Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 3 in Effect of environmental change after the 2011 tsunami on the population dynamics of Japanese tubesnout Aulichthys japonicus (Gasterosteiformes)

Figure 3. – Monthly changes in the number of individuals for larva, juvenile and young Aulichthys japonicus and water temperature collected at the seagrass bed in Namiita beach in 2012.

Figure 6 in Effect of environmental change after the 2011 tsunami on the population dynamics of Japanese tubesnout Aulichthys japonicus (Gasterosteiformes)

Figure 6. – Changes in the surface of the seagrass bed area (m2) since before Tsunami (according to Yamaki, 2009) to 2014.

Figure 5 in Effect of environmental change after the 2011 tsunami on the population dynamics of Japanese tubesnout Aulichthys japonicus (Gasterosteiformes)

Figure 5. – Changes of number of Japanese tubesnouts Aulichthys japonicus and ascidians Halocynthia roretzi from 2007 to 2008 and from 2012 to 2016.

Figure 1 in Effect of environmental change after the 2011 tsunami on the population dynamics of Japanese tubesnout Aulichthys japonicus (Gasterosteiformes)

Figure 1. – Location of study area in Okirai Bay and position of the sampling site in Namiita Beach. The white dotted area shows the seagrass bed's area (m2) in August 2014.

Fig. 4 in Louse flies in Azorean and mainland populations of four Passeriformes species: A new perspective to parasite Island syndromes

Fig. 4. Map showing the prevalence (represented by different color; yellow color represent the prevalence of uninfested birds) of hippoboscid fly species in blackbirds, blackcaps, chaffinches and robins in the each of the sampled Azorean Islands (S˜ao Miguel, Terceira and Flores) and the mainland Portugal. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Fig. 1 in Louse flies in Azorean and mainland populations of four Passeriformes species: A new perspective to parasite Island syndromes

Fig. 1. Map of the mainland Portugal and Azores Islands with the geographic distribution of the study areas (Silves, Olh˜ao, S˜ao Miguel Island, Terceira Island and Flores Island).

Fig. 3 in Louse flies in Azorean and mainland populations of four Passeriformes species: A new perspective to parasite Island syndromes

Fig. 3. Prevalence (%) of hippoboscid fly species found on blackbirds, blackcaps, chaffinches and robins from the Azores Islands and mainland Portugal.

Fig. 2 in Lungworms (Metastrongylus spp.) and intestinal parasitic stages of two separated Swiss wild boar populations north and south of the Alps: Similar parasite spectrum with regional idiosyncrasies

Fig. 2. Wild boar lung with massive trauma after bullet penetration and visible bone fractures (A), dense nodule of the lobus caudalis dexter (B), and accumulation of nematodes in a bronchus (C).

Fig. 5 in Louse flies in Azorean and mainland populations of four Passeriformes species: A new perspective to parasite Island syndromes

Fig. 5. Photos of phoretic association of Guimaraesiella amsel on Ornithomya fringillina (A) and Epidermoptidae mites on Ornithoica turdi (B). Scale bar: 1 mm.

Fig. 1 in Borrelia miyamotoi infection in Apodemus spp. mice populating an urban habitat (Warsaw, Poland)

Fig. 1. Scheme of the study area (city of Warsaw, Poland) showing the arrangement of mice-trapping locations. Black points – locations where B. miyamotoi infected mice were present; White points – locations where none of the captured mice were B. miyamotoi infected; N1–N3 – locations within northern suburbs; C1–C5 - locations within city centre; S1–S2 – locations within southern suburbs; numbers in boxes – B. miyamotoi prevalence in mice inhabiting respective areas.

Fig. 2 in Louse flies in Azorean and mainland populations of four Passeriformes species: A new perspective to parasite Island syndromes

Fig. 2. Photos of three species of hippoboscid fly and their wings collected from Passeriformes species: (A and B) Ornithoica turdi, (C and D) Ornithomya fringillina and (E and F) Icosta minor. Scale bar: 1 mm.

