Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
709
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
709 results for “soil carbon”
Dataset for Aqueous habitats and carbon inputs shape the microscale geography and interaction ranges of soil bacteria
<p>This repository hosts data for the paper entitled: "<em>Aqueous habitats and carbon inputs shape the microscale geography and interaction ranges of soil bacteria</em>" by Samuel Bickel and Dani Or.</p> <p>The following files are provided:</p> <p><strong>Microcosm experiment:</strong></p> <p>- Fluorescence microscopy images of the microcosm experiment (*.tif)</p> <p>- Code used for extracting cell locations from images (image_analysis.py)</p> <p><strong>Global model estimates from the bacterial interactions heuristic model:</strong></p> <p>- Maps of estimated cell density and proportion of biomass associated with anoxic cell clusters (*.nc)</p> <p> </p>
Realistic soil carbon sequestration considering food security and climate change
<p>This dataset contains soil organic carbon stocks as described in Keel et al. Global Change Biology (submitted)</p> <p>Annual soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks (t C ha-1, 0-30 cm depth) of Swiss agricultural soils simulated with the model RothC for the years 2020-2100. Simulations were performed for 240 strata (regions with similar agricultural production types, climatic conditions and clay content). The SOC stocks are weighted averages across strata for the national scale. <br> Each column contains SOC stocks for a specific combination of a climate model chains (nine in total) and an emission scenario (three in total: RCP 26, RCP 45, RCP 85) (specified in column header). </p> <p>The results include simulated SOC stocks for a baseline scenario and five soil carbon sequestration (SCS) scenarios (cover crops, biochar amendment at two rates, biochar amendment based on biomass from two agroforestry scenarios). <br> The SCS scenarios were only performed on cropland, therefore there is only a single file for grassland (the baseline scenario). <br> All simulations (i.e. baseline as well as the five scenarios) account for changes in crop shares and organic matter additions associated with growing food demand as well as climate change. </p> <p>The scenarios are described in Keel et al. Global Change Biology (submitted)</p> <p>CL_baseline: Baseline scenario for cropland (CL) <br> GL_baseline: Baseline scenario for permanent grassland (GL)<br> CL_cover_crops: Cover crop scenario for cropland <br> CL_biochar_I: Biochar I scenario for cropland <br> CL_biochar_II: Biochar II scenario for cropland <br> CL_agroforestry_I: Agroforestry I scenario for cropland <br> CL_agroforestry_II: Agroforestry II scenario for cropland </p>
Plant management but not fertilization mediates soil carbon emission and microbial community composition in subtropical Eucalyptus plantations
<p><span>The diversity of </span><span>plant functional group</span><span>s</span><span> in plantations affects soil carbon, but we have limited understanding of the underlying mechanisms for how plant management affects soil carbon dynamics. Here, we conducted a 3-year manipulation experiment of plant functional groups that included understory removal, tree root trenching, and fertilization treatments in 2-year-old and 6-year-old <em>Eucalyptus</em> plantations in the subtropical region. The results showed that soil respiration was significantly suppressed by understory removal (-38%), tree root trenching (-41%), and their interactions (-54%), but that fertilization alone and in interactions had no significant effect. The Chao1 indices for soil bacterial and fungal diversity significantly decreased with understory removal in the 2-year-old plantation and with tree root trenching in the 6-year-old plantation. Soil bacterial and fungal communities were also affected by understory removal and tree root trenching. Soil respiration, physicochemical characteristics, microbial diversity, and community composition were significantly affected by plantation age. Reductions in soil carbon emissions were associated with reductions in plant functional groups and soil microbial groups, while increases in soil respiration were associated with soil physicochemical factors, soil temperature, and plantation age. Our findings highlight that plant managements are of great significance to the soil carbon emission processes in afforested plantations.</span></p>
