Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 3 in Considering gene flow when using coalescent methods to delimit lineages of North American pitvipers of the genus Agkistrodon

Figure 3. Posterior probability of speciation inferred by BPP, version 2.0 (Yang & Rannala, 2010) with an increasing proportion of hybrids included in the dataset for Agkistrodon contortrix (A) and Agkistrodon piscivorus (B). Results are shown for both species with hybrids assigned to the population that contributed the majority of alleles with a fully resolved starting tree (1) and a fully collapsed starting tree (0), as well as hybrids assigned to the population that contributed the minority of alleles with both starting trees.

Figure 1 in Considering gene flow when using coalescent methods to delimit lineages of North American pitvipers of the genus Agkistrodon

Figure 1. Map of the USA showing the sampling localities and distribution of inferred lineages of Agkistrodon contortrix (A) and Agkistrodon piscivorus (B). The distribution of both species is indicated by a bold outline. The key to the right of each map indicates the population membership of individuals and also identifies admixture in individuals.

Figure 4 in Considering gene flow when using coalescent methods to delimit lineages of North American pitvipers of the genus Agkistrodon

Figure 4. Niche predictions for each species of the Agkistrodon contortrix complex with hybrids included in training the model (A), Agkistrodon contortrix complex with hybrids excluded (B), Agkistrodon piscivorus complex with hybrids included in training the model (C), Agkistrodon piscivorus complex with hybrids excluded (D), and East and Central lineages of Agkistrodon contortrix inferred by mtDNA (E). The distribution of colubriod samples obtained from the Herpnet database used to correct for sampling bias is shown in (F). Overlap between predicted suitable habitat is indicated by the darkest intermediate shade.

Figure 5 in Considering gene flow when using coalescent methods to delimit lineages of North American pitvipers of the genus Agkistrodon

Figure 5. The distribution of species within the Agkistrodon contortrix complex (A) and Agkistrodon piscivorus complex (B) inferred by Bayesian species delimitation. Putative hybrids zones are identified with cross-hatches. Distributions are adapted from Gloyd & Conant (1990) and the results from ecological niche modelling.

Figure 6 in Bayesian Poisson tree processes and multispecies coalescent models shed new light on the diversification of Nawab butterflies in the Solomon Islands (Nymphalidae, Charaxinae, Polyura)

Figure 6. Habitus of Polyura bicolor and Polyura epigenes across the Solomon Islands. Pictures of the upperside (left half) and underside (right half) of the two sexes. All pictures taken by Bernard Turlin.

Figure 4 in Bayesian Poisson tree processes and multispecies coalescent models shed new light on the diversification of Nawab butterflies in the Solomon Islands (Nymphalidae, Charaxinae, Polyura)

Figure 4. Nuclear haplotype network and maximum-likelihood phylogenetic reconstruction. The haplotype network reconstructed using the concatenated RPS5 and wingless alignments is presented on the left. The phylogenetic hypothesis inferred using the same data set in RA×ML is presented at the top right. A table highlighting the nucleotide substitutions found between Polyura epigenes bicolor and Polyura epigenes* is presented at the bottom right.

Figure 3 in Bayesian Poisson tree processes and multispecies coalescent models shed new light on the diversification of Nawab butterflies in the Solomon Islands (Nymphalidae, Charaxinae, Polyura)

Figure 3. Comparison of species delimitation results. Graph showing the result of each analysis of species delimitation. The posterior probability of either Polyura bicolor or Polyura epigenes (including Polyura bicolor) as a valid species are shown.

Figure 2 in Bayesian Poisson tree processes and multispecies coalescent models shed new light on the diversification of Nawab butterflies in the Solomon Islands (Nymphalidae, Charaxinae, Polyura)

Figure 2. Molecular phylogeny and molecular species delimitation results. Bayesian phylogeny as recovered from MrBayes analyses. The nodal supports of both Bayesian-inference (BI) and maximum-likelihood (ML) analyses are shown, with colour coding as indicated in the figure. The cloudogram of the *BEAST analysis showing all posterior species trees is presented at the bottom left. Denser regions indicate a robust support for the inferred relationship.

Figure 1 in Bayesian Poisson tree processes and multispecies coalescent models shed new light on the diversification of Nawab butterflies in the Solomon Islands (Nymphalidae, Charaxinae, Polyura)

Figure 1. Map of the geographic range of Polyura epigenes in the Solomon Islands. Male habitus of the different subspecies are shown above the name of the taxon. The distribution of each taxa is indicated by a coloured dashed line. The colour of the line refers to the pastille on the side of the taxon name. All pictures were taken by Bernard Turlin. The map is from National Geographic's MapMaker Interactive.

Figure 5 in Bayesian Poisson tree processes and multispecies coalescent models shed new light on the diversification of Nawab butterflies in the Solomon Islands (Nymphalidae, Charaxinae, Polyura)

Figure 5. Divergence time estimates derived from the *BEAST analysis. Chronogram derived from the posterior trees of dating analysis conducted in BEAST. The 95% credibility intervals are shown at each node of the phylogeny. A map of the Solomon Islands with bathymetry is shown at the top of the figure. The island of Malaita is highlighted in violet. A picture of a female Polyura epigenes bicolor f. cinereus (orange morph) is presented. Picture taken by Bernard Turlin. T in time bar stands for Tarantian.