Find research datasets worth reusing

FIG. 12 in Analysis of lichen secondary metabolites and morphometrics in the Cladonia chlorophaea species group (Cladoniaceae, lichenized Ascomycota) in Hungary

FIG. 12. — Cladonia cryptochlorophaea Asahina: A, habit (BP[BP 48938]); B, spots of lichen secondary metabolites on chromatographic plates; C, distribution in Hungary. Abbreviations: c, cryptochlorophaeic acid; nR, norrangiformic acid; F, fumarprotocetraric acid; Z, zeorin; N, norstictic acid. Scale bar: A, 2 mm.

FIG. 7 in Analysis of lichen secondary metabolites and morphometrics in the Cladonia chlorophaea species group (Cladoniaceae, lichenized Ascomycota) in Hungary

FIG. 7. — Width of podetium stalk (mm) in different species. Abbreviations: asa, C. asahinae (n = 22); chlo, C. chlorophaea (n = 55); cry, C. cryptochlorophaea (n = 53); gra, C. grayi (n = 17); mero, C. merochlorophaea (n = 70); novo, C. novochlorophaea (n = 10). The lines represent the minimum and maximum values, the box represents the 25% and 75% of the data, the thick line represents the median. Means with the same letter are not significantly different at 95% confidence.

FIG. 11 in Analysis of lichen secondary metabolites and morphometrics in the Cladonia chlorophaea species group (Cladoniaceae, lichenized Ascomycota) in Hungary

FIG. 11. — Cladonia chlorophaea (FlÖrke ex Sommerf.) Spreng.: A, habit (BP[BP 49014]); B, spots of lichen secondary metabolites on chromatographic plates; C, distribution in Hungary. Abbreviations: F, fumarprotocetraric acid; Z, zeorin; N, norstictic acid. Scale bar: A, 2 mm.

FIG. 6 in Analysis of lichen secondary metabolites and morphometrics in the Cladonia chlorophaea species group (Cladoniaceae, lichenized Ascomycota) in Hungary

FIG. 6. — Width of cup (mm) in different species. Abbreviations: asa, C. asahinae (n = 22); chlo, C. chlorophaea (n = 55); cry, C. cryptochlorophaea (n = 53); gra, C. grayi (n = 17); mero, C. merochlorophaea (n = 70); novo, C. novochlorophaea (n = 10). The lines represent the minimum and maximum values, the box represents the 25% and 75% of the data, the thick line represents the median. Means with the same letter are not significantly different at 95% confidence.

FIG. 10. — Cladonia asahinae J.W in Analysis of lichen secondary metabolites and morphometrics in the Cladonia chlorophaea species group (Cladoniaceae, lichenized Ascomycota) in Hungary

FIG. 10. — Cladonia asahinae J.W.Thomson: A, habit (BP[BP 9421]); B, spots of lichen secondary metabolites on chromatographic plates; C, distribution in Hungary. Abbrevations: R, rangiformic acid; nR, norrangiformic acid; F, fumarprotocetraric acid; Z, zeorin; N, norstictic acid. Scale bar: A, 2 mm.

FIG. 3 in Analysis of lichen secondary metabolites and morphometrics in the Cladonia chlorophaea species group (Cladoniaceae, lichenized Ascomycota) in Hungary

FIG. 3. — Conditional inference tree presenting the presence of the three most abundant lichen secondary metabolites occurring in more than one species of the C. chlorophaea species group. A level of p <0.05 was considered for a significant difference. Abbreviations: cch, cryptochlorophaeic acid; ran, rangiformic acid; tha, thamnolic acid; a, C. asahinae; ch, C. chlorophaea; cr, C. cryptochlorophaea; g, C. grayi; me, C. merochlorophaea; no, C. novochlorophaea. Boxes represent the highest probability of a species occurrence on the tree node.

