Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 10 in Taxonomy of the genus Oriverutus Siddiqi, 1971 (Nematoda: Dorylaimida: Nordiidae)

Figure 10. Parapalus arboricola Loof and Zullini, 2000 (light microscopy). (A–C) Neck region of female, male and J4, respectively; (D) J4, anterior region in median, lateral view; (E) Male, anterior region in median, lateral view; (F) Male, lip region and amphid fovea in submedian, lateral view; (H) Vagina; (I) Male, spicules and caudal region. Scale bars: A–C = 100 µm; D–F, H = 5 µm; G = 10 µm; I = 20 µm.

Figure 3 in Disjunct distribution of Szeptyckiella gen. nov. from New Caledonia and South China undermines the monophyly of Willowsiini (Collembola: Entomobryidae)

Figure 3. Szeptyckiella boulouparica sp. nov., abdominal chaetotaxy: (A) Abd. I–III; (B) Abd. IV; (C) Abd. V. Scale bar: 50 µm.

Figure 7 in New eriophyoid mites (Acari: Prostigmata: Eriophyoidea) from cultivated plants from northeastern Brazil, including the second taxon in the Prothricinae

Figure 7. Tegolophus indica. CGM, coxigenital region, male; D, dorsal habitus, female; DS, detail of prodorsal shield; em, empodium, leg I, female; IG,. internal genital structures, female; L1, leg I, female; L2, leg II, female; V, ventral habitus, female.

Figure 6 in New eriophyoid mites (Acari: Prostigmata: Eriophyoidea) from cultivated plants from northeastern Brazil, including the second taxon in the Prothricinae

Figure 6. Thamnacus paubrasil sp. nov. (A) Dorsal habitus, female; (B) ventral habitus, female; (C) lateral habitus, female; (D) leg I and II, female; (E) epigynum; (F) genitalia, male; (G) empodium, female.

Figure 5 in A revisional study of the Chinese species of Amphiops Erichson (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae, Chaetarthriini)

Figure 5. Aedeagi. (A) Amphiops coomani; (B) Amphiops coelopunctatus; (C–F Amphiops mirabilis, from (C) Guangzhou, (E) Hainan and (D, F) Yunnan; (G, H) Amphiops mater from (G) Guangdong and (H) Yunnan.

Figure 2 in Life cycle of Huarpea fallax (Hymenoptera: Sapygidae) in a xeric forest in Argentina

Figure 2. Emergence pattern of individuals of Huarpea fallax obtained from nests of wild bees collected in trap nests in a xeric forest of Argentina (n = 11).

Figure 6 in First record of Longosomatidae (Annelida: Polychaeta) from Iceland with a worldwide review of diagnostic characters of the family

Figure 6. Schematic drawings (not to scale) following Laubier et al. (1972–73), showing lateral (above) and dorsal (below) views of four species of Heterospio. Heterospio mediterranea Laubier, Picard and Ramos, 1972–73, Heterospio reducta Laubier, Picard and Ramos, 1972–73, Heterospio peruana Borowski, 1994 and Heterospio angolana Bochert and Zettler, 2009. Arrows mark position of first elongated chaetiger: black, after original description; grey, new interpretation (see text for explanations). Chaetigers numbered below lateral view of each species.

Figure 4 in Larval development and emigration behaviour during sea-to-land transition of the land hermit crab Coenobita brevimanus Dana, 1852 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Coenobitidae) under laboratory conditions

Figure 4. Coenobita brevimanus, second zoea: (A) antennule; (B) antenna; (C) mandibles; (D) maxillule; (E) maxilla; (F) first maxilliped; (G) second maxilliped; (H) third maxilliped; (I) telson. Scale bars: 100 μm (A–C, F–I) or 50 μm (D, E).

Figure 1 in Larval development and emigration behaviour during sea-to-land transition of the land hermit crab Coenobita brevimanus Dana, 1852 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Coenobitidae) under laboratory conditions

Figure 1. Numbers of larvae of Coenobita brevimanus reared individually in the laboratory. (A) Brood 1, hatched on 31 July 2008; (B) brood 2, hatched on 13 July 2010. Z1–Z4, first to fourth zoeae; MG, megalopa. Five specimens of each zoeal and megalopal stage were sampled from each brood.

Figure 9 in Descriptions of Pelodera scrofulata sp. nov. and Pelodera aligarhensis sp. nov. (Nematoda: Rhabditidae) with supplementary information on Pelodera teres (Schneider, 1866).

Figure 9. Pelodera teres (Schneider, 1866). (A–E) Anterior end (A and B, scanning electron micrographs); (F) anterior pharyngeal region (lateral); (G) posterior pharyngeal region (lateral); (H) posterior intestinal region; (I) anterior genital branch; (J, K) uterine region with embryonating eggs; (L) vulval region (lateral); (M) vulval region (Ventral); (N) female posterior region (lateral); (O–Q) male posterior region (lateral) (Q is scanning electron micrograph); (R) male posterior region (ventral) (R is scanning electron micrograph). Scale bars: 10 μm.

