Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 5 in Integrative taxonomy supports two new species of Macrobiotus (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae) allowing further discussion on the genus phylogeny

Fig. 5. Macrobiotus ovovittatus sp. nov., PCM images of the buccal apparatus, A–D. Holotype (GL.001.01, ISEA PAS). E. Paratype (ISEA PAS). A. An entire buccal apparatus. B–C. The oral cavity armature, dorsal and ventral teeth, respectively. D–E. Placoid morphology, dorsal and ventral placoids respectively. The filled flat arrowheads indicate the first band of teeth, the empty flat arrowheads indicate the second band of teeth, the filled indented arrowheads indicate the third band of teeth, and the empty indented arrowheads indicate central and subterminal constrictions in the first and second macroplacoid, respectively. Scale bars in μm.

Fig. 3 in Integrative taxonomy supports two new species of Macrobiotus (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae) allowing further discussion on the genus phylogeny

Fig. 3. Macrobiotus ovovittatus sp. nov., PCM (A, C, E) and SEM (B, D, F) images of dense granulation patches on legs of paratypes (ISEA PAS). A–B. Granulation on the external surface of leg III. C–D. Granulation on the internal surface of leg III and II, respectively. E–F. Granulation on the hind legs. The empty flat arrowheads indicate a single continuous cuticular bar above the claws, the filled flat arrowheads indicate a pulvinus-shaped cuticular bulge, and the filled indented arrowheads indicate shadowed extensions extending from the lunulae. Scale bars in μm.

Fig. 9 in Integrative taxonomy supports two new species of Macrobiotus (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae) allowing further discussion on the genus phylogeny

Fig. 9. Macrobiotus mileri sp. nov., PCM images of habitus and body granulation. A. Dorso-ventral projection (holotype, IL.001.11, ISEA PAS, forma aporata). B. Granulation in the dorsal cuticle (paratype, ISEA PAS, forma aporata). C. Granulation in the dorsal body cuticle (paratype, ISEA PAS, forma porata). Scale bars in μm.

Figure 4 in Integrative taxonomy supports two new species of Macrobiotus (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae) allowing further discussion on the genus phylogeny

Figure 4. Macrobiotus ovovittatus sp. nov., images of claws. A–C. PCM, holotype (GL.001.01, ISEA PAS). D–F. SEM, paratype (ISEA PAS). A. Claws II with smooth lunulae. B. Claws IV with dentate lunulae. C. Dentate lunulae. D–E. Claws II and III with smooth lunulae, respectively. F. Claws IV with dentate lunulae. The empty flat arrowheads indicate a single continuous cuticular bar above the claws, the filled indented arrowheads indicate shadowed extensions extending from the lunulae (under PCM) or the places where they should be expected (SEM), the filled flat arrowheads indicate paired muscles attachments, and the empty indented arrowheads indicate the horseshoe structure connecting the anterior and the posterior claw. Scale bars in μm.

F I G U R E 7 in Unravelling the taxonomy of an interstitial fish radiation: Three new species of Gouania (Teleostei: Gobiesocidae) from the Mediterranean Sea and redescriptions of G. willdenowi and G. pigra

F I G U R E 7 Gouania hofrichteri sp. nov., PMR VP4595, holotype, male, 30.35+3.67 mm, Souda Beach, Plakias, Crete, Greece. Lateral view of specimen preserved in 4% formaldehyde (top). Lateral, dorsal and ventral view, alive (below). Photographs by M. Wagner and M. Kovacˇic

F I G U R E 9 in Unravelling the taxonomy of an interstitial fish radiation: Three new species of Gouania (Teleostei: Gobiesocidae) from the Mediterranean Sea and redescriptions of G. willdenowi and G. pigra

F I G U R E 9 Gouania willdenowi (Risso 1810), PMR VP4574, neotype, male, 46.11+6.56 mm, Cagnes-sur-mer, Nice, France. Lateral view of specimen preserved in 4% formaldehyde (top). Lateral, dorsal and ventral view, alive (below). Photographs by M. Wagner and M. Kovacˇic

F I G U R E 1 0 in Unravelling the taxonomy of an interstitial fish radiation: Three new species of Gouania (Teleostei: Gobiesocidae) from the Mediterranean Sea and redescriptions of G. willdenowi and G. pigra

F I G U R E 1 0 Results of DNA-barcoding analyses. (a) Net between-group mean distances (mean and S.E.). The phylogeny shown in this figure is based on Wagner et al. (2019). (b) DNA-barcoding gap represented by boxplots showing maximum intraspecific and minimum interspecific divergences in %

F I G U R E 6 in Unravelling the taxonomy of an interstitial fish radiation: Three new species of Gouania (Teleostei: Gobiesocidae) from the Mediterranean Sea and redescriptions of G. willdenowi and G. pigra

