Find research datasets worth reusing

opennotspecifiedJun 2021View details →

Fig. 1 in Carotenoid profiles of red- and yellow-colored arils of cultivars of Taxus baccata L. and Taxus × media Rehder

Fig. 1. HPLC-DAD chromatograms of carotenoids from (a) red arils of Taxus × media Rehder 'Hicksii' and (b) yellow arils of Taxus baccata L. 'Lutea' at 504 (450) and 475 nm, respectively. See Tables 2 and 3 for compound assignment. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Fig. 4 in Characterisation of Thai strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) cultivars with RAPD markers and metabolite profiling techniques

Fig. 4. Metabolite pathway display shows significant difference between Praratchatan No.80 and Akihime at 25Daa. Changes of metabolites are displayed as ratio>1 (blue), <1 (red), no change (grey) and not detected (white). Analysis comprised six biological replicates per cultivar. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Fig. 5 in Characterisation of Thai strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) cultivars with RAPD markers and metabolite profiling techniques

Fig. 5. PCA analysis of volatile analysis of Akihime and Praratchatan No.80. Freeze-dried tissue was analysed by SPME-GC-MS. Samples and metabolites are displayed as score plot (A) and loading plot (B). Six biological replicates are displayed individually.

Fig. 3 in Characterisation of Thai strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) cultivars with RAPD markers and metabolite profiling techniques

Fig. 3. Heatmap of metabolites detected in strawberry fruits of Praratchatan No.80 and Akihime. Metabolites were analysed by GC-MS and LC-MS from polar extracts and by GC-MS from non-polar extracts. Ripening stages are displayed as 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28Daa. Only significant compounds, as determined by twoway ANOVA analysis, are displayed. Biological replicates are displayed individually. A more detailed version of this figure is available as Supplementary Fig. 3.

Fig. 2 in Characterisation of Thai strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) cultivars with RAPD markers and metabolite profiling techniques

Fig. 2. Stages of fruit development from flower (FL) to overripe fruit of strawberry cultivar Akihime (A) and Praratchatan No.80 (B). Stages are labelled as days after anthesis (Daa). PCA analysis of metabolite composition of Praratchatan No.80 (circles) and Akihime (squares) at eight different fruit ripening stages (C). Metabolites of polar and non-polar extracts were analysed by GC-MS and LC-MS. Data includes 134 identified metabolites including primary and specialised metabolism. Analysis comprised six biological replicates, which are displayed individually.

Fig. 1 in Characterisation of Thai strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) cultivars with RAPD markers and metabolite profiling techniques

Fig. 1. Dendrograms of six strawberry varieties based on their genetic (A) and metabolic (B) similarities. The genetic information is based on the degree of band sharing of 228 polymorphic alleles. The metabolic data comprises 129 metabolites identified in polar and non-polar leaf extracts by GC-MS. (C) Representative leaf of six strawberry cultivars.

Fig. 5 in Transcriptome profiling of two Dactylis glomerata L. cultivars with different tolerance in response to submergence stress

Fig. 5. Gene Ontology (GO) classification of genes that only expressed differently in tolerant material 'Dianbei' and expressed differently between two materials all the time. (a) Gene Ontology (GO) classification of 1395 genes only expressed differently in tolerant material 'Dianbei'; (b) GO classification of 18 genes that were found to expressed differently between two materials all the time.

Fig. 1 in Transcriptome profiling of two Dactylis glomerata L. cultivars with different tolerance in response to submergence stress

Fig. 1. Hierarchical clustering analysis of changes in gene expression in two D. glomerata cultivars under submergence tolerance.

Fig. 3 in Transcriptome profiling of two Dactylis glomerata L. cultivars with different tolerance in response to submergence stress

Fig. 3. Gene Ontology (GO) classification of assembled unigenes in two D. glomerata cultivars, submergence-tolerant 'Dianbei' and submergence-sensitive 'Anba'.

Fig. 4 in Transcriptome profiling of two Dactylis glomerata L. cultivars with different tolerance in response to submergence stress

Fig. 4. Scatterplot of enriched KEGG pathways for differentially expressed genes between two D. glomerata cultivars.