Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2022View details →

Quantum calculation results for "Butyl Acetate Pyrolysis and Combustion Chemistry: Mechanism Generation and Shock Tube Experiments"

This repository contains the quantum calculation results associated with the paper "Butyl Acetate Pyrolysis and Combustion Chemistry: Mechanism Generation and Shock Tube Experiments" by Xiaorui Dong, Gianmaria Pio, Farhan Arafin, Andrew Laich, Jessica Baker, Erik Ninnemann, Subith S. Vasu, and William H. Green. In the BA_QM.zip, there are five subfolders: <ul> <li>The "BA_Habs" folder has 18 entries related to the calculations of butyl acetate H abstraction reactions</li> <li>The "BA_Retroene" folder has 6 entries related to the calculations of butyl acetate retro-ene reactions</li> <li>The "Species" folder has 606 entries related to the calculations of non-TS species included in the kinetic mechanisms.</li> <li>The "TS_XYZ" and "XYZ" folders contain the XYZ files of the calculated TS and non-TS geometries, respectively.</li> </ul> For each species and TS calculation, the CBS-QB3 optimization/single point energy calculation is stored in the "composite" folder, the frequency calculation is stored in the 'freq' folder, and scan jobs for torsional modes (if available) are stored in the 'scan_XXXX' folders. For reaction and TS entries, folders are named in a user-readable way. For species, folders are named according to their SMILES representation.

opencc-zeroJun 2024View details →

Dataset: Adicet Bio, Inc. (ACET) Stock Performance

This dataset provides historical stock market performance data for specific companies. It enables users to analyze and understand the past trends and fluctuations in stock prices over time. This information can be utilized for various purposes such as investment analysis, financial research, and market trend forecasting.

Fig. 7. Acetes spiniger Hansen, 1919 in Taxonomic Assessment of Acetes indicus H. Milne Edwards, 1830 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Sergestoidea) as Revealed from Molecular and Morphological Analyses: Re-validation of A. spiniger Hansen, 1919 and Designation of a New Species

Fig. 7. Acetes spiniger Hansen, 1919. (a–e) male (cl 4.3 mm) and (f–i) female (cl. 5.8 mm) from off Kuala Selangor, Malaysia (NSMT-Cr 31637): a, anterior part of cephalothorax, lateral; b, posterior part of abdomen, lateral; c, right left lower antennular flagellum; d, basal segments of third pereopod and genital coxa, ventral; e, capitulum of right petasma; f, anterior part of cephalothorax, lateral; g, basal segments of third pereopod and third and fourth thoracic sternites, ventral; h, lateral profile showing channels and sternites between third and fourth thoracic somites, i, posterior part of telson, dorsal. Abbreviations: gc, genital coxa; iiist, ivst, third and fourth thoracic sternites, respectively.

Fig. 6 in Taxonomic Assessment of Acetes indicus H. Milne Edwards, 1830 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Sergestoidea) as Revealed from Molecular and Morphological Analyses: Re-validation of A. spiniger Hansen, 1919 and Designation of a New Species

Fig. 6. Acetes omorii Hanamura, Imai & Hardianto sp. nov. (a) holotype male (cl 5.3 mm) (NSMT-Cr 31621), and (b–d) paratype female (cl 6.0 mm) (NSMT-Cr 31622) from Matang Mangrove, Malaysia: a, b, right lower antennular flagellum of male and female, respectively; c, basal segments of third pereopod and third and fourth abdominal sternites, ventral; d, lateral profile showing channels and sternites between third and fourth thoracic somites. Abbreviations: iiist, ivst, third and fourth thoracic sternites, respectively.

Fig. 3 in Taxonomic Assessment of Acetes indicus H. Milne Edwards, 1830 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Sergestoidea) as Revealed from Molecular and Morphological Analyses: Re-validation of A. spiniger Hansen, 1919 and Designation of a New Species

Fig. 3. Map showing sampling localities and distribution ranges of Acetes indicus, A. omorii sp. nov. and A. spiniger recognised in this study with certainty: blue solid circles (nos. 1–2) for A. indicus, green solid squares and open square (museum vouchered specimens) for A. spiniger, and red solid triangles for A. omorii sp. nov. Numerals indicating sampling locations: 1, Chiringa; 2, Kumira-Sandwip Ship Ghat; 3, Merbok Mangrove; 4; Matang Mangrove, 5; Kuala Selangor; 6, Malacca; 7, Samut Prakan; 8, Setarap Estuary, South Kalimantan; and 9, Goa.

