Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 6 in A well-preserved partial skeleton of the poorly known early Miocene seriema Noriegavis santacrucensis

Fig. 6. Strict consensus tree of two most parsimonious tree resulting from analysis of the character matrix in SOM 1 (Supplementary Online Material available at http://app.pan.pl/SOM/app60-Mayr_Noriega_SOM.pdf) length = 55, CI = 0.70, RI = 0.72). Characters (top) and character states bottom) are listed, with filled circles representing unambiguous apomorphies. Bootstrap support values are indicated next to the internodes, fossil taxa are marked with a dagger.

Fig. 2 in A well-preserved partial skeleton of the poorly known early Miocene seriema Noriegavis santacrucensis

Fig. 2. Comparison of skulls and mandibles of the seriema (Cariamidae) Noriegavis santacrucensis (Noriega Vizcaíno, and Bargo, 2009) from the early Miocene Santa Cruz Formation in Argentina (A) with extant Chunga burmeisteri (Hartlaub, 1860) (C) and extant Cariama cristata Bonaparte, 1853 (B, D). A. MPM-PV 15049, skull in left lateral (A 1), right lateral (A 2), dorsal (A 5), and caudal (A 6) views, skull with upper beak oriented in its natural position (A 3); partial mandible in right lateral view (A 4); left os lacrimale in dorsal (A 7) and lateral (A 8) views. B. SMF 1710, skull in dorsal view. C. MACN 2351, skull in dorsal (C 1) and lateral (C 2) views. D. SMF 1862, skull in lateral view.

Fig. 3 in A well-preserved partial skeleton of the poorly known early Miocene seriema Noriegavis santacrucensis

Fig. 3. Wing bones and sternum of the seriema (Cariamidae) Noriegavis santacrucensis (Noriega, Vizcaíno, and Bargo, 2009) from the early Miocene Santa Cruz Formation in Argentina (B), in comparison with extant Cariama cristata Bonaparte, 1853 (A, C). A. SMF 1710, proximal left humerus in cranial view (A 1), proximal right ulna in caudal view (A 2), right phalanx proximalis digiti majoris in ventral view (A 3). B. MPM-PV 15049, proximal half of left humerus in cranial (B 1) and caudal (B 2) views, proximal portion of right ulna in cranial (B 3) and caudal (B 4) views, distal end of left ulna in ventral view (B 5), right phalanx proximalis digiti majoris in ventral view (B 6), sternum in right lateral (B 7) and cranial (B 8) views. C. SMF 2462, sternum in lateral (C 1) and cranial (C 2) views.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2013View details →

Fig. 1 in The Chinchilla Local Fauna: An exceptionally rich and well-preserved Pliocene vertebrate assemblage from fluviatile deposits of south-eastern Queensland, Australia

Fig. 1. Physiography of the Chinchilla local area, showing the location of Chinchilla relative to the Condamine River System. Redrawn after Reiser 1971).

Fig. 5 in A well-preserved partial skeleton of the poorly known early Miocene seriema Noriegavis santacrucensis

Fig. 5. Hindlimb bones of the seriema (Cariamidae) Noriegavis santacrucensis (Noriega, Vizcaíno, and Bargo, 2009) from the early Miocene Santa Cruz Formation in Argentina (A) in comparison with extant Cariama cristata Bonaparte, 1853 (B–D). A. MPM-PV 15049. B. SMF 1710. C. SMF 2462. D. SMF 1862. Right femur in caudal (A 1, B) and cranial (A 2) views. Right tibiotarsus: cranial view (A 3, C 1), distal end in caudal (A6) and cranial (A 7) views, proximal end in proximal view (A 8, C 2). Left tarsometatarsus: shaft in cranial (A 4) and caudal (A5) views, distal end in dorsal (A 9, D 1), plantar (A 11), and distal (A 14, D 2) views. Right tarsometatarsus in dorsal (A 10) and plantar (A 12) views, pedal phalanges (A 13)

Fig. 1 in A well-preserved partial skeleton of the poorly known early Miocene seriema Noriegavis santacrucensis

Fig. 1. Map of southeastern Patagonia (A) and detail map (B) showing the position of the Monte Tigre locality, from which the new Noriegavis santacrucensis fossil comes, and the holotype locality Punto Estancia La Costa.