Fig. 3 in Lungworms (Metastrongylus spp.) and intestinal parasitic stages of two separated Swiss wild boar populations north and south of the Alps: Similar parasite spectrum with regional idiosyncrasies

Fig. 3. Caudal ends of the 5 Metastrongylus species identified in this study: M. apri female (A) and male (B), M. asymmetricus female (C) and male (D), M. confusus female (E) and male (F), M. pudendotectus female (G) and male (H), M. salmi female (I) and male (J).

Fig. 1 in Lungworms (Metastrongylus spp.) and intestinal parasitic stages of two separated Swiss wild boar populations north and south of the Alps: Similar parasite spectrum with regional idiosyncrasies

Fig. 1. Map of Switzerland with sampling areas for the northern (Cantons of Aargau (AG), Schaffhausen (SH), Thurgau (TG) and Zürich (ZH)) and the southern (Canton of Ticino (TI)) wild boar population. N: number of lungs sampled.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2022View details →

Fig. 1 in Population dynamics and seasonality of Euspilotus (Hesperosaprinus) azureus Sahlberg (Coleoptera: Histeridae: Saprininae)

Fig. 1. Frequency of occurrence (FO) (bars) and absolute frequency (AF) (above the bars) of individuals collected and in each month of the population (gray), females (blue), and males (orange).

opencc-by-4.0May 2019View details →

Figs 4-8 in Influence of environmental variables on seasonal abundance and relative growth of Macrobrachium amazonicum (Crustacea: Decapoda: Caridea): variations of a continental population

Figs 4-8. Percentage distribution of the independent effect of the abiotic factor on the total abundance (Fig. 4), and on the abundance by demographic category (Figs 5-8) of Macrobrachium amazonicum (Heller, 1862). Grey bars indicate a significant effect (p<0.05), determined by the randomization test. Positive and relative relationships are shown by the bars above and under the horizontal aXis, respectively (EC, conductivity; DO, dissolved oXygen; PI, precipitation; T, water temperature).

opencc-by-4.0May 2019View details →

Figs 2, 3 in Influence of environmental variables on seasonal abundance and relative growth of Macrobrachium amazonicum (Crustacea: Decapoda: Caridea): variations of a continental population

Figs 2, 3. Percentage of total abundance (Fig. 2) and juveniles, males, non-ovigerous females and ovigerous females (Fig. 3) of Macrobrachium amazonicum (Heller, 1862) along the study period (J, juveniles; M, males; NOF, non-ovigerous female; OF, ovigerous females).

Fig. 5 in Fossil population structure and mortality analysis of the cave bears from Urşilor Cave, north-western Romania

Fig. 5. Greatest length vs. width for the lower (A, N = 74) and upper (B, N = 105) cave bear canines from Urşilor (~45–40 calendar kyrs BP).

Fig. 6 in Fossil population structure and mortality analysis of the cave bears from Urşilor Cave, north-western Romania

Fig. 6. Percentage of juveniles vs. females (A) and old individuals vs. males (B) of cave bears from Urşilor, (~45–40 calendar kyrs BP). Data derived from SOM: tables 3 and 4.

Fig. 3 in Fossil population structure and mortality analysis of the cave bears from Urşilor Cave, north-western Romania

Fig. 3. Tripolar graphs showing the distribution of the teeth and mandibles (A) of cave bears from Urşilor (~45–40 calendar kyrs BP) in the three main age categories (according to Stiner 1994); and distribution of age classes (B) from different cave bear sites in the three main age categories, as proposed by Stiner (1994): NNVA (Normal Non-Violent Assemblage), grey dashed polygon; LS (Living age Structure), black dashed polygon.

Fig. 2 in Fossil population structure and mortality analysis of the cave bears from Urşilor Cave, north-western Romania

Fig. 2. Mortality profile of cave bears from Urşilor (~45–40 calendar kyrs BP). A. Right M1 (N = 44). B. Right M2 (N = 36). C. Left mandible (N = 82).