Data set on soil physicochemical parameters, biomass accumulation and carbon credit generation in different management systems in Rio Verde, GO, Brazil
<h1>Description</h1> <p>This repository contains a comprehensive dataset focused on soil organic carbon and its role in mitigating climate change through carbon sequestration on agricultural lands in Rio Verde, GO, Brazil. With the global imperative to reduce anthropogenic CO2 emissions, our data highlights the effectiveness of no-till agricultural practices in both improving soil quality and enhancing carbon storage. This collection represents extensive soil and biomass sampling from five distinct areas within the Cerrado region, utilizing three priority management systems:</p> <p>No-till with soybean and maize in sequence under rainfed conditions. No-till with soybean and maize in sequence with central pivot irrigation. First and second cuts of sugarcane. The samples were meticulously collected post-harvest and used to estimate both soil biomass accumulation and carbon stock indices. A thorough analysis of the soil's physicochemical parameters was conducted for the 0-20 cm soil profile in each area. This dataset not only provides a valuable resource for studying the impact of different no-till practices on carbon sequestration but also serves as a critical input for modeling future contributions of conservation management systems to carbon trading markets.</p> <div> <div> </div> <div> <h2>Data Contents</h2> </div> <p>Soil organic carbon measurements for various no-till systems. Biomass accumulation data post-harvest. Carbon stock indices derived from biomass samples. Detailed physicochemical profiles of soil samples.</p> <div> <h2>Significance</h2> </div> <p>This dataset is pivotal for researchers and policymakers focusing on the potentials of agricultural carbon sequestration and its implications for carbon trading schemes. It offers insights into the current contributions of no-till conservation management systems and aids in the development of future strategies to enhance carbon</p> <h1>Metadata Description and Script</h1> </div> <p>This repository contains two key data files that encapsulate diverse aspects of soil physicochemical parameters, biomass accumulation, and carbon credit generation across different management systems in Rio Verde, GO, Brazil. Below are descriptions of each file's contents and structure.</p> <div> <h2>all.txt</h2> </div> <p>This text file presents aggregated data from various sites under different agricultural management systems. Each row in the dataset represents measurements from distinct sample plots, with the following fields:</p> <ul> <li><code>Sites</code> - Identifier for the plot location.</li> <li><code>SB</code> - Soil bulk density (g/cm³).</li> <li><code>SOC</code> - Soil organic carbon (%).</li> <li><code>Stock</code> - Carbon stock (ton/ha).</li> <li><code>Biomass</code> - Biomass accumulation (ton/ha).</li> <li><code>Credits</code> - Estimated carbon credits (ton CO2 equivalent/ha).</li> </ul> <div> <h2>Quimica.xlsx</h2> </div> <p>This Excel file provides detailed physicochemical analyses of soil samples from different management zones in the study area. The data is structured to support in-depth analysis of soil characteristics influencing carbon sequestration capabilities. Each sheet in the workbook corresponds to a specific area, with columns typically representing:</p> <ul> <li><code>pH</code> - Soil pH, indicating the acidity or alkalinity.</li> <li><code>EC</code> - Electrical conductivity (dS/m).</li> <li><code>Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC):</code> - (meq/100g).</li> <li><code>Organipont c Matter:</code> - (%).</li> <li><code>NPK levels</code> - Concentrations of Nitrogen (N), Phosphorus (P), and Potassium (K).</li> </ul>
Carbon stock increase during post-agricultural succession in central France: no change of the superficial soil stock and high variability within forest stages
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Carbon sequestration potential in hedgerow soils: Results from 23 sites in Germany
