Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
6,059
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
6,059 results for “Journals”
Figure 1 from: Komeda Y, Mita T, Hirose Y, Yamagishi K (2020) Taxonomic revision of charon-, floridanum- and muscaeforme-groups of Gryon Haliday, 1833 (Hymenoptera, Scelionidae) from Japan, with descriptions of two new species and host information. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 80: 99-135. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.80.56178
Figure 1 Japanese Gryon spp., dorsal view AG. fulvicoxa sp. nov., holotype BG. japonicumCG. yamagishiiDG. philippinenseEG. shisa sp. nov., holotype FG. pennsylvanicum. Scale bars: 1 mm.
Figures 26-29 from: Ganjisaffar F, Talamas EJ, Bon MC, Perring TM (2020) First report and integrated analysis of two native Trissolcus species utilizing Bagrada hilaris eggs in California. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 80: 49-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.80.57024
Figures 26-29 Trissolcus utahensis (FSCA 00033042, ex. P. maculiventris) 26 head, anterior view 27 head and mesosoma, lateral view 28 head and mesosoma, ventrolateral view 29 lateral habitus. Scale bars in millimeters.
Figure 2 from: Komeda Y, Mita T, Hirose Y, Yamagishi K (2020) Taxonomic revision of charon-, floridanum- and muscaeforme-groups of Gryon Haliday, 1833 (Hymenoptera, Scelionidae) from Japan, with descriptions of two new species and host information. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 80: 99-135. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.80.56178
Figure 2 Japanese Gryon spp., lateral views AG. fulvicoxa sp. nov., holotype BG. japonicumCG. yamagishiiDG. philippinenseEG. shisa sp. nov., paratype FG. pennsylvanicum. Scale bars: 1 mm.
Figure 4-5 from: Ganjisaffar F, Talamas EJ, Bon MC, Perring TM (2020) First report and integrated analysis of two native Trissolcus species utilizing Bagrada hilaris eggs in California. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 80: 49-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.80.57024
Figure 4-5 4Trissolcus hullensis (FSCA 00091886), head, mesosoma, metasoma, dorsolateral view 5T. utahensis (FSCA 00000302), head, mesosoma, metasoma, dorsolateral view. Scale bars in millimeters.
Figures 20-22 from: Ganjisaffar F, Talamas EJ, Bon MC, Perring TM (2020) First report and integrated analysis of two native Trissolcus species utilizing Bagrada hilaris eggs in California. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 80: 49-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.80.57024
Figures 20-22 Trissolcus utahensis20 FSCA 00033239 (ex. B. hilaris), head, mesosoma, metasoma, dorsal view 21 FSCA 00033041 (ex. P. maculiventris), head, mesosoma, metasoma, dorsolateral view 22 FSCA 00033040 (ex. P. maculiventris), head, mesosoma, metasoma, dorsal view. Scale bars in millimeters.
Figures 16-19 from: Ganjisaffar F, Talamas EJ, Bon MC, Perring TM (2020) First report and integrated analysis of two native Trissolcus species utilizing Bagrada hilaris eggs in California. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 80: 49-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.80.57024
Figures 16-19 Trissolcus utahensis, head and mesosoma, ventrolateral view 16 DPI_FSCA00033239 (ex. B. hilaris) 17 FSCA 00033041 (ex. P. maculiventris) 18 FSCA 00000302 (ex. P. maculiventris) 19 FSCA 00033040 (e. P. maculiventris). Scale bars in millimeters.
Figures 12-15 from: Ganjisaffar F, Talamas EJ, Bon MC, Perring TM (2020) First report and integrated analysis of two native Trissolcus species utilizing Bagrada hilaris eggs in California. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 80: 49-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.80.57024
Figures 12-15 Trissolcus utahensis, head and mesosoma, lateral view 12 DPI_FSCA00033239 (ex. B. hilaris) 13 FSCA 00033041 (ex. P. maculiventris) 14 FSCA 00000302 (ex. P. maculiventris) 15 FSCA 00033040 (ex. P. maculiventris). Scale bars in millimeters.
