Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 8 from: Reip HS, Wesener T (2018) Intraspecific variation and phylogeography of the millipede model organism, the Black Pill Millipede Glomeris marginata (Villers, 1789) (Diplopoda, Glomerida, Glomeridae). In: Stoev P, Edgecombe GD (Eds) Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Myriapodology, Krabi, Thailand. ZooKeys 741: 93-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.741.21917

Figure 8 Mapped genetic p-distance to geographical distance of all analysed specimen-pairs (4,656) of Glomeris marginata. Solid line: linear trend line with linear function and coefficient of determination R². Circles: see text below and Table 5.

Figure 5 from: Reip HS, Wesener T (2018) Intraspecific variation and phylogeography of the millipede model organism, the Black Pill Millipede Glomeris marginata (Villers, 1789) (Diplopoda, Glomerida, Glomeridae). In: Stoev P, Edgecombe GD (Eds) Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Myriapodology, Krabi, Thailand. ZooKeys 741: 93-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.741.21917

Figure 5 Modified biogeographic regions of France, based on http://inpn.mnhn.fr/programme/rapportage-directives-nature/presentation.

Figure 7 from: Reip HS, Wesener T (2018) Intraspecific variation and phylogeography of the millipede model organism, the Black Pill Millipede Glomeris marginata (Villers, 1789) (Diplopoda, Glomerida, Glomeridae). In: Stoev P, Edgecombe GD (Eds) Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Myriapodology, Krabi, Thailand. ZooKeys 741: 93-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.741.21917

Figure 7 Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Glomeris species by the maximum likelihood method. Midpoint rooted. Bootstrap values in % at nodes. All collapsed nodes have a bootstrap value of 100%. Scale bar: 10 % genetic ML distance.

Figure 3 from: Reip HS, Wesener T (2018) Intraspecific variation and phylogeography of the millipede model organism, the Black Pill Millipede Glomeris marginata (Villers, 1789) (Diplopoda, Glomerida, Glomeridae). In: Stoev P, Edgecombe GD (Eds) Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Myriapodology, Krabi, Thailand. ZooKeys 741: 93-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.741.21917

Figure 3 Distribution map of all successfully sequenced samples of G. marginata (blue dots). Base map: Shuttle Radar Topography Mission elevation data of the Deutsche Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (SRTM-3), accessed with GLOBALMAPPER v17.

Figure 12 from: Reip HS, Wesener T (2018) Intraspecific variation and phylogeography of the millipede model organism, the Black Pill Millipede Glomeris marginata (Villers, 1789) (Diplopoda, Glomerida, Glomeridae). In: Stoev P, Edgecombe GD (Eds) Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Myriapodology, Krabi, Thailand. ZooKeys 741: 93-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.741.21917

Figure 12 Extrapolation of rarefaction curves with ESTIMATES of the COI sequences of Glomeris marginata. Blue line = estimation with premise of mean number (404 haplotypes); Horizontal yellow line = 95% satisfaction of mean number (384 haplotypes); Green and red line = curve at the 95% upper and lower boundary.

Figure 2 from: Reip HS, Wesener T (2018) Intraspecific variation and phylogeography of the millipede model organism, the Black Pill Millipede Glomeris marginata (Villers, 1789) (Diplopoda, Glomerida, Glomeridae). In: Stoev P, Edgecombe GD (Eds) Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Myriapodology, Krabi, Thailand. ZooKeys 741: 93-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.741.21917

Figure 2 A G. marginata, brown and black form occurring in sympatry, Germany, Rügen, 2016. B–G Similar coloured species of Glomeris analyzed in this study B G. marginata, with a single specimen of G. intermedia in the upper left part, Germany, Landskrone, 2015 C G. intermedia Latzel, 1884, with sympatric G. marginata, Germany, Landskrone, 2015 D G. annulata Brandt, 1833, France, Gard, Courry, 2015 E G. cf. lugubris Attems, 1952, Spain, Cádiz/ Sierra de Grazalema, 2008, preserved specimenF G. cf. maerens Attems, 1927, Spain, Aragón/Teruel, 2010, preserved specimen G G. maerens, Spain, Tarragona/Montsià, 2017; B–D photographed by Jan Philip Oeyen.

Figure 10 from: Reip HS, Wesener T (2018) Intraspecific variation and phylogeography of the millipede model organism, the Black Pill Millipede Glomeris marginata (Villers, 1789) (Diplopoda, Glomerida, Glomeridae). In: Stoev P, Edgecombe GD (Eds) Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Myriapodology, Krabi, Thailand. ZooKeys 741: 93-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.741.21917

Figure 10 TCS-Network of haplotypes of Glomeris marginata with distribution region. Numbers behind region = consecutive haplotype number of DNASP-output. Haplotype accumulations: Red oval = Haplotype lineage I; Yellow oval = Haplotype lineage II; Blue oval = Haplotype lineage III; Green circle = Haplotype lineage IV; Black oval = Haplotype lineage V. Dashes on node connecting lines are representing single nucleotide mutations.

