Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 6. Cypria pustulosa Sharp, 1897, A, B, C, D, F, G, H in On the recent Cyclocypridinae (Podocopida, Candonidae) with description of two new genera and one new species 2820

FIGURE 6. Cypria pustulosa Sharp, 1897, A, B, C, D, F, G, H (♂, SMNH 111402), E (♀, SMNH 111407): A—RV, interior view; B—LV, interior view; C—T2; D—hemipenis; E—UR and genital field; F—UR; G, H—prehensile palps. Scales = 0.1 mm.

FIGURE 1. A in On the recent Cyclocypridinae (Podocopida, Candonidae) with description of two new genera and one new species 2820

FIGURE 1. A, Cyclocypris washingtoniensis Dobbin, 1941, syntype (male, SMNH 335865); B, C, E, H, I, Cyclocypris sharpei Furtos, 1933, B, C, E Paratype (♂, SMNH 67879), H, I paratype (♂, SMNH 67920); D, F, G, C. cruciata Furtos, 1935 holotype (♂, SMNH 71416): A—left prehensile palp, B—T3, without basal segment, C—T2; D, E—UR, F—LV, interior view (valve broken), G—RV, interior view; H—LV, interior view; I—RV, interior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.

FIGURE 2. Cyclocypris pusilla Sars, 1895 in On the recent Cyclocypridinae (Podocopida, Candonidae) with description of two new genera and one new species 2820

FIGURE 2. Cyclocypris pusilla Sars, 1895, type (NHMO F11355): A—carapace, dorsal view; B—carapace, exterior view from the left side (carapace slightly tilted); C—T2, D—UR; E—T3, withouth basal segment; F—hemipenis, outline only. Scales = 0.1 mm.

FIGURE 7. Cypria pusilla Sars, 1896 in On the recent Cyclocypridinae (Podocopida, Candonidae) with description of two new genera and one new species 2820

FIGURE 7. Cypria pusilla Sars, 1896 (NHMO F11601): A—carapace, exterior view from the left side (microphotograph); B—T2, C—A2; D—A1, not all setae drawn; E—T3; F—two terminal segments of Md-palp, without setae drawn. Scales for B- F = 0.1 mm.

FIGURE 5. A–D in On the recent Cyclocypridinae (Podocopida, Candonidae) with description of two new genera and one new species 2820

FIGURE 5. A–D, Cypria maculata Hoff, 1942, A, C holotype (♀, SMNH 81083), B, D allotype (♂, SMNH 81084); E-F, C. palustera Furtos, 1935, paratype (♂, SMNH 71410); G-I, Cypria spinifera Tressler, 1937, type (♀, SMNH 71504): A—LV, interior view; B—UR of ♂; C—UR and genital field of ♀: D, E—hemipenis (arrow on E showing well sclerotized parts); F, G—T2; H—UR and genital field of ♀; I—RV, interior view. Scales = 0.1 mm.

opennotspecifiedMay 2010View details →

FIGURES 1−9. 1−4 in Nysius caledoniae Distant, 1920 (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Orsillidae) a recent introduction into New Zealand, and keys to the species of Nysius, and genera of Orsillidae, in New Zealand

FIGURES 1−9. 1−4 Nysius caledoniae: 1, male (Pukekohe); 2, male (on left) and female (Bastion Point); 3, fifth instar showing dorsal markings on head and thorax (Bastion point); 4, another view of same to show abdominal markings (body length 3.63 mm, head width 1.14 mm). 5, Nysius huttoni fifth instar (mean body length 2.52 mm, mean head width 0.78 mm) [from Eyles (1960)]. 6−9 left paramere: 6, of N. caledoniae in situ dorsal view (Auckland Botanic Gardens); 7, same when turned slightly to the left; 8, of N. huttoni dorsal view (Waipukurau); 9, same one-quarter turn to the right (attachment at bottom left).

opennotspecifiedJul 2010View details →

FIGURE 2 in A critical review and systematic discussion of recent classification proposals for liolaemid lizards

FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic relationships among the major clades of Liolaemus lizards, detailing relationships within the lineomaculatus section, as currently understood (black text) and proposed by Pincheira-Donoso and Núñez (2005; red text). Relationships are those recovered by Espinoza et al. (2004) using morphological and molecular data. Major clade names follow Etheridge (1995) and Schulte et al. (2000). As defined by P-D&N, (1) their subgenus Vilcunia is paraphyletic and nested within Eulaemus; (2) their subgenus Liolaemus is polyphyletic with respect to some members of the lineomaculatus section of the subgenus Eulaemus; and (3) their subgenus Donosolaemus, albeit monophyletic, is nested within the subgenus Eulaemus. See text for details and Fig. 1 for additional comments.