Figure 3 from: Kang G-W, Kolarov J, Lee J-W (2020) Review of the genus Syzeuctus (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Banchinae) from South Korea. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 80: 17-30. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.80.57667
Figure 3 Syzeuctus flavofacialis Kang & Lee, female A habitus in lateral view B head in frontal view C head in dorsal view D thorax in lateral view E propodeum in dorsal view F first tergite in dorsal view G wings (left) H abdomen in dorsal view. Scale bars: 1.0 mm (A), 0.2 mm (B–F), 0.5 mm (G, H).
Figure 4 from: Kang G-W, Kolarov J, Lee J-W (2020) Review of the genus Syzeuctus (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Banchinae) from South Korea. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 80: 17-30. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.80.57667
Figure 4 Syzeuctus takaozanus Uchida, male A habitus in lateral view B head in frontal view C head in dorsal view D thorax in lateral view E propodeum in dorsal view F first tergite in dorsal view G wings (left) H abdomen in dorsal view. Scale bars: 1.0 mm (A), 0.2 mm (B–F), 0.5 mm (G, H).
Figure 2 from: Kang G-W, Kolarov J, Lee J-W (2020) Review of the genus Syzeuctus (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Banchinae) from South Korea. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 80: 17-30. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.80.57667
Figure 2 Habitus in lateral view ASyzeuctus apicifer (Walker) BS. coreanus Uchida CS. sambonis Uchida. Scale bars: 1.0 mm.
Figure 1 from: Kang G-W, Kolarov J, Lee J-W (2020) Review of the genus Syzeuctus (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Banchinae) from South Korea. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 80: 17-30. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.80.57667
Figure 1 Syzeuctus albopictus Kang & Lee, male A habitus in lateral view B head in frontal view C head in dorsal view D thorax in lateral view E propodeum in dorsal view F first tergite in dorsal view G wings H abdomen in dorsal view. Scale bars: 1.0 mm (A), 0.2 mm (B–F), 0.5 mm (G, H).
Data from: A superlinear iteration method for calculation of finite length journal bearing's static equilibrium position
Solving the static equilibrium position is one of the most important parts of dynamic coefficients calculation and further coupled calculation of rotor system. The main contribution of this study is testing the superlinear iteration convergence method - twofold secant method, for determination of the static equilibrium position of journal bearing with finite length. Essentially, the Reynolds equation for stable motion is solved by finite difference method and the inner pressure is obtained by successive over-relaxation iterative method reinforced by the compound Simpson quadrature formula. The accuracy and efficiency of the twofold secant method are higher in comparison with the secant method and dichotomy. The total number of iterative steps required for the twofold secant method are about one-third of secant method and less than one-eighth of dichotomy for the same equilibrium position. The calculations for equilibrium position and pressure distribution for different bearing length, clearance and rotating speed were done. In the results, the eccentricity presents linear inverse proportional relationship to the attitude angle. The influence of the bearing length, clearance and bearing radius on the load-carrying capacity were also investigated. The results illustrate that larger bearing length, larger radius and smaller clearance are good for the load-carrying capacity of journal bearing. The application of twofold secant method can greatly reduce the computational time for calculation of the dynamic coefficients and dynamic characteristics of rotor-bearing system with a journal bearing of finite length.
Data from: Women are underrepresented on the editorial boards of journals in environmental biology and natural resource management
Despite women earning similar numbers of graduate degrees as men in STEM disciplines, they are underrepresented in upper level positions in both academia and industry. Editorial board memberships are an important example of such positions; membership is both a professional honor in recognition of achievement and an opportunity for professional advancement. We surveyed 10 highly regarded journals in environmental biology, natural resource management, and plant sciences to quantify the number of women on their editorial boards and in positions of editorial leadership (i.e., Associate Editors and Editors-in-Chief) from 1985 to 2013. We found that during this time period only 16% of subject editors were women, with more pronounced disparities in positions of editorial leadership. Although the trend was towards improvement over time, there was surprising variation between journals, including those with similar disciplinary foci. While demographic changes in academia may reduce these disparities over time, we argue journals should proactively strive for gender parity on their editorial boards. This will both increase the number of women afforded the opportunities and benefits that accompany board membership and increase the number of role models and potential mentors for early-career scientists and students.
