Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
147
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
147 results for “CO2 flux”
Eddy covariance 30-minute CO2 fluxes with accompanying biophysical variables from the GCE-LTER flux tower site from January 2014 to December 2017 for sensor Flux1
Eddy covariance (EC) CO2 fluxes from flux sensor set "Flux1" from January 2014 to December 2017 collected over a Spartina alterniflora marsh located on the western side of Sapelo Island bounded by the Duplin River and Barn Creek. EC fluxes were processed in EddyPro 7. Additional biophysical variables included are air temperature, relative humidity, vapor pressure deficit, and water table height from a nearby tidal creek and the marsh platform.
Eddy covariance 30-minute CO2 fluxes with accompanying biophysical variables from the GCE-LTER flux tower site from January 2014 to December 2022 for sensor Flux2
Eddy covariance (EC) CO2 fluxes from sensor set "Flux2" from January 2014 to December 2022 collected over a Spartina alterniflora marsh located on the western side of Sapelo Island bounded by the Duplin River and Barn Creek. EC fluxes were processed in EddyPro 7. Additional biophysical variables included are air temperature, relative humidity, vapor pressure deficit, and water table height from a nearby tidal creek and the marsh platform.
CO2 and CH4 fluxes from living and standing dead trees in Howland Research Forest, Maine USA, 2024
Methane (CH4) is the second-largest contributor to human-induced climate change, with significant uncertainties in its terrestrial sources and sinks. Tree stems, both living and dead, play crucial roles in forest ecosystem CH4 and carbon dioxide (CO2) flux dynamics, yet much remains unknown regarding the environmental drivers of fluxes. We measured CH4 and CO2 fluxes from 51 living trees (Picea rubens, Tsuga canadensis, Acer rubrum) along an upland-to-wetland gradient at Howland Research Forest, a net annual sink of CH4, in Maine USA. We also measured CH4 and CO2 fluxes from six standing dead red spruce stems (snags). We measured fluxes every two weeks throughout the growing season (April to November 2024) and at three heights (for a subset of red spruce stems) to capture a range of environmental conditions.
New Hampshire Soil Sensor Network: Soil CO2 Fluxes
The goal of the New Hampshire Soil Sensor Network is to examine spatial and temporal changes in soil properties and processes as the climate changes. Data collected can also calibrate and validate models that examine how ecosystems may respond to changing climate and land use. To determine how soil processes are affected by climate change and land management, this soil sensor network measures snow depth, air temperature, soil temperature, soil volumetric water content, and soil electrical conductivity, as well as soil CO2 fluxes. This data package includes air temperature, soil temperature at 5 cm, and soil volumetric water content at 5 cm, and soil CO2 flux at the time of sampling, as well as gap-filled soil CO2 fluxes using non-linear least squares regression. Data were collected at the following sites: BRT = Bartlett Experimental Forest, Bartlett, NH; BDF = Burley-Demmerit Farm, Lee, NH; DCF = Dowst Cate Forest, Deerfield, NH; HUB = Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, Woodstock, NH; SBM = Saddleback Mountain, Deerfield, NH; THF = Thompson Farm, Durham, NH; and Trout Pond Brook, Strafford, NH.
CO2 Flux and Temperature Data for Estimating Thermal Acclimation in Ecosystem Respiration
We have compiled an extensive dataset of long-term, hourly CO2 flux measurements from 93 global eddy covariance sites to estimate the thermal response strength in nighttime ecosystem respiration. Flux data was sourced from AmeriFlux (https://ameriflux.lbl.gov/), FluxNet (https://fluxnet.org/), and ICOS (https://www.icos-cp.eu/). The processed data product encompasses five categories. (1) Long-term, directly measured, Ustar-filtered, hourly or subhourly nighttime ecosystem respiration, along with corresponding air temperature, soil temperature, and soil water content at the 93 sites. (2) Long-term gap-filled data, including hourly or subhourly net ecosystem exchange, air temperature, and soil temperature at these sites. (3) Annual topsoil (< 0.1 m) temperature and nighttime ecosystem respiration curves during the growing season, designed for calculating thermal response strength. (4) Estimated thermal response strength across these sites, detailed with geographic, climatic, soil, and vegetation conditions for each site. (5) An R script to calculate thermal response strength using the data product (3).
