Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 4 in Three new species of the genus Mimetus Hentz, 1832 (Araneae: Mimetidae) from Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau of China

Fig. 4. Mimetus lingbaoshanensis sp. nov. A–B, E. Holotype, ♂ (YN-MIM-2015-010). C–D. Paratype, ♀ (YN-MIM-2015-011). A. Palp, prolateral view. B. Palp, retrolateral view. C. Epigyne, ventral view. D. Vulva, dorsal view. E. Left chelicerae, ventral view. Scale bars = 0.1 mm.

Fig. 2 in Three new species of the genus Mimetus Hentz, 1832 (Araneae: Mimetidae) from Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau of China

Fig. 2. Mimetus bucerus sp. nov. A–D. Holotype, ♂ (GZ-MIM-2017-005). A. Palp, prolateral view. B. Palp, retrolateral view. C. Left chelicerae of male,ventral view. D. Left chelicerae, dorsal view. Scale bars: 0.1 mm.

Fig. 5 in Three new species of the genus Mimetus Hentz, 1832 (Araneae: Mimetidae) from Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau of China

Fig. 5. Mimetus yinae sp. nov. A–B, E. Holotype, ♂ (GZ-MIM-2015-005). C–D. Paratype, ♀ (GZ-MIM-2017-001). A. Palp, prolateral view. B. Palp, retrolateral view. C. Epigyne, ventral view. D. Vulva, dorsal view. E. Left chelicerae, ventral view. Scale bars = 0.1 mm.

Fig. 7 in Three new species of the genus Mimetus Hentz, 1832 (Araneae: Mimetidae) from Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau of China

Fig. 7. Distribution records of Mimetus bucerus sp. nov. (▲), M. lingbaoshanensis sp. nov. (●) and M. yinae sp. nov. (■).

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2017View details →

Eddy Duck Data: Measured Three-Dimensional Structure of Surfzone Velocities

This archive contains data from the 2011 EddyDuck experiment. Three-dimensional structure of surfzone velocity fields was measured using 12 horizontally-spaced Nortek Aquadopp current meters, each instrument measuring vertical profiles of water velocity. The experiment was conducted by folks from Washington State University and Oregon State University, with help from staff of the USACE's Duck Field Research Facility. Funding from the US National Sciences Foundation, Award OCE-1061692 An in-review JGR-Oceans manuscript “Depth-Dependence of Nearshore Currents and Eddies” discusses the observations. Data are contained in two zip files. File summary.zip unzips to give a folder containing summary data in matlab 2015b format, and a pdf readme file explaining details. Folder full.zip unzips to give a folder containing full time-resolution data in ASCII format, and a readme file explaining details. Questions to steve_henderson@wsu.edu

Fig. 6 in Molecular phylogenies support taxonomic revision of three species of Laurencia (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta), with the description of a new genus

Fig. 6. Scenario of Osmundea biogeography using frame from Scotese animation (www.scotese.com/) at 100 Ma. South America and Africa are starting to move apart. Hypothetical ancestors (A) of widespread and diverse Osmundea Fora along Tethyan shores of which Osmundea caspica (A.D.Zinova & Zaberzhinskaya) comb. nov. (b) is almost certainly a relic. Since 100 Ma, Osmundea has colonized the Atlantic Ocean (c, e). Brazilian O. sanctarum M.T.Fujii & Cord.-Mar. (c) is likely a relic of the lineage at the origin of the clade that entered the Pacifc (d) and colonized the Americas.

Fig. 5 in Molecular phylogenies support taxonomic revision of three species of Laurencia (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta), with the description of a new genus

Fig. 5. Osmundea caspica (A.D.Zinova & Zaberzhinskaya). Sangachal Bay, Azerbaijan, September 2003, dredged. A. Habit of herbarium voucher specimen with epiphytic acrochaetioid red algae. B. Outer cortical cells in surface view, elongated along the thallus axis, lacking secondary pit connections. C. Longitudinal section through outer cortex (scale bar as in B). D. Part of mature spermatangial receptacle, showing spermatangial flaments each terminating in a large rounded sterile cell. E. Spermatangial flament bearing mature spermatia and terminating in a rounded sterile cell.

