Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
30
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
30 results for “Canis aureus”
Distribution of large carnivores in Europe 2012 - 2016: Distribution map for Golden Jackal (Canis aureus)
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p> <p>Regular assessments of species’ status are an essential component of conservation planning and adaptive management. They allow the progress of past or ongoing conservation actions to be evaluated and can be used to redirect and prioritize future conservation actions. Most countries perform periodic assessments for their own national adaptive management procedures or national red lists. Furthermore, the countries of the European Union have to report on the status of all species listed on the directives of the Habitats Directive every 6 years as part of their obligations under Article 17. However, these national level assessments are often made using non-standardized procedures and do not always adequately reflect the biological units (i.e., the populations) which are needed for ecologically meaningful assessments.</p> <p>Since the early 2000’s the Large Carnivore Initiative for Europe (a Specialist Group of the IUCN’s Species Survival Commission) has been coordinating periodic surveys of the status of large carnivores across Europe (e.g., von Arx et al. 2004; Salvatori & Linnell 2005, Kaczensky et al. 2013). These have covered the Eurasian lynx (<em>Lynx lynx</em>), the wolf (<em>Canis lupus</em>), the brown bear (<em>Ursus arctos</em>) and the wolverine (<em>Gulo gulo</em>). The golden jackal (<em>Canis aureus</em>) has been added to the LCIE prerogatives in 2014. The species is rapidly expanding in Europe (Trouwborst <em>et al.</em> 2015; Männil & Ranc 2022), a large-scale phenomenon that resembles that of the other large carnivores. Golden jackals are thriving in human-dominated landscapes (Ćirović <em>et al.</em> 2016; Lanszki <em>et al.</em> 2018; Fenton <em>et al.</em> 2021), where they are often functioning as the top predators, despite having smaller body size that is typical for large carnivores. The expansion of the species triggers many questions among scientists, stakeholders, and policy makers (Trouwborst <em>et al.</em> 2015; Hatlauf <em>et al.</em> 2021), that are closely connected to those raised by the other large carnivores (e.g., potential conflicts with livestock or hunting). In this context, monitoring the species’ expansion, delineating populations, assessing the species' legal and protection status, and addressing the concerns raised by this rapidly expanding carnivore requires a high level of coordination among regional experts.</p> <p>These surveys involve the contributions of the best available experts and sources of information. While the underlying data quality and field methodology varies widely across Europe, these coordinated assessments do their best to integrate the diverse data in a comparable manner and make the differences transparent. They also endeavor to conduct the assessments on the most important scales. This includes the continental scale (all countries except for Russia, Belarus, Moldova and the parts of Ukraine outside the Carpathian Mountain range), the scale of the EU 28 (where the Habitats Directive operates) and of the biological populations which reflect the scale at which ecological processes occur (Linnell et al. 2008). In this way, the independent LCIE assessments provide a valuable complement to the ongoing national processes.</p> <p>Our last assessments covered the period 2006-2011 (Kaczensky et al. 2013; Chapron et al. 2014) but, at the time, did not include golden jackals. The current assessment is based on the period 2012-2016 and broadly follows the same methodology. Explicit distinctions are made between classification based on empirical data and expert opinion. The population definitions used in this report follow those proposed in (Ranc <em>et al.</em> 2018); areas whose presence category was defined by expert opinion were not assigned to a specific population, though. </p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Methods</strong></p> <p>The mapping approach follows the methods described in Chapron et al. (2014) and Kaczensky et al. (2013). It updates the published Species Online Layers (SPOIS) to the period 2012-2016.