Eight Mile Lake Research Watershed, Carbon in Permafrost Experimental Heating Research (CiPEHR): Half-hourly growing season, chamber-based, CO2 flux data, 2009-2021
The Carbon in Permafrost Experimental Heating Research (CiPEHR) project addresses the following questions: 1) Does ecosystem warming cause a net release of C from the ecosystem to the atmosphere?, 2) Does the decomposition of old C, that comprises the bulk of the soil C pool, influence ecosystem C loss?, and 3) How do winter and summer warming alone, and in combination, affect ecosystem C exchange? We are answering these questions using a combination of field and laboratory experiments to measure ecosystem carbon balance and radiocarbon isotope ratios at a warming experiment located in an upland tundra field site near Healy, Alaska in the foothills of the Alaska Range. This data contains CO2 fluxes measured using an automated chamber system that measures net ecosystem CO2 exchange (NEE). Measurements are made every ~1.5 hours and modeled half-hourly. Half hour ecosystem respiration is modeled using an exponential Q10 relationship when light conditions are low (PAR<5umol/m2/s) and using a hyperbolic light relationship when PAR>5umol/m2/s. GPP is calculated as the difference between NEE and Reco.
Eight Mile Lake Research Watershed, Carbon in Permafrost Experimental Heating and Drying Research (DryPEHR): Growing season, chamber-based, CO2 flux data, 2009-2021
This drying and warming experiment addresses the following questions: 1) Does ecosystem drying, warming and permafrost thaw cause a net release or uptake of C from the ecosystem to the atmosphere?, 2) Does the decomposition of old C that comprises the bulk of the soil C pool influence ecosystem C loss? 3) How do drying and warming affect plant communities and ecosystem properties? We are answering these questions using a combined warming and drying experiment (DryPEHR), which is situated with the Carbon in Permafrost Experimental Heating Research (CiPEHR) project and located in an upland tundra field site near Healy, Alaska in the foothills of the Alaska Range. Warming treatment here refers to growing season air temperature warming (~1C) using open top chambers (OTC) combined with soil 'warming' using snow fences during the snow covered months. Drying is achieved using an automated pumping system that lowers the water table in the dry plots. Soil warming began in 2008; OTCs and drying in 2011. This data set includes measured values of CO2 fluxes during the growing season.
Eddy covariance 30-minute CO2 fluxes with accompanying biophysical variables from the Grand Bay, Mississippi flux tower site from March 2018 to January 2019
Eddy covariance (EC) CO2 fluxes from March 2018 to January 2019 collected over a Juncus roemerianus marsh located in the Grand Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve (NERR) in Mississippi. EC fluxes were processed in EddyPro 7. Additional biophysical variables included are air temperature, relative humidity, vapor pressure deficit, soil temperature, and water table height within the marsh.
Eddy covariance 30-minute CO2 fluxes with accompanying biophysical variables from the GCE-LTER flux tower site from December 2018 to January 2020
Eddy covariance (EC) CO2 fluxes from December 2018 to January 2020 collected over a Spartina alterniflora marsh located on the western side of Sapelo Island bounded by the Duplin River and Barn Creek. EC fluxes were processed in EddyPro 7. Additional biophysical variables included are air temperature, relative humidity, vapor pressure deficit, soil temperature, and water table height from a nearby tidal creek.
A long term hourly eddy covariance dataset of consistently processed CO2 and H2O Fluxes from the Tibetan Alpine Steppe at Nam Co (2005 - 2019)
<p>The data set contains nearly 15 years of eddy covariance data from an alpine steppe ecosystem on the central Tibetan Plateau. The data was processed following standardized quality control methods to allow for comparability between the different years of our record and with other data sets. To ensure meaningful estimates of ecosystem atmosphere exchange, careful application of the following correction procedures and analyses was necessary: (1) Due to the remote location, continuous maintenance of the eddy covariance (EC) system was not always possible, so that cleaning and calibration of the sensors was performed irregularly. Furthermore, the high proportion of bare soil and high wind speeds led to accumulation of dirt in the measurement path of the infrared gas analyzer (IRGA). The installation of the sensor in such a challenging environment resulted in a considerable drift in CO2 and H2O