Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2009View details →

Figure 4 in Winter species composition, diversity and abundance of macrozoobenthos in Kuwait's waters, Arabian Gulf

Figure 4. Percentage composition of the abundance of the main taxonomic groups in the sublittoral zone of the three sampled areas of Kuwait Bay, Bubiyan Island and Failaka Island.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2009View details →

Figure 7 in Winter species composition, diversity and abundance of macrozoobenthos in Kuwait's waters, Arabian Gulf

Figure 7. The variation in a Pielou index of evenness (J`) and b Simpson index of dominance (λ`) for the three sampled areas of Failaka, Kuwait Bay and Bubiyan.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2009View details →

Figure 3 in Winter species composition, diversity and abundance of macrozoobenthos in Kuwait's waters, Arabian Gulf

Figure 3. The abundance (ind/m2) of different taxonomic groups of macrozoobenthos in the sublittoral zone: a Average distribution and b Distribution at station 12 in Khor Al-Sabiyah.

Fig. 7. A-B. A in Digenetic Trematodes From Marine Fishes Off The Coast Of Kuwait, Arabian Gulf: Fellodistomidae And Some Smaller Families, New Host And Geographic Records

Fig. 7. A-B. A. Diphterostomun brusinae (STOSSICH, 1888) STOSSICH, 1903 from Argyrops spinifer. Ventral view. Scale 0.5 mm. B. Cirrus sac free-hand drawing

Fig. 3. A in Digenetic Trematodes From Marine Fishes Off The Coast Of Kuwait, Arabian Gulf: Fellodistomidae And Some Smaller Families, New Host And Geographic Records

Fig. 3. A = Monascus filiformis (RUD., 1819) from Selaroides leptolepis. Ventral view. Scale 1 mm. B = Cirrus sac free-hand composite drawing

Fig 6 in Digenetic Trematodes From Marine Fishes Off The Coast Of Kuwait, Arabian Gulf: Fellodistomidae And Some Smaller Families, New Host And Geographic Records

Fig 6. Prosogonotrema bilabiatum PÉREZ VIGUERAS, 1940 from Epinephelus areolatus. Ventral view. Scale 1 mm

Fig. 2. A in Digenetic Trematodes From Marine Fishes Off The Coast Of Kuwait, Arabian Gulf: Fellodistomidae And Some Smaller Families, New Host And Geographic Records

Fig. 2. A = Complexobursa vjetnamensis OSHMARIN e t MAMAEV, 1963, from Terapon theraps. Ventrolateral view. Scale 1 mm. B. Cirrus sac free-hand drawing

Fig. 1. A in Digenetic Trematodes From Marine Fishes Off The Coast Of Kuwait, Arabian Gulf: Fellodistomidae And Some Smaller Families, New Host And Geographic Records

Fig. 1. A = Lintonium vibex (LINTON, 1900) STUNKARD e t NIGRELLI, 1930, from Lagocephalus lunaris. Ventral view. Scale 1 mm. B = Cirrus sac free-hand composite drawing

Figs 29–36 in Taxonomic Descriptions of Two Marine Ciliates, Euplotes dammamensis n. sp. and Euplotes balteatus (Dujardin, 1841) Kahl, 1932 (Ciliophora, Spirotrichea, Euplotida), Collected from the Arabian Gulf, Saudi Arabia

Figs 29–36. Photomicrographs of Euplotes dammamensis n. sp. during binary division after protargol impregnation. 29, 32 – ventral and dorsal views of a specimen at an early stage of morphogenesis to show the frontoventral-transverse cirral anlagen (29, arrowheads) and denote the parental dikinetids (32, arrowheads); 30, 33, 34 – ventral and dorsal views of a specimen at a slightly later stage of morphogenesis, to show the frontoventral-transverse cirral anlagen developed and broadened (30), the newly formed dorsal kineties anlagen (33, arrowheads) and the marginal anlagen (34, arrowheads); 31, 35, 36 – ventral and dorsal views of a specimen at middle-stage to show the rightmost frontoventral-transverse cirral anlagen (31, arrowheads), the migratory cirral anlage in the proter (31, double-arrowhead), the marginal cirral anlagen (31, arrows), the dorsal kineties anlagen (35, arrowheads) and the replication bands (36, arrowheads).

