Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
18
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
18 results for “Agathemera”
FIGURE 10 in Comparative morphology of the eggs from the eight species in the genus Agathemera Stål (Insecta: Phasmatodea), through phylogenetic comparative method approach
FIGURE 10. Phylogenetic hypothesis based on the morphological characters from the Agathemera eggs. a. Unrooted tree considering all the Agathemera species' eggs. b. rooted tree considering just the species in clade 1 (sensu Vera et al. 2012) and A. grylloidea as outgroup. c. Rooted tree considering only the species in clade 2 (sensu Vera et al. 2012) and A. luteola as outgroup. Black circles and their respective numbers indicate synapomorphies. Jacknife/Bootstrap values are shown for each node.
FIGURE 6 in Comparative morphology of the eggs from the eight species in the genus Agathemera Stål (Insecta: Phasmatodea), through phylogenetic comparative method approach
FIGURE 6. External morphology of the eggs from clade 2 and their respective operculum. a1-c1, dorsal view; a2-c2 operculum. The order of the eggs and operculum from right to left is A. grylloidea, A. elegans, A. mesoauriculae (escale = 1mm).
FIGURE 7 in Comparative morphology of the eggs from the eight species in the genus Agathemera Stål (Insecta: Phasmatodea), through phylogenetic comparative method approach
FIGURE 7. Ultrastructure surface of the micropylar plate of the eggs from clade 1 and their respective operculum. A1-E1, micropylar plate ultrastructure; A2-E2 ultrastructure surface of the operculum. The order of the micropylar plates and operculum from top to bottom is A. luteola, A. maculafulgens, A. crassa. A. millepunctata, A. claraziana.
FIGURE 8 in Comparative morphology of the eggs from the eight species in the genus Agathemera Stål (Insecta: Phasmatodea), through phylogenetic comparative method approach
FIGURE 8. Ultrastructure surface of the micropylar plate of the eggs from clade 2 and their respective operculum. A1-C1, micropylar plate ultrastructure; A2-C2 ultrastructure surface of the operculum. The order of the micropylar plates and operculum from top to botom is A. grylloidea, A. elegans, A. mesoauriculae.
FIGURE 9 in Comparative morphology of the eggs from the eight species in the genus Agathemera Stål (Insecta: Phasmatodea), through phylogenetic comparative method approach
FIGURE 9. Character states reconstruction by maximum parsimony over the molecular phylogeny (sensu Vera et al. 2012). The character states for both the ancestral nodes A-G and actual species (H-O) are represented by color-coded boxes, where numbers indicate the character and colors the state. Besides, examples of the micropylar plate open (A. maculafulgens) and closed (A. elegans) are shown. Note: character numbers are consistent with those throughout the text.
FIGURE 5 in Comparative morphology of the eggs from the eight species in the genus Agathemera Stål (Insecta: Phasmatodea), through phylogenetic comparative method approach
FIGURE 5. External morphology of the eggs from clade 1 and their respective operculum. a1-e1, dorsal view; a2-e2 operculum. The order of the eggs and operculum from right to left is A. luteola, A. maculafulgens, A. crassa. A. millepunctata, A. claraziana (escale = 1mm).
FIGURE 3 in Comparative morphology of the eggs from the eight species in the genus Agathemera Stål (Insecta: Phasmatodea), through phylogenetic comparative method approach
FIGURE 3. Principal component analysis for the Agathemera eggs. The percentage of the variance explained by each principal component plotted is in parentheses. Every line connects a data point with its corresponding centroid. a. PCA for the eight Agathemera species; b. PCA for the species from clade 1; c. PCA for species from clade 2.
FIGURE 2 in Comparative morphology of the eggs from the eight species in the genus Agathemera Stål (Insecta: Phasmatodea), through phylogenetic comparative method approach
FIGURE 2. Distribution of the nine morphometric variables measured. the species are ordered following the phylogenetic relationships. Boxes represent the values between the 25 and 75 percentiles respectively, the horizontal line is the median and the point within each box is the mean and the whiskers indicate the sample range. Light grey boxplots correspond to species from clade 1 and dark grey boxplots correspond to species from clade 2. a. Capsule width; b. Capsule length; c. Capsule height; d. Micropylar plate length; e. Micropylar plate width; f. Operculum length; g. Operculum width; h. Operculum height; i. Opercular angle.