opennotspecifiedJan 2016View details →

Figure 19. Fossil and recent Catherinum. C–K, N–Q, T, V in Phylogeny of the deep-sea cirripede family Scalpellidae (Crustacea, Thoracica) based on shell capitular plate morphology

Figure 19. Fossil and recent Catherinum. C–K, N–Q, T, V, Catherinum anglicum sp. nov., Upper Campanian, Belemnitella mucronata zone, Keswick, Norwich, UK; (O) is the holotype, the other specimens are paratypes. C, D, F, G, carinolatera in external (C, D, F) and internal (G, H) aspects (C, NHMUK IC 1203; D, 1204; F–G, 1206; H, 1208). E, transverse section of carina (NHMUK IC 1205); I, T, dorsal view of carinae (NHMUK IC 1209, 1216); P, lateral view of carina (NHMUK IC 1214); V, internal view of base of carina (NHMUK IC 1217); J, K, O, internal views of scuta, to show large pit for dwarf males (NHMUK IC 1210, 1211, 1213); N, external view of scutum (NHMUK IC 1212); Q, external view of tergum (NHMUK IC 1215). A, B, L, M, R, S, U, Catherinum hispidum (G.O. Sars, 1890). Recent, Norwegian Sea. A, B, carinolatus in external and internal views. L, M, external and internal views of scutum. R, external view of tergum. S, U, dorsal and internal views of carina. Scale bars: S, U, V, 1 mm; A–D, F, G, K–O, Q, R, T, 0.5 mm; E, H, P, 0.2 mm.

Figure 6 in DNA sequencing reveals unexpected Recent diversity and an ancient dichotomy in the American marsupial genus Marmosops (Didelphidae: Thylamyini)

Figure 6. Lateral view of posterior braincase of Marmosops (Sciophanes) pinheiroi (A, AMNH 267345) and Marmosops (Marmosops) noctivagus (B, MUSM 13288) illustrating diagnostic subgeneric morphologies of the squamosal (green) and petrosal (yellow). Abbreviations: als, alisphenoid; exo, exoccipital; lspc, lateral surface of pars canalicularis (of petrosal); par, parietal; pet, petrosal; sps, sulcus for the prootic sinus (of petrosal); sq, squamosal; srza, squamosal root of zygomatic arch; ssf, subsquamosal foramen.

Figure 5 in DNA sequencing reveals unexpected Recent diversity and an ancient dichotomy in the American marsupial genus Marmosops (Didelphidae: Thylamyini)

Figure 5. Phylogeny of Marmosops obtained by Bayesian analysis of a concatenated-gene [cytochrome b + breast cancer activating 1 (CYTB + BRCA1)] data set. Terminals are putative species recovered by general mixed Yule coalescent model analyses of CYTB plus Marmosops juninensis (uniquely represented by a BRCA1 sequence). Filled semicircles at internal nodes indicate high support (posterior probability ≥ 0.95, bootstrap ≥ 75%). Abbreviations: BI, Bayesian inference; ML, maximum likelihood.

Figure 3 in DNA sequencing reveals unexpected Recent diversity and an ancient dichotomy in the American marsupial genus Marmosops (Didelphidae: Thylamyini)

Figure 3. Collection localities for sequenced specimens of Atlantic Forest species included in subgenus II of Marmosops. Progressively darker shading indicates the following elevations: pale grey ≥ 500 m, medium grey ≥ 1000 m, and dark grey ≥ 2000 m.

Figure 2 in DNA sequencing reveals unexpected Recent diversity and an ancient dichotomy in the American marsupial genus Marmosops (Didelphidae: Thylamyini)

Figure 2. Collection localities for sequenced specimens of subgenus I of Marmosops. Progressively darker shading indicates the following elevations: pale grey ≥ 500 m, medium grey ≥ 1000 m, dark grey ≥ 2000 m, and darkest grey ≥ 3000 m.

Figure 1 in DNA sequencing reveals unexpected Recent diversity and an ancient dichotomy in the American marsupial genus Marmosops (Didelphidae: Thylamyini)

Figure 1. Collection localities for sequenced specimens of subgenus II of Marmosops. Progressively darker shading indicates the following elevations: pale grey ≥ 500 m, medium grey ≥ 1000 m, dark grey ≥ 2000 m, and darkest grey ≥ 3000 m.

Figure 4. Individual multilocus genotype clustering analysis for Podarcis carbonelli. A in Recent evolutionary history of the Iberian endemic lizards Podarcis bocagei (Seoane, 1884) and Podarcis carbonelli Pérez-Mellado, 1981 (Squamata: Lacertidae) revealed by allozyme and microsatellite markers

Figure 4. Individual multilocus genotype clustering analysis for Podarcis carbonelli. A, inferred population structure from the number of clusters (K) = 2 to 5. These plots were obtained from the runs producing the highest values of Ln probability for each value of K, assuming correlated allele frequencies. In these plots, each individual is represented by a column divided into K segments, the size of each corresponding to the individual's estimated membership fraction in each of the K clusters. See Table 1 for locality name abbreviations. B, variation of the value of DK with the number of clusters, following Evanno et al. (2005). C, pie charts representing the mean proportion of membership for K = 4 (chosen by the previous method) for each locality.

