Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
660
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
660 results for “Biomechanics”
Figure 21 in The axial biomechanics of Trigonosaurus pricei (Neosauropoda: Titanosauria) and the importance of the cervical-dorsal region to sauropod high-browser feeding strategy
Figure 21. Reconstruction of what the sauropod Trigonosaurus pricei looked like in life, with an elevated neck and a sigmoidal tail above the horizontal line.
Figure 20. A in The axial biomechanics of Trigonosaurus pricei (Neosauropoda: Titanosauria) and the importance of the cervical-dorsal region to sauropod high-browser feeding strategy
Figure 20. A, reconstruction of the general body plan of Trigonosaurus associated with MCT 1719-R as a paratype. B, reconstruction of the general body plan of Trigonosaurus considering only the MCT 1488-R holotype. A standard tail was used.
Figure 19. A, C, E in The axial biomechanics of Trigonosaurus pricei (Neosauropoda: Titanosauria) and the importance of the cervical-dorsal region to sauropod high-browser feeding strategy
Figure 19. A, C, E, Apatosaurus, Diplodocus, and Barosaurus, respectively, with horizontalized neck [according to Stevens and Parrish 2005a (A, C) and Lovelace, 2007 (E), in light grey]. B, D, F, Apatosaurus, Diplodocus, and Barosaurus, respectively, with a more upward-facing neck, in dark grey (according to the authors). In F, the Cv13 vertebra is a simple line art representation. No scale.
Figure 18. A, a in The axial biomechanics of Trigonosaurus pricei (Neosauropoda: Titanosauria) and the importance of the cervical-dorsal region to sauropod high-browser feeding strategy
Figure 18. A, a possible tripodal pose in Trigonosaurus feeding in high regions. Dorsal column in extension and neck in cartilaginous neutral posture (CNP) (with neck in ventral flexion and in extension, in grey). Arrows indicate movement in the dorsal and ventral direction. B, dorsal column and neck in flexion (neck in CNP and extension, in grey) in possible feeding pose (and/or consuming water) in low regions with flexed forelimbs. C, dorsal column in CNP and neck in ventral flexion in possible feeding pose (and/or consuming water) in low regions.
Figure 17 in The axial biomechanics of Trigonosaurus pricei (Neosauropoda: Titanosauria) and the importance of the cervical-dorsal region to sauropod high-browser feeding strategy
Figure 17. Reconstructions of poses in Trigonosaurus according to Salgado et al. (1997), taking as an example 5% as the cartilage thickness. A, cartilaginous neutral posture, with reconstructed limbs with forelimbs exceptionally larger than hindlimbs (like basal Macronaria). B, reconstruction with the region of the dorsal column in maximal ventral position, still with the hindlimbs relatively larger than the forelimbs (like basal Macronaria). C, reconstruction with the neural canal horizontally aligned. D, reconstruction with a strong arch of the dorsal column and with forelimbs relatively proportional to the hindlimbs (as proposed by Salgado et al. 1997: Fig. C). E, detail of the reconstruction with a strongly arched dorsal column, showing disarticulated vertebrae. Red arrows indicate the zygapophyses of the dorsal vertebrae that are disarticulated. F, more parsimonious reconstruction with more anteriorly inclined pubic peduncle. No scale.
Figure 16 in The axial biomechanics of Trigonosaurus pricei (Neosauropoda: Titanosauria) and the importance of the cervical-dorsal region to sauropod high-browser feeding strategy
Figure 16. Angular variation between maximal mediolateral positions with combinations of soft-tissue thickness in cervical, dorsal, and caudal order, respectively, as follows: A, 2.5%, 5%, 5%; B, 5%, 5%, 5%; C, 10%, 5%, 5%; D, 2.5%, 5%, 10%; E, 5%, 5%, 10%; F, 10%, 5%, 10%; G, 2.5%, 5%, 15%; H, 5%, 5%, 15%; I, 10%, 5%, 15%. J, model in cartilaginous neutral posture (5%) shows the increase in laterolateral range considering the dorsal column. K, only the neck in maximum lateral position. L, cervical and dorsal column in maximal lateral position. No scale.
Figure 15 in The axial biomechanics of Trigonosaurus pricei (Neosauropoda: Titanosauria) and the importance of the cervical-dorsal region to sauropod high-browser feeding strategy
Figure 15. Range of motion: angular variation between maximal dorsal position with combinations of intervertebral soft-tissue thickness, in cervical, dorsal, and caudal order, respectively, as follows: A, 2.5%, 5%, 5%; B, 5%, 5%, 5%; C, 10%, 5%, 5%; D, 2.5%, 5%, 10%; E, 5%, 5%, 10%; F, 10%, 5%, 10%; G, 2.5%, 5%, 15%; H, 5%, 5%, 15%; I, 10%, 5%, 15%. No scale.