Figure 5 in Larval development and emigration behaviour during sea-to-land transition of the land hermit crab Coenobita brevimanus Dana, 1852 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Coenobitidae) under laboratory conditions

Figure 5. Coenobita brevimanus, third zoea: (A) antennule; (B) antenna; (C) mandibles; (D) maxillule; (E) maxilla; (F) first maxilliped; (G) second maxilliped; (H) third maxilliped; (I) telson. Scale bars: 100 μm (A–C, F–I) or 50 μm (D, E).

Figure 7 in Descriptions of Pelodera scrofulata sp. nov. and Pelodera aligarhensis sp. nov. (Nematoda: Rhabditidae) with supplementary information on Pelodera teres (Schneider, 1866).

Figure 7. Pelodera aligarhensis sp. nov. male. (A–C) Anterior end (A is scanning electron micrograph); (D) anterior pharyngeal region (lateral); (E) posterior pharyngeal region (lateral); (F) male genital tract at level of ejaculatory gland (ventral); (G) posterior region (lateral); (H–J) tail end showing bursa and genital papillae (lateral) (J is scanning electron micrograph); (K–N) Tail end showing bursa and genital papillae (ventral) (K is scanning electron micrograph). Scale bars: 10 μm.

Figure 2 in Larval development and emigration behaviour during sea-to-land transition of the land hermit crab Coenobita brevimanus Dana, 1852 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Coenobitidae) under laboratory conditions

Figure 2. Coenobita brevimanus, whole animals. Dorsal view: (A) first zoea; (B) second zoea; (C) third zoea; (D) fourth zoea; (E) megalopa. Lateral view: (F) first zoea; (G) second zoea; (H) third zoea; (I) fourth zoea. Scale bar: 1.0 mm.

Figure 8 in Descriptions of Pelodera scrofulata sp. nov. and Pelodera aligarhensis sp. nov. (Nematoda: Rhabditidae) with supplementary information on Pelodera teres (Schneider, 1866).

Figure 8. Cluster analysis (complete linkage) showing relationship between species of Pelodera (coarctata-group) based on morphological data.

Figure 10 in Larval development and emigration behaviour during sea-to-land transition of the land hermit crab Coenobita brevimanus Dana, 1852 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Coenobitidae) under laboratory conditions

Figure 10. The proportions of Coenobita brevimanus carrying three different sizes of gastropod shells. The small (S) and large (L) gastropod shells were Littoraria undulata and the medium (M) size shell was Littorina brevicula.

Figure 4 in Descriptions of Pelodera scrofulata sp. nov. and Pelodera aligarhensis sp. nov. (Nematoda: Rhabditidae) with supplementary information on Pelodera teres (Schneider, 1866).

Figure 4. Cluster analysis (complete linkage) showing relationship between species of Pelodera (strongyloides-group) based on morphological data.

Figure 1 in First record of Longosomatidae (Annelida: Polychaeta) from Iceland with a worldwide review of diagnostic characters of the family

Figure 1. Type localities and collection localities of described and undescribed species of Heterospio, respectively, arranged in ascending order by date of description: (1) Ehlers (1874); (2) Hartman (1944); (3) Knox (1960); (4) Hartman (1965); (5) Wu and Chen (1966); (6) and (7) Laubier et al. (1972–73); (8) Uebelacker (1984); (9) and (10) Borowski (1994); (11) Bochert and Zettler (2009). The BIOICE sampling area is indicated. (*) probably represents a different species.

Figure 4. Heterospio longissima Ehlers, 1874 in First record of Longosomatidae (Annelida: Polychaeta) from Iceland with a worldwide review of diagnostic characters of the family

Figure 4. Heterospio longissima Ehlers, 1874 sensu Hartman (1965): Specimens from BIOICE samples 2414 and 2474. (A, B) capillary chaetae (cc) and subuluncini (su) of CH13 and CH14; (C) capillary chaetae of CH13; (D–G) detail of distal end of subuluncini of CH11 to CH14; (H) detail of tip of subuluncini without distal appendage from CH14. Scale bars: A, B, 20 µm; C–G, 3 µm; H, 5 µm.

Figure 1 in Descriptions of Pelodera scrofulata sp. nov. and Pelodera aligarhensis sp. nov. (Nematoda: Rhabditidae) with supplementary information on Pelodera teres (Schneider, 1866).

Figure 1. Pelodera scrofulata sp. nov. (all lateral) (A) Entire female; (B) entire male; (C) female anterior end; (D) female pharyngeal region; (E) female reproductive system; (F) female tail region; (G) male tail region.

Figure 4 in A revisional study of the Chinese species of Amphiops Erichson (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae, Chaetarthriini)

Figure 4. (A–F) Amphiops yunnanensis Pu. (A) Habitus (dorsal view); (B) habitus (ventral view); (C) head and pronotum; (D) lateral portion of pronotum and elytra; (E) elytra; (F) type data. (G–I) Amphiops mirabilis Sharp. (G) Habitus; (H) lateral portion of elytra; (I) elytra.