Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

45

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

45 results for “Biological classification”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
edi52/100

Landscape Ecosystem Classification Soils and Vegetation Plots Data at the University of Michigan Biological Station, Pellston, Michigan from 1987 to 2015 remeasurements

Landscape ecosystems are a means of understanding the spatial patterns of and the functional interrelationships in forest ecosystems. Landscape ecosystem research is a multifactor, holistic approach to identifying, classifying, describing, and mapping terrain ecosystems. Abiotic and biotic factors are integrated in the field to distinguish repeating units similar in ecological structure and function. Landscape ecosystems are identified by simultaneous integration of physiographic, soil, and vegetation information. The more stable components--physiography and soil--largely determine local climate, and water and nutrient relations, and thus the interrelationships of physiography and soil form the foundation of a landscape ecosystem classification. Vegetation is seen as a phytometer that integrates the many abiotic factors and their interactions, and therefore reflects differences in ecosystem structure and function. When the three main ecosystem factors are analyzed simultaneously, one can perceive interrelationships that result in ecologically meaningful differences among segments of the ecosphere. Landscape ecosystems are spatial; they are volumetric, multi-dimensional segments of earth, whose components include soil, water, atmosphere, solar radiation, and biota. These segments can be identified, classified, described, and mapped at various scales. From the years of 1988 to 2001, various graduate students of Burton V. Barnes completed their masters thesis and dissertations in this pursuit. The attached data set is a culmination of these individual work. Each plot has measurements at various scales within the 10 by 30 meet plot. A stratified random design was used to locate plot locations. The random design was stratified by major and minor landforms in the region. All trees within the plot where identified and dbh was measured. All individual shrubs where identified and abundance was counted within the entire plot. Soils pits locations for each plot where selected

openCC (other)Apr 2025View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 4 in the Arabian Peninsula and Socotra including new species, biological notes, and a new infrageneric classification

Fig. 4. — Morphology of Romulea lilacina: detail of the stamens and style branches and transverse section of the leaf much enlarged (Manning 2252). Drawn by John MANNING.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2001View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 1 in the Arabian Peninsula and Socotra including new species, biological notes, and a new infrageneric classification

Fig. 1. — Corm and tunic details in Romulea: A-E., sect. Romulea: A, R. autumnalis; B, R. columnae; C, R. bulbocodium; D, R. pratensis; E, R. gigantea. F-I, sect. Ciliatae: F, R. minutiflora; G, R. austinii; H, R. montana; I, R. tortuosa. J-K, sect. Hirsutae: J, R. triflora; K, R. discifera. L-M, sect. Aggregatae: L, R. dichotoma; M, R. amoena. N, sect. Spatalanthus: R. rosea. O, sect. Cruciatae: R. cruciata. Corms full size, detail of tunic margins enlarged x 5. Drawn by John MANNING.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2001View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 3 in the Arabian Peninsula and Socotra including new species, biological notes, and a new infrageneric classification

Fig. 3. — Morphology of Romulea discifera: full size, detail of the stamens and style branches, seed, and transverse section of the leaf much enlarged (Goldblatt & Manning 11075). Drawn by John MANNING.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2001View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 5 in the Arabian Peninsula and Socotra including new species, biological notes, and a new infrageneric classification

Fig. 5. — Morphology of Romulea albiflora: with transverse section of the leaf much enlarged (Goldblatt & Manning 10367). Drawn by John MANNING.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2001View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 2 in the Arabian Peninsula and Socotra including new species, biological notes, and a new infrageneric classification

Fig. 2. — Flowers of Romulea species: A, R. tabularis; B, R. saldanhensis; C, R. tortuosa; D, R. sabulosa; E, R. eximia; F, R. sulphurea; G, R. namaquensis; H, R. komsbergensis.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2001View details →
zenodo32/100

Supplementary material 1 from: Gutjahr S, Schmidt S, Hahn H (2014) A proposal for a groundwater habitat classification at local scale. Subterranean Biology 14: 25-49. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.14.5429

Graphic output of a hierarchical cluster analysis (single linkage) of faunistic data.: Explanation note: Cluster analysis of the ecological goups' faunistic data based on a Bray-Curtis-similarity-matrix (calculated using a dummy variable).

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2014View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Biological Classification of Mental Disorders

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03984084. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 2.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Chromosome numbers, Sudanese wild forms, and classification of the watermelon genus Citrullus, with 50 names allocated to seven biological species

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicNov 2018View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 1 from: Pergl J, Brundu G, Harrower CA, Cardoso AC, Genovesi P, Katsanevakis S, Lozano V, Perglová I, Rabitsch W, Richards G, Roques A, Rorke SL, Scalera R, Schönrogge K, Stewart A, Tricarico E, Tsiamis K, Vannini A, Vilà M, Zenetos A, Roy HE (2020) Applying the Convention on Biological Diversity Pathway Classification to alien species in Europe. In: Wilson JR, Bacher S, Daehler CC, Groom QJ, Kumschick S, Lockwood JL, Robinson TB, Zengeya TA, Richardson DM. NeoBiota 62: 333-363. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.62.53796

Table S1

opencc-zeroOct 2020View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 1 from: Praz CJ (2017) Subgeneric classification and biology of the leafcutter and dauber bees (genus Megachile Latreille) of the western Palearctic (Hymenoptera, Apoidea, Megachilidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 55: 1-54. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.55.11255

Additional notes on the new synonymies :

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2017View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 2 from: Gutjahr S, Schmidt S, Hahn H (2014) A proposal for a groundwater habitat classification at local scale. Subterranean Biology 14: 25-49. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.14.5429