gas density measurements. If not accounted for, this concentration bias may distort the estimation of the carbon uptake. We applied a modified drift correction procedure following Fratini et al. (2014) which, instead of a linear interpolation between calibration dates, uses the CO2 concentration measurements from the Mt. Waliguan atmospheric observatory as reference time series. (2) We applied rigorous quality filtering of the calculated fluxes to retain only fluxes which represent actual physical processes. (3) During the long measurement period, there were several buildings constructed in the near vicinity of the EC system. We investigated the influence of these obstacles on the turbulent flow regime to identify fluxes with uncertain land cover contribution and exclude them from subsequent computations. (4) We calculated the de-facto standard correction for instrument surface heating during cold conditions (hereafter called sensor self heating correction) following Burba et al. (2008) and a revision of the original method following Frank and Massman (2020). (5) Subsequently, we applied the traditional and widely used gap filling procedure following Reichstein et al. (2005) to provide a more complete overview of the annual net ecosystem CO2 exchange. (6) We estimated the flux uncertainty by calculating the random flux error (RE) following Finkelstein and Sims (2001) and by using the standard deviation of the fluxes used for gap filling (NEE_fsd) as a measure for spatial and temporal variation.</p> <p>References:</p> <ol> <li>Burba, G. G., McDermitt, D. K., Grelle, A., Anderson, D., and XU, L. (2008). Addressing the influence of instrument surface heat exchange on the measurements of CO2 flux from open-path gas analyzers, Global Change Biology, 14, 1854-1876, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01606.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01606.x</a>.</li> <li>Finkelstein, P. L. and Sims, P. F. (2001). Sampling error in eddy correlation flux measurements, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 106, 3503–3509, doi:10.1029/2000JD900731.</li> <li>Frank, J. M. and Massman, W. J.: A new perspective on the open-path infrared gas analyzer self-heating correction, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 290, 107986, doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.107986, 2020.</li> <li>Fratini, G., McDermitt, D. K., and Papale, D. (2004). Eddy-covariance flux errors due to biases in gas concentration measurements: origins, quantification and correction, Biogeosciences, 11, 1037-1051, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-1037-2014">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-1037-2014</a>.</li> <li>Reichstein, M., Falge, E., Baldocchi, D., Papale, D., Aubinet, M., Berbigier, P., Bernhofer, C., Buchmann, N., Gilmanov, T., Granier, A., Grunwald, T., Havrankova, K., Ilvesniemi, H., Janous, D., Knohl, A., Laurila, T., Lohila, A., Loustau, D., Matteucci, G., Meyers, T., Miglietta, F., Ourcival, J.-m., Pumpanen, J., Rambal, S., Rotenberg, E., Sanz, M., Tenhunen, J., Seufert, G., Vaccari, F., Vesala, T., Yakir, D., and valentini, R. (20050. On the separation of net ecosystem exchange into assimilation and ecosystem respiration: review and improved algorithm, Global Change Biology, 11, 1424-1439, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001002.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001002.x</a>.</li> </ol>
Surface alkalinity, pH (total scale) and CO2 air-sea flux of the Mediterranean Sea under different alkalinisation scenarios.
<p>Surface maps and basin mean/total of annual mean surface alkalinity, pH (total scale) and CO2 air-sea flux of the Mediterranean Sea under different alkalinisation scenarios and for underlying the baseline projection (RCP4.5).</p> <p>Details on simulations and alkalinisation strategies are given in the reference article below.</p> <p> </p> <p>Reference:</p> <p>Butenschön, M., Lovato, T., Masina, S., Caserini, S., Grosso, M., 2021. Alkalinization Scenarios in the Mediterranean Sea for Efficient Removal of Atmospheric CO2 and the Mitigation of Ocean Acidification. Front. Clim. 3. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.614537">https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.614537</a></p>
Global Carbon Budget 2022, surface ocean fugactiy of CO2 (fCO2) and air-sea CO2 flux of individual Global ocean biogechemical models and surface ocean fCO2-based data-products