Data from: Has open data arrived at the British Medical Journal (BMJ)? An observational study
Objective: To quantify data sharing policy compliance at the BMJ by analysing the rate of data sharing practices, and investigate attitudes and examine barriers towards data sharing. Design: Observational study. Setting: The BMJ research archive. Participants: 160 randomly sampled BMJ research articles, excluding meta-analysis and systematic reviews. Main outcome measures: Percentages of research articles that indicated the availability of their raw datasets in their data sharing statements and those that provided their datasets upon request. Results: Fifty out of 160 (31%) research articles indicated the availability of their datasets. Twelve used publicly available data and the remaining 38 were sent email requests to access their datasets. Only 1 publicly available dataset could be accessed and only 6 out of 38 shared their data via e-mail. So only 7/160 research articles shared their datasets, 4.4% (95% confidence interval: 1.8% to 8.8%). Conclusions: Despite the BMJ's strong data sharing policy, sharing rates are low. Possible explanations for low data sharing rates could be: the wording of the BMJ data sharing policy, which leaves room for individual interpretation and possible loopholes; that our email requests ended up in researchers spam folders; and, that researchers are not rewarded in the scientific community for sharing their data. It might be time for a more effective data sharing policy and better incentives for health and medical researchers to share their data.
Data from: Editor and reviewer gender influence the peer review process but not peer review outcomes at an ecology journal
Lack of diversity on editorial boards might generate disparities in editorial and peer review that contribute to gender and geographic disparities in scholarly publishing. We use a comprehensive data set of the peer review process for all papers submitted to the journal Functional Ecology from January 2004 to June 2014 to examine how gender, seniority and geographic location of editors and reviewers influence reviewer recruitment and scores given to papers by reviewers. The gender ratio of editors for Functional Ecology was majority male, but the proportion of female editors increased over time. The gender ratio of selected reviewers was also highly majority male, but the proportion of women selected as reviewers increased over the 10 years largely because the number of women on the editorial board increased and female editors invited more female reviewers than did male editors. Male editors selected <25% female reviewers even in the year they selected the most women, but female editors consistently selected ˜30–35% female reviewers. Editors also over-selected reviewers from their own geographic locality. Women invited to review were less likely to respond to review invitations, but more likely to accept if they responded. Women invited to review responded to the invitation similarly regardless of whether the editor inviting them was male or female, but men invited to review were both less likely to respond and more likely to decline if the editor was female. Review scores given to papers did not differ between male and female reviewers, and final decisions (proportion of papers rejected) did not differ between male and female editors. The proportion of women among selected reviewers decreased with editor seniority when the editor was male but increased with editor seniority when the editor was female. Thus, the gender ratio of selected reviewers differed little between early-career male and female editors but differed a lot between late-career (more senior) male and female editors. Individuals invited to review were less likely to agree to review if the editor was more senior. Editor gender, seniority and geographic location affect who is invited to review for Functional Ecology, and how invitees respond to review invitations, but not the final outcome of the peer review process. To increase diversity of reviewer populations, journals should increase gender, age and geographic diversity of their editorial boards.
Data from: Gender differences in peer review outcomes and manuscript impact at six journals of ecology and evolution
The productivity and performance of men is generally rated more highly than that of women in controlled experiments, suggesting conscious or unconscious gender biases in assessment. The degree to which editors and reviewers of scholarly journals exhibit gender biases that influence outcomes of the peer review process remains uncertain due to substantial variation among studies. We test whether gender predicts the outcomes of editorial and peer review for >23,000 research manuscripts submitted to six journals in ecology and evolution from 2010 to 2015. Papers with female and male first authors were equally likely to be sent for peer review. However, papers with female first authors obtained, on average, slightly worse peer review scores and were more likely to be rejected after peer review, though the difference varied among journals. These gender differences appear to be partly due to differences in authorial roles. Papers for the which the first author deferred corresponding authorship to a coauthor (which women do more often than men) obtained significantly worse peer review scores and were less likely to get positive editorial decisions. Gender differences in corresponding authorship explained some of gender differences in peer review scores and positive editorial decisions. In contrast to these observations on submitted manuscripts, gender differences in peer review outcomes were observed in a survey of >12,000 published manuscripts; women reported similar rates of rejection (from a prior journal) before eventual publication. After publication, papers with female authors were cited less often than those with male authors, though the differences are very small (~2%). Our data do not allow us to test hypotheses about mechanisms underlying the gender discrepancies we observed, but strongly support the conclusion that papers authored by women have lower acceptance rates and are less well cited than are papers authored by men in ecology.