<p>Dataset to the manuscript: Drexler, S. & Don, A. (2024). Carbon sequestration potential in hedgerow soils: Results from 23 sites in Germany. Geoderma. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.116878">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.116878</a></p> <ul> <li>Drexler_Don_2024_Data: contains the lab data for all samples</li> <li>Drexler_Don_2024_SOC_Stock_Per_Core: contains the calculated SOC stocks per soil core</li> </ul>
Land management controls on soil carbon fluxes in Asia's largest tropical grassland
<p>Data files for 'Land management controls on soil carbon fluxes in Asia’s largest tropical grassland', submitted to Ecological Indicators on 15 May 2024.</p>
Supporting data for "Granularity of model input data impacts estimates of carbon storage in soils"
<p>The exchange of carbon between the soil and the atmosphere is an important factor in climate change. Soil organic carbon (SOC) storage is sensitive to land management, soil properties, and climatic conditions, and these data serve as key inputs to computer models projecting SOC change. Farmland has been identified as a sink for atmospheric carbon, and we have previously estimated the potential for SOC sequestration in agricultural soils in Vermont, USA using the Rothamsted Carbon Model. However, fine spatial-scale (high granularity) input data are not always available, which can limit the skill of SOC projections. For example, climate projections are often only available at scales of 10s to 100s of km2. To overcome this, we use a climate projection dataset downscaled to <1 km2 (~18,000 cells). We compare SOC from runs forced by high granularity input data to runs forced by aggregated data averaged over the 11,690 km2 study region. We spin up and run the model individually for each cell in the fine-scale runs and for the region in the aggregated runs factorially over three agricultural land uses and four Global Climate Models. </p> <p>In this repository are the downscaled climate input data that drive the RothC model, as well as the model outputs for each GCM.</p>
Total data for global pattern of organic carbon pools in forest soil
<p>Understanding the mechanisms of soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration in forests is vital to ecosystem carbon budgeting, and helps gain insight in the functioning and sustainable management of world forests. An explicit knowledge of the mechanisms driving global SOC sequestration in forests is still lacking because of the complex interplays between climate, soil and forest type in influencing SOC pool size and stability. Based on a synthesis of 1179 observations from 292 studies across global forests, we quantified the relative importance of climate, soil property and forest type on total SOC content and the specific contents of physical (particulate vs. mineral-associated SOC) and chemical (labile vs. recalcitrant SOC) pools in upper 10 cm mineral soils, as well as SOC stock in the O horizons. The variability in the total SOC content of the mineral soils was better explained by climate (47~60%) and soil factors (26%~50%) than by NPP (10~20%). The total SOC content and contents of particulate (POC) and recalcitrant SOC (ROC) of the mineral soils all decreased with increasing mean annual temperature because SOC decomposition overrides the C replenishment under warmer climate. The content of mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC) was influenced by temperature, which directly affected microbial activity. Additionally, the presence of clay and iron oxides physically protected SOC by forming MAOC. The SOC stock in the O horizons was larger in the temperate zone and Mediterranean regions than in the boreal and sub/tropical zones. Mixed forests had 64% larger SOC pools than either broadleaf or coniferous forests, because of i) higher productivity, and ii) litter input from different tree species resulting in diversification of molecular composition of SOC and microbial community. While climate, soil and forest type jointly determine the formation and stability of SOC, climate predominantly controls the global patterns of SOC pools in forest ecosystems.</p>
Database Manuscript Temperature and moisture are minor drivers of regional-scale soil organic carbon dynamics - Gonzalez Dominguez et al
<p>The database contained the data used in the manuscript <strong>Temperature and moisture are minor drivers of regional-scale soil organic carbon dynamics, by Gonzalez Dominguez et al. </strong></p>
