Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 2 in Can Aurelia (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa) species be differentiated by comparing their scyphistomae and ephyrae?

Fig. 2. Body proportions of polpys (shown as percentage). Error Bars show standard deviation. Abbreviations: see Table 2.

Fig. 1 in Can Aurelia (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa) species be differentiated by comparing their scyphistomae and ephyrae?

Fig. 1. Measurements of: A. Scyphistomae. B. Ephyrae. C. Lappets of an ephyra: the marginal lappet can be divided into rhopalial lappet and lappet stem; also visible are the rhopalial and velar canals. D. Rhopalial lappet and gastric canal forms of ephyrae in this study: 1. Rhopalial lappet forms (i.e. left lappet): (a) pointed spoon-like, (b) round spatula-like, (c) lancet-like and (d) bread knife-like; 2. Rhopalial canal forms: (a) forked, sharp points, (b) club-shaped, forked, sharp points and (c) spade-like; 3. Velar canal forms: (a) spade-like and (b) rhombic. Abbreviations: RH = rhopalium; RhC = rhopalial canal; RL = rhopalial lappet; Sta = statolith; UR = umbrella rim; VC = velar canal. Other abbreviations: see Table 2. Modified after Straehler-Pohl & Jarms (2010).

Fig. 4 in Can Aurelia (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa) species be differentiated by comparing their scyphistomae and ephyrae?

Fig. 4. Linear Discriminant Analysis based on the morphology. A. Scyphistomae (17 cultures) of Aurelia congeners. B. Ephyrae (7 of the 17 cultures) of Aurelia congeners. In each case, cultures can be distinguished from one another by different symbols and corresponding numbers (see legend).

Fig. 3 in Can Aurelia (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa) species be differentiated by comparing their scyphistomae and ephyrae?

Fig. 3. Body proportions of ephyrae (shown as percentages). Error bars show standard deviation. Abbreviations: see Table 2.

Fig. 8 in Population dynamics and predatory impact of the alien jellyfish Aurelia solida (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa) in the Bizerte Lagoon (southwestern Mediterranean Sea) Abstract

Fig. 8: Path diagram of the interaction between the abiotic (temperature, salinity) and biotic parameter (chlorophyll biomass, mesozooplankton and Aurelia solida) in Bizerte lagoon in 2013 and 2014.

Fig. 6 in Population dynamics and predatory impact of the alien jellyfish Aurelia solida (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa) in the Bizerte Lagoon (southwestern Mediterranean Sea) Abstract

Fig. 6: Prey selectivity of Aurelia solida in Bizerte Lagoon during the present study; Har = Harpacticoids; Biv = bivalve larvae; Gas = gastropods larvae; Lar = larvaceans; Fis = Fish larvae; Cru = crustacean larvae; Cal = Calanoids; Cla = Cladocerans.

Fig. 5 in Population dynamics and predatory impact of the alien jellyfish Aurelia solida (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa) in the Bizerte Lagoon (southwestern Mediterranean Sea) Abstract

Fig. 5: Relation between Aurelia solida bell diameter (cm) and (A) the prey in the gut contents and (B) the prey diversity.

Fig. 4 in Population dynamics and predatory impact of the alien jellyfish Aurelia solida (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa) in the Bizerte Lagoon (southwestern Mediterranean Sea) Abstract

Fig. 4: Variation of the diet composition of Aurelia solida in Bizerte Lagoon in (A) 2013 and (B) 2014; (n) number of analyzed specimens.

Fig. 7 in Population dynamics and predatory impact of the alien jellyfish Aurelia solida (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa) in the Bizerte Lagoon (southwestern Mediterranean Sea) Abstract

Fig. 7: Seasonal variation of Aurelia solida (A-B) feeding rate (prey consumed medusae-1) and (C-D) predation impact (% prey standing stock consumed day-1) in Bizerte Lagoon in 2013-2014.

Fig. 3 in Population dynamics and predatory impact of the alien jellyfish Aurelia solida (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa) in the Bizerte Lagoon (southwestern Mediterranean Sea) Abstract

Fig. 3: Seasonal variation of Aurelia solida (A) abundance and (B) bell diameter in Bizerte lagoon between November 2012 and August 2014; white spots: 0 ind.m-3.

Fig. 1 in Population dynamics and predatory impact of the alien jellyfish Aurelia solida (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa) in the Bizerte Lagoon (southwestern Mediterranean Sea) Abstract

Fig. 1: Map of the Mediterranean Sea showing with locations of the sampling station and the transect in the Bizerte Lagoon between November 2012 and August 2014.

