistry-3-standard-3-0-0</a></td> </tr> <tr> <td>1k PBMCs from a Healthy Donor (v2 chemistry)</td> <td>v2.0</td> <td><a href="https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/1-k-pbm-cs-from-a-healthy-donor-v-2-chemistry-3-standard-3-0-0">https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/1-k-pbm-cs-from-a-healthy-donor-v-2-chemistry-3-standard-3-0-0</a></td> </tr> <tr> <td>1k PBMCs from a Healthy Donor (v3 chemistry)</td> <td>v3.0</td> <td><a href="https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/1-k-pbm-cs-from-a-healthy-donor-v-3-chemistry-3-standard-3-0-0">https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/1-k-pbm-cs-from-a-healthy-donor-v-3-chemistry-3-standard-3-0-0</a></td> </tr> <tr> <td>Fresh 68k PBMCs (Donor A)</td> <td>v1.0</td> <td><a href="https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/fresh-68-k-pbm-cs-donor-a-1-standard-1-1-0">https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/fresh-68-k-pbm-cs-donor-a-1-standard-1-1-0</a></td> </tr> <tr> <td>Frozen PBMCs (Donor A)</td> <td>v1.0</td> <td><a href="https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/frozen-pbm-cs-donor-a-1-standard-1-1-0">https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/frozen-pbm-cs-donor-a-1-standard-1-1-0</a></td> </tr> <tr> <td>Frozen PBMCs (Donor B)</td> <td>v1.0</td> <td><a href="https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/frozen-pbm-cs-donor-b-1-standard-1-1-0">https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/frozen-pbm-cs-donor-b-1-standard-1-1-0</a></td> </tr> <tr> <td>Frozen PBMCs (Donor C)</td> <td>v1.0</td> <td><a href="https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/frozen-pbm-cs-donor-c-1-standard-1-1-0">https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/frozen-pbm-cs-donor-c-1-standard-1-1-0</a></td> </tr> <tr> <td>PBMCs from a Healthy Donor: Whole Transcriptome Analysis</td> <td>v3.1</td> <td><a href="https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/pbm-cs-from-a-healthy-donor-whole-transcriptome-analysis-3-1-standard-4-0-0">https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/pbm-cs-from-a-healthy-donor-whole-transcriptome-analysis-3-1-standard-4-0-0</a></td> </tr> <tr> <td>PBMC 600K</td> <td>v1</td> <td><a href="https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa/sc/experiments/E-HCAD-4/downloads">https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa/sc/experiments/E-HCAD-4/downloads</a></td> </tr> <tr> <td>GSM4560071</td> <td>v2.0</td> <td><a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSM4560071">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSM4560071</a></td> </tr> <tr> <td>GSM4560074</td> <td>v2.0</td> <td><a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSM4560074">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSM4560074</a></td> </tr> <tr> <td>GSM4560070</td> <td>v2.0</td> <td><a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSM4560070">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSM4560070</a></td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p>References for the Datasets :</p> <ol> <li>H. sapiens dataset: Kang Xu, Shangbo Xie,Yuming Huang,Tingwen Zhou, Ming Liu, Peng Zhu, Chunli Wang, Jiawei Shi, Fei Li,Frank W. Sellke and Nianguo Dong (2020) Cell-Type Transcriptome Atlas of Human Aortic Valves Reveal Cell Heterogeneity and Endothelial to Mesenchymal Transition Involved in Calcific Aortic Valve Disease.</li> <li>E-GEOD-152766: Shahan R, Hsu C, Nolan TM, Cole BJ, Taylor IW et al. (2020) A single cell Arabidopsisroot atlas reveals developmental trajectories in wild type and cell identity mutants.</li> <li>E-GEOD-121619: Jean-Baptiste K, McFaline-Figueroa JL, Alexandre CM, Dorrity MW, Saunders L et al. (2019) Dynamics of Gene Expression in Single Root Cells of Arabidopsis thaliana.</li> <li>E-GEOD-123013: Ryu KH, Huang L, Kang HM, Schiefelbein J. (2019) Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Resolves Molecular Relationships Among Individual Plant Cells.</li> <li>E-GEOD-158761: Gala HP, Lanctot A, Jean-Baptiste K, Guiziou S, Chu JC et al. (2020) A single cell view of the transcriptome during lateral root initiation in Arabidopsis thaliana.</li> <li>COVID Atlas Reference: Xianwen Ren, Wen Wen, Xiaoying Fan et.al. (2021) COVID-19 immune features revealed by a large-scale single-cell transcriptome atlas</li> <li>PBMC data are downloaded from respective links</li> </ol>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.