Figure 14 in The axial biomechanics of Trigonosaurus pricei (Neosauropoda: Titanosauria) and the importance of the cervical-dorsal region to sauropod high-browser feeding strategy
Figure 14. Angular variation between dorsal, ventral, and lateral maxima with: A, 2,5%; B, 5%; C, 10% (maximum dorsal and ventral positions); D, 2.5; E, 5%; F, 10% (maximum lateral position) of soft-tissue thickness in the cervical region; G, 5% (maximum dorsal and ventral positions); H, lateral maximum with the soft-tissue thickness in dorsal region; I, 5%; J, 10%; K, 15% (maximaum dorsal and ventral positions); and L, 5%; M, 10%; N, 15% (maximum lateral position) of the soft-tissue thickness in the caudal region. No scale.
Figure 8 in The axial biomechanics of Trigonosaurus pricei (Neosauropoda: Titanosauria) and the importance of the cervical-dorsal region to sauropod high-browser feeding strategy
Figure 8. Simplification of the 'shape' of the vertebral column regions. A, cervical region in a 'J' shape, dorsal region in an arc shape, and caudal region in a sigmoid shape. B, cervical region in a sigmoid shape, dorsal region in an arch shape, and caudal region in a sigmoid shape. C, cervical region in a 'U' shape, dorsal region in an arc shape, and caudal region in a 'U' shape. D, cervical region in a sigmoid shape, dorsal region in a linear shape, and caudal region in a linear shape.
Figure 7 in The axial biomechanics of Trigonosaurus pricei (Neosauropoda: Titanosauria) and the importance of the cervical-dorsal region to sauropod high-browser feeding strategy
Figure 7. Simplification of evaluation model for sauropod vertebral column direction. The directions of each region can be assigned from the starting point of the vertebral sequence or from the point of change of direction (e.g. cervicodorsal region). A, the sauropod body plane angle can be measured from the ground to the head (orange). Up to 10° can be considered low elevation, between 10° and 20° medium direction, and above 20° can be considered high elevation. B, cervical region high suprahorizontal direction (between 30° and 60°). Dorsal region in medium suprahorizontal direction (between 15° and 30°). Caudal region in low subhorizontal direction (between 0° and −15°). Sacral angle at 30°. The body plane angle is at 33, 59° in high elevation. C, cervical region in low suprahorizontal direction (15°). Dorsal region in low suprahorizontal direction (between 0° and 15°). Caudal region in high subhorizontal direction (between −15° and −30°). Sacral wedge at 15°. The body plane angle is at 18, 22° in medium elevation. D, cervical region in horizontal direction (0°). Dorsal region in horizontal direction (0°). Caudal region in horizontal direction (0°). The body plane angle is at 9, 72° in low elevation. E, the direction of the trunk (dorsal region + sacrum) can also be measured by adding the sacral region from the most distant point of the sacrum (e.g. in pink, forming an angle of 25°); as a result, there is an increase in the value (in degrees) over the horizontal line.
Figure 3 in The axial biomechanics of Trigonosaurus pricei (Neosauropoda: Titanosauria) and the importance of the cervical-dorsal region to sauropod high-browser feeding strategy
Figure 3. Holotype (MCT 1488-R), made up of cervical, dorsal, and sacral vertebrae, and the paratype (MCT 1719-R), made up of caudal vertebrae, of Trigonosaurus pricei. Scale bar: 20 cm.
Figure 13. A in The axial biomechanics of Trigonosaurus pricei (Neosauropoda: Titanosauria) and the importance of the cervical-dorsal region to sauropod high-browser feeding strategy
Figure 13. A, angular variation of D2 over D3 in the still articulated fossil. B–G, angular variation of D2 over D3 in cartilaginous neutral postures with soft-tissue thickness as follows: B, 2.5%; C, 5%; D, 10%; E, 15%; F, 20%; G, 25%. H, detail of the dorsal vertebrae D2 and D3 (highlighted) directing the neck to an elevated height. I, axial skeleton set with a more vertical direction for the neck. No scale.
Figure 11 in The axial biomechanics of Trigonosaurus pricei (Neosauropoda: Titanosauria) and the importance of the cervical-dorsal region to sauropod high-browser feeding strategy
Figure 11. Caudal cartilaginous neutral posture: neutral pose of the caudal region of Trigonosaurus pricei with percentages of soft-tissue thickness as follows: A, 2.5%; B, 5%; C, 10%; D, 15%; E, 20%; F, 25%. In dark grey are shown reconstructed elements based on the morphology of MCT 1719-R vertebrae and close taxa. No scale.
Figure 12 in The axial biomechanics of Trigonosaurus pricei (Neosauropoda: Titanosauria) and the importance of the cervical-dorsal region to sauropod high-browser feeding strategy
Figure 12. Representation of the neutral pose with soft-tissue thickness combinations, in cervical, dorsal, and caudal order, respectively, as follows: A, 2.5%, 5%, 5%; B, 5%, 5%, 5%; C, 10%, 5%, 5%; D, 2.5%, 5%, 10%; E, 5%, 5%, 10%; F, 10%, 5%, 10%; G, 2.5%, 5%, 15%; H, 5%, 5%, 15%; I, 10%, 5%, 15%. The skeletons in each row share the same tail pose; in each column they share the same neck pose, and the trunk pose is constant. No scale.
