Find research datasets worth reusing

FIG. 4 in Bat activity rates do not predict bat fatality rates at wind energy facilities

FIG. 4. Bat activity rates measured before and after turbines were built at four wind energy facilities for high- and low-frequency bats during individual seasons. The dashed line indicates a 1:1 relationship between pre- and post-construction activity rates

FIG. 11 in Terrestrial behavior and trackway morphology of Neotropical bats

FIG. 11. Carollia perspicillata arcuate manus tracks on Cast 1 and outlines of arcuate tracks produced by digit I of right and left manus. Scale bar 1 cm

FIG. 9 in Terrestrial behavior and trackway morphology of Neotropical bats

FIG. 9. Desmodus rotundus track morphologies: A) Left manus track showing a) digit I trace, b) wrist trace, c) distal forearm trace; B) Left pes track. Scale bars 1 cm

FIG. 8 in Terrestrial behavior and trackway morphology of Neotropical bats

FIG. 8. Desmodus rotundus bounding trackway cast showing outlines of manus and pes tracks. Dotted line represents trackway midline and arrows indicate direction of movement. Pes tracks are posterior to the corresponding manus tracks and closer to the trackway midline, except in the lower right where the bat changed direction of travel. Scale bar 5 cm

FIG. 5 in Terrestrial behavior and trackway morphology of Neotropical bats

FIG. 5. Screen capture outlines of C. perspicillata breaststrokelike locomotion method: A) Initial position with both wrists level with head; B–D) Bat pulls body forward resulting in the position of the wrists level with the shoulders; E–G) Bat picks up arms and swings wings forward; H) Bat returns wrists to position level with the head. Screen captures taken approximately 0.25 seconds apart

FIG. 14 in Terrestrial behavior and trackway morphology of Neotropical bats

FIG. 14. Micronycteris microtis cast showing outlines of manus and pes tracks lacking any discernable trackways. Scale bar 5 cm

FIG. 4 in Terrestrial behavior and trackway morphology of Neotropical bats

FIG. 4. Screen capture outlines of D. rotundus semidiagonal sequence walk: A) Initial position with right manus posterior to head: B–C) Right manus picked up and moved to position with wrist roughly level with eyes, body moved forward so left wrist now even with shoulders; D) Left manus picked up and moved into position with wrist level with eyes; E) Right pes picked up and brought proximal to body; F) Left pes picked up and brought proximal to body, in this case before right pes planted; G–H) Left pes planted and bat returns to original position. Screen captures taken approximately 0.125 seconds apart

FIG. 1 in Terrestrial behavior and trackway morphology of Neotropical bats

FIG. 1. Three types of bat pelvic and hindlimb morphology: A) Type 1 Carollia perspicillata (Phyllostomidae, Carolliinae) pelvis KUNHM 142704; B) C. perspicillata hindlimb KUNHM 142704; C) Type 2 Eptesicus fuscus (Vespertilionidae) pelvis KUNHM 6189; D) E. fuscus hindlimb KUNHM 6189; E) Type 3 Tadarida brasiliensis (Molossidae) pelvis KUNHM 7330; F) T. brasiliensis hindlimb KUNHM 7330. Scale bars are 1 cm

FIG. 3 in The wrinkle-lipped free-tailed bat (Chaerephon plicatus Buchannan, 1800) feeds mainly on brown planthoppers in rice fields of central Thailand

FIG. 3. The average monthly number of male brown planthopper genitalia per pellet (0 ± SE) in the diet of C. plicatus at two caves: Khao Wongkot Cave (KWC) and Khao Chakan Cave (KCC) in central Thailand (2015–2016), as determined by fecal analysis. The yearly average number of genitalia per pellet was 2.16 ± 1.55 (0 ± SE) for KWC and 2.55 ± 1.68 for KCC

FIG. 10. Carollia perspicillata walking trial plaster Cast 1 in Terrestrial behavior and trackway morphology of Neotropical bats

FIG. 10. Carollia perspicillata walking trial plaster Cast 1, indicating locations of arcuate traces, clustered pedal tracks, and manus-dominated trackway. Forward progress of bat from top to bottom of figure

FIG. 13 in Terrestrial behavior and trackway morphology of Neotropical bats

FIG. 13. Carollia perspicillata breaststrokelike crawl trackway on Cast 1 showing outlines of manus tracks; arrow indicates direction of movement. Scale bar 1 cm

