Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
68
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
68 results for “Anthonomus”
Figura 1 in Evaluación en campo de atrayentes para la captura de Anthonomus eugenii Cano (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)
Figura 1. Promedio de picudos recapturados a 5 y 10 m de distancia durante 2018. Tratamientos: MS (mezcla sintética), AE (aceite esencial), FA (feromona de agregación), FA: MS (feromona de agregación: mezcla sintética), FA: AE (feromona de agregación: aceite esencial) y TA (trampa sin atrayente como testigo). Medias ± Error estándar de los tratamientos. Letras distintas indican diferencias significativas; Prueba de Bonferroni (P <0,05).
Figura 2 in Evaluación en campo de atrayentes para la captura de Anthonomus eugenii Cano (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)
Figura 2. Promedio de picudos recapturados a 15, 30 y 60 m de distancia durante 2018. Tratamientos: MS (Mezcla sintética), AE (aceite esencial), FA (feromona de agregación), FA: MS (feromona de agregación: mezcla sintética), FA: AE (feromona de agregación: aceite esencial) y TA (trampa sin atrayente como testigo). Medias ± Error estándar de los tratamientos. Letras distintas indican diferencias significativas; Prueba de Bonferroni (P <0,05).
Figure 2 in A new species of the genus Anthonomus Germar, 1817 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) from Altai with a list of the Russian species
Figure 2. Distribution of the subgenus Anthonomidius from Asia: star – A. germanicus, octagon – A. dudkoi, square – A. morosus, circle – A. dauricus.
Figure 1 in A new species of the genus Anthonomus Germar, 1817 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) from Altai with a list of the Russian species
Figure 1. Anthonomus dudkoi sp. n., holotype, female: a - body, dorsally, b - abdomen, ventrally, c – body, laterally. Scale bar = 1.0 mm.
Fig. 2 in A rapid screening method for resistance to Anthonomus eugenii (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Capsicum (Solanaceae) spp. plants
Fig. 2. Visual scale of damaged leaf area by Anthonomus eugenii on pepper leaves: 1 = leaf with 0% of damaged area, 3 = leaf with approximate 25% of damaged area, 5 = leaf with approximate 50% of damaged area, 7 = leaf with approximate 75% of damaged area, and 9 = leaf with approximate 100% of damaged area.
Fig. 1 in A rapid screening method for resistance to Anthonomus eugenii (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Capsicum (Solanaceae) spp. plants
Fig. 1. Plastic micro-cages used for resistance experiments to Anthonomus eugenii on pepper leaves: (A) empty micro-cage, (B) micro-cage used as negative control where we placed only pepper leaves without insects, (C) micro-cage with adults of A. eugenii and pepper leaves, and (D) close up of 1 micro-cage with adults of A. eugenii and pepper leaves for resistance experiments.
Fig. 4 in A rapid screening method for resistance to Anthonomus eugenii (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Capsicum (Solanaceae) spp. plants
Fig. 4. Damage caused by Anthonomus eugenii: (A) susceptible control leaf of the Fascinato commercial cultivar with severe damage, and (B) Capsicum annuum plant considered resistant of the UTC17 wild pepper population collected from Tabasco, Mexico, infested with A. eugenii. Picture was taken 7 d afer infestation.
Fig. 3 in A rapid screening method for resistance to Anthonomus eugenii (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Capsicum (Solanaceae) spp. plants
Fig. 3. Mortality (%) of Anthonomus eugenii adults per micro-cage during 21 consecutive d afer infestation (DAI) in pepper leaves from wild and landrace populations and commercial cultivars. Bars are average percentage mortality. Comparisons made with Mann-Whitney test (P ≤ 0.05). Different letters in the columns indicate significant differences. Error bars indicate the standard error.
Fig. 3 in Influence of plant direction, layer, and spacing on the infestation levels of Anthonomus eugenii (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in open jalapeño pepper fields in North Florida
Fig. 3. Number of infested fruits and presence of weevil larvae in different jalapeño plant parts (means ± SE). Number of infested fruits in 5 directions (A), in 3 layers (C), and at 5 spacings (E). Number of larval A. eugenii within infested fruits in 5 directions (B), in 3 layers (D), and at 5 spacings (F). Different letters indicate significant differences among the treatments (means separated by Tukey's HSD, P <0.05).