FIGURE 1 in Comparative morphology of the eggs from the eight species in the genus Agathemera Stål (Insecta: Phasmatodea), through phylogenetic comparative method approach
FIGURE 1. schematic drawing of an Agathemera egg showing the different variables measured. a. dorsal view. b. lateral view. c. upper view. Abbreviations: w = width; mpl = micropylar plate width; mpl = micropylar plate length; h = capsule height; l = capsule length; opl = operculum length; opa = opercular angle; opw = operculum width; operculum height.
Figure 3 in Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Agathemera (Insecta: Phasmatodea) inferred from the genes 16S, COI and H3
Figure 3. Reconstruction of the ancestral states for the development of the mesonotal lobules obtained with the ML analysis: model MK1 superimposed on the phylogeny obtained with ML analysis of the three combined genes. An image of the mesonotal lobules are shown for each species, and the habitus of 'A. crassa' and 'A. mesoauriculae' is shown for clade 'A' and 'B', respectively.
Figure 2 in Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Agathemera (Insecta: Phasmatodea) inferred from the genes 16S, COI and H3
Figure 2. Phylogeny obtained by ML analysis of the markers 16S + COI + H3 used together. The shaded area represents the genus Agathemera and the boxes show lineages 'A' and 'B'. Over each node is the Bayesian a posterior probability and below the line are bootstrap estimations for ML/MP. Shaded boxes above nodes show partitioned Bremer support values; from top to bottom: 16S, COI, and H3.
Figure 1 in Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Agathemera (Insecta: Phasmatodea) inferred from the genes 16S, COI and H3
Figure 1. Distribution of the eight species of Agathemera in South America. Symbols signify collection localities; shaded areas indicate approximate ranges of distribution.
FIGURE 9. Potential geographic distribution estimated for A in Cladistic, biogeographic and environmental niche analysis of the species of Agathemera Stål (Phasmatida, Agathemeridae)
FIGURE 9. Potential geographic distribution estimated for A. elegans.
FIGURE 4 in Cladistic, biogeographic and environmental niche analysis of the species of Agathemera Stål (Phasmatida, Agathemeridae)
FIGURE 4. Mean percent contribution of variables for each species in the ENM analysis.
FIGURE 1 in Cladistic, biogeographic and environmental niche analysis of the species of Agathemera Stål (Phasmatida, Agathemeridae)
FIGURE 1. Distribution map of the species of the genus.
FIGURE 5. Potential geographic distribution estimated for A in Cladistic, biogeographic and environmental niche analysis of the species of Agathemera Stål (Phasmatida, Agathemeridae)
FIGURE 5. Potential geographic distribution estimated for A. claraziana.
FIGURE 4 in Comparative morphology of the eggs from the eight species in the genus Agathemera Stål (Insecta: Phasmatodea), through phylogenetic comparative method approach
FIGURE 4. Distribution of height/length ratio. the species are ordered following the phylogenetic relationships. Boxes represent the values between the 25 and 75 percentiles respectively, the horizontal line is the median and the point within each box is the mean and the whiskers indicate the sample range. Light grey boxplots correspond to species from clade 1 and dark grey boxplots correspond to species from clade 2. Different letters indicate significant differences (α = 0.05) in multiple comparisons. * indicates that differences are marginally significant (p = 0.043, see table 3), however the letters indicate no differences between those group, for simplicity in the coding.
FIGURE 2 in Cladistic, biogeographic and environmental niche analysis of the species of Agathemera Stål (Phasmatida, Agathemeridae)
FIGURE 2. Tree obtained using implicit enumeration. Jacknife and, Bootstrap values are shown for each node. Apormophies (exclusive in black and non exclusive in white) are also indicated at each and corresponding character state.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.