Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
9
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
9 results for “Cacteae”
Figure 3 from: Sánchez D, Vázquez-Benítez B, Vázquez-Sánchez M, Aquino D, Arias S (2022) Phylogenetic relationships in Coryphantha and implications on Pelecyphora and Escobaria (Cacteae, Cactoideae, Cactaceae). PhytoKeys 188: 115-165. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.188.75739
Figure 3 Representative species and morphology of Coryphantha and EscobariaAEscobaria dasyacantha bearing red fruits (S. Arias 2090, MEXU) B flower of Escobaria emskoetteriana (Quehl) Borg with fimbriate outer tepals (D. Aquino 322, MEXU) CCoryphantha macromeris bearing flowers with fimbriate outer tepals (S. Arias 1788, MEXU) D close-up of the furrow on the tubercles (arrow) in Pelecyphora aselliformis (H. Sánchez-Mejorada 3616, MEXU) E green fruits (top) and flat multicellular sculpture of the lateral side of the seed (bottom) in Coryphantha calipensis (B. Vázquez 2555, MEXU) FCoryphantha maiz-tablasensis (D. Aquino 400, MEXU) GCoryphantha cornifera (SA 2212, MEXU) HCoryphantha durangensis (B. Vázquez 2625, MEXU) ICoryphantha poselgeriana (S. Arias 2109, MEXU) JCoryphantha kracikii (B. Vázquez 2618, MEXU) K glands at the axil (arrow) in Coryphantha ottonis (D. Sánchez s.n., IBUG) LCoryphantha glanduligera (S. Arias 2129, MEXU).
Figure 2 from: Sánchez D, Vázquez-Benítez B, Vázquez-Sánchez M, Aquino D, Arias S (2022) Phylogenetic relationships in Coryphantha and implications on Pelecyphora and Escobaria (Cacteae, Cactoideae, Cactaceae). PhytoKeys 188: 115-165. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.188.75739
Figure 2 Phylogenetic relationships of Coryphantha and close related genera. Majority rule phylogram, from the BI analysis using cpDNA sequences, indels, and morphological partitions (combined analysis). Numbers in nodes indicate posterior probabilities. Labels indicate the main recovered clades and subclades.
Figure 1 from: Sánchez D, Vázquez-Benítez B, Vázquez-Sánchez M, Aquino D, Arias S (2022) Phylogenetic relationships in Coryphantha and implications on Pelecyphora and Escobaria (Cacteae, Cactoideae, Cactaceae). PhytoKeys 188: 115-165. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.188.75739
Figure 1 Phylogenetic relationships of Coryphantha and close related genera. Majority rule phylogram, from the BI analysis using cpDNA sequences and indels partitions (molecular analysis). Numbers in nodes indicate posterior probabilities. Labels indicate the main recovered clades and subclades.
Figure 1 from: Vargas-Luna MD, Hernández-Ledesma P, Majure LC, Puente-Martínez R, Macías HMH, Luna RTB (2018) Splitting Echinocactus: morphological and molecular evidence support the recognition of Homalocephala as a distinct genus in the Cacteae. PhytoKeys 111: 31-59. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.111.26856
Figure 1 Echinocactus species. AE.platyacanthus from Querétaro BE.horizonthalonius from Chihuahua CH.texensis from Chihuahua DH.parryi from Chihuahua EH.polycephalasubsp.polycephala from Sonora FK.grusonii from Querétaro. Line bar in fruit photographs is 1 mm.
Figure 3 from: Vargas-Luna MD, Hernández-Ledesma P, Majure LC, Puente-Martínez R, Macías HMH, Luna RTB (2018) Splitting Echinocactus: morphological and molecular evidence support the recognition of Homalocephala as a distinct genus in the Cacteae. PhytoKeys 111: 31-59. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.111.26856
Figure 3 Phylogenetic relationships of Echinocactus inferred with the total evidence matrix. Maximum parsimony strict consensus tree of 2 most parsimonious trees of 863 steps with a consistency index of 0.790 and a retention index of 0.770. Values above/below nodes indicate maximum parsimony bootstrap (mpb) and posterior probabilities (pp), respectively. Black circles indicate synapomorphic characters identified by the character optimisation analyses. Numbers above/below circles indicate characters and character states, respectively (see Appendix 2). The HEA clade is labelled showing the three genera: Astrophytum, Echinocactus and Homalocephala. Line drawings illustrate the morphological synapomorphies for respective clades.
Figure 5 from: Vargas-Luna MD, Hernández-Ledesma P, Majure LC, Puente-Martínez R, Macías HMH, Luna RTB (2018) Splitting Echinocactus: morphological and molecular evidence support the recognition of Homalocephala as a distinct genus in the Cacteae. PhytoKeys 111: 31-59. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.111.26856
Figure 5 Bayesian 50% majority rule consensus tree showing phylogenetic relationship of Echinocactus inferred with 5GT. Values in tree nodes correspond (left to right) to bootstrap values from maximum parsimony (mpb), maximum likelihood (mlb) and posterior probabilities (pp). The clades highlighted in dark and light grey correspond to the Echinocactus, Homalocephala and K.grusonii-Ferocactus clades.
Figure 4 from: Vargas-Luna MD, Hernández-Ledesma P, Majure LC, Puente-Martínez R, Macías HMH, Luna RTB (2018) Splitting Echinocactus: morphological and molecular evidence support the recognition of Homalocephala as a distinct genus in the Cacteae. PhytoKeys 111: 31-59. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.111.26856
Figure 4 Phylogenetic relationship of Echinocactus inferred with cpDNA plus morphology. Bayesian 50% majority rule consensus tree. Values in nodes correspond (left to right) to bootstrap values from maximum parsimony (mpb) and posterior probabilities (pp). The black star indicates the HEA clade and its three subclades Astrophytum, Echinocactus and Homalocephala highlighted.
Figure 2 from: Vargas-Luna MD, Hernández-Ledesma P, Majure LC, Puente-Martínez R, Macías HMH, Luna RTB (2018) Splitting Echinocactus: morphological and molecular evidence support the recognition of Homalocephala as a distinct genus in the Cacteae. PhytoKeys 111: 31-59. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.111.26856
Figure 2 Phylogenetic relationship of Echinocactus inferred with the cpDNA matrix. Maximum parsimony 50% majority rule consensus tree of 4 most parsimonious trees of 347 steps with a consistency index of 0.681 and retention index of 0.848. Values in nodes correspond (from left to right) to maximum parsimony bootstrap (mpb), maximum likelihood bootstrap (mlb) and posterior probabilities (pp). The black star indicates the HEA clade with three subclades: Astrophytum, Echinocactus and Homalocephala highlighted.
Figure A1 from: Sánchez D, Vázquez-Benítez B, Vázquez-Sánchez M, Aquino D, Arias S (2022) Phylogenetic relationships in Coryphantha and implications on Pelecyphora and Escobaria (Cacteae, Cactoideae, Cactaceae). PhytoKeys 188: 115-165. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.188.75739
Figure A1 Continued.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.