Dataset for the article Maintaining favourable carbon balance in boreal clay soil is challenging even under no-till and crop diversification
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Soil and understory CO2 respiration, CH4, and N2O fluxes, tree biomass and litter, and soil carbon stock after a long-term N fertilization of a Scots pine forest in Finland
<p>Data of forest soil respiration, soil and undestory respiration, CH4, and N2O fluxes, soil temperature and volumetric water content (Data_Karstula_GHG_temp.swc.csv), continuous soil temperature and moisture data (Data_Karstula_measured_temperature_2021_2023.csv, Data_Karstula_measured_moisture_2021_2023.csv), forest biomass and litter (Data_Karstula_total_biomass_litter.csv, Data_Karstula_measured_litter_2021_2023.csv), and soil C stocks (Data_Karstula_soc.csv) from the boreal Scots pine forest site Karstula after a long-term N fertilization in Finland (62°54'43.343"N; 24°34'16.021"E).</p> <p>The dataset is used for the publication "Tupek et al. : <strong>Lower sensitivity of microbial respiration to soil moisture after long-term N fertilization increases soil carbon retention in a Scots pine forest</strong>. 2024".</p>
Long-term biochar and soil organic carbon stability– Evidence from field experiments in Germany-ROW DATA
<p> Row data for researcher paper Long-term biochar and soil organic carbon stability– Evidence from field experiments in Germany</p>
Text-fig. 4. Stratigraphic correlation of the five major fossil-bearing localities in the Mikhailovka quarry near Zheleznogorsk. 1 – loesses and soils, 2 – unlaminated loams, 3 – laminated loams, 4 – clays, 5 – sands, 6 – gravels, 7 – carbonate concretions, 8 – mollusk shells, 9 – small mammal remains, 10 – insect remains, 11 – plant macroremains. in Late Pleistocene (Eemian) Mollusk And Small Mammal Fauna From Mikhailovka-5 (Kursk Oblast, Central Russia)
Text-fig. 4. Stratigraphic correlation of the five major fossil-bearing localities in the Mikhailovka quarry near Zheleznogorsk. 1 – loesses and soils, 2 – unlaminated loams, 3 – laminated loams, 4 – clays, 5 – sands, 6 – gravels, 7 – carbonate concretions, 8 – mollusk shells, 9 – small mammal remains, 10 – insect remains, 11 – plant macroremains.
data sets for the article Short‑term impact of crop diversifcation on soil carbon fuxes and balance in rainfed and irrigated woody cropping systems under semiarid Mediterranean conditions
<p>Diversifcation practices such as intercropping in woody cropping systems have recently been proposed as a promising management strategy for addressing problems related to soil degradation, climate change mitigation and food security. In this study, we assess the impact of several diversifcation practices in diferent management regimes on the main carbon fuxes regulating the soil carbon balance under semiarid Mediterranean conditions.</p>
Data and scripts associated with "Rock weathering controls soil carbon storage potential at a continental scale"
<p>The zipped folder contains the following files:</p> <p>CONUS_mineral_grid.csv [gridded soil mineralogy maps, with coordinates representing cell centers]</p> <p>CONUS_grid.csv [blank grid, used for reproducing the analysis]</p> <p>NCSS_datamerge_071321.R [core script used for running the analyses presented in the associated publication]</p> <p>apply_depthwtavg.R [wrapper function for depth weighted averaging]</p> <p>attach_ENV.R [function to attach climate data]</p> <p>bootstrap_functions.R [functions for spatial bootstrap statistics]</p> <p>depthweightavg.R [function for calculating depth weighted averages]</p> <p>get_MWBM.R [function for compiling climate data into averages]</p> <p>get_SLP.R [function for reading and pre-processing the NASGLP dataset</p> <p>SLP_IDW.R [inverse distance weighting function interpolating the NASGLP data at query points]</p> <p>weather_calcs.R [secondary calculations partitioning Al and Fe; weathering rate estimation]</p>
Rates of greenhouse gas (carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide) fluxes, denitrification-derived N2O and N2 fluxes and nitrification-derived N2O fluxes from salt marsh soils in Quebec, Canada and Louisiana, U.S. under ambient and elevated temperature and nutrient loading.
