Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
12
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
12 results for “App comparison”
Mining Detailed Information from Description for App functions comparison
<p>The corresponding Dataset and Source-Code for the paper named "Mining Detailed Information from Description for App functions comparison"</p>
Evaluation of Near Visual Acuity With ODYSIGHT, a Smartphone Based Medical App in Comparison to a Standardized Method
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03457441. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Comparison of Men's Prevention Apps to Research Efficacy
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03965221. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Comparison of Follow-up by Mobile App or Paper Questionnaire of Patients Undergoing Rotator Cuff Surgery
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04359160. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 6.
Data from: Comparison of the validity of the checklist assessment in the cardiac arrest simulations with the app in an academic hospital in Taiwan: a retrospective observational study
Background: Robust assessment is a crucial component in Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) training to determine whether participants have achieved learning objectives with little or no variation in their overall outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate resuscitation performance by real-time logs. We hypothesized that instructors may not be able to evaluate time-sensitive parameters, namely, chest compression fraction, time to initiating chest compression, and time to initiating defibrillation efficiently in a subjective manner. Methods: Video records and formal checklist-based test results of Megacode scenarios for the ACLS certification examination at several hospitals in Taipei were examined. For the study interest, three time-sensitive parameters were measured via video review assisted by a mobile phone application, and were used for evaluation. We evaluated if the pass/fail results made by instructors via checklists were correlated with these parameters. Results: A total of 185 Megacode scenarios were eligible for the final analysis. Among the three parameters, good chest compression fraction was statistically significant with higher odds ratio (OR) of passing (OR = 3.65; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36-9.91; P = 0.01). In 112 participants with one parameter that did not meet the criteria, 25 were graded as fail, making the specificity 22.3% (95% CI: 15.0-31.2%). Conclusions: Visual observation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance is not accurate when evaluating time-sensitive parameters. Objective results should be offered for training outcome evaluation, and also for feedback to participants.
Data from: Comparison of the validity of the checklist assessment in the cardiac arrest simulations with the app in an academic hospital in Taiwan: a retrospective observational study
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
PHARMACODYNAMICS ASSESSMENT PRODUCT HEPARIN SODIUM (INTRAVENOUSLY) OF THE SWINE 5.000UI/ML OF BLAU FARMACÊUTICA S/A IN HEALTHY SUBJECTS IN COMPARISON OF SODIUM HEPARIN APP PHARMACEUTICALS
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01651923. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
PHARMACODYNAMICS ASSESSMENT PRODUCT HEPARIN SODIUM (SUBCUTANEOUSLY) OF THE SWINE 5.000UI/ML OF BLAU FARMACÊUTICA S/A IN HEALTHY SUBJECTS IN COMPARISON OF SODIUM HEPARIN APP PHARMACEUTICALS
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01652638. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Comparison of Video Based Phone App vs. Supervised Preoperative Exercise for ACL Reconstruction
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07322497. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Nebula Study - Screener Apps and HSAT vs. PSG Comparison
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04597749. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Gene expression data from iPSC-derived neural cells, comparison between APP wild and E693delta mutation
GEO Series GSE43326. Homo sapiens. 6 samples. Type: Expression profiling by array.
Comparison of expression profiles of APP-depleted prostate cancer cells (LNCaP)
GEO Series GSE98009. Homo sapiens. 12 samples. Type: Expression profiling by high throughput sequencing.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.