Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 5 in First record of the hyperparasite Liriopsis pygmaea (Cryptoniscidae, Isopoda) from a rhizocephalan parasite of the false king crab Paralomis granulosa from the Beagle Channel (Argentina), with a redescription

Figure 5. Liriopsis pygmaea. Cryptoniscus larva. (a) Third pereopod; (b) sixth pereopod; (c) seventh pereopod, merus and carpus only; (d) first pleopod, (e) uropods. Scale bars: 0.1 mm (b and c, same scale).

Figure 3 in First record of the hyperparasite Liriopsis pygmaea (Cryptoniscidae, Isopoda) from a rhizocephalan parasite of the false king crab Paralomis granulosa from the Beagle Channel (Argentina), with a redescription

Figure 3. Liriopsis pygmaea. SEM photographs of the cryptoniscus larva. (a, b) Dorsal and ventral habitus; (c) ventral view of head, arrow shows the median plate partially covering the rostral teeth of the first antenna; (d) anterior part of first and second antennular articles, arrows show the first article with a rostral tooth completely exposed and the second article with a single median tooth; (e) ventral view showing the sixth (foreground) and seventh styliform pereopods; arrow indicates seventh coxal plate. Photographs (b) and (c) belong to the same specimen, the others to different specimens. Scale bars in mm.

Figure 1 in First record of the hyperparasite Liriopsis pygmaea (Cryptoniscidae, Isopoda) from a rhizocephalan parasite of the false king crab Paralomis granulosa from the Beagle Channel (Argentina), with a redescription

Figure 1. Liriopsis pygmaea. SEM photographs of the epicaridium larva. (a) Ventral habitus; (b) ventral view of abdomen; (c) detail of anal tube. All photographs belong to the same specimen.

Figure 2 in First record of the hyperparasite Liriopsis pygmaea (Cryptoniscidae, Isopoda) from a rhizocephalan parasite of the false king crab Paralomis granulosa from the Beagle Channel (Argentina), with a redescription

Figure 2. Liriopsis pygmaea. Epicaridium larva. (a) Second antenna; (b) sixth pereopod; (c) fourth pleopod; (d) uropods. Scale bars: 0.05 mm.

Figure 4 in First record of the hyperparasite Liriopsis pygmaea (Cryptoniscidae, Isopoda) from a rhizocephalan parasite of the false king crab Paralomis granulosa from the Beagle Channel (Argentina), with a redescription

Figure 4. Liriopsis pygmaea. Cryptoniscus larva. (a) Dorsal habitus; (b) first antenna; (c) second antenna; (d) first pereopod, with detail of distal process of propodus. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (a); 0.1 mm (b–d).

Figure 6 in A preliminary revision of the Gobius auratus species complex with redescription of Gobius auratus Risso, 1810

Figure 6. (A) Neighbour-joining tree based on a 379 bp segment of the mitochondrial control region of closely related gobiid taxa belonging to the G. auratus species complex. (B) Minimum-spanning tree constructed on the basis of one of the 125 most parsimonious trees (tree length: 45; consistency index excluding uninformative characters: 0.7083; retention index: 0.7879; rescaled consistency index: 0.6653), that was identical to the neighbour-joining tree. Each circle represents one mitochondrial haplotype. Black dots indicate intermediate haplotypes which were not found in the sequenced specimens. Each cross bar represents one mutation step. Abbreviations within circles represent species and colour morphs: Ga1, G. auratus colour morph 1; Ga2, G. auratus colour morph 2; Gf, G. fallax; Gx, G. xanthocephalus; OUT, outgroup G. bucchichi. Numbers of specimens having identical haplotypes are given in parentheses.

Figure 2 in A preliminary revision of the Gobius auratus species complex with redescription of Gobius auratus Risso, 1810

Figure 2. Morphology of the pelvic disc of closely related Gobius species. (A) G. auratus (colour morph 1), MNHN 1988-630 (neotype of G. auratus by Heymer and Zander 1992), male, 57.1 + 15.0 mm (right fourth ray damaged); (B) G. auratus (colour morph 2), female, 60.7 + 16.5 mm; (C) G. fallax, female, 55.3 + 15.2 mm; (D) G. xanthocephalus, male, 55.4 + 15.2 mm. Scale bar: 5 mm.

Figure 1 in A preliminary revision of the Gobius auratus species complex with redescription of Gobius auratus Risso, 1810

Figure 1. Mediterranean and eastern Atlantic locations of examined material. G. auratus colour morph 1 (full circles) and colour morph 2 (open circles), G. fallax (squares) and G. xanthocephalus (stars). Grey symbols indicate locations of type material by Sarato (1889), Bath (1971) and Heymer and Zander (1992). Insert shows part of the northern Adriatic Sea enlarged. Canary Island location not indicated.

Figure 5 in A preliminary revision of the Gobius auratus species complex with redescription of Gobius auratus Risso, 1810

Figure 5. Lateral line system of G. fallax, male, 48.5 + 12.6 mm, from the northern Adriatic Sea in dorsal (A), lateral (B) and ventral (C) view. Scale bar: 5 mm.