<p><strong>Surface ocean fugacity of CO2 (fCO2) and air-sea CO2 flux data from individual Global Ocean Biogeochemistry Models (GOBMs) and surface ocean fCO2-based data-products (data-products).</strong><br> There are three types of files: (1) one file per fCO2-product with gridded fields and regionally-integrated CO2 flux time-series, (2) one file per GOBM with gridded fields, and (3) one file with the regionally-integrated time-series for the GOBMs. </p> <p><strong>Note: </strong>These provided gridded outputs from fCO2-based data-products and GOBMs are regridded datasets, without adjustments. <strong>The best estimates of the annual global ocean carbon sink, based on the native grids of data-products and GOBMs and with the adjustments described in the Global Carbon Budget 2022 (https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022, section C3), are available in the Global Carbon Budget 2022 spreadsheet.</strong></p> <p>The regionally-integrated time-series are as provided by the contributing groups, i.e. integrated from their native grids. In order to reproduce Figure 13 of the Global Carbon Budget 2022 paper (https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022), the river flux adjustment needs to be added to the CO2 flux estimated from the data-products (North: 0.17 GtC yr-1, Tropics: 0.16 GtC yr-1, South: 0.32 GtC yr-1, see GCB 2022 paper, section 2.4.1). The sum of the regional fluxes may differ from the global estimates as reported in the GCB spreadsheet, because adjustments were applied only for global fluxes.</p> <p><strong>What is in the files?</strong></p> <p>(1) The files for the fCO2-based data-products contain the following variables (temporal resolution: monthly):</p> <p><br> fgco2_reg: Regionally integrated air-sea CO2 flux (positive downward), monthly, for regions: north, tropics, south<br> fgco2: Flux density of the total air-sea CO2 flux (positive downward), dimensions: time, latitude, longitude<br> sfco2: Surface ocean fCO2, dimensions: time, latitude, longitude<br> area: Area per pixel, dimensions: latitude, longitude<br> area_reg: Total surface ocean area covered by native grid, for global, north, tropics, south</p> <p>(2) The files for the GOBMs contain the following fields, for simulation A (‘contemporary simulation’, including effects of rising CO2, climate change and variability) and simulation B (‘control simulation’, constant CO2, no climate change and variability). Temporal resolution: monthly</p> <p>fgco2: Flux density of the total air-sea CO2 flux (positive downward), dimensions: time, latitude, longitude<br> sfco2: Surface ocean fCO2, dimensions: time, latitude, longitude<br> area: Area per pixel, dimensions: latitude, longitude</p> <p><br> (3) One file ‘GCB-2022_OceanModel_RegionalBreakdown_1959-2021.nc’ with the regionally-integrated CO2 flux time-series for all individual GOBMs, and for simulations A and B. Temporal resolution: annual.</p> <p><br> <strong>Fair data use statement:</strong><br> The data and model output provided on this site are freely available and were furnished by individual scientists who encourage their use.<br> <strong>Citation:</strong> Please cite the Global Carbon Budget 2022 (Friedlingstein et al., 2022, ESSD, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022) for all data. In addition, please also cite the corresponding original reference for each dataset that has been used - see Table 4 in Global Carbon Budget 2022 for references of all the individual Global Ocean Biogeochemical Models and fCO2-based data-products. Further, for an overview of the Global Ocean Biogeochemical Model output, you may find it useful to cite Hauck et al. (2020, Frontiers, doi:10.3389/fmars.2020.571720).<br> <strong>Acknowledgement:</strong> Please add the following text in the acknowledgement of your paper: “We acknowledge the Global Carbon Project, which is responsible for the Global Carbon Budget and we thank the ocean modeling and fCO2-mapping groups for producing and making available their model and fCO2-product output.”<br> <strong>Co-authorship: </strong>An invitation of co-authorship to the contributing groups is encouraged if these data are the central data set of the publication.</p> <p><br> Besides the surface fCO2 and air-sea CO2 flux data that is made available open access, we make<strong> additional output</strong> from the Global Ocean Biogeochemical models (GCB-ocean) available upon request and with its own data policy. Please refer to the Global Carbon Budget website for these additional data: https://globalcarbonbudget.org/</p> <p> </p>
SeaFlux v2023: harmonised sea-air CO2 fluxes from surface pCO2 data products using a standardised approach