Figure 1 from: Reip HS, Wesener T (2018) Intraspecific variation and phylogeography of the millipede model organism, the Black Pill Millipede Glomeris marginata (Villers, 1789) (Diplopoda, Glomerida, Glomeridae). In: Stoev P, Edgecombe GD (Eds) Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Myriapodology, Krabi, Thailand. ZooKeys 741: 93-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.741.21917

Figure 1 Glomeris marginata (Villers, 1789) colour morphs. A main coloration form, center immature specimens showing the perplexa colour pattern; Germany, Landskrone B strongly lightened adult perplexa pattern, France, Pays de la Loire C red mutant, Germany, Bonn D strongly red-banded form, from France, Montauroux E more weakly red-brown banded from, France, same population as D. A, D, E photographed by Jan Philip Oeyen B by ZFMK C by Dennis Rödder.

Figure 4 from: Reip HS, Wesener T (2018) Intraspecific variation and phylogeography of the millipede model organism, the Black Pill Millipede Glomeris marginata (Villers, 1789) (Diplopoda, Glomerida, Glomeridae). In: Stoev P, Edgecombe GD (Eds) Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Myriapodology, Krabi, Thailand. ZooKeys 741: 93-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.741.21917

Figure 4 Modified biogeographic regions of Germany, based on Naturräumliche Großregionen of Germany, Meynen and Schmithüsen (1953–1962) and http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Deutschland_Naturraeumliche_Grossregionen.png

Figure 11 from: Reip HS, Wesener T (2018) Intraspecific variation and phylogeography of the millipede model organism, the Black Pill Millipede Glomeris marginata (Villers, 1789) (Diplopoda, Glomerida, Glomeridae). In: Stoev P, Edgecombe GD (Eds) Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Myriapodology, Krabi, Thailand. ZooKeys 741: 93-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.741.21917

Figure 11 Individual based rarefaction curve calculated with ESTIMATES and with 10,000 replicates (simulated collections) of the COI sequences of Glomeris marginata. Vertical lines indicating 95% lower and upper boundary.

Figure 6 from: Reip HS, Wesener T (2018) Intraspecific variation and phylogeography of the millipede model organism, the Black Pill Millipede Glomeris marginata (Villers, 1789) (Diplopoda, Glomerida, Glomeridae). In: Stoev P, Edgecombe GD (Eds) Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Myriapodology, Krabi, Thailand. ZooKeys 741: 93-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.741.21917

Figure 6 Distribution of nucleotide differences in % between specimen pairs of Glomeris marginata and to outgroup specimens.

Figure 9 from: Reip HS, Wesener T (2018) Intraspecific variation and phylogeography of the millipede model organism, the Black Pill Millipede Glomeris marginata (Villers, 1789) (Diplopoda, Glomerida, Glomeridae). In: Stoev P, Edgecombe GD (Eds) Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Myriapodology, Krabi, Thailand. ZooKeys 741: 93-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.741.21917

Figure 9 Maximum likelihood tree based on the mtDNA COI gene of 97 Glomeris marginata. Midpoint rooted. Roman numerals: Haplotype lineages I–V. Colour morphs of G. marginata: Common black = none; G = grey; R = red border; P = perplexa-markings. Scale bar = 1 % genetic ML distance.

Figure 5 from: Oeyen JP, Wesener T (2015) Steps towards a phylogeny of the pill millipedes: non-monophyly of the family Protoglomeridae, with an integrative redescription of Eupeyerimhoffia archimedis (Diplopoda, Glomerida). In: Tuf IH, Tajovský K (Eds) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Myriapodology, Olomouc, Czech Republic. ZooKeys 510: 49-64. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.510.8675

Figure 5 - Eupeyerimhoffia archimedis (Strasser, 1965) male and female, SEM. A Leg-pair 1, male, right side, posterior view B Leg-pair 2, female, right side, posterior view C Leg-pair 2, male, left side, posterior view D Leg-pair 2, female, right vulva, ventral view E Leg-pair 2, male gonopore, posterior view F Leg-pair 9, male, right side, posterior view G Leg-pair 17, left side, anterior view H Leg-pair 18, right side, posterior view I Telopod with syncoxite, anterior view J Telopod, inner horn of syncoxite K Telopod, posterior view. Abbreviations: Cx = Coxa; Pre = Prefemur; Fem = Femur; Post = Postfemur; Tib = Tibia; Tar = Tarsus; Vu = Vulva; Go = Gonopore; Mp = Median plate; Lp = Lateral plate; Op = Operculum; 1-4 = Podomere 1-4; cL = Central lobe; h = Inner horn; Scx = Syncoxite; Tr = Trichostele. Scale bar: 400 μm (A, B); 250 μm (C); 100 μm (D, H); 25 μm (E); 200 μm (F, I); 150 μm (G, K); 50 μm (J).

