Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 6 in Three new and five known species of Diplopeltoides Gerlach, 1962 (Nematoda, Diplopeltoididae) from Sweden, and a revision of the genus

Fig. 6. Diplopeltoides bulbosus (Vitiello, 1972) comb. nov. SEM micrographs of females. A–B. Anterior end, right sublateral view (arrow points at the anterior edge of longitudinal striation of cuticle). C. Female tail (arrow points at the posterior edge of the longitudinal striation of the cuticle). D. Anterior end, left sublateral view. E. Vulval region, ventrosublateral view. F. Vulval region, lateral view. G. Tail terminus (arrows point at openings of caudal glands. Scale bars: A–G = 5 µm.

Fig. 5 in Three new and five known species of Diplopeltoides Gerlach, 1962 (Nematoda, Diplopeltoididae) from Sweden, and a revision of the genus

Fig. 5. Diplopeltoides bulbosus (Vitiello, 1972) comb. nov. A. Female anterior end, surface view. B. Female pharyngeal region, optical median section. C. Vulval region. D. Female tail. E. Male anterior end, surface view. F. Male tail. Scale bar = 20 µm.

Fig. 4 in Three new and five known species of Diplopeltoides Gerlach, 1962 (Nematoda, Diplopeltoididae) from Sweden, and a revision of the genus

Fig. 4. Diplopeltoides asetosus (Juario, 1974) comb. nov. A. Vulval region. B. Female tail. C. Male tail. D. Female anterior end, surface view. E. Male anterior end, surface view. F. Female pharyngeal region, optical median section. Scale bar = 20 µm.

Fig. 3 in Three new and five known species of Diplopeltoides Gerlach, 1962 (Nematoda, Diplopeltoididae) from Sweden, and a revision of the genus

Fig. 3. Diplopeltoides suecicus sp. nov. SEM micrographs. A. Male cloacal region, lateral view. B. Male cloacal region, ventrosubventral view. C. Male tail, lateral view. D–E. Female tail, ventrosublateral view. Scale bars: A–E = 5 µm.

Fig. 1 in Three new and five known species of Diplopeltoides Gerlach, 1962 (Nematoda, Diplopeltoididae) from Sweden, and a revision of the genus

Fig. 1. Diplopeltoides suecicus sp. nov. A. Anterior part of the female reproductive system. B. Female anterior end, surface view. C. Male anterior end, surface view. D. Female pharyngeal region, optical median section. E. Female tail. F. Male tail. Scale bar = 20 µm.

Fig. 2 in Three new and five known species of Diplopeltoides Gerlach, 1962 (Nematoda, Diplopeltoididae) from Sweden, and a revision of the genus

Fig. 2. Diplopeltoides suecicus sp. nov. SEM micrographs. A, C–D. Male. B, E. Female. A. Anterior end, apical view (arrows point at outer labial sensilla). B–D. Anterior end, left sublateral view. E. Vulval region. Scale bars: A–E = 5 µm.

Fig. 10 in A revision of the genus Rhinotorus Förster, 1869 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Ctenopelmatinae), with descriptions of three new species and an illustrated identification key

Fig. 10. Rhinotorus nasutus (Gravenhorst, 1829). A. Face. B. Head dorsally. C. Propodeum. D. First metasomal tergite dorsally. E. Habitus.

Fig. 13 in A revision of the genus Rhinotorus Förster, 1869 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Ctenopelmatinae), with descriptions of three new species and an illustrated identification key

Fig. 13. Rhinotorus tarsilatus sp. nov., holotype, ♀. A. Face. B. Head dorsally. C. Metasoma. D. Habitus.

Fig. 8 in A revision of the genus Rhinotorus Förster, 1869 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Ctenopelmatinae), with descriptions of three new species and an illustrated identification key

Fig. 8. Rhinotorus longicornis (Schmiedeknecht, 1914). A. Mesoscutellum. B. Metasoma dorsally. C. Face. D. Head dorsally. E. Habitus.

Fig. 7 in A revision of the genus Rhinotorus Förster, 1869 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Ctenopelmatinae), with descriptions of three new species and an illustrated identification key

Fig. 7. Rhinotorus leucostomus (Gravenhorst, 1829). A. First metasomal tergite dorsally with projections at spiracles (arrows). B. Mesoscutellum. C. Propodeum. D. Face. E. Habitus.

