Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2021View details →

Fig. 3 in The Relationship Between Fish Length And Otolith Size And Weight Of The Australian Anchovy, Engraulis Australis (Clupeiformes, Engraulidae), Retrieved From The Food Of The Australasian Gannet, Morus Serrator (Suliformes, Sulidae), Hauraki Gulf, New Zealand

Fig. 3. Fish total length relationship with: A — otolith length; B — otolith width; C — otolith weight.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2021View details →

Fig. 2. A in The Relationship Between Fish Length And Otolith Size And Weight Of The Australian Anchovy, Engraulis Australis (Clupeiformes, Engraulidae), Retrieved From The Food Of The Australasian Gannet, Morus Serrator (Suliformes, Sulidae), Hauraki Gulf, New Zealand

Fig. 2. A, Engraulis australis, 138 mm TL; B, Otolith of Engraulis australis, 135 mm TL showing otolith sizes, length (OL) and width (OW).

Fig. 5 in Hydrographic conditions driving sardine and anchovy populations in a land-locked sea Abstract

Fig. 5: Common trends (uniteless) and factor loadings of anchovy and sardine landings and recruits at age 0. Trends were calculated with DFA using three common trends and two explanatory variables (T100, S100). Factor loadings are plotted for: 1 - sardine recruits age 0, 2 - sardine landings, 3 - anchovy recruits, 4 - anchovy landings.

Fig. 4 in Hydrographic conditions driving sardine and anchovy populations in a land-locked sea Abstract

Fig. 4: Annual time series of temperature, salinity, apparent oxygen utilisation (AOU), total inorganic nitrogen (TIN) and orthophosphates (HPO 2-), all collected at station S between 1975 and 2010.

Fig. 3 in Hydrographic conditions driving sardine and anchovy populations in a land-locked sea Abstract

Fig. 3: From top to bottom: annual time series of total (sardine+anchovy) recruits and landings; sardine recruits and landings; and anchovy recruits and landings, all between 1975 and 2010.

Fig. 2 in Hydrographic conditions driving sardine and anchovy populations in a land-locked sea Abstract

Fig. 2: Schematic diagram of the fisheries and environmental data, methods and models used in analyses.

Fig. 6 in Hydrographic conditions driving sardine and anchovy populations in a land-locked sea Abstract

Fig. 6: Observed values (diamonds) and fitted values (black lines) of: sardine recruits age 0, sardine landings, anchovy recruits age 0, anchovy landings. Fitted values were calculated with DFA using three common trends and two explanatory variables (T100,S100).

Fig. 1 in Hydrographic conditions driving sardine and anchovy populations in a land-locked sea Abstract

Fig. 1: The geography of the Adriatic-Ionian basin, with major dynamical features and oceanographic processes illustrated. WAC stands for the surface Western Adriatic Current driven by freshwater inputs, ADW denotes the bottom density current which originates from wintertime dense water generation at the shallow northern (D1) and deep southern (D2) Adriatic regions, while EAC stands for the Eastern Adriatic Current flowing at surface and intermediate layers. Ionian Sea circulation includes cyclonic (C) or anticyclonic (A) circular current regime in its northern parts, resulting in warm and saline Levantine Intermediate Water (LIW) and colder and less saline upper-layer Western Mediterranean Waters (WMW) flowing at different pathways depending on the BIOS (Bimodal Adriatic-Ionian Oscillation) phase (full line denotes pathways during cyclonic BIOS phase and dashed line during anticyclonic BIOS phase). Finally, EMT denotes the deep massive outflow of dense waters from the Aegean Sea to the Eastern Mediterranean during the Eastern Mediterranean Transient in early 1990s. Sardine and anchovy data were collected northwest from the GSA 17 line (pink, dashed). Station at which environmental data were collected is marked with S.

Fig. 4 in Stolephorus lotus, a New Anchovy (Teleostei: Clupeiformes: Engraulidae) from the Northern Territory, Australia

Fig. 4. Relationships of total gill raker numbers (TGR) on (A) first gill arch (1GA), (B) second gill arch (2GA) and (C) third gill arch (3GA) to SL in Stolephorus lotus sp. nov. (circles) and S. andhraensis (squares).