<p>Dataset used in <a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10533-023-01104-0?utm_source=rct_congratemailt&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=oa_20231214&utm_content=10.1007/s10533-023-01104-0#citeas">Elevated temperature and nutrients lead to increased N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from salt marsh soils from cold and warm climates</a>.</p> <p>The dataset contains fluxes calculated from headspace gas samples taken over a 24 hour period from intact soil cores, as well as corresponding environmental data. Intact soil cores (0-15 cm depth, 2.5 cm diameter) were taken at five sampling locations along a 20 m transect using a soil auger or piston corer. Samples were collected along a transect in four marsh sites in Quebec, Canada (La Pocatière: 47°22'24.7"N 70°03'26.3"W) and Louisiana, U.S. (Barataria Basin: 29°33'47.3"N 90°04'22.8"W and 29°29'52.2"N 89°55'00.2"W) from two vegetation types (<em>Sporobolus alterniflorus</em> formerly known as <em>Spartina alterniflora </em>and<em> Sporobolus pumilus</em> formerly known as<em> Spartina patens</em>). In Quebec, the two vegetation zones were in the same marsh whereas in Louisiana two separate marshes, dominated by the relevant vegetation, were chosen. Soil samples were collected on the 20-21<sup>st</sup> July 2021 from Louisiana and the 9-10<sup>th</sup> August 2021 from Quebec. Environmental data was collected including <em>in-situ</em> soil temperature and salinity, and gravimetric soil moisture, extractable soil dissolved organic carbon (DOC), extractable soil total dissolved nitrogen (TDN), extractable soil nitrate, extractable soil ammonium, extractable soil soluble reactive phosphate, soil total carbon, soil total nitrogen, soil carbon to nitrogen ratio, soil d<sup>13</sup>C and soil d<sup>15</sup>N determined from additional 0-15 cm core samples. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under Grant Agreement no. 838296, a NSERC Discovery Grant and a Natural Environment Research Council grant number (NE/T012323/1).</p> <p>Stable <sup>15</sup>N tracers were added to the intact soil cores so that at each location, at each treatment level (ambient and elevated, described below), there was one core receiving no tracer for greenhouse gas fluxes, one core receiving <sup>15</sup>N-NO<sub>3</sub><sup>‑ </sup>for denitrification rates and one core receiving <sup>15</sup>N-NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> for nitrification rates. The cores were incubated at ambient temperature (16 ℃ and 28.1 ℃ for Quebec and Louisiana, respectively) and nutrient concentrations (3.2 NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>, 2.0 NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>; 2.9 NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>, 2.5 NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>; 0.5 NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>, 7.3 NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+ </sup>and 5.7 NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>, 2.8 NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> mg g wet soil<sup>-1</sup> for Quebec <em>S. alterniflorus</em>, Quebec <em>S. pumilus</em>, Louisiana <em>S. alterniflorus</em> and Louisiana <em>S. pumilus</em>, respectively), and elevated temperature (ambient temperature +5 ℃) and nutrient concentration (double ambient concentration). Gas samples were collected from the headspace of 0-15 cm intact cores in a 20 cm high PVC pipe, capped at the top and bottom to create a 5 cm headspace. Gas samples were analysed for greenhouse gases (GHGs: N<sub>2</sub>O, CH<sub>4</sub>, CO<sub>2</sub>) and <sup>15</sup>N in denitrification-derived N<sub>2</sub>O, denitrification-derived N<sub>2</sub> and nitrification-derived N­<sub>2</sub>O.