Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
3,100
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
3,100 results for “recent”
Figure 4 in Genetic and morphometric variation of the Blackcap (Sylvia atricapilla) on the Azores Archipelago reveals a recent range expansion
Figure 4. Bayesian skyline plot showing changes in effective population size through time (million years ago). Estimations were based on a molecular clock of 2% divergence for one million years. The population size and the generation time is reported on the y-axis. Estimates of means are joined by a solid line; whereas clear lines mark the 95% highest probability density limits.
Figure 2 in Genetic and morphometric variation of the Blackcap (Sylvia atricapilla) on the Azores Archipelago reveals a recent range expansion
Figure 2. Parsimony haplotype networks based on mtDNA (Cytb and Nd2 sequences) and Aco1 nuclear gene sequences of Blackcaps. Each circle represents a haplotype. Dots on lines represent the number of mutational steps between two haplotypes. C – Corvo; F – Flores; L – Faial; P – Pico; J – São Jorge; G – Graciosa; T – Terceira: S – São Miguel; M Santa Maria.
Figure 4 in Morphology of immature stages of Atherigona reversura (Diptera: Muscidae), with notes on the recent invasion of North America
Figure 4. Immature stages of Atherigona reversura. (A) Cephaloskeleton of mature second instar larva, lateral view; (B) second instar larva, anterior view; (C) cephaloskeleton of third instar larva, lateral view; (D) posterior spiracles of mature second instar larva. Notes: an, antennal complex; mh LIII, mouthhook of third instar larva; mp, maxillary palpus; ps LII (LIII), posterior spiracle of second (third) instar larva; st LII (LIII), spiracular tufts of second (third) instar larva; sub, suprabuccal teeth.
Figure 2 in Morphology of immature stages of Atherigona reversura (Diptera: Muscidae), with notes on the recent invasion of North America
Figure 2. Third instar larva of Atherigona reversura. (A) First abdominal segment, lateral view; (B) bubble membrane; (C) second abdominal segment, ventral view of anterior part; (D) anal division, ventral view; (E) anal division, posterior view; (F) anal division, lateral view; (F) anal plate. Notes: a1 (a2), first (second) abdominal segment; ao, anal opening; ap, anal plate; p1–p4, papillae around spiracular field; ps, posterior spiracle.
Figure 3 in Morphology of immature stages of Atherigona reversura (Diptera: Muscidae), with notes on the recent invasion of North America
Figure 3. Immature stages of Atherigona reversura. (A) Cephaloskeleton of second instar larva, lateral view; (B) cephaloskeleton of third instar larva, lateral view; (C) puparium, ventral view. Notes: acc, accessory stomal sclerite; accs, supplementary accessory stomal sclerite; as, anterior spiracle; db, dorsal bridge; dc, dorsal cornua; ds, dental sclerite; es, epistomal sclerite; is, intermediate sclerite; ls, labial sclerite; mh, mouthhook; nes, necklace structure; ob, oral bar; ps, posterior spiracle; rh, respiratory horn; sub, suprabuccal teeth; vc, ventral cornua; vp, vertical plate. Scale bars 0.1 mm (A, B) and 1 mm (C).
Figure 1 in Morphology of immature stages of Atherigona reversura (Diptera: Muscidae), with notes on the recent invasion of North America
Figure 1. Third instar larva of Atherigona reversura. (A) Anterior end of body, lateral view; (B) anterior end of body, ventral view; (C) facial mask; (D) maxillary palpus; (E) ventral organ; (F) antennal complex; (G) second thoracic segment, lateral view, spinulation pattern. Notes: an, antennal complex; cir, cirri; ll, labial lobe; lo, labial organ; mp, maxillary palpus; ns1 (ns2), first (second) additional sensillum coeloconicum; ob, oral bar; or, oral ridges; sb1 (sb2, sb3), first (second, third) sensillum basiconicum; sc1 (sc2, sc3), first (second, third) sensillum coeloconicum; sub, suprabuccal teeth; t1 (t2), first (second) thoracic segment; vo, ventral organ.
Figure 3 in A redescription of the fossil coleoid cephalopod genus Palaeololigo Naef, 1921 (Decapodiformes: Palaeololiginidae) and its relationship to Recent squids
Figure 3. Chtenopteryx sp. Gladius. (Top) right lateral view; (bottom) oblique ventral view. Note: Photo, D.T. Donovan.