Figure 6 in The axial biomechanics of Trigonosaurus pricei (Neosauropoda: Titanosauria) and the importance of the cervical-dorsal region to sauropod high-browser feeding strategy
Figure 6. Representation of the process of alignment and angulation of the vertebrae in the cartilaginous neutral posture. A, Cv9 and Cv10 cervical vertebrae were aligned based on the supposed horizontality of the neural canal. Arrow 1 indicates the place where the intervertebral soft tissue is located. B, the vertebrae are brought together and aligned, maintaining the distance corresponding to the thickness of the intervertebral soft-tissue. C, the anterior vertebra is displaced in relationship to the posterior one in the dorsal direction (ventral or lateral). Arrow 2 indicates where the centre of rotation is located. D, condyle similar to a paraboloid and the point where soft tissue was positioned. The apex of the paraboloid is a zero point and is furthest from the vertebral centrum. No scale.
Figure 10 in The axial biomechanics of Trigonosaurus pricei (Neosauropoda: Titanosauria) and the importance of the cervical-dorsal region to sauropod high-browser feeding strategy
Figure 10. Dorsal cartilaginous neutral posture: neutral pose of the dorsal region with percentages of soft-tissue thickness as follows: A, 2.5%; B, 5%; C, 10%; D, 15%; E, 15%; F, 25%. No scale.
Figure 1. A in The axial biomechanics of Trigonosaurus pricei (Neosauropoda: Titanosauria) and the importance of the cervical-dorsal region to sauropod high-browser feeding strategy
Figure 1. A, lithostratigraphic map of the Bauru Basin showing the Bauru group. B, detailed lithostratigraphic map of the north-eastern Bauru Group deposits (from Soares et al. 2020a). C, Uberaba municipality, with the location of the BR050, Price 1, Price 6, and Ponte Alta (based on Silva Junior et al. 2022).
Figure 9 in The axial biomechanics of Trigonosaurus pricei (Neosauropoda: Titanosauria) and the importance of the cervical-dorsal region to sauropod high-browser feeding strategy
Figure 9. Cervical cartilaginous neutral posture: neutral pose of the cervical region of Trigonosaurus pricei with percentages of soft-tissue thickness as follows: A, 2.5%; B, 5%; C, 10%; D, 15%; E, 20%; F, 25%. Vertebrae were with non-articulated zygapophyses and vertebral centra were not displaced in any direction. In dark grey, the reconstructed elements are based on the morphology of the vertebrae of Trigonosaurus pricei and close taxa. No scale.
Figure 2 in The axial biomechanics of Trigonosaurus pricei (Neosauropoda: Titanosauria) and the importance of the cervical-dorsal region to sauropod high-browser feeding strategy
Figure 2. Comparison between the last sacral vertebrae of Baurutitan (MCT 1719-R) and Trigonosaurus (MCT 1488-R). A, last sacral vertebra (concave posterior facet), first biconvex, and anterior caudal vertebrae (Ca2 and Ca3) of Baurutitan. The red arrow indicates the opposite (biconvex) direction of the condyles in the vertebral centrum of the first caudal vertebra of Baurutitan. B, biconvex sacrum of Trigonosaurus. The thick red arrows indicate the first opisthocoelous sacral vertebra and the last procoelous sacral vertebra (convex posterior facet). C, E, articulation between MCT 1719-R and the sacrum MCT 1488-R. Red arrows highlight the direction of the neural spines in the last sacral and the first anterior caudal vertebrae. D, F, articulation between the caudal vertebrae of Baurutitan (MCT 1490-R; brown) and the sacrum MCT 1488-R. In E, the arrow indicates the more robust and posteriorly deflected feature of the transverse process of the anterior caudal vertebrae of MCT 1719-R, similar to the last sacral vertebra of MCT 1488-R.
Figure 4 in The axial biomechanics of Trigonosaurus pricei (Neosauropoda: Titanosauria) and the importance of the cervical-dorsal region to sauropod high-browser feeding strategy
Figure 4. Three-dimensional (3D) models of the reconstructed vertebrae (grey) and 3D models of the original vertebrae (brown), in dorsal view. The assemblage of cervical and dorsal vertebrae (Cv9–D10) belongs to the Trigonosaurus haplotype (MCT 1488-R). The assemblage of caudal vertebrae corresponds to the paratype of Trigonosaurus (MCT 1719-R). The red circles indicate the structures reconstructed through bilateral symmetry. The vertebrae Cv13–D1, D2–D3, D4–D5, D6–D7–D8, and D9–D10, connected by sediment (brown), were reconstructed in the zygapophyseal surface and the anterior and/or posterior portion of vertebral centra (grey). No scale.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.