<p><strong>BE SURE TO DOWNLOAD 2023.02</strong></p> <p>See the additional notes for updates on the products. </p> <p>Fluxes calculated using the standardized approach:</p> <p> \(F\text{CO}_2=K_0 \cdot K_w \cdot (p\text{CO}_2^\text{sea} - p\text{CO}_2^\text{atm})\ \cdot (1 - [ice])\).</p> <p>We provide each of the components to this equation to reduce the potential for errors in fluxes due to methodological differences.</p> <p>The netCDF files contain the following data (<strong>note that only bold names have been updated in v2023</strong>): </p> <ul> <li>fgco2_all_winds_products: the sea-air CO2 flux for all spCO2 products (6) and <em>kw</em> from all wind products (5). </li> <li>fgco2_global:<strong> </strong>the globally integrated sea-air CO2 fluxes for all spCO2 products (6) and <em>kw</em> from all wind products (6)</li> <li><strong>sol:</strong> \(K_0\) is calculated using the Weiss (1974) parameterization with EN4 salinity and OISST temperatures </li> <li><strong>kw:</strong> \(k_w\) is calculated for winds with each being scaled independently to a 14-C bomb flux estimate of 16.5 cm/hr using the quadratic formulation by Wanninkhof (1992). <ul> <li>CCMPv2</li> <li>ERA5</li> <li>JRA55</li> <li>NCEP1</li> <li>NCEP2</li> </ul> </li> <li>spco2_SOCOM_unfilled<em>: </em>\(p\text{CO}_2^\text{sea}\) downloaded from various sources contains the following products: <ul> <li>CMEMS_FFNN</li> <li>CSIR_ML6</li> <li>JENA_MLS</li> <li>JMA_MLR</li> <li>MPI_SOMFFN</li> <li>NIES_FNN</li> </ul> </li> <li>spco2_filler<em>: </em>scaled version of the Landschützer et al. (2020) climatology used to fill missing regions of <em>spco2_SOCOM_unfilled</em></li> <li><strong>fco2atm: </strong>\(p\text{CO}_2^\text{atm}\) is calculated from NOAA's marine boundary layer product with ERA5 mean sea level pressure corrected for pH2O. The virial coefficient is then applied to pCO2atm</li> <li><strong>ice: </strong>\([ice]\) is the ice fraction from the OISST product</li> <li><strong>area_ocean:</strong><em> </em>the surface area of the ocean including the fractional area of the coastal regions</li> <li><strong>seafrac: </strong>the fraction of a pixel that is ocean</li> </ul> <p><strong><em>Units are listed in the metadata of each of the netCDF variables. </em></strong></p>
Accessible Oceans: Auditory Display. Net flux of CO2 between Ocean and Atmosphere
<p>The seven tracks make up an auditory display of the net flux of carbon dioxide between the ocean and the atmosphere. The seven tracks in the auditory display are comprised of data sonifications and contextual audio supports (dialogue, auditory icons, and music). You may <a href="https://samply.app/p/RhkRBKbRTueE2F86b5QS">listen online here</a>.</p> <p>The data comes from the National Science Foundation (NSF) Ocean Observatories Initiative (OOI) and the display is based on the OOI Nugget developed by Dr. Leslie Smith. (<a href="https://datalab.marine.rutgers.edu/ooi-nuggets/co2-flux/">https://datalab.marine.rutgers.edu/ooi-nuggets/co2-flux/</a>)</p> <p>The “Accessible Oceans” AISL Pilots and Feasibility study aims to inclusively design auditory displays that support the perception and understanding of ocean data in informal learning environments (ILEs). More can be found on the project website: <a href="https://accessibleoceans.whoi.edu/">https://accessibleoceans.whoi.edu/</a></p>
Global Carbon Budget 2023, surface ocean fugactiy of CO2 (fCO2) and air-sea CO2 flux of individual global ocean biogechemical models and surface ocean fCO2-based data-products
<p><strong>Surface ocean fugacity of CO2 (fCO2) and air-sea CO2 flux data from individual Global Ocean Biogeochemistry Models (GOBMs) and surface ocean fCO2-based data-products (fCO2-products).</strong><br>There are three types of files: (1) one file per fCO2-product with gridded fields and regionally-integrated CO2 flux time-series, (2) one file per GOBM with gridded fields, and (3) one file with the regionally-integrated time-series for the GOBMs. </p><p><strong>Note: </strong>These provided gridded outputs from fCO2-based data-products and GOBMs are regridded datasets, without adjustments. <strong>The best estimates of the annual global ocean carbon sink, based on the native grids of fCO2-products and GOBMs and with the adjustments described in the Global Carbon Budget 2023 (https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023), are available in the Global Carbon Budget 2023 spreadsheet.</strong></p><p>The regionally-integrated time-series are as provided by the contributing groups, i.e. integrated from their native grids. In order to reproduce Figure 13 of the Global Carbon Budget 2023 paper (https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023), the river flux adjustment needs to be added to the CO2 flux estimated from the data-products (North: 0.14 GtC yr-1, Tropics: 0.42 GtC yr-1, South: 0.09 GtC yr-1, see GCB 2023 paper, section 2.5.1). The sum of the regional fluxes may differ from the global estimates as reported in the GCB spreadsheet, because some adjustments were applied only for global fluxes.