Figure 4 in A redescription of the fossil coleoid cephalopod genus Palaeololigo Naef, 1921 (Decapodiformes: Palaeololiginidae) and its relationship to Recent squids
Figure 4. (A) Palaeololigo oblonga (Wagner), holotype. Formerly in Paläontologisches Museum Munich, from Wagner 1860; (B) holotype of Teuthopsis princeps Wagner. Formerly in Paläontologisches Museum Munich, from Wagner 1860; (C) P. oblonga (Wagner), dorsal view of gladius, based mainly on the holotype, restored to original shape, as for illustrations of Recent gladii; (D) P. oblonga (Wagner), left lateral views of gladius, based mainly on the holotype, restored to original shape; (E) P. oblonga (Wagner), gladius of Paläontologisches Museum Munich AS 1968 I 62, natural size; (F) P. oblonga (Wagner), gladius of Jura-Museum, Eichstätt SOS 1325, natural size; (G) Niobrarateuthis walkeri Green, dorsal view of gladius. Upper Cretaceous (Coniacian or Santonian), Kansas, USA. Actual length of specimen about 60 cm, after Green (1977); (H) N. walkeri Green, right lateral view (details as for Fig. 4G).
Figure 6. Molecular time-scale for decapodiform cephalopods indicating a in A redescription of the fossil coleoid cephalopod genus Palaeololigo Naef, 1921 (Decapodiformes: Palaeololiginidae) and its relationship to Recent squids
Figure 6. Molecular time-scale for decapodiform cephalopods indicating a potential position for the Palaeololiginidae and Chtenopteryx on two alternative decapodiform phylogenies (modified from Strugnell et al. [2006]). The topologies result from two alternative Bayesian analyses using: (A) all three codon positions of three nuclear genes (octopine dehydrogenase, rhodopsin, pax-6) partitioned by codon; and (B) only first and second codon positions of the same three nuclear genes. The divergence dates of Palaeololiginidae from Bathyteuthis and Chtenopteryx and also Chtenopteryx from Bathyteuthis are hypothetical. A simplified possible scenario of morphological character loss is depicted. Notes: Ɨ indicates the presence of suckers on the buccal lappets; • indicates the presence of accessory nidamental glands (which is present in Chtenopteryx, but apparently lost in Bathyteuthis); indicates the presence of fused axons in the giant nerve fibre system; ▲ indicates the "juvenile" characters for Oegopsida detailed by Naef (1923), namely the form of gladius with a long narrow rachis, subterminal position of the fins, and also quadriserial suckers on the arms, which Naef (1923) believed to the ancestral form for all Oegopsida; "open" shapes (O, O, Δ, Z)
Figure 2 in A redescription of the fossil coleoid cephalopod genus Palaeololigo Naef, 1921 (Decapodiformes: Palaeololiginidae) and its relationship to Recent squids
Figure 2. Palaeololigo oblonga (Wagner). (A) Paläontologisches Museum Munich AS 1968 I 62. Posterior part to show vane of gladius; (B) Paläontologisches Museum Munich 1964 XXIII 147. Gladius, dorsal view with outline of ink sac; (C) Jura-Museum, Eichstätt SOS 1325. Gladius; (D) Jura-Museum, Eichstätt SOS 1366. Posterior end of gladius and impression of fin; (E) Jura-Museum, Eichstätt SOS 1366. Posterior part of right side of vane. Area where gladius is missing shows clear impression of growth lines and radial folds. Notes: Photos, (A–B) Georg Janssen; (C) Martin Ebert; (D–E) D.T. Donovan.
Figure 1 in A redescription of the fossil coleoid cephalopod genus Palaeololigo Naef, 1921 (Decapodiformes: Palaeololiginidae) and its relationship to Recent squids
Figure 1. Palaeololigo oblonga (Wagner). Paläontologisches Museum Munich AS 1968 I 62. (A) Note that the end of the rachis is broken and bent backwards; (B) detail of arm crown. Note: Photos supplied by Georg Janssen with permission.
Figure 3. Ninety-five per cent maximum parsimony networks obtained for the 12 in Mitochondrial DNA genetic variation and phylogeography of the recently described vole species Proedromys liangshanensis Liu, Sun, Zeng and Zhao, 2007 (Rodentia: Arvicolinae)
Figure 3. Ninety-five per cent maximum parsimony networks obtained for the 12 haplotypes in Proedromys liangshanensis. Circle sizes are proportional to haplotype frequencies.
Figure 2 in Mitochondrial DNA genetic variation and phylogeography of the recently described vole species Proedromys liangshanensis Liu, Sun, Zeng and Zhao, 2007 (Rodentia: Arvicolinae)
Figure 2. Bayesian inference tree using the TrN+I model depicting the relationship of Proedromys liangshanensis. The phylogenetic tree was rooted using Microtus kikuchii. Numbers represent node supports inferred from Bayesian posterior probabilities, neighbour joining and maximum parsimony bootstrap analyses.
