Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
260
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
260 results for “Interceptions”
FIGURE 14 in Black fungus gnats (Diptera: Sciaridae) found in association with cultivated plants and mushrooms in Australia, with notes on cosmopolitan pest species and biosecurity interceptions
FIGURE 14. Bradysia spatitergum (Hardy, 1956). A. Hypopygium, ventral side. B. Hypopygium, dorsal side. C. Flagellomeres 3–5.
FIGURE 13 in Black fungus gnats (Diptera: Sciaridae) found in association with cultivated plants and mushrooms in Australia, with notes on cosmopolitan pest species and biosecurity interceptions
FIGURE 13. Bradysia pallipes (Fabricius, 1787); (specimen from Australia). A. Hypopygium (left half in ventral view).
FIGURE 11 in Black fungus gnats (Diptera: Sciaridae) found in association with cultivated plants and mushrooms in Australia, with notes on cosmopolitan pest species and biosecurity interceptions
FIGURE 11. Pnyxia scabiei (Hopkins, 1895). A. Hypopygium. B. Head with basal segments of antenna (male). C. Fore tibia.
FIGURE 9 in Black fungus gnats (Diptera: Sciaridae) found in association with cultivated plants and mushrooms in Australia, with notes on cosmopolitan pest species and biosecurity interceptions
FIGURE 9. Cosmosciara hartii (Johannsen, 1912). (A, C and D, morphotype II). A. Head, female (specimen from Hawaii). B. Head, female (morphotype I, from Europe). C. Male (specimen from Fiji). D. Head and thorax of female (specimen from Hawaii).
FIGURE 10 in Black fungus gnats (Diptera: Sciaridae) found in association with cultivated plants and mushrooms in Australia, with notes on cosmopolitan pest species and biosecurity interceptions
FIGURE 10. Bradysia tilicola (Loew, 1850); (specimen from Europe). A. Hypopygium. B. Flagellomeres 4–5. C. Palpus. D. Fore tibia. E. wing.
FIGURE 5 in Black fungus gnats (Diptera: Sciaridae) found in association with cultivated plants and mushrooms in Australia, with notes on cosmopolitan pest species and biosecurity interceptions
FIGURE 5. Lycoriella ingenua (Dufour, 1839). A. Hypopygium. B. Gonostylus. C. Flagellomeres 2–4. D. Palpus. E. Fore tibia.
FIGURE 8 in Black fungus gnats (Diptera: Sciaridae) found in association with cultivated plants and mushrooms in Australia, with notes on cosmopolitan pest species and biosecurity interceptions
FIGURE 8. Cosmosciara hartii (Johannsen, 1912). Male (morphotype I). A. Hypopygium. B. Distal part of gonostylus. C. Flagellomeres 2–6.
FIGURE 4 in Black fungus gnats (Diptera: Sciaridae) found in association with cultivated plants and mushrooms in Australia, with notes on cosmopolitan pest species and biosecurity interceptions
FIGURE 4. Lycoriella agraria (Felt, 1898). A. Hypopygium. B. Basal segments of antenna. C. Palpus. D. Fore tibia. E. wing.
FIGURE 1 in Black fungus gnats (Diptera: Sciaridae) found in association with cultivated plants and mushrooms in Australia, with notes on cosmopolitan pest species and biosecurity interceptions
FIGURE 1. Bradysia impatiens (Johannsen, 1912). Form A (typical pest specimen). A. Hypopygium. B. Flagellomeres 3–5. C. Palpus. D. Fore tibia. E. wing.
FIGURE 3 in Black fungus gnats (Diptera: Sciaridae) found in association with cultivated plants and mushrooms in Australia, with notes on cosmopolitan pest species and biosecurity interceptions
FIGURE 3. Bradysia ocellaris (Comstock, 1882). A. Hypopygium. B. Head and thorax. C. Basal segments of antenna. D. Palpus. E. Fore tibia.
FIGURE 2 in Black fungus gnats (Diptera: Sciaridae) found in association with cultivated plants and mushrooms in Australia, with notes on cosmopolitan pest species and biosecurity interceptions
FIGURE 2. Bradysia impatiens (Johannsen, 1912). Form B. (specimen from Kingston, Tasmania, glasshouse). A. Hypopygium. B. Gonostylus. C. Flagellomeres 3–4.