</p> <p>Soil temperature (YSI 30, Baton Rouge, USA or DeltaTrak 11050, Pleasanton, USA) and porewater salinity (YSI 30, Baton Rouge, USA or portable ATC refractometer) were measured in-situ or in the laboratory using the portable refactometer. Additional soil samples were used for multiple analyses; one subsample was extracted with ultrapure water (18.2 MΩ) for DOC and TDN analysis, one subsample was extracted with 2M KCl for NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> and NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>, one subsample was extracted with Olsen-P solution (0.5 M NaHCO<sub>3</sub>, pH 8.5), for soluble reactive phosphate analysis and one subsample was weighed and dried for soil moisture and then finely ground and analysed for total carbon, total nitrogen, d<sup>13</sup>C and d<sup>15</sup>N.</p> <p>N<sub>2</sub>O, CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations were measured in the gas samples using a gas chromatograph interfaced with a PAL3 autosampler (Agilent 7890A, Agilent Technologies Ltd, USA) fitted with a flame ionisation detector (FID) for CH<sub>4</sub> analysis and a micro electron capture detector (mECD) for N<sub>2</sub>O analysis. CO<sub>2</sub> was methanised to CH<sub>4</sub> before analysis on the FID. The instrument precision as the relative standard deviation was < 5 % for all of the gases, while the minimum detectable concentration difference (MDCD) was 9 ppb N<sub>2</sub>O, 72 ppb CH<sub>4 </sub>and 31 ppm CO<sub>2</sub>. Potential GHG fluxes were calculated from the linear portion or where the highest production was observed in the concentration-time series ( https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2003.2436). If fluxes were below the MDCD they were set to zero see (https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JG003783). The <sup>15</sup>N content of the N<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O was determined using a continuous flow isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Elementar Isoprime PrecisION; Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Hanau, Germany) coupled with a trace-gas pre-concentrator inlet with autosampler (isoFLOW GHG; Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Hanau, Germany), with a standard deviation of d<sup>15</sup>N < 0.05 %. Extractable dissolved organic carbon and total dissolved nitrogen were analysed in soil extractant (ultrapure water 18.2 MΩ, 7:1 of extractant to soil) on a TOC/TDN analyser (TOC VCSn + TMN-1, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), with 50 mg C l<sup>-1</sup> and 10 mg l<sup>-1</sup> standards resulting in accuracy and precision of 0.3 and ±0.3 mg C l<sup>-1</sup>, and 0.5 and ±0.3 mg N l<sup>-1</sup>, respectively. Extractable nitrate+nitrite (assumed to be nitrate) and ammonium were analysed in soil extractant (2M KCl, 5:1 of extractant to soil) using a microplate reader and methods in Sims et al., 1995 (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629509369298">https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629509369298</a>) with a limit of detection of 0.1 ppm and accuracy of ±5 %. Extractable phosphate was analysed in soil extractant (Olsen-P solution 0.5M NaHCO­<sub>3</sub>, pH 8.5, 10:1 of extractant to dry soil) using a microplate reader and methods in Jeannotte et al., 2004 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-004-0760-4) with a limit of detection of 1 mg P l<sup>-1</sup> and accuracy of ±6 %. Soil total carbon, total nitrogen, d<sup>13</sup>C and d<sup>15</sup>N analysis was performed using a continuous flow isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Elementar Isoprime PrecisION; Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Hanau, Germany) coupled with an elemental analyser (EA) inlet (vario PYRO cube; Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Hanau, Germany). The precision was < 5 % for both C and N and the precision as a standard deviation was < 0.06 % for both d<sup>13</sup>C and d<sup>15</sup>N. Results from the experiments were entered into an Excel spreadsheet for ingestion into the Zenodo data repository.</p>
Soil organic carbon models need independent time-series validation for reliable prediction
<p>Supplementary Data 1 to the paper: Soil organic carbon models need independent time-series validation for reliable prediction</p> <p>By: Le Noë, J., Manzoni, S., Abramoff, R.Z., Bölscher, T., Bruni, E., Cardinael, R., Ciais, P., Chenu, C., Clivot, H., Derrien, D., Ferchaud, F., Garnier, P., Goll, D., Lashermes, G., Martin, M.P., Rasse, D., Rees, F., Sainte-Marie, J., Salmon, E., Schiedung, M., Schimel, J., Wieder, W.R., Abiven, S., Barré, P., Cécillon, L., Guenet, B.</p>