Figure 4 in Mitochondrial DNA genetic variation and phylogeography of the recently described vole species Proedromys liangshanensis Liu, Sun, Zeng and Zhao, 2007 (Rodentia: Arvicolinae)
Figure 4. Expected (solid line) and observed (broken lines) mismatch distribution of Proedromys liangshanensis.
Figure 1 in Mitochondrial DNA genetic variation and phylogeography of the recently described vole species Proedromys liangshanensis Liu, Sun, Zeng and Zhao, 2007 (Rodentia: Arvicolinae)
Figure 1. Sampling localities of Proedromys liangshanensis. The filled circles represent the 12 haplotypes.
FIGURE 6 in Recent Ostracoda (Arthropoda, Crustacea) from São Pedro-São Paulo Archipelago, Brazil: a preliminary approach
FIGURE 6. Ostracods from São Pedro-São Paulo Archipelago, Northeastern Brazil. 1–5. Paradoxostoma sp. 1. 1–4. Adult valve, CP-482. 1. Right view. 2. Right internal view. 3. Central muscle scar in detail. 4. Interpretation of the central muscle scar. 5. A-1? carapace, CP-484, right view. 6–8 Paradoxostoma sp. 2, Adult carapace, CP-508. 6. Right view. 7. Left view. 8. Dorsal view. 9–12. Xestoleberis toni? Wouters, 2003. 9–11. Adult carapace, CP-506. 1. Left view. 2 Right view. 3. Dorsal view. 4. Adult valve, CP-490, internal view. 13–20. Xestoleberis sp. 2. 13–14. Adult carapace, CP-498. 13. Right view. 14. Left view. 15–17. Adult valve, CP-502. 15. Left internal view. 16. Central muscle scar in detail. 17. Interpretation of the Central muscle scar. 18. A-1? carapace, CP-499, right view. 19. A-4? carapace, CP-501, left view. 20. A-5? carapace, CP-503, right view. Scale = 100 µm.
FIGURE 10 in Recent Ostracoda (Arthropoda, Crustacea) from São Pedro-São Paulo Archipelago, Brazil: a preliminary approach
FIGURE 10. Zoogeographical distribution of Propontocypris (Ekpontocypris) pirifera (Müller, 1894), Triebelina intermedia Witte, 1993 and Xestoleberis toni Wouters, 2003 (Müller 1894; Rome 1942,1964; Vos 1957; Reys 1961; Yassimi 1969,1979; Bonaduce et al. 1975; Athersuch et al. 1989; Coimbra et al. 1992; Jellinek 1993; Witte et al. 1993; Ruiz et al. 1999; Keyser & Schöning 2000; Yamaguchi & Endo 2003; Wouters 2003; Tryantaphillou et al. 2005).
FIGURE 4 in Recent Ostracoda (Arthropoda, Crustacea) from São Pedro-São Paulo Archipelago, Brazil: a preliminary approach
FIGURE 4. Ostracods from São Pedro-São Paulo Archipelago, Northeastern Brazil. 1–15. Keijcyoidea praecipua (Bold, 1963) emend. 1–3. Adult carapace, CP-436 (♀). 1. Right view. 2. Left view. 3. Dorsal view. 4–6. Adult valve, CP-445 (♀). 4. Left internal view. 5. Interpretation of the hinge tooth in detail. 6. Interpretation of the central muscle scar in detail. 7–8. Adult carapace, CP-548 (♂). 7. Right view. 8. Dorsal view. 9. A-1 valve, CP-437, left view. 10. A-2 valve, CP-438, left view. 11. A-3 valve, CP-439, left view. 12. A-4 valve, CP-440, right view. 13. A-5 carapace, CP-441, left view. 14. A-6 valve, CP-442, right view. 15. A-7 carapace, CP-443, right view. 16–22. Neonesidea tenera? (Brady, 1886) emend. Maddocks, 1969. 16–18. A-1? carapace, CP-448. 16. Right view. 17. Left view. 18. Dorsal view. 19. A-2? carapace, CP-450, right view. 20. A-3? valve, CP- 451, right view. 21. A-5? valve, CP-452, right view. 22. A-7? carapace, CP-453, right view. Scale = 100 µm.
FIGURE 2 in Recent Ostracoda (Arthropoda, Crustacea) from São Pedro-São Paulo Archipelago, Brazil: a preliminary approach
FIGURE 2. Main oceanic currents of the Atlantic Ocean (modified from Peterson & Stramma 1991; CIMAS 2008; Brandt et al. 2010).
FIGURE 1 in Recent Ostracoda (Arthropoda, Crustacea) from São Pedro-São Paulo Archipelago, Brazil: a preliminary approach
FIGURE 1. Geocentrical and detail maps from São Pedro-São Paulo Archipelago, Northeastern Brazil (Campos et al. 2005, modified).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.