Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,581
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
2,581 results for “amphibians”
Figure 7 from: Lemos-Espinal JA, Smith GR (2020) A checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of Sinaloa, Mexico with a conservation status summary and comparisons with neighboring states. ZooKeys 931: 85-114. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.931.50922
Figure 7 Proportion of A amphibians and B reptiles listed in protected categories on the IUCN Red List, SEMARNAT, and high EVS for Sinaloa. Green is proportion in Data Deficient and Least Concern (IUCN); Not Listed and Subject to Special Protection (we regarded the category of Subject to Special Protection in SEMARNAT equivalent to Least Concern in IUCN) (SEMARNAT); or low or medium EVS. Red is percentage in protected categories or high EVS. N is the number of species assessed.
Figure 4 from: Lemos-Espinal JA, Smith GR (2020) A checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of Sinaloa, Mexico with a conservation status summary and comparisons with neighboring states. ZooKeys 931: 85-114. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.931.50922
Figure 4 Vegetation map of the state of Sinaloa, Mexico (modified from Dirección General de Geografía – INEGI 2013).
Figure 5 from: Lemos-Espinal JA, Smith GR (2020) A checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of Sinaloa, Mexico with a conservation status summary and comparisons with neighboring states. ZooKeys 931: 85-114. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.931.50922
Figure 5 Climate map of the state of Sinaloa, Mexico (modified from García – Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad 1998).
Figure 3 from: Lemos-Espinal JA, Smith GR (2020) A checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of Sinaloa, Mexico with a conservation status summary and comparisons with neighboring states. ZooKeys 931: 85-114. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.931.50922
Figure 3 Physiographic provinces of the state of Sinaloa, Mexico (modified from Cervantes-Zamora et al. 1990).
Figure 1 from: Lemos-Espinal JA, Smith GR (2020) A conservation checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of Mexico City, with comparisons with adjoining states. ZooKeys 951: 109-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.951.52578
Figure 1 Basin of Mexico, circa 1519. Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/99/Basin_of_Mexico_1519_map-en.svg
Figure 5 from: Lemos-Espinal JA, Smith GR (2020) A conservation checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of Mexico City, with comparisons with adjoining states. ZooKeys 951: 109-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.951.52578
Figure 5 Climate map of Mexico City, Mexico (modified from García and Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad 1998).
Figure 4 from: Lemos-Espinal JA, Smith GR (2020) A conservation checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of Mexico City, with comparisons with adjoining states. ZooKeys 951: 109-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.951.52578
Figure 4 Vegetation map of Mexico City, Mexico (modified from Dirección General de Geografía; INEGI 2016).
Figure 8 from: Lemos-Espinal JA, Smith GR (2020) A conservation checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of Mexico City, with comparisons with adjoining states. ZooKeys 951: 109-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.951.52578
Figure 8 Percentage of species included in the IUCN Red List or listed by SEMARNAT, and the Environmental Vulnerability Score (EVS). A Amphibians B reptiles. Green is percentage in Data Deficient and Least Concern (IUCN); Not Listed and Subject to Special Protection (we regarded the category of Subject to Special Protection in SEMARNAT equivalent to IUCN's Least Concern) (SEMARNAT); low and medium EVS. Red is percentage in protected categories or high EVS. N is the number of species assessed by each agency.
Figure 6 from: Lemos-Espinal JA, Smith GR (2020) A conservation checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of Mexico City, with comparisons with adjoining states. ZooKeys 951: 109-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.951.52578
Figure 6 Satellite map showing the topographic features of Mexico City (source: Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad 2003) and Regions of Mexico City according to Reygadas-Prado (2016): 1) Forests and Ravines; 2) Wetlands of Xochimilco and Tláhuac; 3) Urban Parks and Gardens; 4) Mountains of Xochimilco and Milpa Alta; 5) Sierra de Guadalupe; 6) Sierra de Santa Catarina.
Figure 7 from: Lemos-Espinal JA, Smith GR (2020) A conservation checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of Mexico City, with comparisons with adjoining states. ZooKeys 951: 109-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.951.52578
Figure 7 Species accumulation curves for total herpetofauna of Mexico City, Mexico, as well as separately for amphibians and reptiles.