Fig. 4 in Influence of plant direction, layer, and spacing on the infestation levels of Anthonomus eugenii (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in open jalapeño pepper fields in North Florida
Fig. 4. Fruit wall thickness and single weight in different jalapeño plant parts (means ± SE). Fruit wall thickness (A) and single weight (B) in 5 directions, fruit wall thickness (C) and single weight (D) in 3 layers, fruit wall thickness (E) and single weight (F) at 5 spacings. Different letters indicate significant differences among the treatments (means separated by Tukey's HSD, P <0.05).
Fig. 2 in Influence of plant direction, layer, and spacing on the infestation levels of Anthonomus eugenii (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in open jalapeño pepper fields in North Florida
Fig. 2. Infestation and larval density of pepper weevil in 2017. Vertical bars are standard errors of the means.
Fig. 5 in Influence of plant direction, layer, and spacing on the infestation levels of Anthonomus eugenii (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in open jalapeño pepper fields in North Florida
Fig. 5. Relationship between the infestation level and the fruit wall thickness (A) and single weight (B). Each data point represents the number of infested fruits per plant in each fruit wall thickness or weight (means ± SE). Line was fitted using linear regression analysis.
Fig. 1 in Influence of plant direction, layer, and spacing on the infestation levels of Anthonomus eugenii (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in open jalapeño pepper fields in North Florida
Fig. 1. (a) Adult pepper weevil feeding on the stalk of a pepper fruit; (b) young and full grown larvae inside a pepper fruit; (c) pupa inside the fruit; and (d) adult weevil exit holes in pepper fruits.
Fig. 2 in A modelling approach to describe the Anthonomus eugenii (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) life cycle in plant protection: a priori and a posteriori analysis
Fig. 2. Simulation output from the model (1) evaluating the daily average temperature with the Logan development rate function.
Fig. 1 in A modelling approach to describe the Anthonomus eugenii (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) life cycle in plant protection: a priori and a posteriori analysis
Fig. 1. Simulation output from the model (1) evaluating the daily average temperature with the Briére development rate function.
Fig. 3 in A modelling approach to describe the Anthonomus eugenii (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) life cycle in plant protection: a priori and a posteriori analysis
Fig. 3. Briére development rate function compared with life tables point from Toapanta et al. (2005).
Figure 7-8 in The Anthonomus juniperinus group, with descriptions of two new species (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)
Figure 7-8. Anthonomus sanborni, pygidium, dorsal view. 7) Male with exposed apical portion of median lobe, Laird's Landing, Siskiyou County, California. 8) Female, Utah.
Figure 1-6 in The Anthonomus juniperinus group, with descriptions of two new species (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)
Figure 1-6. Anthonomus juniperinus group spp., habitus, lateral and dorsal views. 1, 2) A. juniperinus, male, 10 mi. SW Elkhart, Texas. 3, 4) A. sanborni, female, 15 mi. N Alvord Ranch, Harney County, Oregon. 5, 6) A. rileyi, female, vic. Long Hollow Creek, Travis County, Texas.
Anthonomus eugenii ̶ Pest Report and Datasheet to support ranking of EU candidate priority pests
<p>These two files are part of the outputs produced under the mandate <a href="http://registerofquestions.efsa.europa.eu/roqFrontend/wicket/page?1-1.ILinkListener-contentPane-listContainer-pageable-21-mandateNumberLnk">M-2017-0056</a> of the European Commission requesting EFSA for technical assistance in the field of quarantine pests qualifying as priority pests as by Article 6(2) of the Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 <em>on protective measures against pests of plants</em>.</p> <p>Under the mandate EFSA produced: i) 1 methodology report (DOI available at the field "Related/alternate identifiers"), ii) 28 datasheets, one for each of the 28 candidate pests, and iii) 28 pest reports supporting the information provided in the datasheets.</p> <p>EFSA wishes to acknowledge the contribution of Antoon Loomans and Antonio Biondi to the EKE and the review conducted by Josep Anton Jaques Miret.</p>
Figure 3 in A new species of the genus Anthonomus Germar, 1817 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) from Altai with a list of the Russian species
Figure 3. Habitat of Anthonomus dudkoi sp. n.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.