FIG. 1. A in The wrinkle-lipped free-tailed bat (Chaerephon plicatus Buchannan, 1800) feeds mainly on brown planthoppers in rice fields of central Thailand

FIG. 1. A map of Thailand showing active rice fields and our two study caves housing C. plicatus bats at Khao Wongkot cave (KWC, 70% surrounding rice fields) and Khao Chakan cave (KCC, 22% surrounding rice fields) in central Thailand. The two circle insets show a 20-km radius (approximate bat foraging distance) around each cave [gray: newly planted rice, black: older rice and white: no rice; data from GISTDA, September 2016]

FIG. 3 in Bat activity rates do not predict bat fatality rates at wind energy facilities

FIG. 3. Regression analysis for high-frequency bat activity rates (Panel A, n = 23) and low-frequency bat activity rates (Panel B, n = 24) recorded by raised microphones versus overall bat fatality rates at paired pre-construction and post-construction studies, grouped by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service region

FIG. 3 in Terrestrial behavior and trackway morphology of Neotropical bats

FIG. 3. Screen capture outlines of D. rotundus bounding behavior: A) Bat positions both wrists anterior to tip of snout with pedes proximal to body; B–C) Body propelled forward as wrists and manual digit I remain planted, resulting in position with wrists posterior to shoulders and pedes directed posteriorly; D) Pedes picked up and brought forward and beneath body at same time as forelimbs lifted and moved forward; E) Bat returns to initial position with wrists anterior to tip of snout; F) Motion repeated. Note staggered movement of hindlimbs in second bound (E–F). Screen captures taken approximately 0.125 seconds apart

opennotspecifiedNov 2020View details →

FIG. 4. Admixture plots for 1−9 in Reconstructing the genomic diversity of a widespread Sub-Saharan bat (Pteropodidae: Eidolon helvum) using archival museum collections

FIG. 4. Admixture plots for 1−9 populations (K). Abbreviations: ND: no data, Lib: Liberia, IC: Ivory Coast, Cam: Cameroon, EG: São Tomé and Príncipe, Gab: Gabon, DRC – Democratic Republic of Congo, Sud: Sudan, Uga: Uganda, Mad: Madagascar

opennotspecifiedJun 2018View details →

FIG. 2 in Postnatal variation in ectoparasite (Spinturnix emarginata) load in neonates of Geoffroy's bat (Myotis emarginatus): how fast do young bats become infested with ectoparasites?

FIG. 2. Relationship between mite load and body mass in male (Ì) and female (u) neonates of M. emarginatus measured in nine sampling occasions in the Kerend cave, western Iran

FIG. 6 in Terrestrial behavior and trackway morphology of Neotropical bats

FIG. 6. Screen capture outlines of C. perspicillata one-armed locomotion method: A) Initial position with left wrist approximately level with head, both feet distal to body, and right wrist behind shoulder; B) Bat pulls body forward with left arm, resulting in position of left wrist level with the shoulder; C) Bat picks up left foot and places it proximal to body; D–E) Bat picks up all limbs keeping only left forelimb in contact with sediment and moves body forward; F) Bat places left wrist approximately level with head; G–H) Bat repeats sequence, keeping left forelimb planted while moving the rest of the body forward. Screen captures taken approximately 0.25 seconds apart

opennotspecifiedNov 2020View details →

FIG. 2. A in Reconstructing the genomic diversity of a widespread Sub-Saharan bat (Pteropodidae: Eidolon helvum) using archival museum collections

FIG. 2. A — The Elevation Hypothesis: The Mambila Mountains in the west and the Ethiopian highlands/Katanga Plateau act as barriers to gene flow across the range of E. helvum; B — The River Basin Hypothesis: The Niger River, Congo River, Nile River, and Zambezi River act as rufugia for populations and limit gene flow across the range of E. helvum; C — The Panmixia Hypothesis: E. helvum mates randomly across the range with no limits to gene flow

FIG. 2 in Bat activity rates do not predict bat fatality rates at wind energy facilities

FIG. 2. Regression analysis for overall bat activity rates recorded by ground microphones (n = 47) versus overall bat fatality rates at paired pre-construction and post-construction studies, grouped by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service region

FIG. 1 in Bat activity rates do not predict bat fatality rates at wind energy facilities

FIG. 1. The number of paired pre-construction bat activity and post-construction bat fatality studies (first number) and paired post-construction bat activity and post-construction bat fatality studies (second number) used for regression analyses, organized by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service region. The Mountain-Prairie region includes five studies from southern Alberta, Canada