Fig. 2 in Taxonomic Assessment of Acetes indicus H. Milne Edwards, 1830 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Sergestoidea) as Revealed from Molecular and Morphological Analyses: Re-validation of A. spiniger Hansen, 1919 and Designation of a New Species

Fig. 2. Haplotype network (implemented in PopART) of the Acetes indicus, A. omorii sp. nov., and A. spiniger based on the mitochondrial 16S (a) and mitochondrial COI (b) markers using minimum spanning network (MSN) analysis with outgroups of congeneric species. Circles with different colours represent different species.

Fig. 1 in Taxonomic Assessment of Acetes indicus H. Milne Edwards, 1830 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Sergestoidea) as Revealed from Molecular and Morphological Analyses: Re-validation of A. spiniger Hansen, 1919 and Designation of a New Species

Fig. 1. Bayesian inference trees of Acetes indicus, A. omorii sp. nov., and A. spiniger with the outgroups of other congeneric species based on the mitochondrial 16S (a) and mitochondrial COI (b) markers. Values at the nodes are Bayesian posterior probabilities/Maximum Likelihood/Neighbor Joining support values. For the haplotype abbreviations, see Table 1.

Fig. 5 in Taxonomic Assessment of Acetes indicus H. Milne Edwards, 1830 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Sergestoidea) as Revealed from Molecular and Morphological Analyses: Re-validation of A. spiniger Hansen, 1919 and Designation of a New Species

Fig. 5. Acetes omorii Hanamura, Imai and Hardianto sp. nov. (a–g) holotype male (cl 5.3 mm) (NSMT-Cr 31621), and (b–d) paratype female (cl 6.0 mm) from Matang Mangrove, Malaysia (NSMT-Cr 31622): a, cephalothorax, lateral; b, same, anterior part enlarged; c, right posterior part of abdomen, lateral; d, posterior part of telson, dorsal; e, basal segments of third pereopod and genital coxa; f, capitulum of petasma, posterior; g, right endopod of second pleopod, mesial; h, anterior part of body.

Fig. 4. Acetes indicus H. Milne Edwards, 1830 in Taxonomic Assessment of Acetes indicus H. Milne Edwards, 1830 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Sergestoidea) as Revealed from Molecular and Morphological Analyses: Re-validation of A. spiniger Hansen, 1919 and Designation of a New Species

Fig. 4. Acetes indicus H. Milne Edwards, 1830. (a–g) male (cl 5.6 mm) from Kumia-Sandwip Ship Ghat Bangladesh, and (h–j) female (cl 7.3 mm) from same locality (NSMT-Cr 31616): a, anterior part of cephalothorax, lateral; b, posterior part of abdomen, lateral; c, posterior part of telson, dorsal; d, left lower antennular flagellum; e, basal segments of third pereopod and genital coxa, ventral; f, right petasma, posterior; g, same, capitulum; h, anterior part of cephalothorax, lateral; i, basal segments of third pereopod and third and fourth abdominal sternites, ventral; j, lateral profile showing channels and sternites between third and fourth thoracic somites. Abbreviations: gc, genital coxa; iiist and ivst, third and fourth thoracic sternites, respectively.

Fig. 2 in Attraction of Bactrocera cucurbitae and Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) to beer waste and other protein sources laced with ammonium acetate

Fig. 2. Response of males of Bactrocera cucurbitae and B. dorsalis to GF-120® NF Naturalyte® Fruit Fly Bait (= GF-120), Bugs for Bugs® Fruit Fly Bait (= Bugs for Bugs), Buminal® (= Buminal), and water (negative control) either in the absence (A), or presence (B) of ammonium acetate (= AA). For each species, different letters (lowercase: B. cucurbitae; uppercase: B. dorsalis) indicate significant differences according to ANOVA and the Fisher LSD tests at P ≤ 0.05.

Fig. 3 in Attraction of Bactrocera cucurbitae and Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) to beer waste and other protein sources laced with ammonium acetate

Fig. 3. Response of females of Bactrocera cucurbitae and B. dorsalis to GF- 120® NF Naturalyte® Fruit Fly Bait (= GF-120), Bugs for Bugs® Fruit Fly Bait (= Bugs for Bugs), Buminal® (= Buminal), and water (negative control) either in the absence (A), or presence (B) of ammonium acetate (= AA). For each species, different letters (lowercase: B. cucurbitae; uppercase: B. dorsalis) indicate significant differences according to ANOVA and the Fisher LSD tests at P ≤ 0.05.