FIG. 4 in Analysis of lichen secondary metabolites and morphometrics in the Cladonia chlorophaea species group (Cladoniaceae, lichenized Ascomycota) in Hungary

FIG. 4. — Height of podetia (mm) of the different species. Abbreviations: asa, C. asahinae (n = 22); chlo, C. chlorophaea (n = 55); cry, C. cryptochlorophaea (n = 53); gra, C. grayi (n = 17); mero, C. merochlorophaea (n = 70); novo, C. novochlorophaea (n = 10). The lines represent the minimum and maximum values, the box represents the 25% and 75% of the data, the thick line represents the median. Means with the same letter are not significantly different at 95% confidence.

Fig. 10 in Landmark and outline-based geometric morphometrics analysis of three Stomoxys flies (Diptera: Muscidae)

Fig. 10. Outline-based discriminant analysis. Factor map of canonical variates (i.e. discriminant factors) derived from the principal components of the Normalised Elliptic Fourier coefficients of three species of Stomoxys Geoffroy, 1762, in males (A) and females (B).

Fig. 6 in Landmark and outline-based geometric morphometrics analysis of three Stomoxys flies (Diptera: Muscidae)

Fig. 6. Configurations of the ten anatomical landmarks connected by a straight line after procrustes superimposition of three species of Stomoxys Geoffroy, 1762, in males (A) and females (B).

Fig. 2 in Landmark and outline-based geometric morphometrics analysis of three Stomoxys flies (Diptera: Muscidae)

Fig. 2. Morphological characters of tibia and tarsus used to separate Stomoxys pullus Austen, 1909 (A), S. uruma Shinonaga et Kano, 1966 (B) and S. indicus Picard, 1908 (C).

Fig. 3 in Landmark and outline-based geometric morphometrics analysis of three Stomoxys flies (Diptera: Muscidae)

Fig. 3. Ten landmarks digitised on wings of species of Stomoxys Geoffroy, 1762 flies for landmark-based geometric morphometrics analysis (see Table 2 for description).

Fig. 9 in Landmark and outline-based geometric morphometrics analysis of three Stomoxys flies (Diptera: Muscidae)

Fig. 9. Configurations of the outlines after Elliptic Fourier Analysis of Stomoxys pullus Austen, 1909, S. uruma Shinonaga et Kano, 1966 and S. indicus Picard, 1908, in males (A) and females (B). Areas outlined by different colours represent shape, not size.

Fig. 5 in Landmark and outline-based geometric morphometrics analysis of three Stomoxys flies (Diptera: Muscidae)

Fig. 5. Centroid size variation of the wings between species and sexes, shown as quartile boxes. Each box shows the group median separating the 25th and 75th quartiles. Vertical bars under the boxes represent the wing (units as mm).

Fig. 1 in Landmark and outline-based geometric morphometrics analysis of three Stomoxys flies (Diptera: Muscidae)

Fig. 1. Morphological characters of palpi used to separate Stomoxys pullus Austen, 1909 (A), S. uruma Shinonaga et Kano, 1966 (B) and S. indicus Picard, 1908 (C).

Fig. 8 in Landmark and outline-based geometric morphometrics analysis of three Stomoxys flies (Diptera: Muscidae)

Fig. 8. Perimeter variation of the wings between species and sexes, shown as quartile boxes. Each box shows the group median sepa- rating the 25th and 75th quartiles. Vertical bars under the boxes represent the wing (units as mm).

Fig. 7 in Landmark and outline-based geometric morphometrics analysis of three Stomoxys flies (Diptera: Muscidae)

Fig. 7. Landmark-based discriminant analysis. Factor map of canonical variates resulting from comparison among the three species of Stomoxys Geoffroy, 1762, in males (A) and females (B).

Fig. 4 in Landmark and outline-based geometric morphometrics analysis of three Stomoxys flies (Diptera: Muscidae)

Fig. 4. Contour digitised on Stomoxys Geoffroy, 1762 flies wing for outline-based geometric morphometrics analysis. A short, artificial segment is computed by the digitising program to completely close the contour.