F I G U R E 6 Gouania orientalis sp. nov., PMR VP4585, holotype, male, 32.8+4.93 mm, Plakias, Crete, Greece. Lateral view of specimen preserved in 4% formaldehyde (top). Lateral, dorsal and ventral view, alive (below). Photographs by M. Wagner and M. Kovacˇic

F I G U R E 8 in Unravelling the taxonomy of an interstitial fish radiation: Three new species of Gouania (Teleostei: Gobiesocidae) from the Mediterranean Sea and redescriptions of G. willdenowi and G. pigra

F I G U R E 8 Gouania pigra (Nardo, 1827), PMR VP3529, neotype, female, 43.12+5.03 mm, Glavotok, Krk, Croatia. Lateral view of specimen preserved in 4% formaldehyde (top). Lateral, dorsal and ventral view, alive (below). Photographs by M. Wagner and M. Kovacˇic

F I G U R E 5 in Unravelling the taxonomy of an interstitial fish radiation: Three new species of Gouania (Teleostei: Gobiesocidae) from the Mediterranean Sea and redescriptions of G. willdenowi and G. pigra

F I G U R E 5 Head osteology of Gouania species. (a) G. adriatica sp. nov. (PMR VP4618 – Holotype), (b) G. orientalis sp. nov. (PMR VP4585 – Holotype), (c) G. hofrichteri sp. nov. (ZSM-PIS- 047656 – Paratype), (d) G. pigra (Nardo 1827) (PMR VP3531 – Other material) and (e) G. willdenowi (Risso 1810) (ZSM-PIS-0476654 – Other material). Red, ceratobranchial 5; orange, premaxillary bone; blue, maxillary bone; green, nasal bone

F I G U R E 3 in Unravelling the taxonomy of an interstitial fish radiation: Three new species of Gouania (Teleostei: Gobiesocidae) from the Mediterranean Sea and redescriptions of G. willdenowi and G. pigra

F I G U R E 3 Gouania adriatica sp. nov., PMR VP4618, holotype, male, 41.41+6.77 mm, Stoja, Pula. Lateral view of specimen preserved in 4% formaldehyde (top). Lateral, dorsal and ventral view, alive (below). Photographs by M. Wagner and M. Kovacˇic

F I G U R E 4 in Unravelling the taxonomy of an interstitial fish radiation: Three new species of Gouania (Teleostei: Gobiesocidae) from the Mediterranean Sea and redescriptions of G. willdenowi and G. pigra

F I G U R E 4 Sucking discs and disc-papillae of Gouania species. (a) G. adriatica sp. nov. (PMR VP4618 – Holotype), (b) G. orientalis sp. nov. (PMR VP4585 – Holotype), (c) G. hofrichteri sp. nov. (PMR VP4595 – Holotype), (d) G. pigra (Nardo 1827) (ZSM-PIS-047649 – Other material) and (e) G. willdenowi (Risso 1810) (PMR VP4574 – Neotype). (f) Males of Gouania can have seemingly perfused prominent finger-like extensions on sucking disc edge in region A.A, B and C correspond to disc regions. Photographs by M. Wagner

F I G U R E 1 in Unravelling the taxonomy of an interstitial fish radiation: Three new species of Gouania (Teleostei: Gobiesocidae) from the Mediterranean Sea and redescriptions of G. willdenowi and G. pigra

F I G U R E 1 Geographical distribution ranges and ecology. (a) Distribution ranges of single Gouania species. The data shown are based on genetic, morphological and field observations as well as on historical findings mentioned by Hofrichter (1995) (all his records combined the species in G. willdenowi described here). Type and location of water currents are based on data provided by El-Geziry and Bryden (2010). Numbers 1–23 indicate sampling sites (compare with Supporting Information Table S1). (b) Female Gouania pigra (Nardo, 1827) in the interstitial of pebbles (photo taken in aquarium); see Supporting Information Video S1 for behaviour. (c) Trstenik (Pelješac, Croatia) – a site where G. pigra, G. adriatica sp. nov. and G. hofrichteri sp. nov. were found in sympatry. Photographs by M. Wagner

F I G U R E 2 in Unravelling the taxonomy of an interstitial fish radiation: Three new species of Gouania (Teleostei: Gobiesocidae) from the Mediterranean Sea and redescriptions of G. willdenowi and G. pigra

