Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 6 in A zoologist's perspective on Robert Hooke's Micrographia (1665) studies of marine and terrestrial invertebrates, and his contemplations on invertebrate "generation" and mutability

Figure 6. Dorsal and ventral aspects of an astigmatid mite of the genus Tyrophagus (Chelicerata: Arachnida: Acari), probably T. longior (Gervais). Engraving reproduced by permission of the Rare Book and Manuscript Library of the University of Pennsylvania.

Figure 5. A in A zoologist's perspective on Robert Hooke's Micrographia (1665) studies of marine and terrestrial invertebrates, and his contemplations on invertebrate "generation" and mutability

Figure 5. A pseudoscorpion, Chelifer cancroides (L.) (Chelicerata: Arachnida: Pseudoscorpionida). Engraving reproduced by permission of the Rare Book and Manuscript Library of the University of Pennsylvania.

Figure 4 in A zoologist's perspective on Robert Hooke's Micrographia (1665) studies of marine and terrestrial invertebrates, and his contemplations on invertebrate "generation" and mutability

Figure 4. An oribatid mite of the family Oribatulidae, very likely Phauloppia lucorum (Koch). Engraving reproduced by permission of the Rare Book and Manuscript Library of the University of Pennsylvania.

Figure 3 in A zoologist's perspective on Robert Hooke's Micrographia (1665) studies of marine and terrestrial invertebrates, and his contemplations on invertebrate "generation" and mutability

Figure 3. Dorsal and ventral aspects of the same male individual of a harvestman (Arthropoda: Chelicerata: Opiliones), most likely Leiobunum rotundum (Latreille). Engraving reproduced by permission of the Rare Book and Manuscript Library of the University of Pennsylvania.

Figure 1 in A zoologist's perspective on Robert Hooke's Micrographia (1665) studies of marine and terrestrial invertebrates, and his contemplations on invertebrate "generation" and mutability

Figure 1. (A) Spongin fibre skeleton of a marine sponge (phylum Porifera) of indeterminate genus or species, but most likely either Spongia or Hippospongia (Family Spongiidae: Order Dictyoceratida: Class Demospongiae). (B, C) The skeletal remains of a colony of Flustra foliacea L. (Phylum Ectoprocta), a colonial marine animal. Note Hooke's use of a scale line in (C). Engravings reproduced by permission of the Rare Book and Manuscript Library of the University of Pennsylvania.

Figure 2 in A zoologist's perspective on Robert Hooke's Micrographia (1665) studies of marine and terrestrial invertebrates, and his contemplations on invertebrate "generation" and mutability

Figure 2. The mouth, including the horny jaw, of a helicid snail, very likely Cornu aspersum (Müller). Engraving reproduced by permission of the Rare Book and Manuscript Library of the University of Pennsylvania.

Figure 2 in Effects of fragmentation on genetic variation in populations of the terrestrial earthworm Drawida japonica Michaelsen, 1892 (Oligochaeta, Moniligastridae) in Shandong and Liaodong peninsulas, China

Figure 2. Maximum-parsimony (MP) tree of the unique haplotypes. Numbers at nodes represent bootstrap values (> 50) as a measure of support.

Figure 4 in Effects of fragmentation on genetic variation in populations of the terrestrial earthworm Drawida japonica Michaelsen, 1892 (Oligochaeta, Moniligastridae) in Shandong and Liaodong peninsulas, China

Figure 4. Mismatch curve of nucleotide pairwise based on 16S sequences. Exp, expected value; Obs, observed value.

Figure 3 in Effects of fragmentation on genetic variation in populations of the terrestrial earthworm Drawida japonica Michaelsen, 1892 (Oligochaeta, Moniligastridae) in Shandong and Liaodong peninsulas, China

Figure 3. Maximum-likelihood (ML) tree of the unique haplotypes. Bootstrap values (> 50) are shown on the nodes; Bayesian inference (BI) tree based on the analysis of the unique haplotypes. Posterior probability values (> 0.5) are shown.

Figure 5 in Effects of fragmentation on genetic variation in populations of the terrestrial earthworm Drawida japonica Michaelsen, 1892 (Oligochaeta, Moniligastridae) in Shandong and Liaodong peninsulas, China

Figure 5. Mismatch curve of nucleotide pairwise based on 28S sequences. Exp, expected value; Obs, observed value.

Figure 4 in Terrestrial macroinvertebrates captured with a baited ramp-pitfall trap from five limestone caves in North Alabama and Georgia (USA) and their association with soil organic matter

Figure 4. Regression analyses of species richness from the various distance intervals in Howard's Waterfall Cave, Georgia.

Figure 6 in Terrestrial macroinvertebrates captured with a baited ramp-pitfall trap from five limestone caves in North Alabama and Georgia (USA) and their association with soil organic matter

Figure 6. Regression analyses of total Collembola abundance from the various distance intervals in Howard's Waterfall Cave, Georgia.

Figure 3 in Terrestrial macroinvertebrates captured with a baited ramp-pitfall trap from five limestone caves in North Alabama and Georgia (USA) and their association with soil organic matter

Figure 3. Regression of total invertebrate abundance and % total organic matter (% TOM) from the various distance interval in Cave Springs Cave, Alabama.

Figure 1 in Terrestrial macroinvertebrates captured with a baited ramp-pitfall trap from five limestone caves in North Alabama and Georgia (USA) and their association with soil organic matter

Figure 1. Our ramp-pitfall trap without styrofoam plate and bait. Plastic container dimensions (width and height 18 cm), openings to container (width 8 cm, height 7 cm), ramps (8 cm, 19 cm, and slanted side 18 cm).

Figure 2 in Terrestrial macroinvertebrates captured with a baited ramp-pitfall trap from five limestone caves in North Alabama and Georgia (USA) and their association with soil organic matter

Figure 2. Regression of total invertebrate abundance and % total organic matter (% TOM) from the various distance intervals in Anvil Cave, Alabama.

Figure 5 in Terrestrial macroinvertebrates captured with a baited ramp-pitfall trap from five limestone caves in North Alabama and Georgia (USA) and their association with soil organic matter

Figure 5. Regression analyses of total invertebrate abundance from the various distance intervals in Howard's Waterfall Cave, Georgia.

Figure 5 in Diversity of terrestrial isopods in a protected area characterized by salty coastal ponds (Vendicari, Sicily)

Figure 5. Similarity analysis. (A) Jaccard and Sørensen indices (in brackets). (B,C) Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA) analyses of the five sites obtained from D(J) (B) and D(C N) (C).

Figure 2 in Diversity of terrestrial isopods in a protected area characterized by salty coastal ponds (Vendicari, Sicily)

Figure 2. Label, distances and altitude (metres above sea level) of each trap; orientation of each transect.

Figure 3 in Diversity of terrestrial isopods in a protected area characterized by salty coastal ponds (Vendicari, Sicily)

Figure 3. Activity density (AD) in the five sites for Chaetophiloscia elongata (Ce), Leptotrichus panzerii (Lp), Porcellio laevis (Pl), Armadillidium badium (Ab), Armadillidium granulatum (Ag), Armadillidium vulgare (Av) and Armadillo officinalis (Ao).

Figure 4 in Diversity of terrestrial isopods in a protected area characterized by salty coastal ponds (Vendicari, Sicily)

Figure 4. Diversity index values, reported monthly for each sampling site. Shannon's index, H, light grey; Pielou's index, J, dark grey. Total values (T) for H and J are also reported.