Fig. 4 in Molecular phylogenies support taxonomic revision of three species of Laurencia (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta), with the description of a new genus

Fig. 4. Palisada crustiformans (McDermid). A. Voucher specimen of P. crustiformans (ARS03327/BISH 766726) collected at Hawaii Island (type locality). B. Outer cortical cells in surface view. C. Detail of outermost cortical cell showing small spherical structure similar to 'corps en cerise' and secondary pit connections with adjacent cells.

Fig. 3 in Molecular phylogenies support taxonomic revision of three species of Laurencia (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta), with the description of a new genus

Fig. 3. Ohelopapa fexilis (Setch.). A. Voucher specimen (01A07 / UPF4223) collected at Tahiti (type locality). B. Transversal section through outer cortex showing a translucent outermost cortical layer lacking secondary pit connections between cells.

Fig. 1 in Molecular phylogenies support taxonomic revision of three species of Laurencia (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta), with the description of a new genus

Fig. 1. Tree inferred from rbcL using Bayesian analysis (BI) and including 111 specimens of members of the Laurencia complex and six outgroup taxa. The numbers above branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (pp) and below branches indicate bootstrap values (bp) inferred from 1000 ML bootstrap replicates (ML); pp <0.95 and bp <75% are not shown. Taxa for which new sequences were produced are indicated in bold.

Fig. 2. Tree inferred from COI-5P in Molecular phylogenies support taxonomic revision of three species of Laurencia (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta), with the description of a new genus

Fig. 2. Tree inferred from COI-5P + rbcL + LSU using Bayesian analysis (BI) and including 30 specimens of the Laurencia complex and two outgroup taxa. The numbers above branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (pp) and below branches indicate bootstrap values (bp) inferred from 1 000 ML bootstrap replicates (ML); pp <0.95 and bp <75% are not shown.

Fig. 1. A in "A character does not make a genus, but the genus makes the character ": three-taxon statement analysis and intuitive taxonomy

Fig. 1. A. Strict consensus of 61 most parsimonious phylogenetic trees; tree length = 90 steps; CI = 0.6000; RI = 0.8302, recovered from a standard cladistic analysis (MP) (Fitch Parsimony) of the complete conventionalmorphologicalmatrixof Atraphaxis s. l. (TableS1).All 27 unordered (non-additive) characters are parsimony informative. B. Strict consensus of two nested most parsimonious hierarchies of patterns; length = 8328 steps; CI = 0.8521; RI = 0.8264), recovered from a MP analysis of the three-taxon statement representation of the complete conventional 27 characters' morphological matrix of Atraphaxis s. l. (Table S1). The number of 3TSs (characters) is equal to 7096, all are parsimony-informative. C. Strict consensus of six most parsimonious phylogenetic trees; tree length = 56 steps; CI = 0.6071; RI = 0.8370, recovered from a MP analysis of the reduced conventional 18 characters' morphological matrix of Atraphaxis s. l. (Table S1) with the characters one, two, four, eight, 12, 16, 18, 19, and 26 excluded. D. Strict consensus of two nested, most parsimonious hierarchies of patterns; length = 5844 steps; CI = 0.8665; RI = 0.8460), recovered from a MP analysis of the three-taxon statement representation of the reduced conventional 18 characters' morphological matrix of Atraphaxis s. l. (Table S1) with characters 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 18, 19 and 26 excluded. The number of 3TSs (characters) is equal to 5064, all are parsimony-informative. All MP analyses as in PAUP* 4.0a150 (Swofford 2002) were conducted using either conventional matrices or TAXODIUM's output 3TS NEXUS files with a heuristic search of 1000 random addition replicates (saving no more than 100 trees per replicate), and the TBR branch swapping/MulTrees option into effect. Branches with a minimum length of zero were collapsed. The three-taxon statement analysis (3TA) of the unordered morphological matrix was established after it three-taxon (3TS) Williams-Siebert (WS) representation (Williams & Siebert 2000) using TAXODIUM v. 1.2 (Mavrodiev & Madorsky 2012). The 3TS permutations were performed with the following command: taxodium input_file_name. csv –ium –ob –og –nex The value of the operational outgroup was fixed as a value of Bactria lazkovii. All 3TSs were weighted uniformly and treated as ''ordered'' (Wagner Parsimony). The bootstrap resampling of both conventional and 3TS matrices have been performed as described in Mavrodiev & Madorsky (2012). The diagnostic traits are optimized using Mesquite (Maddison & Maddison 2011).

