Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
14
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
14 results for “Campomanesia”
Figure 6 in Shading minimizes the effects of water deficit in Campomanesia xanthocarpa (Mart.) O. Berg seedlings
Figure 6. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in leaves (a) and o roots (b, c, d) ofCampomanesia xanthocarpa seedlings as a function of shading (0, 30 and 70%), continuous irrigation (CI) and intermittent (II) conditions, and experimental period (start - T0, 1st and 2nd photosynthesis zero – P0, 1st and 2nd Recovery - REC and END). Uppercase letters compare the same shading and irrigation conditions in different experimental periods.Lowercase letters compare the same irrigation condition and period in different shading.The asterisk compares irrigation conditions in the same shading and period (a). Uppercase letters compare the same condition shading in the different period (d). Lowercase letters compare different irrigation conditions in the different periods (b) and same shading (c) and same period in the different shading (d). The means of shading were compared by the Tukey test, the experimental periods by the Scott Knott test, and the irrigation conditions by the Bonferroni T test. In all cases, 5% probability was used.
Figure 5 in Shading minimizes the effects of water deficit in Campomanesia xanthocarpa (Mart.) O. Berg seedlings
Figure 5. Peroxidase activity (POD) in leaves (a) and roots (b, c, d) of Campomanesia xanthocarpa seedlings as a function of shading (0, 30 and 70%), continuous irrigation (CI) and intermittent (II) conditions, and experimental period (Start - T0, 1st and 2nd Photosynthesis Zero – P0, 1st and 2nd Recovery - REC and END). Uppercase letters compare the same shading and irrigation conditions in different experimental periods. Lowercase letters compare the same irrigation condition and period in different shading. The asterisk compares irrigation conditions in the same shading and period (a). Upper case letters compare the same irrigation condition in different shading and the same shading in the different period (d). Lowercase letters compare different irrigation conditions in the different periods (b) and same shading (c) and same period in the different shading (d). The means of shading were compared by the Tukey test, the experimental periods by the Scott Knott test, and the irrigation conditions by the Bonferroni T test. In all cases, 5% probability was used.
Figure 1 in Shading minimizes the effects of water deficit in Campomanesia xanthocarpa (Mart.) O. Berg seedlings
Figure 1. Water potential (Ψw) of Campomanesia xanthocarpa seedlings as a function of continuous irrigation (CI) and intermittent (II) conditions, shading (0, 30, and 70%) (a) and experimental period (Start: T0, 1st and 2nd Photosynthesis Zero: P0, 1st and 2nd Recovery: REC and END); (b). Uppercase letters compare the same irrigation condition in different shading. Lowercase letters compare the same shading in different irrigation conditions and shading (Figure 1a).
Figure 7 in Shading minimizes the effects of water deficit in Campomanesia xanthocarpa (Mart.) O. Berg seedlings
Figure 7. Schematic representation of the effects of shading (0, 30, and 70%) on the reduction (%) of water potential (Ψw) in the1st and 2nd photosynthesis zero (P0) in relation to initial fluorescence (F0), basal quantum production of the non-photochemical processes of photosystem II (F0/Fm), potential quantum efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm), maximum efficiency of the photochemical process in photosystem II (Fv/F0), and peroxidase (POD) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities in the leaves of Campomanesia xanthocarpa.
Figure 3 in Shading minimizes the effects of water deficit in Campomanesia xanthocarpa (Mart.) O. Berg seedlings
Figure 3. Maximum efficiency of the photochemical process in photosystem II – Fv/F0 (a, b) and basal quantum production of the non-photochemical processes of photosystem – F0/Fm (c) of Campomanesia xanthocarpa seedlings as a function of continuous irrigation (CI) and intermittent (II) conditions, shading (0, 30, and 70%) and experimental period (Start - T0, 1st and 2nd Photosynthesis Zero – P0, 1st and 2nd Recovery - REC and END). Uppercase letters compare the same irrigation condition in different shading (a) and different experimental periods (b). Lowercase letters compare different irrigation conditions in the same shading (a) and different experimental periods (b). Uppercase letters compare the same shading and irrigation conditions in different experimental periods. Lowercase letters compare the same irrigation condition and period in different shading. The asterisk compares irrigation conditions in the same shading and period (c). The means of shading were compared by the Tukey test, the experimental periods by the Scott Knott test, and the irrigation conditions by the Bonferroni T test. In all cases, 5% probability was used.
Figure 4 in Shading minimizes the effects of water deficit in Campomanesia xanthocarpa (Mart.) O. Berg seedlings
Figure 4. Dickson quality index (DQI) (a, b) and chlorophyll index (c) of Campomanesia xanthocarpa seedlings as a function of continuous irrigation (CI) and intermittent (II) conditions, shading (0, 30, and 70%) and experimental period (Start: T0, 1st and 2nd Photosynthesis Zero: P0, 1st and 2nd Recovery: REC and END). Uppercase letters compare the same irrigation condition in different shading. Lowercase letters compare different irrigation conditions in the same shading (a). The means of shading were compared with the Tukey test; experimental periods, Scott Knott test; and irrigation conditions, Bonferroni t-test. In all cases, 5% probability was used.