Figs 19–28 in Taxonomic Descriptions of Two Marine Ciliates, Euplotes dammamensis n. sp. and Euplotes balteatus (Dujardin, 1841) Kahl, 1932 (Ciliophora, Spirotrichea, Euplotida), Collected from the Arabian Gulf, Saudi Arabia

Figs 19–28. Photomicrographs of Euplotes dammamensis n. sp. in vivo (19–25) and after protargol impregnation (26–28). 19, 20 – ventral views of different specimens, arrowheads in (19) to show the ventral ridges; 21 – dorsal view, arrowheads point to the dominant dorsal ridges; 22 – lateral view; 23 – ventral view of the posterior end, arrowhead marks the longest caudal cirrus; 24 – detailed dorsal view, arrowheads point to the apical view of the granules around the dorsal brush; 25 – arrowheads to show the lateral view of granules around the dorsal brush; 26 – arrow indicates the curved C-shaped macronucleus; 27, 28 – infraciliature on the ventral and dorsal sides, arrowheads indicate the dorsal kineties. Scale bars: 50 μm.

Figs 1–9. Euplotes dammamensis n in Taxonomic Descriptions of Two Marine Ciliates, Euplotes dammamensis n. sp. and Euplotes balteatus (Dujardin, 1841) Kahl, 1932 (Ciliophora, Spirotrichea, Euplotida), Collected from the Arabian Gulf, Saudi Arabia

Figs 1–9. Euplotes dammamensis n. sp. in vivo (1–7) and after protargol impregnation (8, 9). 1, 2 – ventral views of different individuals, arrows indicate the longest caudal cirrus; 3 – dorsal view, showing the conspicuous ridges; 4 – lateral view; 5 – frontoventral cirri, arrows indicate the cortical granules around the cirri; 6 – apical view of the cortical granules distributed on the dorsal side; 7 – lateral view of the cortical granules; 8, 9 – ventral and dorsal views of the same specimen, showing the general infraciliature and the micronucleus (arrow). AZM – adoral zone of membranelles, CC – caudal cirri, DK – dorsal kineties, FVC – frontoventral cirri, MC – marginal cirri, PM – paroral membrane, TC – transverse cirri, 1–11 – dorsal kineties. Scale bars: 50 μm.

Fig. 91 in Taxonomic Descriptions of Two Marine Ciliates, Euplotes dammamensis n. sp. and Euplotes balteatus (Dujardin, 1841) Kahl, 1932 (Ciliophora, Spirotrichea, Euplotida), Collected from the Arabian Gulf, Saudi Arabia

Fig. 91. Phylogenetic tree inferred by Maximum Likelihood (ML) based on SSU-rRNA gene sequences, showing the positions of Euplotes dammamensis n. sp. and Euplotes balteatus (red highlighted). The topology of the tree constructed with Bayesian analysis (BI) was essentially identical. Fully supported (100%/1.00) branches are marked with solid circles. The scale bar corresponds to 2 substitutions per 100 nucleotide positions. Systematic classification follows Lynn (2008).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2015View details →

Figure 2. - K2P in Range extension of Gerres infasciatus (Perciformes: Gerreidae) from the Red Sea and the Arabian Gulf, with distributional implications for the G. filamentosus complex

Figure 2. - K2P distance neighbouring-joining tree of COI sequences (615 bp) of gerreid species in the Gerres filamentosus complex; G. oyena used as outgroup.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2015View details →

Figure 1. - Gerres filamentosus complex. A in Range extension of Gerres infasciatus (Perciformes: Gerreidae) from the Red Sea and the Arabian Gulf, with distributional implications for the G. filamentosus complex

Figure 1. - Gerres filamentosus complex. A: Gerres infasciatus. SMF 35412, 99.5 mm SL, off Jizan, Saudi Arabia, Red Sea; B: G. microphthalmus, NSMT-P 45901, holotype, female, 189 mm SL, Kyushu, Japan; C: G. macracanthus, SMF 35037, 98 mm SL, off Jizan, Saudi Arabia, Red Sea; D: G. filamentosus, KAUMI 12250, 139 mm SL, off Sabah, Borneo Island, Malaysia. Photographs (A, C) were taken by S.V. Bogorodsky and (D) by M. Matsunuma.