FIGURE 6 in Black fungus gnats (Diptera: Sciaridae) found in association with cultivated plants and mushrooms in Australia, with notes on cosmopolitan pest species and biosecurity interceptions
FIGURE 6. Lycoriella sativae (Johannsen, 1912). A. Hypopygium. B1-B3. Ventral bases of hypopygium (intergonocoxal membrane with bristle patch). C. Flagellomeres 3–5. D. Fore tibia.
Supplement scripts for the paper " The importance of impoundment interception in simulating riverine dissolved organic carbon"
<p>The supplement scripts used in the paper, "The importance of impoundment interception in simulating riverine dissolved organic carbon".</p>
Reduced latency in manual interception with anticipatory smooth eye movements
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Fig. 3 in A Comparison of the Dung Beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) Collecting Performance of Pitfall Traps and Burrowing Interception Traps
Fig. 3. Species accumulation curves comparing burrowing interception traps (BIT, in black) and pitfall traps (in gray).
Fig. 2 in A Comparison of the Dung Beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) Collecting Performance of Pitfall Traps and Burrowing Interception Traps
Fig. 2. Mean and standard deviations for different measures of performance by individual burrowing interception traps (BIT) and pitfall traps.
Fig. 1. a in A Comparison of the Dung Beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) Collecting Performance of Pitfall Traps and Burrowing Interception Traps
Fig. 1. a) Construction diagram of the burrowing interception trap (BIT), b) Completely assembled BIT.
Border Interceptions Reveal Novel Bridgehead Effects on Global Dispersal of Insects
<p>Supplemental data - including raw and processed data from intercepting agencies, native range information and code for the analysis of the final data. </p>
Point intercept and biomass data for vascular plants in a manipulative experiment of rear-round, winter-only, summer-only grazing, mowing and full exclosure at Molslab, Denmark
<p>Data from two sets of sample quadrats included, both from nine experimental blocks, each replicating the treatments: rear-round grazing, winter-only grazing (summer exclosure), summer-only grazing (winter exclosure), mowing (one annual event in autumn) and full exclosure (no cattle or horse grazing, no mowing, but grazing by wild roe deer and hare).</p> <p>1) Each of the 24 sample plots (six blocks times four treatments, mowing excluded) was first sampled non-destructively with the point intercept method, then above-ground biomass was cut at the soil surface, sorted into species fractions, dried and weighed. Data recording <span>September 1–16, 2020</span>.</p> <p>2) Each of the 45 sample plots (nine blocks times five treatments) was sampled non-destructively with the point intercept method. Data recording <span>August 2–20, 2021</span>.</p>
Data for: The effects of leaf traits on litter rainfall interception with consequences for runoff and soil conservation
<ol> <li><span>During rainfall, plant litter interception regulates overland flow with an impact on water runoff generation and sediment displacement. Besides the rainfall characteristics, the effects of litter mass, thickness, storage and drainage properties on rainfall interception are reasonably well understood. In contrast, less is known about the influence of leaf traits, which we hypothesized to affect interception, soil hydrology and conservation via litter structure assembly. </span></li> <li><span>We measured the runoff and soil loss generation as determined by litter layer structural and hydraulic properties of 16 coexisting tropical woody species with wide-range morphological leaf traits in a rainfall simulator experiment. </span></li> <li><span>Our results show that litter produced by coexisting species can differ in precipitation interception, thereby influencing runoff and soil loss. This is because there is important interspecific variation in litter water storage and drainage, which are negatively affected by leaf area. Leaf water repellency positively affected litter water storage. Moreover, leaf area also negatively affected litter layer density. Litter density, in turn, increased runoff, but decreased soil loss, possibly due to protection against splash erosion. </span></li> <li> <span>T</span><span>hese results can be used to predict the effects of plant traits on the soil water balance and soil integrity protection through ecohydrological interception by the litter layer. The next research steps will be to extend our model to multiple-species litter layers and to validate and calibrate our model in different field situations in different ecosystems.</span> </li> </ol>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.