</p><p><strong>What is in the files?</strong></p><p>(1) The files for the fCO2-based data-products contain the following variables (temporal resolution: monthly):<br><br>fgco2_reg: Regionally integrated air-sea CO2 flux (positive downward), monthly, for regions: north, tropics, south<br>fgco2: Flux density of the total air-sea CO2 flux (positive downward), dimensions: time, latitude, longitude<br>sfco2: Surface ocean fCO2, dimensions: time, latitude, longitude<br>area: Area per pixel, dimensions: latitude, longitude<br>area_reg: Total surface ocean area covered by native grid, for global, north, tropics, south</p><p>(2) The files for the GOBMs contain the following fields, for simulation A ('contemporary simulation', including effects of rising CO2, climate change and variability) and simulation B ('control simulation', constant CO2, no climate change and variability). Temporal resolution: monthly</p><p>fgco2: Flux density of the total air-sea CO2 flux (positive downward), dimensions: time, latitude, longitude<br>sfco2: Surface ocean fCO2, dimensions: time, latitude, longitude<br>area: Area per pixel, dimensions: latitude, longitude<br><br>(3) One file 'GCB-2023_OceanModel_RegionalBreakdown_1959-2022.nc' with the regionally-integrated CO2 flux time-series for all individual GOBMs, and for simulations A and B. Temporal resolution: annual.</p><p><strong>Fair data use statement:</strong><br>The data and model output provided on this site are freely available and were furnished by individual scientists who encourage their use.<br><strong>Citation:</strong> Please cite the Global Carbon Budget 2023 (Friedlingstein et al., 2023, ESSD, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023) for all data. In addition, please also cite the corresponding original reference for each dataset that has been used - see Table 4 in Global Carbon Budget 2023 for references of all the individual Global Ocean Biogeochemical Models and fCO2-based data-products. Further, for an overview of the Global Ocean Biogeochemical Model output, you may find it useful to cite Hauck et al. (2020, Frontiers, doi:10.3389/fmars.2020.571720).<br><strong>Acknowledgement:</strong> Please add the following text in the acknowledgement of your paper: "We acknowledge the Global Carbon Project, which is responsible for the Global Carbon Budget and we thank the ocean modeling and fCO2-mapping groups for producing and making available their model and fCO2-product output."<br><strong>Co-authorship: </strong>An invitation of co-authorship to the contributing groups is encouraged if these data are the central data set of the publication.</p><p>Besides the surface fCO2 and air-sea CO2 flux data that is made available open access, we make<strong> additional 3D output</strong> from the Global Ocean Biogeochemical models (GCB-ocean) available upon request and with its own data policy. Please refer to the Global Carbon Budget website for these additional data: https://globalcarbonbudgetdata.org/closed-access-requests.html</p>
A global gridded CO2 flux dataset inferred from OCO-2 retrievals using the GONGGA inversion system (v2025)
<p><strong>Data Description</strong></p> <p>Here we provide a global monthly CO2 flux dataset at 1° × 1° spatial resolution for the period 2014.9-2024.12. The dataset is generated using the GONGGA (Global ObservatioN-based system for monitoring Greenhouse GAs) inversion system by assimilating OCO-2 (Observing Carbon Observatory 2) v11.2r column CO2 retrievals that scaled to the WMO X2019 standard. The dataset contains fluxes from biosphere (Net Ecosystem Exchange, NEE) (both prior and posterior), ocean (both prior and posterior), biomass burning emissions and fossil fuel emissions.</p> <p>We also provide the posterior model simulated values corresponding to all measurements contained in the lastest release of NOAA’s ObsPack database (obspack_co2_1_GLOBALVIEWplus_v10.1_2024-11-13 and obspack_co2_1_NRT_v10.1_2025-02-07).</p> <p><strong>Change from v2024</strong></p> <ul> <li>Assimilation of OCO-2 v11.2r retrievals</li> <li>Update of prior fluxes</li> </ul> <p><strong>Data version specification</strong></p> <p>v202x.ori refers to original GONGGA flux data with 3-hourly time resolution and 2° latitude × 2.5° longitude spatial resolution, v202x refers to GONGGA flux data resampled to monthly time resolution and 1° latitude × 1° longitude spatial resolution for facilitating comparisons with other GCP inversion results.</p> <p><strong>Article citation</strong></p> <p>Jin, Z., Wang, T., Zhang, H., Wang, Y., Ding, J., Tian, X., Constraint of satellite CO2 retrieval on the global carbon cycle from a Chinese atmospheric inversion system. Science China Earth Sciences, 2023, 66: 609-618, doi: 10.1007/s11430-022-1036-7.</p> <p>Jin, Z., Tian, X., Wang, Y., Zhang, H., Zhao, M., Wang, T., Ding, J., and Piao, S.: A global surface CO2 flux dataset (2015–2022) inferred from OCO-2 retrievals using the GONGGA inversion system, Earth System Science Data, 2024, 16: 2857-2876, doi: 10.5194/essd-16-2857-2024.</p>