Figure 4 from: Oeyen JP, Wesener T (2015) Steps towards a phylogeny of the pill millipedes: non-monophyly of the family Protoglomeridae, with an integrative redescription of Eupeyerimhoffia archimedis (Diplopoda, Glomerida). In: Tuf IH, Tajovský K (Eds) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Myriapodology, Olomouc, Czech Republic. ZooKeys 510: 49-64. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.510.8675

Figure 4 - Eupeyerimhoffia archimedis (Strasser, 1965) male, SEM. A Thoracic shield, dorso-lateral view B Thoracic shield, meso-lateral C Thoracic shield, schism detail, ventro-lateral view D Tergite, detail of peg, antero-lateral view E Tergite, detail of depression, lateral view F Tergite, ventral view G Tergite, dorso-lateral view H Tergite, ozopore, dorsal view I Collum, dorsal view J Tergite 11 and anal shield, detail of furrow, ventro-lateral view K Tergite 11 and anal shield, left side, anterior view L Tergite 11 and anal shield, right side, posterior view. Abbreviations: AS = Anal shield; Dp = Depression; F = Furrow; Oz = Ozopore; LDp = Lateral depression; P = Peg; Sch = Schisma; stri = striae; T11 = Tergite 11. Arrows point anteriorly. Scale bar: 400 μm (A, H, I, K, L); 300 μm (B, F); 100 μm (C, D, J); 50 μm (E); 500 μm (G).

Figure 3 from: Oeyen JP, Wesener T (2015) Steps towards a phylogeny of the pill millipedes: non-monophyly of the family Protoglomeridae, with an integrative redescription of Eupeyerimhoffia archimedis (Diplopoda, Glomerida). In: Tuf IH, Tajovský K (Eds) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Myriapodology, Olomouc, Czech Republic. ZooKeys 510: 49-64. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.510.8675

Figure 3 - Eupeyerimhoffia archimedis (Strasser, 1965) male, SEM. A Head, frontal view B Head, ventral view C Head, detail of lateral area D Antenna, posterior viewE Antenna, antennomere 6 and 7 F Antenna, apical edge of antennomere 3 G Mandible, mesal view H Gnathochilarium, ventral view I Endochilarium, dorsal view J Gnathochilarium, lateral and inner palpi, dorsal view K Endochilarium, detail of median area, dorsal view. Abbreviations: 1-7 = Antennal segments number 1-7; 4iT = 4-combed inner tooth; AC = Apical cone; AF = Antennal fossa; Ca = Cardine; Co = Condylus; cP = Central pads; CT = Central tooth; eT = External tooth; fS = fringed seam; Gu = Gula; iA = Intermediate area; iL = Incisura lateralis; iP = Inner palpi; L = Labrum; LL = Lamella linguales; LP = Lateral palpi; M = Mentum; MP = Molar plate; O = Ocellaria; O1-O4 = Ocelli 1-4; pL = Pectinate lamellae; pmL = paramedian lobe; TO = Organ of Tömösváry; SC = Sensory clusters; St = Stipites. Arrows mark sensilla basiconica. Scale bar: 400 μm (A, B); 200 μm (C); 150 μm (D); 25 μm (E); 10 μm (F); 100 μm (G); 250 μm (H, I); 40 μm (J); 50 μm (K).

Figure 2 from: Oeyen JP, Wesener T (2015) Steps towards a phylogeny of the pill millipedes: non-monophyly of the family Protoglomeridae, with an integrative redescription of Eupeyerimhoffia archimedis (Diplopoda, Glomerida). In: Tuf IH, Tajovský K (Eds) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Myriapodology, Olomouc, Czech Republic. ZooKeys 510: 49-64. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.510.8675

Figure 2 - Maximum likelihood bootstrap consensus tree. Members of the family Protoglomeridae are marked in bold.

Figure 1 from: Oeyen JP, Wesener T (2015) Steps towards a phylogeny of the pill millipedes: non-monophyly of the family Protoglomeridae, with an integrative redescription of Eupeyerimhoffia archimedis (Diplopoda, Glomerida). In: Tuf IH, Tajovský K (Eds) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Myriapodology, Olomouc, Czech Republic. ZooKeys 510: 49-64. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.510.8675

Figure 1 - Eupeyerimhoffia archimedis (Strasser, 1965) female in situ and habitat. A Eupeyerimhoffia archimedis female rolled up, in situ B Eupeyerimhoffia archimedis female in situ C Habitat of Eupeyerimhoffia archimedis, close to the type locality Ferla.