</p> <p>In short, large carnivore presence was mapped at a 10x10 km ETRS89-LAEA Europe grid scale. This grid is widely used for the Flora-Fauna-Habitat reporting by the European Union (EU) and can be downloaded at: http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/eea-reference-grids-2</p> <p>The map encompasses the EU countries plus the non-EU Balkan states, Switzerland, Norway, and the Carpathian region of Ukraine. Presence in a grid cell was ideally mapped based on carnivore presence and frequency in a cell resulting in:</p> <p>1 = Permanent (presence confirmed in >= 3 years in the last 5 years OR in >50% of the time OR reproduction confirmed within the last 3 years)</p> <p>3 = Sporadic (highly fluctuating presence) (presence confirmed in <3 years in the last 5 years OR in <50% of the time)</p> <p>5 = Expert-based presence (high confidence) (expert-based opinion; very suitable habitat near permanent presence areas)</p> <p>6 = Expert-based presence (low confidence or unconfirmed records) (expert-based opinion; suitable habitat near presence areas or unconfirmed C3 records of jackal presence)</p> <p>7 = Expert-based absence (high confidence) (jackal presence according to coarse-resolution hunting bag data but experts think, with high confidence, the species is not present)</p> <p>8 = Expert-based absence (low confidence) (jackal presence according to coarse-resolution hunting bag data but experts think the species is not present)</p> <p>Where grid cells were assigned different values between neighboring countries; the “disputed” cells were given the “higher” presence values e.g., a cell categorized as “sporadic” by one country and “permanent” by another was categorized as “permanent”. Data-based categories (1,3) were given priority over expert-based categories (5 through 8).</p> <p>To assess the quality of carnivore signs we used the SCALP criteria developed for the standardized monitoring of Eurasian lynx (<em>Lynx lynx</em>) in the Alps (Molinari-Jobin et al. 2012):</p> <p>Category 1 (C1): “Hard facts”, verified and unchallenged large carnivore presence signs (e.g., dead animals, DNA, verified camera trap images);</p> <p>Category 2 (C2): Large carnivore presence signs controlled and confirmed by a large carnivore expert (e.g., trained member of the network), which requires documentation of large carnivore signs; and</p> <p>Category 3 (C3): Unconfirmed category 2 large carnivore presence signs and all presence signs such as sightings and calls which, if not additionally documented, cannot be verified.</p> <p>See Hatlauf and Böcker (2022) for best practices regarding golden jackal records.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Usage Notes</strong></p> <p>The data available consists of a shapefile at a 10 x 10 km resolution compiled for the period 2012-2016 for the Large Carnivore Initiative of Europe IUCN Specialist Group and for the IUCN Red List Assessment.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>References</strong></p> <p>Boitani, L., F. Alvarez, O. Anders, H. Andren, E. Avanzinelli, V. Balys, J. C. Blanco, U. Breitenmoser, G. Chapron, P. Ciucci, A. Dutsov, C. Groff, D. Huber, O. Ionescu, F. Knauer, I. Kojola, J. Kubala, M. Kutal, J. Linnell, A. Majic, P. Mannil, R. Manz, F. Marucco, D. Melovski, A. Molinari, H. Norberg, S. Nowak, J. Ozolins, S. Palazon, H. Potocnik, P.-Y. Quenette, I. Reinhardt, R. Rigg, N. Selva, A. Sergiel, M. Shkvyria, J. Swenson, A. Trajce, M. Von Arx, M. Wolfl, U. Wotschikowsky and D. Zlatanova. 2015. Key actions for Large Carnivore populations in Europe. Institute of Applied Ecology (Rome, Italy). Report to DG Environment, European Commission, Bruxelles. Contract no. 07.0307/2013/654446/SER/B3</p> <p>Ćirović, D., A. Penezić and M. Krofel. 2016. Jackals as cleaners: Ecosystem services provided by a mesocarnivore in human-dominated landscapes. <em>Biological Conservation</em>, 199: 51–55.</p> <p>Chapron, G., Kaczensky, P., Linnell, J.D.C., von Arx, M., Huber, D., Andrén, H., López-Bao, J.V., Adamec, M., Álvares, F., Anders, O., Balčiauskas, L., Balys, V., Bedő, P., Bego, F., Blanco, J.C., Breitenmoser, U., Brøseth, H., Bufka, L., Bunikyte, R., Ciucci, P., Dutsov, A., Engleder, T., Fuxjäger, C., Groff, C., Holmala, K., Hoxha, B., Iliopoulos, Y., Ionescu, O., Jeremić, J., Jerina, K., Kluth, G., Knauer, F., Kojola, I., Kos, I., Krofel, M., Kubala, J., Kunovac, S., Kusak, J., Kutal, M., Liberg, O., Majić, A., Männil, P., Manz, R., Marboutin, E., Marucco, F., Melovski, D., Mersini, K., Mertzanis, Y., Mysłajek, R.W., Nowak, S., Odden, J., Ozolins, J., Palomero, G., Paunović, M., Persson, J., Potočnik, H., Quenette, P.