Figure 4 in A preliminary revision of the Gobius auratus species complex with redescription of Gobius auratus Risso, 1810

Figure 4. Lateral line system of G. auratus (colour morph 2), male, 61.6 + 19.9 mm, from the northern Adriatic Sea in dorsal (A), lateral (B) and ventral (C) view. Scale bar: 5 mm.

Figure 3 in A preliminary revision of the Gobius auratus species complex with redescription of Gobius auratus Risso, 1810

Figure 3. Life coloration of (A) G. auratus (colour morph 1: central Adriatic, Island of Murter, Croatia); (B) G. auratus (colour morph 2: northern Adriatic, Island of Cres, Croatia); (C) G. fallax (northern Adriatic, Island of Krk, Croatia); (D) G. xanthocephalus (western Mediterranean, Banyuls-sur-Mer, France). Scale bar: 1 cm.

Figure 4 in Aylax hypecoi Trotter (Hymenoptera, Cynipidae) in Europe: Redescription, with taxonomic and biological notes

Figure 4. The phylogenetic relationships of Aylax hypecoi after Nylander et al. (2004a, 2004b) (distant clades omitted). Majority-rule consensus tree from analysis of three genes (EF1a, COI, 28S) combined with morphology.

Figure 3 in Aylax hypecoi Trotter (Hymenoptera, Cynipidae) in Europe: Redescription, with taxonomic and biological notes

Figure 3. (A) Aylax minor, anterodorsal view of pronotum. (B) Aylax papaveris, forewing venation. (C–F) Neaylax versicolor: (C) pronotum; (D) mesosoma dorsal view; (E) head anterior view; (F) forewing venation.

Figure 2 in Aylax hypecoi Trotter (Hymenoptera, Cynipidae) in Europe: Redescription, with taxonomic and biological notes

Figure 2. Aylax hypecoi, female and galls. (A) Mesosoma, anterodorsal view showing the pronotum; (B) metasoma, lateral view; (C) left forewing; (D) emerged adult female; (E) section of a gall showing an adult female inside; (F) galls in fruits of Hypecoum.

Figure 1 in Aylax hypecoi Trotter (Hymenoptera, Cynipidae) in Europe: Redescription, with taxonomic and biological notes

Figure 1. Aylax hypecoi, female (SEM). (A) Head anterior view; (B) head posterior view; (C) antenna; (D) mesosoma dorsal view; (E) mesosoma lateral view; (F) mesosoma posterodorsal view.

Figure 4 in Ultrastructural redescription of Chordodes moraisi (Carvalho, 1942) and Chordodes straviarskii Carvalho and Feio, 1950, and re-interpretation of Chordodes gestri Camerano, 1904 and Pseudochordodes griffinii (Camerano, 1898) (Gordiida, Nematomorpha)

Figure 4. SEM of male of ''Pseudochordodes griffinii'' holotype. (A) Cuticle of midbody; (B) areolar group in the middle region of the body. Scale bars: 10 mm.

Figure 2 in Ultrastructural redescription of Chordodes moraisi (Carvalho, 1942) and Chordodes straviarskii Carvalho and Feio, 1950, and re-interpretation of Chordodes gestri Camerano, 1904 and Pseudochordodes griffinii (Camerano, 1898) (Gordiida, Nematomorpha)

Figure 2. SEM of female of Chordodes staviarskii holotype. (A) Ventral view of posterior end with cloacal opening, bristles and radiating grooves (arrow). (B, C) Midbody cuticle: (B) areoles types 1–3 and interareolar tubercle; (C) areoles of type 1–3 and clusters containing types 4 and 6. (D) Areoles type 5 and 6 in the longitudinal ventral groove; b, bristles; t, tubercle. Scale bars: 100 mm (A, D); 10 mm (B); 50 mm (C).

Figure 1 in Ultrastructural redescription of Chordodes moraisi (Carvalho, 1942) and Chordodes straviarskii Carvalho and Feio, 1950, and re-interpretation of Chordodes gestri Camerano, 1904 and Pseudochordodes griffinii (Camerano, 1898) (Gordiida, Nematomorpha)

Figure 1. SEM of female of Chordodes moraisi, holotype. (A) Ventral view of posterior end with cloacal opening; (B) midbody cuticle, areoles types 1–3; (C) tubercle in the interareolar furrow; (D, E) areoles type 4 with long filaments in the longitudinal ventral groove. Scale bars: 100 mm (A, E); 50 mm (B–D).

Figure 3 in Ultrastructural redescription of Chordodes moraisi (Carvalho, 1942) and Chordodes straviarskii Carvalho and Feio, 1950, and re-interpretation of Chordodes gestri Camerano, 1904 and Pseudochordodes griffinii (Camerano, 1898) (Gordiida, Nematomorpha)

Figure 3. SEM of male of ''Chordodes gestri'' holotype. (A, B) Ventral view of posterior end: (A) whole posterior end with cloacal opening (arrow); (B) cloacal opening with circumcloacal bristles. (C) Cuticle at the midbody with megareolar pattern. (D) Areolar pattern in the anterior region of the body. Scale bars: 100 mm (A); 50 mm (B); 10 mm (C, D).