Global Carbon Budget 2024, surface ocean fugacity of CO2 (fCO2) and air-sea CO2 flux of individual global ocean biogeochemical models and surface ocean fCO2-based data-products
<p><strong>v2 update: </strong></p> <ul> <li>update to data in UoEX-UEPFFNU fCO2-product</li> <li>fix of lat-lon issue in Jena-MLS fCO2-product</li> <li>minor fixes to metadata in fCO2-products</li> </ul> <p><br>The v2 data is used for the final published version of the Global Carbon Budget 2024.</p> <p>-----------------</p> <p><strong>Surface ocean fugacity of CO2 (fCO2) and air-sea CO2 flux data from individual Global Ocean Biogeochemistry Models (GOBMs) and surface ocean fCO2-based data-products (fCO2-products).</strong><br>There are three types of files: (1) one file per fCO2-product with gridded fields and regionally-integrated CO2 flux time-series, (2) one file per GOBM with gridded fields, and (3) one file with the regionally-integrated time-series for the GOBMs. </p> <p><strong>Note: </strong>These provided gridded outputs from fCO2-based data-products and GOBMs are regridded datasets, without adjustments. <strong>The best estimates of the annual global ocean carbon sink, based on the native grids of fCO2-products and GOBMs and with the adjustments described in the Global Carbon Budget 2024 (https://essd.copernicus.org/preprints/essd-2024-519), are available in the Global Carbon Budget 2024 spreadsheet.</strong></p> <p>The regionally-integrated time-series are as provided by the contributing groups, i.e. integrated from their native grids. In order to reproduce Figure 14 of the Global Carbon Budget 2024 paper (https://essd.copernicus.org/preprints/essd-2024-519), the river flux adjustment needs to be added to the CO2 flux estimated from the fCO2-products (North: 0.14 GtC yr-1, Tropics: 0.42 GtC yr-1, South: 0.09 GtC yr-1, see GCB 2024 paper). The sum of the regional fluxes may differ from the global estimates as reported in the GCB spreadsheet, because some adjustments were applied only for global fluxes.</p> <p><strong>What is in the files?</strong></p> <p>(1) The files for the fCO2-based data-products contain the following variables (temporal resolution: monthly):<br><br>fgco2_reg: Regionally integrated air-sea CO2 flux (positive downward), monthly, for regions: global, north, tropics, south<br>fgco2: Flux density of the total air-sea CO2 flux (positive downward), dimensions: time, latitude, longitude<br>sfco2: Surface ocean fCO2, dimensions: time, latitude, longitude<br>area: Area per pixel, dimensions: latitude, longitude<br>area_reg: Total surface ocean area covered by native grid, for global, north, tropics, south</p> <p>(2) The files for the GOBMs contain the following fields, for simulation A ('contemporary simulation', including effects of rising CO2, climate change and variability) and simulation B ('control simulation', constant CO2, no climate change and variability). Temporal resolution: monthly</p> <p>fgco2: Flux density of the total air-sea CO2 flux (positive downward), dimensions: time, latitude, longitude<br>sfco2: Surface ocean fCO2, dimensions: time, latitude, longitude<br>area: Area per pixel, dimensions: latitude, longitude</p> <p>(3) One file 'GCB-2024_OceanModel_RegionalBreakdown_1959-2023.nc' with the regionally-integrated CO2 flux time-series for all individual GOBMs, and for simulations A and B. Regions: North, tropics, south. Temporal resolution: annual.</p> <p><strong>Fair data use statement:</strong><br>The data and model output provided on this site are freely available and were furnished by individual scientists who encourage their use.<br><strong>Citation:</strong> Please cite the Global Carbon Budget 2024 (Friedlingstein et al., 2024, ESSD, https://essd.copernicus.org/preprints/essd-2024-519) for all data. In addition, please also cite the corresponding original reference for each dataset that has been used - see Table 4 in Global Carbon Budget 2024 for references of all the individual Global Ocean Biogeochemical Models and fCO2-based data-products. Further, for an overview of the Global Ocean Biogeochemical Model output, you may find it useful to cite Hauck et al. (2020, Frontiers, doi:10.3389/fmars.2020.571720).