Fig. 2. Mesoleius roepkei Teunissen, 1945 in A revision of the genus Rhinotorus Förster, 1869 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Ctenopelmatinae), with descriptions of three new species and an illustrated identification key

Fig. 2. Mesoleius roepkei Teunissen, 1945, holotype, ♀. A. Face. B. First metasomal tergite with shallow subapical transverse impressions (arrow). C. Habitus.

Fig. 3 in A revision of the genus Rhinotorus Förster, 1869 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Ctenopelmatinae), with descriptions of three new species and an illustrated identification key

Fig. 3. Rhinotorus alpinus (Roman, 1909), lectotype, ♀. A. Face. B. Mesopleuron. C. Propodeum. D. Head dorsally. E. Habitus.

Fig. 15 in A revision of the genus Rhinotorus Förster, 1869 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Ctenopelmatinae), with descriptions of three new species and an illustrated identification key

Fig. 15. Rhinotorus umbrarum (Holmgren, 1857). A. ♀, face. B. ♂, face. C. Metasoma dorsally. D. Propodeum.

Fig. 1. A–D in A revision of the genus Rhinotorus Förster, 1869 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Ctenopelmatinae), with descriptions of three new species and an illustrated identification key

Fig. 1. A–D. Saotis brachycerus (Kasoparyan & Kopelke, 2009) comb. nov. A. Face. B. Propodeum. C. Habitus paratype, ♂ S. brachycerus (Kasoparyan & Kopelke, 2009). D. Habitus holotype, ♀ S.brachycerus (Kasoparyan & Kopelke, 2009). E–F. Saotis granulator Kasparyan & Kopelke, 2010. E. Habitus ♂ S. granulator Kasparyan & Kopelke, 2010. F. Habitus ♀ S. granulator Kasparyan & Kopelke, 2010.

Fig. 11 in A revision of the genus Rhinotorus Förster, 1869 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Ctenopelmatinae), with descriptions of three new species and an illustrated identification key

Fig. 11. Rhinotorus ovalis (Davis, 1897), lectotype, ♀. A. Metasoma dorsally. B. Face. C. Habitus dorsally. D. Habitus laterally.

Fig. 4 in A revision of the genus Rhinotorus Förster, 1869 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Ctenopelmatinae), with descriptions of three new species and an illustrated identification key

Fig. 4. Rhinotorus campester sp. nov., holotype, ♂. A. Face. B. Male genitalia laterally. C. Male genitalia ventrally. D. Mesopleuron. E. Habitus.

Fig. 6 in A revision of the genus Rhinotorus Förster, 1869 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Ctenopelmatinae), with descriptions of three new species and an illustrated identification key

Fig. 6. Rhinotorus jussilai sp. nov., holotype, ♀. A. Face. B. Mesopleuron. C. Propodeum and first metasomal tergite dorsally. D. Habitus.

opencc-by-3.0Oct 2012View details →

Fig. 12. Bennelongia cuensis sensu lato A-B, D-L in A review of Bennelongia De Deckker & McKenzie, 1981 (Crustacea, Ostracoda) species from eastern Australia with the description of three new species

Fig. 12. Bennelongia cuensis sensu lato A-B, D-L from unnamed pool near Kilcowera Station, QLD; C from island claypan on Bloodwood Station NSW. A. ♀, LVi (W40053). B. ♀, RVi (W40053). C. Ƌ, LVi (W40002). D. Ƌ, RVi (W40052). E. ♀, Cp dorsal (W40059). F. ♀, Cp ventral (W40058). G. Ƌ, Cp ventral (W40056). H. Ƌ, Cp dorsal (W40055). I. Ƌ, RVi detail anteriorly (W40052). J. Ƌ, RVi detail anteriorly (W40052). K. Ƌ, CpRl (W40054). L. ♀, CpRl (W40057). Scales: A-H, K-L = 1000 μm, J = 200 μm, I = 100 μm.

opencc-by-3.0Oct 2012View details →

Fig. 13 in A review of Bennelongia De Deckker & McKenzie, 1981 (Crustacea, Ostracoda) species from eastern Australia with the description of three new species

Fig. 13. Bennelongia cuensis sensu lato, all from unnamed pool near Kilcowera Station, QLD, Ƌ (W40052). A. Right prehensile palp. B. Left prehensile palp. C. Hemipenis. D. Outline of other hemipenis. Scales: A-B = 89.3 μm, C-D = 104.2 μm.