-Y., Rauer, G., Reinhardt, I., Rigg, R., Ryser, A., Salvatori, V., Skrbinšek, T., Stojanov, A., Swenson, J.E., Szemethy, L., Trajçe, A., Tsingarska[1]Sedefcheva, E., Váňa, M., Veeroja, R., Wabakken, P., Wölfl, M., Wölfl, S., Zimmermann, F., Zlatanova, D. and Boitani, L. 2014. Recovery of large carnivores in Europe’s modern human-dominated landscapes. <em>Science</em> 346: 1517-1519.</p> <p>Fenton, S., Moorcroft, P.R., Ćirović, D., Lanszki, J., Heltai, M., Cagnacci, F., Breck, S., Bogdanović, N., Pantelić, I., Ács, K. and Ranc, N. 2021. Movement, space-use and resource preferences of European golden jackals in human-dominated landscapes: insights from a telemetry study. <em>Mammalian Biology</em>, 101: 619–630.</p> <p>Hatlauf, J. and Böcker, F. 2022. Recommendations for the documentation and assessment of golden jackal (<em>Canis aureus</em>) records in Europe. BOKU reports on wildlife research and willdife management 27. Ed: Institute of Wildlife Biology and Game Management (IWJ), University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna. ISBN: 978-3-900932-94-7</p> <p>Hatlauf, J., Bayer, K., Trouwborst, A. and Hackländer, K. 2021. New rules or old concepts? The golden jackal (<em>Canis aureus</em>) and its legal status in Central Europe. <em>European Journal of Wildlife Research</em>, 67, 25.</p> <p>Kaczensky, P., Chapron, G., Von Arx, M., Huber, D., Andrén, H. and Linnell, J. 2013. Status, management and distribution of large carnivores - bear, lynx, wolf and wolverine - in Europe. Istituto di Ecologia Applicata, Rome, Italy.</p> <p>Lanszki, J., Schally, G., Heltai, M. and Ranc, N. 2018. Golden jackal expansion in Europe: first telemetry evidence of a natal dispersal. <em>Mammalian Biology</em>, 88: 81–84.</p> <p>Linnell, J.D.C., Salvatori, V. and Boitani, L. 2008. Guidelines for population level management plans for large carnivores in Europe. A Large Carnivore Initiative for Europe report prepared for the European Commission (contract 070501/2005/424162/MAR/B2).</p> <p>Männil, P. and Ranc, N. 2022. Golden jackal (<em>Canis aureus</em>) in Estonia: development of a thriving population in the boreal ecoregion. <em>Mammalian Research,</em> 67: 245-250.</p> <p>Molinari-Jobin, A., Kéry, M., Marboutin, E., Molinari, P., Koren, I., Fuxjäger, C., Breitenmoser-Würsten, C., Wölfl, S., Fasel, M., Kos, I., Wölfl, M. and Breitenmoser, U. 2012. Monitoring in the presence of species misidentification: the case of the Eurasian lynx in the Alps. <em>Animal Conservation </em>15: 266-273.</p> <p>Ranc, N., Krofel, M. and Cirovic, D. 2018. IUCN Red List Mapping for the regional assessment of the Golden Jackal (<em>Canis aureus</em>) in Europe. IUCN Red List Threatened Species, 13.</p> <p>Salvatori, V. and Linnell, J.D.C. 2005. Report on the conservation status and threats for wolf (Canis lupus) in Europe. Council of Europe Report T-PVS/Inf (2005) 16.</p> <p>Trouwborst, A., Krofel, M. and Linnell, J.D.C. 2015. Legal implications of range expansions in a terrestrial carnivore: the case of the golden jackal (<em>Canis aureus</em>) in Europe. <em>Biodiversity Conservation</em>, 24: 2593–2610.</p> <p>von Arx, M., Breitenmoser-Würsten, C., Zimmermann, F. and Breitenmoser, U. 2004. Status and conservation of the Eurasian lynx (<em>Lynx lynx</em>) in Europe in 2001. KORA Report 19e: 1-330.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Contact information</strong></p> <p>Nathan Ranc, nathan.ranc@inrae.fr</p>
Fig. 1 in Golden jackal (Canis aureus Linnaeus, 1758) and Red fox (Vulpes vulpes Linnaeus, 1758) population dynamics in Sarnena Sredna Gora Mts., Bulgaria based on hunting statistics
Fig. 1. Golden jackal (Canis aureus L.) and Red fox (Vulpes vulpes L.) population dynamics trends in Sarnena Sredna Gora Mts., Bulgaria, for a period of 11 years based on the analysis of the hunting data base (number of shot individuals)
Fig. 1 in Short Communication The golden jackal Canis aureus L. 1758 (Carnivora: Canidae) on the Tuscan Apennines
Fig. 1 - Map showing the area where the two golden jackals have been observed in Tuscany. The precise coordinates are omitted for species conservation reasons (Lunghi et al., 2019). / Mappa che mostra l'area in cui sono stati osservati i due sciacalli dorati in Toscana. Le coordinate precise sono omesse per motivi relativi alla conservazione della specie (Lunghi et al., 2019).