Data from: Recruitment of reviewers is becoming harder at some journals: a test of the influence of reviewer fatigue at six journals in ecology and evolution
Background: It is commonly reported by editors that it has become harder to recruit reviewers for peer review and that this is because individuals are being asked to review too often and are experiencing reviewer fatigue. However, evidence supporting these arguments is largely anecdotal. Main body: We examine responses of individuals to review invitations for six journals in ecology and evolution. The proportion of invitations that lead to a submitted review has been decreasing steadily over 13 years (2003–2015) for four of the six journals examined, with a cumulative effect that has been quite substantial (average decline from 56% of review invitations generating a review in 2003 to just 37% in 2015). The likelihood that an invitee agrees to review declines significantly with the number of invitations they receive in a year. However, the average number of invitations being sent to prospective reviewers and the proportion of individuals being invited more than once per year has not changed much over these 13 years, despite substantial increases in the total number of review invitations being sent by these journals—the reviewer base has expanded concomitant with this growth in review requests. Conclusions: The proportion of review invitations that lead to a review being submitted has been declining steadily for four of the six journals examined here, but reviewer fatigue is not likely the primary explanation for this decline.
Journal based analysis of the Open Access Europe PMC articles.
<p>This file shows the 20 most-represented journals that tag data citations in the XML within articles in the Open Access set from Europe PMC (May 2013). Secondly, it shows the 20 most-represented journals according to number of individual articles, demonstrating that the journals that undertake tagging of data citations most frequently are not the same as those that occur most frequently.</p>
Publishers of journals listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
<p>The file contains all publishers of journals listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ).</p> <p>On August 1, 2017, 9,621 journals were listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). Only 32 publishers published more than 20 of these journals and thus have a quantitatively significant influence on Open Access. PLOS can not be found among them, but still has influence, but more qualitative than quantitative.</p> <p>These 32 publishers publish 2,950 journals, which are 31% of all journals listed in the DOAJ. At this date, the DOAJ reported 7,474 publishers, thus 0.43% of all DOAJ-listed publishers produced 31% of the journals.</p> <p>Of these 2,950 journals, 1,641 (56%) are in the hand of publishers who already dominate the market in the subscription model: e.g. Elsevier, Springer Nature (including BioMed Central, Frontiers), Wiley, SAGE, De Gruyter, Taylor & Francis, OUP, Wolters Kluwer).</p> <p>The data was gathered at August 1, 2017 using the Directory of Open Access Journals web interface. The total number of journals at this point of time was 9,621.</p>
Dataset to reproduce the figures in "Parameterizing the Impact of Unresolved Temperature Variability on the Large-Scale Density Field: Part 2. Modeling." in Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems (JAMES)
Ocean circulation models have systematic errors in large-scale horizontal density gradients due to estimating the grid-cell-mean density by applying the nonlinear seawater equation of state to the grid-cell-mean water properties. In frontal regions where unresolved subgrid-scale (SGS) fluctuations are significant, dynamically relevant errors in the representation of current systems can result. A previous study developed a novel and computationally efficient parameterization of the unresolved SGS temperature variance andresulting density correction. This parameterization was empirically validated but not tested in an ocean model. In this study, we implement deterministic and stochastic variants of this parameterization in the pressure-gradient force term of a coupled ocean-sea ice configuration of CESM-MOM6 and perform a suite of hindcast sensitivity experiments to investigate the ocean response. The parameterization leads to coherent changes in the large-scale ocean circulation and hydrography, particularly in the Nordic Seas and Labrador Sea, which are attributable in large part to changes in the seasonally varying upper-ocean exchange through Denmark Strait. In addition, the separated Gulf Stream strengthens and shifts equatorward, reducing a common bias in coarse-resolution ocean models. The ocean response to the deterministic and stochastic variants of the parameterization is qualitatively, albeit not quantitatively, similar, yet qualitative differences are found in various regions.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.