Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 5 in Seasonal Abundance of Economically Important Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae) in Bangladesh, in Relation to Abiotic Factors and Host Plants

Figure 5. Distribution and mean monthly trap captures of Dacus longicornis, in relation with abiotic factors and host fruit availability.

Figure 4 in Seasonal Abundance of Economically Important Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae) in Bangladesh, in Relation to Abiotic Factors and Host Plants

Figure 4. Distribution and mean monthly trap captures of Zeugodacus cucurbitae (A) and Z. tau (B), in relation with abiotic factors and host fruit availability.

Figure 3 in Seasonal Abundance of Economically Important Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae) in Bangladesh, in Relation to Abiotic Factors and Host Plants

Figure 3. Distribution and mean monthly trap captures of Bactrocera rubigina (A) and B. correcta (B), in relation with abiotic factors.

Figure 7 in From Eradication to Containment: Invasion of French Polynesia by Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae) and Releases of Two Natural Enemies: A 17-Year Case Study

Figure 7. Annual percentage of individual guavas infested with fruit flies on Tahiti. Number of fruits incubated individually each year were: 172 in 2002, 348 in 2003, 539 in 2004, 607 in 2005, 98 in 2006, 4 in 2007, 237 in 2008, and 807 in 2009.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2018View details →

Figure 1 in Does Male Sexual Experience Influence Female Mate Choice and Reproduction in the Melon Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae)?

Figure 1. (A) Number of eggs laid per female per week and (B) proportion of hatched eggs per week for Zeugodacus cucurbitae females mated to virgin or non-virgin (thrice-mated) males. Symbols represent averages (+ 1 SE) over 8 cages per male type.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2015View details →

Figure 1 in Effect of Pupal Holding Density on Emergence Rate, Flight Ability, and Yield of Sterile Male Mediterranean Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Figure 1. Emergence rate (top) and flight ability (bottom) for Hawaii- and Guatemaladerived flies when held at loadings of 250, 350, or 450 ml per eclosion tower tray. Bar heights represent mean values over all trays for a given density (15 dates X 6 trays per loading amount per date = 90 trays total), and error bars represent 1 SE.

Figure 6a–d in From Eradication to Containment: Invasion of French Polynesia by Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae) and Releases of Two Natural Enemies: A 17-Year Case Study

Figure 6a–d. Quarterly emergences on Tahiti of B. dorsalis and F. arisanus per kg fruit for guava (a), Tahitian chestnut (b), tropical almond (c), and mango (d). See under

Figure 4 in From Eradication to Containment: Invasion of French Polynesia by Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae) and Releases of Two Natural Enemies: A 17-Year Case Study

Figure 4. Annual proportion of fruit fly (B. dorsalis, B. tryoni, B. kirki) and parasitoid (F. arisanus, D. longicaudata) emergences in guava, tropical almond, Tahitian chestnut, and mango fruits for selected years.

Figure 2 in Seasonal Abundance of Economically Important Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae) in Bangladesh, in Relation to Abiotic Factors and Host Plants

Figure 2. Distribution and mean monthly trap captures of Bactrocera dorsalis (A) and B. zonata (B), in relation with abiotic factors and host fruit availability.

Figure 3a, b in From Eradication to Containment: Invasion of French Polynesia by Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae) and Releases of Two Natural Enemies: A 17-Year Case Study

Figure 3a, b. Coconut husk block (a) and BactroMAT-ME (b) bait stations used for eradication of B. dorsalis. (Photos: L. Leblanc).

Figure 1 in From Eradication to Containment: Invasion of French Polynesia by Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae) and Releases of Two Natural Enemies: A 17-Year Case Study

Figure 1. Monthly captures of B. dorsalis in methyl eugenol traps and quarterly percent parasitism on guava, Tahitian chestnut and tropical almond on Tahiti.

Figure 7 in Release-Recapture of Sterile Male Mediterranean Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Southern California

Figure 7. Capture of aerially released sterile male medflies in PRP traps as a function of the direction from the east-west oriented flight line. For a given release date, ordinal values represent the proportion of the total captures in PRP traps recorded north or south of the flight line.