Fig. 2 in Short Communication The golden jackal Canis aureus L. 1758 (Carnivora: Canidae) on the Tuscan Apennines
Fig. 2 - The first (A-B) and the second (C-D) of the two golden jackals observed in Tuscany. Individual recognition was carried out by the pattern of the muzzle fur (in the area indicated by the red circle). Photo taken with Victure HC300 trail camera. The full video of the observation can be seen at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0wO4i4SNXA. / Il primo (A-B) e il secondo (C-D) dei due sciacalli dorati osservati in Toscana. Il riconoscimento individuale è stato effettuato attraverso il disegno del pelo del muso (nell'area indicata dal cerchio rosso). Foto scattata con la trail camera Victure HC300. Il video completo dell'osservazione può essere visto su https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0wO4i4SNXA.
Fig. 2 in On the activity of two medium-sized canids: the Golden Jackal (Canis aureus) and the Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) in the Natural Bark "Sinite Kamani" (Bulgaria) revealed by camera traps
Fig. 2. Number of all pictures of Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) taken during 24h (expressed for one hour time interval) during seasons.
Fig. 4 in On the activity of two medium-sized canids: the Golden Jackal (Canis aureus) and the Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) in the Natural Bark "Sinite Kamani" (Bulgaria) revealed by camera traps
Fig. 4. Daytime activity (feeding on dog food) of the Red Fox and the Golden Jackal registered by camera traps at the Sinite Kamani Natural Park.
Fig. 1 in On the activity of two medium-sized canids: the Golden Jackal (Canis aureus) and the Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) in the Natural Bark "Sinite Kamani" (Bulgaria) revealed by camera traps
Fig. 1. Location of Sinite Kamani Natural Park and schematic position of the camera traps through the park (black circles).
Fig. 3 in On the activity of two medium-sized canids: the Golden Jackal (Canis aureus) and the Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) in the Natural Bark "Sinite Kamani" (Bulgaria) revealed by camera traps
Fig. 3. Number of all pictures of Golden Jackal (Canis aureus) taken during 24h (expressed for one hour time interval) during seasons.