</p> <p><strong>Acknowledgement:</strong> Please add the following text in the acknowledgement of your paper: "We acknowledge the Global Carbon Project, which is responsible for the Global Carbon Budget and we thank the ocean modeling and fCO2-mapping groups for producing and making available their model and fCO2-product output."<br><strong>Co-authorship: </strong>An invitation of co-authorship to the contributing groups is encouraged if these data are the central data set of the publication.</p> <p>Besides the surface fCO2 and air-sea CO2 flux data that is made available open access, we make<strong> additional 3D output</strong> from the Global Ocean Biogeochemical models (GCB-ocean) available upon request and with its own data policy. Please refer to the Global Carbon Budget website for these additional data: https://globalcarbonbudgetdata.org/closed-access-requests.html</p>
Dataset for "Regional Uncertainty Analysis in the Air-Sea CO2 Flux"
<p>This repository contains processed and output data used in the "Regional Uncertainty Analysis in the Air-Sea CO2 Flux" project. </p> <ul> <li><strong>fractional-uncertanties-1x1-1993-2022.nc </strong>: fractional uncertanies calculated with FluxError</li> </ul> <p>The following is the processed data used to calculate fractional uncertanties.</p> <p><strong>Individual Datasets</strong></p> <p>Sea Surface Temperature (SST)</p> <ul> <li><strong>oisst-1x1-1993-2022.nc : </strong>NOAA SST</li> <li><strong>cobe2-1x1-1993-2022.nc :</strong> COBE2 SST </li> <li><strong>esa-1x1-1993-2022.nc : </strong>ESA SST</li> <li><strong>ostia-1x1-1993-2022.nc : </strong>OSTIA SST</li> </ul> <p>10m Wind Speed</p> <ul> <li><strong>ccmp-1x1-1993-2022.nc : </strong>CCMP 10m wind speed</li> <li><strong>jra3q-wind-1x1-1993-2022.nc : </strong>JRA wind speed</li> <li><strong>era5-wind-1x1-1993-2022.nc : </strong>ERA5 wind speed</li> </ul> <p>Sea Surface Salinity (SSS)</p> <ul> <li><strong>en4-1x1-1993-2022.nc : </strong>EN4 salinity </li> <li><strong> glorys-1x1-1993-2022.nc :</strong> GLORYS salinity <strong> </strong></li> <li><strong>oras5-1x1-1993-2022.nc :</strong> ORAS5 salinity </li> </ul> <p>Atmospheric xCO2</p> <ul> <li><strong>noaa-mbl_197901-202301_1x1.nc : </strong>atmospheric xCO2</li> </ul> <p>Ocean pCO2</p> <ul> <li><strong>pco2-1x1-1993-2022.nc : </strong>Global Carbon Budget ocean model and data product output, converted to pCO2</li> </ul> <p>Sea Level Pressure </p> <ul> <li><strong>era5-slp-1x1-1993-2022.nc : </strong>ERA5 sea level pressure</li> </ul> <p>1 Degree Ocean Mask</p> <ul> <li><strong>ocean-mask_invariant_1x1.nc : </strong>Ocean mask </li> </ul> <p><strong>Merged datasets: </strong>these datasets are larger and contain the ensemble of datasets above merged into single files</p> <ul> <li><strong>salinity-1x1-1993-2022.nc : </strong>merged salinity datasets</li> <li><strong>sst-1x1-1993-2022.nc : </strong>merged SST datasets</li> <li><strong>wind-1x1-1993-2022.nc : </strong>merged wind speed datasets</li> </ul>
Compiled database, code and raw data for the article "A Comprehensive Database of Leaf Temperature, Water, and CO2 Fluxes in Young Oil Palm Plants Across Diverse Climate Scenarios for the Evaluation of Functional-Structural Models"
<p>This dataset results from an experiment on young oil palm plants (<em>Elaeis guineensis</em>) in the Ecotron facility from CNRS in Montpellier. Four plants were put in a microcosm one by one with varying climatic conditions to investigate the effect of climate on leaf temperature, CO2, and H2O fluxes at the plant scale. The conditions were defined based on typical daily conditions from a location where it is grown (Libo, Indonesia), <em>i.e.</em>, a day with no rainfall and near-average air temperature and humidity. This base condition was then modified by adding more CO2 (400, 600 and 800ppm), less radiation (typical cloudy sky), and more or less temperature and vapour pressure deficit (± 30%).</p> <p>Find more details from the <code>README.md</code> file in the repository or from the associated <a href="https://github.com/PalmStudio/Biophysics_database_palm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Github repository</a>.</p>
MIROC4-ACTM CO2 Inversion flux (2001-2020; case s050_ux4_gvjf)
<p>Details in :</p> <p>Chandra, N., Patra, P. K., Niwa, Y., Ito, A., Iida, Y., Goto, D., Morimoto, S., Kondo, M., Takigawa, M., Hajima, T., and Watanabe, M.: Estimated regional CO<sub>2</sub> flux and uncertainty based on an ensemble of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> inversions, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-1039, in review, 2021.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.