Fig. 3 in On Chilean Loxosceles (Araneae: Sicariidae): first description of the males of L. surca and L. coquimbo, new records of L. laeta and three remarkable new species from coastal deserts

Fig. 3. Loxosceles diaguita sp. nov. A–B. ♂, holotype (MNHNCL 7946). A. Habitus, dorsal. B. Carapace, dorsal. C–D. ♀, paratype (MACN-Ar 30185). C. Carapace, dorsal. D. Left palp, prolateral.

Fig. 2. Loxosceles coquimbo Gertsch, 1967 in On Chilean Loxosceles (Araneae: Sicariidae): first description of the males of L. surca and L. coquimbo, new records of L. laeta and three remarkable new species from coastal deserts

Fig. 2. Loxosceles coquimbo Gertsch, 1967, ♂, Los Choros, La Higuera, Elqui (LEULS). A. Palp, prolateral. B. Bulb, prolateral.

Fig. 8 in On Chilean Loxosceles (Araneae: Sicariidae): first description of the males of L. surca and L. coquimbo, new records of L. laeta and three remarkable new species from coastal deserts

Fig. 8. Spermathecae, dorsal view (except D, ventral), cleared. A. Loxosceles surca Gertsch, 1967, ♀, Zapahuira, Parinacota, Tarapacá (AMNH). B. Loxosceles coquimbo Gertsch, 1967, ♀, Lomas de Peñuelas, Coquimbo (AMNH). C. Loxosceles pallalla sp. nov., ♀, 6 km S of Cruz Grande, Elqui (AMNH). D. Loxosceles diaguita sp. nov., ♀, paratype (MACN-Ar 30185). E. Loxosceles vallenar sp. nov., ♀, holotype (AMNH). Scale bars = 0.5 mm.

Fig. 9 in On Chilean Loxosceles (Araneae: Sicariidae): first description of the males of L. surca and L. coquimbo, new records of L. laeta and three remarkable new species from coastal deserts

Fig. 9. Scanning electron microscopy, ♂ metatarsus I. A. Loxosceles laeta (Nicolet, 1849), ♂, Antofagasta, Antofagasta (IBSP 4663). B. Loxosceles surca Gertsch, 1967, ♂, Parinacota, 24 km S of Zapahuira (AMNH). C–D. Loxosceles diaguita sp. nov., ♂, Taltal, 4 km E of Paposo, Antofagasta (AMNH).

Fig. 1. Male palps, prolateral. A in On Chilean Loxosceles (Araneae: Sicariidae): first description of the males of L. surca and L. coquimbo, new records of L. laeta and three remarkable new species from coastal deserts

Fig. 1. Male palps, prolateral. A. Loxosceles laeta (Nicolet, 1849), ♂, Antofagasta, Antofagasta (IBSP 4663). B–D. Loxosceles surca Gertsch, 1967. B. ♂, Chusmiza, Huara, Tamarugal, Tarapacá (AMNH). C. Same, bulb, prolateral. D. Same, palp, prolateral. Scale bars A–B = 1 mm.

Fig. 7 in On Chilean Loxosceles (Araneae: Sicariidae): first description of the males of L. surca and L. coquimbo, new records of L. laeta and three remarkable new species from coastal deserts

Fig. 7. Loxosceles pallalla sp. nov., ♂, holotype, La Herradura, Elqui, IV Región de Coquimbo, Chile (AMNH). A. Palp, prolateral. B. Palp, retrolateral. C. Bulb, prolateral. D. Bulb, subventral.

Fig. 6 in On Chilean Loxosceles (Araneae: Sicariidae): first description of the males of L. surca and L. coquimbo, new records of L. laeta and three remarkable new species from coastal deserts

Fig. 6. Loxosceles diaguita sp. nov., ♂, Taltal, 4 km E of Paposo, Antofagasta (AMNH), SEM. A–D. Left palp. A. Prolateral. B. Detail of embolus, prolateral. C. Bulb, retrolateral. D. Cymbium, retrolateral.

Fig. 4 in On Chilean Loxosceles (Araneae: Sicariidae): first description of the males of L. surca and L. coquimbo, new records of L. laeta and three remarkable new species from coastal deserts

Fig. 4. Loxosceles diaguita sp. nov., ♂, holotype (MNHNCL 7946). A–D. Left palp. A. Prolateral. B. Dorsal. C. Bulb, prolateral. D. Bulb, retrolateral.