Upscaling soil organic carbon measurements at the continental scale using multivariate clustering analysis and machine learning
<p><strong>Data Description</strong>:</p> <p>To improve SOC estimation in the United States, we upscaled site-based SOC measurements to the continental scale using multivariate geographic clustering (MGC) approach coupled with machine learning models. First, we used the MGC approach to segment the United States at 30 arc second resolution based on principal component information from environmental covariates (gNATSGO soil properties, WorldClim bioclimatic variables, MODIS biological variables, and physiographic variables) to 20 SOC regions. We then trained separate random forest model ensembles for each of the SOC regions identified using environmental covariates and soil profile measurements from the International Soil Carbon Network (ISCN) and an Alaska soil profile data. We estimated United States SOC for 0-30 cm and 0-100 cm depths were 52.6 + 3.2 and 108.3 + 8.2 Pg C, respectively.</p> <p>Files in collection (32):</p> <p>Collection contains 22 soil properties geospatial rasters, 4 soil SOC geospatial rasters, 2 ISCN site SOC observations csv files, and 4 R scripts</p> <p>gNATSGO TIF files:</p> <p>├── available_water_storage_30arc_30cm_us.tif [30 cm depth soil available water storage]<br> ├── available_water_storage_30arc_100cm_us.tif [100 cm depth soil available water storage]<br> ├── caco3_30arc_30cm_us.tif [30 cm depth soil CaCO3 content]<br> ├── caco3_30arc_100cm_us.tif [100 cm depth soil CaCO3 content]<br> ├── cec_30arc_30cm_us.tif [30 cm depth soil cation exchange capacity]<br> ├── cec_30arc_100cm_us.tif [100 cm depth soil cation exchange capacity]<br> ├── clay_30arc_30cm_us.tif [30 cm depth soil clay content]<br> ├── clay_30arc_100cm_us.tif [100 cm depth soil clay content]<br> ├── depthWT_30arc_us.tif [depth to water table]<br> ├── kfactor_30arc_30cm_us.tif [30 cm depth soil erosion factor]<br> ├── kfactor_30arc_100cm_us.tif [100 cm depth soil erosion factor]<br> ├── ph_30arc_100cm_us.tif [100 cm depth soil pH]<br> ├── ph_30arc_100cm_us.tif [30 cm depth soil pH]<br> ├── pondingFre_30arc_us.tif [ponding frequency]<br> ├── sand_30arc_30cm_us.tif [30 cm depth soil sand content]<br> ├── sand_30arc_100cm_us.tif [100 cm depth soil sand content]<br> ├── silt_30arc_30cm_us.tif [30 cm depth soil silt content]<br> ├── silt_30arc_100cm_us.tif [100 cm depth soil silt content]<br> ├── water_content_30arc_30cm_us.tif [30 cm depth soil water content]<br> └── water_content_30arc_100cm_us.tif [100 cm depth soil water content]</p> <p>SOC TIF files:</p> <p>├──30cm SOC mean.tif [30 cm depth soil SOC]<br> ├──100cm SOC mean.tif [100 cm depth soil SOC]<br> ├──30cm SOC CV.tif [30 cm depth soil SOC coefficient of variation]<br> └──100cm SOC CV.tif [100 cm depth soil SOC coefficient of variation]</p> <p>site observations csv files:</p> <p>ISCN_rmNRCS_addNCSS_30cm.csv 30cm ISCN sites SOC replaced NRCS sites with NCSS centroid removed data</p> <p>ISCN_rmNRCS_addNCSS_100cm.csv 100cm ISCN sites SOC replaced NRCS sites with NCSS centroid removed data</p> <p><br> <strong>Data format</strong>:</p> <p>Geospatial files are provided in Geotiff format in Lat/Lon WGS84 EPSG: 4326 projection at 30 arc second resolution.</p> <p><strong>Geospatial projection</strong>: </p> <pre><code>GEOGCS["GCS_WGS_1984", DATUM["D_WGS_1984", SPHEROID["WGS_1984",6378137,298.257223563]], PRIMEM["Greenwich",0], UNIT["Degree",0.017453292519943295]] (base) [jbk@theseus ltar_regionalization]$ g.proj -w GEOGCS["wgs84", DATUM["WGS_1984", SPHEROID["WGS_1984",6378137,298.257223563]], PRIMEM["Greenwich",0], UNIT["degree",0.0174532925199433]] </code></pre> <p> </p>
Data of soil mineralization rates, carbon and nitrogen pools in a rainfed almond crop and an irrigated mandarin crop derived from Diverfarming project
Data of soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics, auxiliary data and methods metadata from a rainfed almond crop and an irrigated mandarin crop studied in Diverfarming project
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.