Figure 8 from: Lemos-Espinal JA, Smith GR (2020) A conservation checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of the State of Mexico, Mexico with comparisons with adjoining states. ZooKeys 953: 137-159. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.953.50881
Figure 8 Proportion of A) amphibians and B) reptiles listed in protected categories on the IUCN Red List, SEMARNAT, and high EVS for the State of Mexico. Green is proportion in Data Deficient and Least Concern (IUCN); Not Listed and Subject to Special Protection (we regarded the category of Subject to Special Protection in SEMARNAT equivalent to Least Concern in IUCN) (SEMARNAT); or low or medium EVS. Red is percentage in protected categories or high EVS. N is the number of species assessed.
Figure 7 from: Lemos-Espinal JA, Smith GR (2020) A conservation checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of the State of Mexico, Mexico with comparisons with adjoining states. ZooKeys 953: 137-159. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.953.50881
Figure 7 Species accumulation curves for total herpetofauna, amphibians, and reptiles of the State of Mexico, Mexico.
Figure 6 from: Lemos-Espinal JA, Smith GR (2020) A conservation checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of the State of Mexico, Mexico with comparisons with adjoining states. ZooKeys 953: 137-159. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.953.50881
Figure 6 AAmbystoma lermaenseBChiropterotriton orculusCAbronia deppiiD juvenile Sceloporus sugillatusECrotalus transversus. Photos by Eric Centenero-Alcalá
Figure 5 from: Lemos-Espinal JA, Smith GR (2020) A conservation checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of the State of Mexico, Mexico with comparisons with adjoining states. ZooKeys 953: 137-159. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.953.50881
Figure 5 Climate map of the State of Mexico, Mexico (modified from García – Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad 1998).
Figure 4 from: Lemos-Espinal JA, Smith GR (2020) A conservation checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of the State of Mexico, Mexico with comparisons with adjoining states. ZooKeys 953: 137-159. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.953.50881
Figure 4 Vegetation map of the State of Mexico, Mexico (modified from Dirección General de Geografía – INEGI 2016).
Figure 3 from: Lemos-Espinal JA, Smith GR (2020) A conservation checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of the State of Mexico, Mexico with comparisons with adjoining states. ZooKeys 953: 137-159. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.953.50881
Figure 3 Physiographic provinces of the State of Mexico, Mexico (modified from Cervantes-Zamora et al. 1990).
FIGURE 1 in Quantifying vertebrate zoogeographical regions of Australia using geospatial turnover in the species composition of mammals, birds, reptiles and terrestrial amphibians
FIGURE 1. Map of Australia with major clusters retrieved from the analysis.
FIGURE 8 in Quantifying vertebrate zoogeographical regions of Australia using geospatial turnover in the species composition of mammals, birds, reptiles and terrestrial amphibians
FIGURE 8. The interim zoogeographic provinces of Australia.
Figure 3 in Year-round activity patterns in a hyperdiverse community of rainforest amphibians in Madagascar
Figure 3. Model selection results and model averaged importance of predictors for 32 models relating abundance and species richness of amphibians along the study transect. The vertical red line indicates the 80% threshold of model averaged importance of predictors (Temp: daily mean temperature, Humid: daily mean relative humidity, Moon: lunar fraction illuminated, Wind: daily mean wind speed, Rain: daily rainfall accumulate).
Figure 2 in Year-round activity patterns in a hyperdiverse community of rainforest amphibians in Madagascar
Figure 2. Annual variation of relative abundance in eight species with more than 100 individual observations along the study transect. Note different activity patterns displayed by the species, some active year round (M. grandidieri), some restricted to the warm/rainy season (A. madagascariensis, B. pyrrhus), some active year round but with a clear peak in the late cold/dry season (B. viridis) or early dry season (Heterixalus spp.), and P. palmata showing an extremely seasonal, explosive breeding activity. The asterisk in the plot for P. palmata indicates the massive breeding of the species when the number of individuals was uncountable and estimated as 100.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.