Fig. 21 in Pseudopolydora (Annelida: Spionidae) from the Arabian Gulf, Kuwait

Fig. 21. Chaetal morphology of Pseudopolydora multispinosa sp. nov., holotype (MIMB 40906, formalin-fixed and stained with MG). A. Parapodia of chaetiger 5. B–C. Notopodial spines of chaetiger 5. D. Neuropodium of chaetiger 12, showing glandular cells intensely stained with MG around a series of hooded hooks. E. Hooded hooks from neuropodium of chaetiger 12. Abbreviations: arrow showing the direction towards the inside of the U-shaped row of spines; no = notopodial postchaetal lamella; su = dorsal superior capillary chaetae; ve = ventral capillary chaetae. Scale bars: A = 50 µm; B–E = 20 µm.

Fig. 19 in Pseudopolydora (Annelida: Spionidae) from the Arabian Gulf, Kuwait

Fig. 19. Chaetal and gamete morphology of Pseudopolydora melanopalpa sp. nov. (formalin-fixed and stained with MG specimens, MIMB 40909). A. Parapodia of chaetiger 5. B. Anterior-row spines of chaetiger 5, view from the outside of the U-shaped spine row.C. Posterior-row falcate spine of chaetiger 5, lateral view. D. Notopodial spines of chaetiger 5, lateral view. E. Neuropodium of chaetiger 10, showing glandular pouch associated with a series of hooded hooks. F. Hooded hooks from middle neuropodium. G. Small previtellogenic oocyte on a genital blood vessel. Abbreviations: arrows showing the direction towards the inside of the U-shaped row of spines; bv = genital blood vessel; gp = glandular pouch; ne = neuropodial postchaetal lamella; oo = oocyte; su = dorsal superior capillary chaetae; ve = ventral capillary chaetae. Scale bars: A, E = 50 µm; B–D, F–G = 20 µm.

Fig. 18 in Pseudopolydora (Annelida: Spionidae) from the Arabian Gulf, Kuwait

Fig. 18. Adult morphology of Pseudopolydora melanopalpa sp. nov. (formalin-fixed and stained with MG specimens, MIMB 40909). A–C. Anterior ends, dorsal (A), ventral (B), and left lateral (C) view. D. Middle chaetigers, left lateral view. E. Chaetigers 7–14, dorsal view. F–G. Middle chaetigers, dorsal view. Abbreviations: ch5, ch13 = chaetigers 5 and 13; ne = nephridia in female fertile chaetigers; oc = occipital antenna; po = nephridiopore. Scale bars = 200 µm.

Fig. 17 in Pseudopolydora (Annelida: Spionidae) from the Arabian Gulf, Kuwait

Fig. 17. Adult morphology of Pseudopolydora melanopalpa sp. nov. (formalin-fixed and stained with MG specimens). A. Holotype (MIMB 40908). B–E. Paratypes (MIMB 40909). A–E. Anterior ends, left lateral (A–B), dorsal (C–D), and ventral (E) view. Abbreviations: ch5 = chaetiger 5; la = lateral peristomial lip; pr = prostomium; ve = ventral peristomial lip. Scale bars = 200 µm.

Fig. 15 in Pseudopolydora (Annelida: Spionidae) from the Arabian Gulf, Kuwait

Fig. 15. Chaetal and gamete morphology of Pseudopolydora kuwaiti sp. nov. (live individuals, MIMB 40713). A. Notopodia of chaetigers 8 and 9, showing pennoned capillaries in the anterior row of notochaetae. B. Notopodium of chaetiger 10, showing pennoned capillaries in the anterior row of notochaetae. C. Chaetae of chaetiger 5. D. A series of hooded hooks and glandular pouch from neuropodium of chaetiger 10. E. A series of hooded hooks from a posterior neuropodium. F. Female fertile chaetigers, left lateral view, showing vitellogenic oocytes in ovaries. Abbreviations: no = notopodial postchaetal lamella; su = dorsal superior capillary chaetae; ve = ventral capillary chaetae. Scale bars: A–E = 20 µm; F = 50 µm.

Fig. 20 in Pseudopolydora (Annelida: Spionidae) from the Arabian Gulf, Kuwait

Fig. 20. Adult morphology of Pseudopolydora multispinosa sp. nov., holotype (MIMB 40906, formalinfixed and stained with MG). A–C. Anterior end, left lateral (A) and dorsal (B–C) view. D–F. Anterior end, ventral view, showing changing of MG staining in time after return of the specimen to clean ethanol: after 1 minute (D), after 15 minutes (E), after 1 hour (F). Abbreviations: ch5 = chaetiger 5; la = lateral peristomial lip; ve = ventral peristomial lip. Scale bars = 200 µm.