Figure 3 in Release-Recapture of Sterile Male Mediterranean Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Southern California

Figure 3. Capture of aerially released sterile male medflies as a function of days after release for three release dates (October 2011 was excluded owing to incomplete sampling). Ordinal values represent the proportion of the total recaptures in transect traps on alternate trap servicing days (1, 3, 5…11 d) after a release. For a given release date, data were pooled across the different transects and different trap positions. Numbers of captures for the different release dates are given in Table 2.

Figure 5 in Release-Recapture of Sterile Male Mediterranean Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Southern California

Figure 5. The probability of capturing ≥ 1 aerially released male medflies in transect traps as a function of distance from the east-west flight line located beneath or north of the flight line (top) or south of the flight line (bottom). North, over all dates: Y = 1/ (1+e(–(–0.20766)–0.0028X+ 0.13053)); South, over all dates: Y = 1/(1+e(–(–0.20766)– 0.0028X–0.58181).

Figure 4 in Release-Recapture of Sterile Male Mediterranean Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Southern California

Figure 4. Capture of aerially released sterile male medflies at different trap positions for different trap servicing intervals following release (October 2011 was excluded owing to incomplete sampling). Ordinal values represent the proportion of the total captures in transect traps recorded at different positions on post-release days 1, 3, 5, and ≥ 7 d (i.e., 7, 9, and 11), where trap position 0 indicates traps beneath the flight path, and higher trap positions represent increasing distances (by increments of 268 m between adjacent positions) along transects perpendicular to the flight line. Capture data were pooled across release dates, transects, and directions; data for trap positions 13–18 were pooled and categorized as> 12. Numbers of captures for the different release dates are given in Table 2.

Figure 6 in Release-Recapture of Sterile Male Mediterranean Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Southern California

Figure 6. Capture of aerially released sterile male medflies in PRP traps in different bands parallel to the flight line. Ordinal values represent proportions of all captures in both north and south directions over all release dates in bands 134 m wide, where band 1 was centered on the flight line, band 2 extended 67 m on either side of band 1, and so on. Captures are depicted for PRP traps up to 3,216 m (2 mi; band 24) from the release line.

Figure 8 in Release-Recapture of Sterile Male Mediterranean Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Southern California

Figure 8. The probability of capturing ≥ 1 aerially released male medflies in PRP traps as a function of distance from the east-west flight line (independent of direction). Over all dates, Y = 1/(1+e(–(0.20768–0.00187X))).

Figure 2 in Release-Recapture of Sterile Male Mediterranean Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Southern California

Figure 2. Capture of aerially released sterile male medflies as a function of the direction from the flight line for the four release dates. Ordinal values represent the proportion of the total captures in transect traps recorded south, north, or directly beneath the westeast oriented flight line. For a given release date, data were pooled across the different transects, different trap positions (for positions ≥ 1), and the different post-release trap servicing dates. Numbers of captures for the different release dates are given in Table 2.

Figure 1 in Release-Recapture of Sterile Male Mediterranean Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Southern California

Figure 1. Capture of aerially released sterile male medflies as a function of the distance from the flight line for the four release dates. Ordinal values represent the proportion of the total captures in transect traps recorded at different positions, where trap position 0 indicates traps beneath the flight path, and higher trap positions represent increasing distances (by increments of 268 m between adjacent positions) along transects perpendicular to the flight line. For a given release date, data were pooled across the different transects, north and south directions (for positions ≥ 1), and the different post-release trap servicing dates. Numbers of captures for the different release dates are given in Table 2.

Figure 5a–d in From Eradication to Containment: Invasion of French Polynesia by Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae) and Releases of Two Natural Enemies: A 17-Year Case Study

Figure 5a–d. Quarterly emergences on Tahiti of B. dorsalis and F. arisanus per fruit for guava (a), Tahitian chestnut (b), tropical almond (c), and mango (d). Numbers of fruits used for each host and each year (for guava, Tahitian chestnut, tropical almond and mango, respectively) were: 1998: 1634, 16238, 5314, 67; 1999: 264, 304, 993, 404; 2000: 37, 40, 154, 64; 2001: 52, 0, 20, 74; 2002: 492, 1204, 474, 268; 2003: 1531, 1539, 2685, 977; 2004: 2252, 1324, 810, 291; 2005: 1071, 904, 4373, 436; 2006: 1927, 3343, 3140, 1044; 2007: 1537, 1525, 4200, 1814; 2008: 3255, 2648, 5045, 2052; 2009: 1515, 1972, 5475, 549.