Fig. 4 in A well-preserved partial skeleton of the poorly known early Miocene seriema Noriegavis santacrucensis

Fig. 4. Pelvis of the seriema (Cariamidae) Noriegavis santacrucensis (Noriega, Vizcaíno, and Bargo, 2009) from the early Miocene Santa Cruz Formation in Argentina (A) in comparison with extant Cariama cristata Bonaparte, 1853 (B). A. MPM-PV 15049, in ventral (A1), dorsal (A2), and lateral (A3) views, with detail of cristae iliacae dorsales (A4). B. SMF 1862, pelvis in dorsal view (B1) and detail in lateral view (B2).

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2010View details →

Fig. 7. Longitudinal section through the well preserved specimen PIMUZ 28583 in Devonian pearls and ammonoid-endoparasite co-evolution

Fig. 7. Longitudinal section through the well preserved specimen PIMUZ 28583 of Sellanarcestes spp., Sellanarcestes wenkenbachi Zone, Emsian, Oufrane (S of Tata), Morocco. A. +/− median section displaying many "Housean pits", most with internal tube; overview. "Housean pits" are marked by white arrows. B. Three closely spaced pits, two displaying the internal tubes, the remaining void inside the pit is filled with a fine−grained sparitic matrix, note the continuous ammonoid shell layer covering the pits and the septum, which grew on the pit wall, note the distinguishable shell layers, which are recrystallised to varying degrees. C. A corroded pit with tube, note the continuation of the innermost ammonoid shell layer. D. Two adjacent fused pits, only the right pit shows the delicate internal tube, mural part of septum on the left.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2017View details →

FIGURE 6 in Foraminifera biostratigraphy and paleoenvironment of Well 5, OML 34, Niger Delta, Nigeria

FIGURE 6. Photomicrographic plate of some foraminfera specie from the studied well. 1, Bolivina dilatata, (Reuss) X 100; 2-3, Ammonia beccarii (Linne), (2)Dorsal view X 200, (3) Ventral view X 200; 4, Uvigerina sp. (Cushman) X 150; 5, Hopkinsina bononiensis, (Fornasini) X 150; 6-8, Epistominella vitrea(Parker), (6) Dorsal viewX 200, (7) Edge view X 200, (8) Ventral view X 200; 9, Orbulina universa, (d'Orbigny) X 250; 10, Brizalina interjuncta, (Graham, De Klasz and Rerat) X 150; 11, Heterolepa floridana, (Cushman) X 200; 12, Orbulina suturalis, (Bronnimann) X 250; 13, Praeorbulina glomerosa, (Blow) X 200; 14, Praeorbulina sicana, (Cushman and Stainforth) X 200; 15, Uvigerina isidroensis, (Cushman and Renz) X 150; 16-17, Cibicorbis inflata, (d'Orbigny), (16) Dorsal view X 200, (17) Ventral view X 200; 18, Hanzawaia strattonii, (Applin) X 200; 19-20,Valvulineria gasperensis, (Bermudez) (19) Dorsal view X 200, (20) Ventral view X 200; 21, Lenticulina grandis,(Cushman) X 200; 22, Textularia laminata, (Cushman) X 100; 23, Brizalina mandoroviensis, (Graham) X 100; 24-25, Globorotalia mayeri, (Cushman and Ellisor) (24) Dorsal view X 200, (25) Ventral view X 200.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2017View details →

FIGURE 5 in Foraminifera biostratigraphy and paleoenvironment of Well 5, OML 34, Niger Delta, Nigeria

FIGURE 5. Triangular plot of shell-type ratio, showing portion of intersection as normal marine shelf sea environment (Modified after Murray, 1973).

FIGURE 8 in An exceptionally well-preserved skeleton of Thomashuxleya externa (Mammalia, Notoungulata), from the Eocene of Patagonia, Argentina

FIGURE 8. Strict consensus of 281 trees, 420 steps in length showing the phylogenetic relationships of Thomashuxleya within Notoungulata based on the morphological dataset of Deraco and García-López (2015). Numbers indicate bootstrap values above 50.