F I G U R E 2 Comparative morphological overview and lateral line system. (a) Main morphological characteristics of head region of (a) G. adriatica sp. nov. (PMR VP4618 – Holotype), (b) G. orientalis sp. nov. (PMR VP4585 – Holotype), (c) G. hofrichteri sp. nov. (PMR VP4595 – Holotype) and (d) G. pigra (Nardo 1827) (PMR VP3529 – Neotype). (e) Position of pores (bold) and neuromasts (italic) shown on the example of G. willdenowi (Risso 1810) (PMR VP4574 – Neotype) and the main morphological characteristics in the head region of this species. (f) Longitudinal infralateral and suborbital transversal rows of superficial neuromasts can be placed on the well-defined bottom of a deep (+) or shallow (–) groove. U, upper opercular tip; Abbreviations: L, lower opercular tip; SR, supralabial row; NR, nasal row; LIR, longitudinal infralateral; STR, suborbital transversal row; POR, postorbital transversal row; PTR, preopercular transversal row; SLR, subopercular longitudinal row; MR, mandibular row; AVR, anterior ventral row; PVR, posterior ventral row; ADR, anterior dorsal row; PDR, posterior dorsal row; HR, hyomandibular row; SR1, supraopercular row; SR2, suprapectoral row; DLR, dorsolateral longitudinal row; VLR, ventrolateral longitudinal row. Photographs by M. Wagner and M. Kovacˇic

opencc-by-4.0May 2021View details →

Fig 10 in Correction: Integrated Taxonomy Reveals Hidden Diversity in Northern Australian Fishes: A New Species of Seamoth (Genus Pegasus)

Fig 10. Molecular species identification of Pegasus species using Genetic treeML trees. (A) sequences from the 16S gene; (B) sequences from the COI gene. Trees are based on the K2 evolutionary distance model and are shown here with mined Pegasus and Eurypegasus sequences from GenBank. The trees are shown here with an E. draconis outgroup. Bootstrap support values (following 1000 replicates) are shown above the nodes. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251680.g001

Fig. 11 in Taxonomy Of The Genus Blindus Mulsant Et Rey From China, With Description Of Two New Species (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae, Pedinini)

Fig. 11. Habitus of Blindus, male, dorsal view: A = Blindus contractus sp. n., B = B. discolor sp. n., C = B. curvotibius Ren et Zhang, 2010, D = B. fulvicornis (Reitter, 1889), E = B. potanini nudiventris Medvedev, 1968, F = B. potanini potanini Medvedev, 1968, G = B. reichardti Medvedev, 1968, H = B. strigosus (Faldermann, 1835), I = B. thibetanus (Fairmaire, 1897). Scale bars = 1 mm.

Fig. 10 in Taxonomy Of The Genus Blindus Mulsant Et Rey From China, With Description Of Two New Species (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae, Pedinini)

Fig. 10. Spiculum gastrales of Blindus, dorsal view: A = B. contractus sp. n., B = B. discolor sp. n., C = B. curvotibius Ren et Zhang, 2010, D = B. fulvicornis (Reitter, 1889), E = B. potanini nudiventris Medvedev, 1968, F = B. potanini potanini Medvedev, 1968, G = B. reichardti Medvedev, 1968, H = B. strigosus (Faldermann, 1835), I = B. thibetanus (Fairmaire, 1897). Scale bars = 1 mm.

Fig. 8 in Taxonomy Of The Genus Blindus Mulsant Et Rey From China, With Description Of Two New Species (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae, Pedinini)

Fig. 8. Metafemora of Blindus, ventral view: A = Blindus contractus sp. n., B = B. discolor sp. n., C = B. curvotibius Ren et Zhang, 2010, D = B. fulvicornis (Reitter, 1889), E = B. potanini nudiventris Medvedev, 1968, F = B. potaninipotanini Medvedev, 1968, G = B. reichardti Medvedev, 1968, H = B. strigosus (Faldermann, 1835), I = B. thibetanus (Fairmaire, 1897). Scale bars = 1 mm.

Fig. 6 in Taxonomy Of The Genus Blindus Mulsant Et Rey From China, With Description Of Two New Species (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae, Pedinini)

Fig. 6. Protibiae of Blindus, ventral view: A = Blindus contractus sp. n., B = B. discolor sp. n., C = B. curvotibius Ren et Zhang, 2010, D = B. fulvicornis (Reitter, 1889), E = B. potanini nudiventris Medvedev, 1968, F = B. potanini potanini Medvedev, 1968, G = B. reichardti Medvedev, 1968, H = B. strigosus (Faldermann, 1835), I = B. thibetanus (Fairmaire, 1897). Scale bars = 1 mm.

Fig. 5 in Taxonomy Of The Genus Blindus Mulsant Et Rey From China, With Description Of Two New Species (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae, Pedinini)

Fig. 5. Protibiae of Blindus, dorsal view: A = Blindus contractus sp. n., B = B. discolor sp. n., C = B. curvotibius Ren et Zhang, 2010, D = B. fulvicornis (Reitter, 1889), E = B. potanini nudiventris Medvedev, 1968, F = B. potanini potanini Medvedev, 1968, G = B. reichardti Medvedev, 1968, H = B. strigosus (Faldermann, 1835), I = B. thibetanus (Fairmaire, 1897). Scale bars = 1 mm.