Output of the one-way ANOSIMS' pairwise test.:

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2014View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 3 from: Gutjahr S, Schmidt S, Hahn H (2014) A proposal for a groundwater habitat classification at local scale. Subterranean Biology 14: 25-49. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.14.5429

Output of a Canonical Analysis of Principal Coordinates (CAP).:

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2014View details →
zenodo28/100

Figures 42-49 from: Praz CJ (2017) Subgeneric classification and biology of the leafcutter and dauber bees (genus Megachile Latreille) of the western Palearctic (Hymenoptera, Apoidea, Megachilidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 55: 1-54. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.55.11255

Figures 42-49 - Apex of male metasoma; 42–46, 48 T5-T7 and apex of genital capsule, dorsal view 47 T5-T7 and apex of genital capsule, lateral view 49 T4-T6, dorsal view 42 Megachile (Megachile) melanopyga 43 M. (Pseudomegachile) sp. aff. incana 44 M. (Chalicodoma) parietina 45 M. (Chalicodoma) hungarica 46 M. (Creightonella) albisecta 47 M. (Creightonella) doriae 48 M. (Chalicodoma) manicata 49 M. (Eurymella) patellimana.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2017View details →
zenodo28/100

Figures 54-57 from: Praz CJ (2017) Subgeneric classification and biology of the leafcutter and dauber bees (genus Megachile Latreille) of the western Palearctic (Hymenoptera, Apoidea, Megachilidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 55: 1-54. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.55.11255

Figures 54-57 - Genital capsule, lateral view. 54 Megachile (Eutricharaea) apicalis 55 M. (Eutricharaea) sp. aff. naevia 56 M. (Eutricharaea) leachella 57 M. (Eutricharaea) leucomalla.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2017View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 1 from: Praz CJ (2017) Subgeneric classification and biology of the leafcutter and dauber bees (genus Megachile Latreille) of the western Palearctic (Hymenoptera, Apoidea, Megachilidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 55: 1-54. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.55.11255

Figure 1 - Female mandible of Megachile (Megachile) centuncularis; the white lines and the numbers indicate the five teeth (numbers on the right) and the four interspaces (numbers on the left); in this species, there is a partial cutting edge in the second interspace and, in front view, no visible cutting edge in the other interspaces. Picture by Andreas Müller (Müller et al. 1997).

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2017View details →
zenodo28/100

Figures 50-53 from: Praz CJ (2017) Subgeneric classification and biology of the leafcutter and dauber bees (genus Megachile Latreille) of the western Palearctic (Hymenoptera, Apoidea, Megachilidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 55: 1-54. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.55.11255

Figures 50-53 - Apex of male metasoma, dorsal view. 50 Megachile (Anodonteutricharaea ) sp. aff. inornata 51 M. (Pseudomegachile) ericetorum 52 M. (Pseudomegachile) saussurei 53 M. (Pseudomegachile) foersteri.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2017View details →
zenodo28/100

Figures 10-15 from: Praz CJ (2017) Subgeneric classification and biology of the leafcutter and dauber bees (genus Megachile Latreille) of the western Palearctic (Hymenoptera, Apoidea, Megachilidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 55: 1-54. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.55.11255

Figures 10-15 - Male metasoma, ventral view. 10 Megachile (Eutricharaea) giraudi, metasoma with four exposed sterna, S4 without hyaline rim, T7 small, unmodified 11 M. (Creightonella) amabilis, metasoma with six exposed sterna, S6 with rounded, weakly sclerotized projection 12 M. (Anodonteutricharaea) sp. aff. inornata, metasoma with four exposed sterna, S4 with apical, hyaline rim (note that S5-S8 are visible in this specimen because the metasoma has been stretched) 13 M. (Megachile) ligniseca, condition as in Fig. 12 14 M. (Eurymella) patellimana, condition as in Fig. 12 15 M. (Chalicodoma) montenegrensis, S6 partly exposed, with rounded, weakly sclerotized projection.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2017View details →
zenodo28/100

Figures 16-23 from: Praz CJ (2017) Subgeneric classification and biology of the leafcutter and dauber bees (genus Megachile Latreille) of the western Palearctic (Hymenoptera, Apoidea, Megachilidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 55: 1-54. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.55.11255

Figures 16-23 - Female clypeus and mandibles, front view. 16 Megachile (Creightonella) amabilis 17 M. (Maximegachile) maxillosa; the white line indicates the hypostomal tooth 18 M. (Callomegachile) sculpturalis 19 M. (Chalicodoma) hungarica 20 M. (Pseudomegachile) ericetorum 21 M. (Pseudomegachile) incana 22 M. (Pseudomegachile) sp. aff. incana 23 M. (Pseudomegachile) foersteri.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2017View details →
zenodo28/100

Figures 24-29 from: Praz CJ (2017) Subgeneric classification and biology of the leafcutter and dauber bees (genus Megachile Latreille) of the western Palearctic (Hymenoptera, Apoidea, Megachilidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 55: 1-54. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.55.11255

Figures 24-29 - Female clypeus and mandibles, front view. 24. Megachile (Pseudomegachile) seraxensis 25 M. (Pseudomegachile) saussurei 26–29 Female hind basitarsus, lateral view 26 M. (Pseudomegachile) ericetorum 27 M. (Pseudomegachile) incana 28 M. (Eutricharaea) giraudi 29 M. (Eurymella) patellimana.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2017View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

ScienceDex for faculty

Your academic CV and NIH biosketch

Make your CV in your school's format and your NIH biosketch from it, then download both as Word files.