Figure 3. Individual multilocus genotype clustering analysis for Podarcis bocagei. A in Recent evolutionary history of the Iberian endemic lizards Podarcis bocagei (Seoane, 1884) and Podarcis carbonelli Pérez-Mellado, 1981 (Squamata: Lacertidae) revealed by allozyme and microsatellite markers

Figure 3. Individual multilocus genotype clustering analysis for Podarcis bocagei. A, inferred population structure from the number of clusters (K) = 2 to 5. These plots were obtained from the runs producing the highest values of Ln probability for each value of K, assuming correlated allele frequencies. In these plots, each individual is represented by a column divided into K segments, the size of each corresponding to the individual's estimated membership fraction in each of the K clusters. See Table 1 for locality name abbreviations. B, variation of the value of DK with the number of clusters, following Evanno et al. (2005). C, pie charts representing the mean proportion of membership for K = 3 and 5 (chosen by the previous method) for each locality.

Figure 2 in Recent evolutionary history of the Iberian endemic lizards Podarcis bocagei (Seoane, 1884) and Podarcis carbonelli Pérez-Mellado, 1981 (Squamata: Lacertidae) revealed by allozyme and microsatellite markers

Figure 2. Synthetic maps showing patterns of geographical variation in allele frequencies across species distribution ranges based on the inversed distance weighted interpolation of the values calculated for each locality of Podarcis bocagei (top) and Podarcis carbonelli (bottom) for the first (A, D), second (B, E), and third (C, F) axes of factorial correspondence analyses. White represents higher and black lower factor score values.

Figure 1 in Recent evolutionary history of the Iberian endemic lizards Podarcis bocagei (Seoane, 1884) and Podarcis carbonelli Pérez-Mellado, 1981 (Squamata: Lacertidae) revealed by allozyme and microsatellite markers

Figure 1. Distribution and localities analysed in this study for Podarcis bocagei (dark grey, circles) and Podarcis carbonelli (light grey, squares) (A), and median-joining networks of mtDNA haplotypes for P. bocagei (B) and P. carbonelli (C) reproduced from Pinho et al., 2007a. Dashed lines indicate the mtDNA groups and corresponding geographical distributions in P. carbonelli. Locality codes and sampling details are given in Table 1. Notice that the distribution shown for P. carbonelli is based on a 20 km buffer of occupied 10 ¥ 10 km UTM (Universal Transverse Mercator) squares and is therefore amplified compared to that in Pinho et al., 2007a. This was necessary in order to visualize geographical patterns of genetic variation (see Material and methods).

opennotspecifiedAug 2010View details →

Figure 11 in Systematics of the Miocene-Recent bryozoan genus Pentapora (Cheilostomata)

Figure 11. Pentapora clipeus sp. nov., scanning electron micrographs of uncoated specimens from the Middle Pliocene of Monte Padova, Castell'Arquato, Piacenza, Emilia, Italy, imaged using back-scattered electrons. A–D, holotype, NHM BZ 5662. A, colony fragment with zooids bearing giant avicularia. B, partly overgrown ovicell and two giant avicularia. C, giant avicularium; note the lack of a calcified crossbar. D, giant avicularium with closure plate containing two pores. E, paratype, NHM BZ 5663. E, orifice with left lappet preserved and giant avicularium with closure plate. F, primary orifice, normal suboral avicularium, and median septum and circular muscle impression visible on the basal wall of the broken zooid at the top left. Scale bars: A = 280 Mm; B = 100 Mm; D = 60 Mm; E = 50 Mm; F = 100 Mm.

opennotspecifiedAug 2010View details →

Figure 12 in Systematics of the Miocene-Recent bryozoan genus Pentapora (Cheilostomata)

Figure 12. Raymondcia rigida (Lorenz, 1886), holotype of Pentapora boreale Kuklinski & Hayward (2004), Kingsfjorden, Spitsbergen, NHM 2003.3.10.1; scanning electron micrographs of uncoated specimen imaged using back-scattered electrons. A, zooids and growing edge. B, zooids with ovicells and suboral avicularia. C, primary orifice, nonporous ovicell, suboral avicularium and lyrula. D, primary orifice, suboral avicularium and ovicell overgrown by granular calcification. Scale bars: A = 600 Mm; B = 200 Mm; C = 80 Mm; D = 100 Mm.