FIGURE 10 in An exceptionally well-preserved skeleton of Thomashuxleya externa (Mammalia, Notoungulata), from the Eocene of Patagonia, Argentina

FIGURE 10. Strict consensus of 620 trees, 122391 steps in length from parsimony analysis of combined proteomic and morphological data constraining monophyly of each of two clades (but not both together): Notoungulata (i.e., Thomashuxleya and Toxodon) and Litopterna (i.e., Protolipterna and Macrauchenia).

FIGURE 6 in An exceptionally well-preserved skeleton of Thomashuxleya externa (Mammalia, Notoungulata), from the Eocene of Patagonia, Argentina

FIGURE 6. Hindlimb of T. externa (MPEF-PV 8166). right pelvis in 1 dorsal and 2 lateral views; 3 right femur in anterior view; 4 right tibia in proximal (top), anterior (middle) and distal (bottom) views; left astragalus in 5 dorsal and 6 plantar views; 7 right navicular in proximal view; 8 navicular and entocuneiform in plantar views.

FIGURE 5 in An exceptionally well-preserved skeleton of Thomashuxleya externa (Mammalia, Notoungulata), from the Eocene of Patagonia, Argentina

FIGURE 5. Forelimb of T. externa (MPEF-PV 8166). 1 right and left ulnae in frontal view; 2 left ulna in medial view; right radius in 3 frontal, 4 lateral, and 5 posterior views.

FIGURE 4 in An exceptionally well-preserved skeleton of Thomashuxleya externa (Mammalia, Notoungulata), from the Eocene of Patagonia, Argentina

FIGURE 4. Scapulae and humeri of T. externa (MPEF-PV 8166). 1 right and 2 left scapulae in proximal view; 3 left scapula in dorsolateral view; right and left humeri in 4 right and left humeri in anterior (top) and distal (bottom) views; 5 right and left humeri in posterior view.

FIGURE 1 in An exceptionally well-preserved skeleton of Thomashuxleya externa (Mammalia, Notoungulata), from the Eocene of Patagonia, Argentina

FIGURE 1. Geographical and stratigraphical occurrence of MPEF-PV 8166. 1 location of Cañadón Vaca, Chubut, Argentina; 2 Paleogene time table and South American Land Mammal Ages (SALMAs) after (Woodburne et al. 2014a,b); 3 skeletal restoration of Thomashuxleya modified from Simpson (1936); 4 artistic reconstruction of Thomashuxleya externa (by Stjepan Lukac).

FIGURE 2 in An exceptionally well-preserved skeleton of Thomashuxleya externa (Mammalia, Notoungulata), from the Eocene of Patagonia, Argentina

FIGURE 2. Skull of T. externa (MPEF-PV 8166). 1 ventral view; 2 lateral view; 3 occiput in caudal view; 4 detail of upper dentition in occlusal view. Abbreviations are prot=protocone (part of the protoloph), par=paracone (part of the ectoloph), parst=parastyle, met=metacone (part of the ectoloph), metst=metastyle, meph=metaloph, pr.l.f.=primary lingual fold, m.cin=mesial cingulum, l.cin=lingual cingulum.

FIGURE 3 in An exceptionally well-preserved skeleton of Thomashuxleya externa (Mammalia, Notoungulata), from the Eocene of Patagonia, Argentina

FIGURE 3. Mandible of T. externa (MPEF-PV 8166) in 1 dorsal and 2 lateral views; 3 lower dentition in occlusal view. Abbreviations are tri=trigonid, tal=talonid, prod=protoconid, metd=metaconid, entd=entoconid, hypd=hypoconulid.

FIGURE 9 in An exceptionally well-preserved skeleton of Thomashuxleya externa (Mammalia, Notoungulata), from the Eocene of Patagonia, Argentina

FIGURE 9. Strict consensus of 510 trees, 122374 steps in length from unconstrained parsimony analysis of combined proteomic and morphological data.

FIGURE 12 in An exceptionally well-preserved skeleton of Thomashuxleya externa (Mammalia, Notoungulata), from the Eocene of Patagonia, Argentina

FIGURE 12. Optimal Bayesian tree (i.e., 50% majority rule of post-burn-in trees) of combined proteomic and morphological analysis constraining monophyly of each of two clades (but not both together): Notoungulata (i.e., Thomashuxleya and Toxodon) and Litopterna (i.e., Protolipterna and Macrauchenia). Numbers represent Bayesian posterior probabilities; daggers indicate fossil taxa.