Fig. 1 in Attraction of Bactrocera cucurbitae and Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) to beer waste and other protein sources laced with ammonium acetate

Fig. 1. Response of adult males (A) and females (B) of Bactrocera cucurbitae and B. dorsalis in field cages to Nu-Lure® Insect Bait (= Nu-Lure), beer waste, Bugs for Bugs® Fruit Fly Bait (= Bugs for Bugs), and Buminal® (= Buminal) either alone or with added ammonium acetate (= AA) or ammonium carbonate (= AC). Water was used as a negative control. For each fly species and sex, different letters (lowercase: B. cucurbitae; uppercase: B. dorsalis) indicate significant differences according to ANOVA and the Fisher LSD tests at P ≤ 0.05.

Fig. 4 in Attraction of Bactrocera cucurbitae and Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) to beer waste and other protein sources laced with ammonium acetate

Fig. 4. Response of males of Bactrocera cucurbitae and B. dorsalis to GF-120® NF Naturalyte® Fruit Fly Bait (= GF-120), beer waste, Nu-Lure® Insect Bait (= Nu-Lure), and water (negative control) either in the absence (A), or presence (B) of ammonium acetate (= AA). For each species, different letters (lowercase: B. cucurbitae; uppercase: B. dorsalis) indicate significant differences according to ANOVA and the Fisher LSD tests at P ≤ 0.05.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2017View details →

Fig. 2 in Evaluating the use of phenylacetonitrile plus acetic acid to monitor Pandemis pyrusana and Cydia pomonella (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in apple

Fig. 2. Mean (SE) number of male, female, and total Pandemis pyrusana caught in traps baited with either the sex pheromone lure (males only) or with phenylacetonitrile plus an acetic acid co-lure (males, females, and total moths). '*' denotes a significant mean difference as compared to male catch in the sex pheromone-baited trap, P <0.05.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2017View details →

Fig. 1 in Evaluating the use of phenylacetonitrile plus acetic acid to monitor Pandemis pyrusana and Cydia pomonella (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in apple

Fig. 1. Mean (SE) number of male, female, and total Cydia pomonella caught in traps with a sex pheromone plus pear ester combo lure and an acetic acid (AA) co-lure versus in traps with these same lures with the addition of a phenylacetonitrile (PAN) sachet lure, 7–21 Jul 2014, Moxee Washington, USA. 'N.S.' denotes a nonsignificant difference in moth catches between the 2 types of lures, P> 0.05.

opencc-by-nc-4.0Aug 2024View details →

Techno Economic Analysis of Biogas Purification by Methane and Acetate Manufacturing CO2 to CH4 2024 SuppInfo

Techno Economic Analysis calculations for manuscript of Biogas Purification by Methane and Acetate Manufacturing to convert CO2 to CH4: Wastewater treatment plants have two persistent financial and energetic drains, the carbon dioxide content of biogas, which limits its commercial sale, and the presence of trace organics in the wastewater effluent, which damages the aquatic ecosystem. Biogas is a renewable methane resource that is underutilized due to the variable CO2 content (~40%). Biogas is energy intensive to purify and limited by the economy of scale (>8.85 GJ/hour) to large-scale purification methods, thus small-scale processes require development. Electrocatalytic microbes native to wastewater have been shown to convert CO2 to CH4 and acetate, however complete conversion of the CO2 content to CH4 is energy intensive. Here we show a low power bioelectrochemical fuel cell design to purify biogas to pipeline quality methane (98%), manufacture methane and/or acetate, and remove trace organics, using HCO3- as the transport charge carrier from dissolved CO2 from the biogas through an anion exchange membrane. This decreased the power required to separate CO2 from methane in biogas on a molar basis, resulting in a net energy recovery similar to current industrial systems. Magnesium anode use resulted in an energy positive system. Tests evaluated the influence of cathode potential on the current density, HCO3- ion flux and the rates and efficiencies of methane production, resulting in optimization at -0.7V vs Standard Hydrogen Electrode (SHE). A techno-economic analysis modeled a positive return on investment for scaled-up production to purify small biogas streams that are otherwise financially unrecoverable. Carbon sequestration by production of methane, acetate and solid fertilizers demonstrated profitable and energy efficient waste-to-resource conversion.