Fig. 6. A in Stolephorus lotus, a New Anchovy (Teleostei: Clupeiformes: Engraulidae) from the Northern Territory, Australia

Fig. 6. A principal components analysis (PCA) graph plotting the first two components for Stolephorus lotus sp. nov. (circles), S. acinaces (triangles), and S. andhraensis (squares) based on 29 morphological characters.

Fig. 5 in Stolephorus lotus, a New Anchovy (Teleostei: Clupeiformes: Engraulidae) from the Northern Territory, Australia

Fig. 5. Relationships of caudal-peduncle length to SL in Stolephorus lotus sp. nov. (circles) and S. andhraensis (squares).

Fig. 3 in Stolephorus lotus, a New Anchovy (Teleostei: Clupeiformes: Engraulidae) from the Northern Territory, Australia

Fig. 3. Relationships of selected measurements relative to standard length (SL) or head length (HL) versus SL in Stolephorus lotus sp. nov. (circles) and S. acinaces (triangles). A, head length (as % of SL); B, predorsal fin length as % SL; C, body depth as % SL; D, maxilla length as % HL.

Fig. 1 in Stolephorus lotus, a New Anchovy (Teleostei: Clupeiformes: Engraulidae) from the Northern Territory, Australia

Fig. 1. (A) Lateral, (B) dorsal, and (C) ventral views of holotype of Stolephorus lotus sp. nov. (NTM S. 15265-006, 40.0 mm SL, Van Diemen Gulf, Northern Territory, Australia).

Fig. 2 in Stolephorus lotus, a New Anchovy (Teleostei: Clupeiformes: Engraulidae) from the Northern Territory, Australia

Fig. 2. Head of paratype of Stolephorus lotus sp. nov., NTM S. 15265-009, 36.2 mm SL, Van Diemen Gulf, Northern Territory, Australia. Dots indicate posterior part of maxilla. Triangle and arrow indicate cavity of preopercle and posterior tip of maxilla, respectively. Scale bar indicates 1 mm.

Fig. 12 in Fig. 6. A in , a New Anchovy (Teleostei: Clupeiformes: Engraulidae) from the Northern Territory, Australia.

Fig. 12. Diploid metaphase (A), and karyotype (B) of Technomyrmex vitiensis (2n = 16; 2n = 16m) from Oiapoque, state of Amapá, Brazil. Scale bars = 5 µm.

Fig. 3 in Fig. 6. A in , a New Anchovy (Teleostei: Clupeiformes: Engraulidae) from the Northern Territory, Australia.

Fig. 3. Profile view of A, Leptomyrmex relictus (ANTWEB1032698); B, Dolichoderus attelaboides (CASENT0249660, www.antweb.org, image by Will Ericson); C, Dolichoderus bispinosus (CASENT0173833, www.antweb.org, image by April Nobile). Scale bars = 2 mm.

Fig. 13 in Fig. 6. A in , a New Anchovy (Teleostei: Clupeiformes: Engraulidae) from the Northern Territory, Australia.

Fig. 13. Diploid metaphases of Technomyrmex vitiensis submitted to (A) Giemsa staining showing heterochromatic pattern in centromeric/ pericentromeric regions on chromosomes, and (B) Fluorescence in situ hybridization with 18S rDNA probe (red blocks). Scale bars = 5 µm.

Fig. 9 in Fig. 6. A in , a New Anchovy (Teleostei: Clupeiformes: Engraulidae) from the Northern Territory, Australia.

Fig. 9. Full-face views and details of mandible basal margins. A and B, Forelius nigriventris (CASENT0173738, www.antweb.org, image by April Nobile); C and D, Linepithema keiteli (CASENT0106975, www.antweb.org, image by Alexander Wild).

Fig. 2 in Fig. 6. A in , a New Anchovy (Teleostei: Clupeiformes: Engraulidae) from the Northern Territory, Australia.

Fig. 2. Technomyrmex vitiensis male (UFV-LABECOL-010784). (A) full-face view, (B) profile view, (C) fore wing, (D) sternite 9, (E) tergite 9, (F, G, and H) genital capsule, dorsal, ventral and lateral views, respectively, (I) volsella, (J, and K) entire penisvalva and detail of dented ventral margin, respectively. Scale bars: A = 0.2 mm, B and C = 0.5 mm, D, E, H and J = 0.1 mm. Scale bar in H serves for F and G as well.