Figure 4 in Use of commercial biostimulator in the ex situ cultivation of a native medicinal plant of Cerrado: Campomanesia adamantium
Figure 4. Two-dimensional graphic of the production data, chemical attributes of substrate, macro and micronutrients of dry mass of aerial parts in different doses of biostimulator. PC1 and PC2 correspond to the Principal Components Leaf dry mass (LDM); Stem dry mass (SDM); Total dry mass (TDM); Leaf area (LA); Dickson quality index (DQI); Root length (RL); Potential of hydrogen (pH); Organic matter (OM); Sum of bases (SB); Cation exchange capacity (CEC); Base saturation (V%); Phosphorus of substrate (P); Calcium of substrate (Ca); Calcium of root (R Ca); Magnesium of substrate (Mg); Copper of substrate (Cu); Copper of shoot (AP Cu); Copper of root (R Cu); Manganese of substrate (Mn); Iron of substrate (Fe); Iron of shoot (AP Fe); Zinc of substrate (Zn); Zinc of shoot (AP Zn) and Zinc of root (R Zn).
Figure 1 in Use of commercial biostimulator in the ex situ cultivation of a native medicinal plant of Cerrado: Campomanesia adamantium
Figure 1. Two-dimensional graphic of the chemical and microbiological attributes in different doses of biostimulator. PC1 and PC2 correspond to the Principal Components Potential of hydrogen (pH); Organic matter (OM); Phosphorus (P); Calcium (Ca); Magnesium (Mg); Copper (Cu); Manganese (Mn); Iron (Fe); Zinc (Zn); Sum of bases (SB); Cation exchange capacity (CEC); Base saturation (V%); microbial biomass carbon (Cmic); Basal respiration (BSR); Metabolic quocient (qCO ).
Figure 3 in Use of commercial biostimulator in the ex situ cultivation of a native medicinal plant of Cerrado: Campomanesia adamantium
Figure 3. Number of leaves of 'guavira' plants according to doses of the biostimulator and epochs of evaluation, * indicates significant difference (p <0.05).
Figure 2 in Use of commercial biostimulator in the ex situ cultivation of a native medicinal plant of Cerrado: Campomanesia adamantium
Figure 2. Photosynthetic activity of 'guavira' plants. A. Photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm); B. absorbed energy conversion efficiency (F v /F 0); C. chlorophyll index and D. chlorophyll b of 'guavira' plants grown on substrate with different doses of biostimulator, *indicates significant difference (p <0.05) between biostimulator.
FIGURE 1. A. Fruiting branch. B. Leaf base, lower surface. C. Leaf margin, lower surface. D. Leaf margin, upper surface. E–G in A new species of Campomanesia (Myrtaceae) from Bahia, Brazil, and its relationships with the C. xanthocarpa complex
FIGURE 1. A. Fruiting branch. B. Leaf base, lower surface. C. Leaf margin, lower surface. D. Leaf margin, upper surface. E–G. Variation of the leaf format. H. Fruit. I. Detail of the calyx-lobes.
FIGURE 2. Campomanesia costata. A. Habit. B in A new species of Campomanesia (Myrtaceae) from Bahia, Brazil, and its relationships with the C. xanthocarpa complex
FIGURE 2. Campomanesia costata. A. Habit. B. Detail of the cracked bark. C. Sulcate veins in the adaxial face of leaf. D. Fruiting branch. E. Calyx and stamen scars in the fruit. F. Cross section of the fruit in natura showing seeds covered by the glandular locular wall. G. Fruit in cross section showing six locules with a glandular wall; one seed developed.
Figure 2. Initial fluorescence - F0 in Shading minimizes the effects of water deficit in Campomanesia xanthocarpa (Mart.) O. Berg seedlings
Figure 2. Initial fluorescence - F0 (a) and the potential quantum efficiency of photosystem II – Fv/Fm (b) of Campomanesia xanthocarpa seedlings as a function of continuous irrigation (CI) and intermittent (II) conditions, shading (0, 30, and 70%) and experimental period (Start: T0, 1st and 2nd Photosynthesis Zero: P0, 1st and 2nd Recovery: REC and END). Uppercase letters compare the same shading and irrigation conditions in different experimental periods. Lowercase letters compare the same irrigation condition and period in different shading. The asterisk compares irrigation conditions in the same shading and period. The means of shading were compared by the Tukey test, the experimental periods by the Scott Knott test, and the irrigation conditions by the Bonferroni T test. In all cases, 5% probability was used.
FIGURE 3 in A new species of Campomanesia (Myrtaceae) from Bahia, Brazil, and its relationships with the C. xanthocarpa complex
FIGURE 3. Distribution map of Campomanesia costata in Brazil.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.