Fig. 6 in Worldwide sampling reveals low genetic variability in populations of the freshwater ciliate Paramecium biaurelia (P. aurelia species complex, Ciliophora, Protozoa)

Fig. 6 Map of sampling sit_s of Paramecium biaurelia strains coll_ct_d during fi_ld r_s_arch in th_ Kraków ar_a. a Kraków, "At th_ brickyard" pond, 1 sampling point. b Kraków, Zaczarowana Dorożka Park (pond), 2 sampling points. c Pi_skowa Skała (pond), 1 sampling point. d Kraków,

Fig. 5 in Worldwide sampling reveals low genetic variability in populations of the freshwater ciliate Paramecium biaurelia (P. aurelia species complex, Ciliophora, Protozoa)

Fig. 5 Haplotyp_ n_twork of Paramecium biaurelia construct_d using th_ 123 s_qu_nc_s of ribosomal ITS1- 5.8S-ITS2-5'LSU fragm_nts (a) and 139 of mitochondrial COI fragm_nts (b). Th_ n_twork pr_s_nts a comparison of haplotyp_s obtain_d in th_ Kraków ar_a vs. th_ oth_r localiti_s, wh_r_ mol_cular data for P. biaurelia is availabl_. Black dash_s on particular branch_s r_pr_s_nt nucl_otid_ substitutions b_tw__n particular haplotyp_s. Analys_s w_r_ conduct_d using th_ M_dian Joining m_thod in PopART softwar_ v. 1.7

Fig. 4 in Worldwide sampling reveals low genetic variability in populations of the freshwater ciliate Paramecium biaurelia (P. aurelia species complex, Ciliophora, Protozoa)

Fig. 4 Haplotyp_ n_twork of Paramecium biaurelia construct_d using th_ 123 s_qu_nc_s of ribosomal ITS1- 5.8S-ITS2-5'LSU fragm_nts (a) and 139 of mitochondrial COI fragm_nts (b). Th_ n_twork pr_s_nts r_ciprocal r_lationships b_tw__n, and th_ origin of P. biaurelia haplotyp_s id_ntifi_d in curr_nt study. Black dash_s on particular branch_s r_pr_s_nt nucl_otid_ substitutions b_tw__n particular haplotyp_s. Analys_s w_r_ conduct_d using th_ M_dian Joining m_thod in PopART softwar_ v. 1.7

Fig. 2 in Worldwide sampling reveals low genetic variability in populations of the freshwater ciliate Paramecium biaurelia (P. aurelia species complex, Ciliophora, Protozoa)

Fig. 2 Phylog_n_tic tr__ construct_d for Paramecium aurelia compl_x, P. jenningsi compl_x and P. schewiakoffi (two sp_ci_s: P. caudatum and P. multimicronucleatum w_r_ us_d as an outgroup). Th_ tr__ was construct_d on th_ basis of a comparison of s_qu_nc_s from th_ ribosomal ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-5'LSU fragm_nt using th_ maximum lik_lihood m_thod. Bootstrap valu_s for n_ighbor joining, maximum parsimony, maximum lik_lihood, and post_rior probabiliti_s for

Fig. 3 in Worldwide sampling reveals low genetic variability in populations of the freshwater ciliate Paramecium biaurelia (P. aurelia species complex, Ciliophora, Protozoa)

Fig. 3 Phylog_n_tic tr__ construct_d for Paramecium aurelia compl_x, P. jenningsi compl_x and P. schewiakoffi (two sp_ci_s: P. caudatum and P. multimicronucleatum w_r_ us_d as an outgroup). Th_ tr__ was construct_d on th_ basis of a comparison of s_qu_nc_s from th_ mitochondrial COI fragm_nt using th_ maximum lik_lihood m_thod. Bootstrap valu_s for n_ighbor joining, maximum parsimony, maximum lik_lihood, and post_rior probabiliti_s for Bay_sian inf_r_nc_ ar_

zenodo36/100

Appendix A in Can Aurelia (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa) species be differentiated by comparing their scyphistomae and ephyrae?

Appendix A. Morphological measurements of scyphistomae (mean ± sd) in mm.

zenodo36/100

Appendix B in Can Aurelia (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa) species be differentiated by comparing their scyphistomae and ephyrae?

Appendix B. Morphological measurements of ephyrae (mean ± sd) in mm.

zenodo36/100

Fig. 1 in Worldwide sampling reveals low genetic variability in populations of the freshwater ciliate Paramecium biaurelia (P. aurelia species complex, Ciliophora, Protozoa)

Fig. 1 Th_ origin (N = 92) of Paramecium biaurelia strains us_d in pr_s_nt studi_s