Рис. 3. ПоΔразΔеΛение Обжоровского участка на зоны и поΔзоны районирования низовьев ΔеΛьты ВоΛги. Обозначения: 1 — верхняя часть русΛовой зоны; 2 — среΔняя часть русΛовой зоны; 3 — нижняя часть русΛовой зоны; 4 — куΛтучная зона и вытечки протоков Fig. 3. Obzhorovsky transect by zones and subzones of the lower reaches of the Volga delta. Designations: 1 — upper part of the streambed; 2 — middle part of the streambed; 3 — lower part of the streambed; 4 — cultuk zone and the streambed outflow in The number and distribution of the raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides Gray) and the common jackal (Canis aureus L.) in 2021-2022 in Astrakhan Nature Reserve under the influence of hydrological changes
Рис. 3. ПоΔразΔеΛение Обжоровского участка на зоны и поΔзоны районирования низовьев ΔеΛьты ВоΛги. Обозначения: 1 — верхняя часть русΛовой зоны; 2 — среΔняя часть русΛовой зоны; 3 — нижняя часть русΛовой зоны; 4 — куΛтучная зона и вытечки протоков Fig. 3. Obzhorovsky transect by zones and subzones of the lower reaches of the Volga delta. Designations: 1 — upper part of the streambed; 2 — middle part of the streambed; 3 — lower part of the streambed; 4 — cultuk zone and the streambed outflow
Рис. 2. ПоΔразΔеΛение Αамчикского участка на зоны и поΔзоны районирования низовьев ΔеΛьты ВоΛги (часть 2). Обозначения: 1 — верхняя часть русΛовой зоны; 2 — среΔняя часть русΛовой зоны: 3 — нижняя часть русΛовой зоны; 4 — куΛтучная зона и вытечки протоков Fig. 2. Damchiksky transect by zones and subzones of the lower reaches of the Volga delta (part 2). 1 — upper part of the streambed; 2 — middle part of the streambed; 3 — lower part of the streambed; 4 — cultuk zone and the streambed outflow in The number and distribution of the raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides Gray) and the common jackal (Canis aureus L.) in 2021-2022 in Astrakhan Nature Reserve under the influence of hydrological changes
Рис. 2. ПоΔразΔеΛение Αамчикского участка на зоны и поΔзоны районирования низовьев ΔеΛьты ВоΛги (часть 2). Обозначения: 1 — верхняя часть русΛовой зоны; 2 — среΔняя часть русΛовой зоны: 3 — нижняя часть русΛовой зоны; 4 — куΛтучная зона и вытечки протоков Fig. 2. Damchiksky transect by zones and subzones of the lower reaches of the Volga delta (part 2). 1 — upper part of the streambed; 2 — middle part of the streambed; 3 — lower part of the streambed; 4 — cultuk zone and the streambed outflow
Рис. 1. ПоΔразΔеΛение Αамчикского участка на зоны и поΔзоны районирования низовьев ΔеΛьты ВоΛги (часть 1). Обозначения: 1 — верхняя часть русΛовой зоны; 2 — среΔняя часть русΛовой зоны: 3 — нижняя часть русΛовой зоны; 4 — куΛтучная зона и вытечки протоков Fig. 1. Damchiksky transect by zones and subzones of the lower reaches of the Volga delta (part 1). Designations: 1 — upper part of the streambed; 2 — middle part of the streambed; 3 — lower part of the streambed; 4 — cultuk zone and the streambed outflow in The number and distribution of the raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides Gray) and the common jackal (Canis aureus L.) in 2021-2022 in Astrakhan Nature Reserve under the influence of hydrological changes
Рис. 1. ПоΔразΔеΛение Αамчикского участка на зоны и поΔзоны районирования низовьев ΔеΛьты ВоΛги (часть 1). Обозначения: 1 — верхняя часть русΛовой зоны; 2 — среΔняя часть русΛовой зоны: 3 — нижняя часть русΛовой зоны; 4 — куΛтучная зона и вытечки протоков Fig. 1. Damchiksky transect by zones and subzones of the lower reaches of the Volga delta (part 1). Designations: 1 — upper part of the streambed; 2 — middle part of the streambed; 3 — lower part of the streambed; 4 — cultuk zone and the streambed outflow
Fig. 2 in Double trouble: Co-infection of Angiostrongylus vasorum and Dirofilaria immitis in golden jackal (Canis aureus) in Friuli Venezia Giulia, Italy
Fig. 2. Pathological findings in case of co-infection with D. immitis and A. vasorum in a golden jackal. (A) Presence of adult D. immitis within the right cardiac chambers (bar = 1 cm). (B) Lung parenchyma show multifocal poorly defined red to yellow-brown nodular firmer areas in the ventral edges of lung lobes (white circle and inset). Multifocal dark brown-black areas representing thrombotic infarcts are also often visible (white square and inset). (bar = 2 cm). (C) Female adult of A. vasorum nematode within a small pulmonary artery (bar = 1 cm). (D) Cross section of adult A. vasorum (black stars) and a thrombus (Th) in the lumen of a small pulmonary artery. Hematoxylin and eosin. (E) Lung parenchyma show multifocal granulomatous interstitial pneumonia. The granulomatous areas contained small central necrotic tissue and occasionally small, calcified areas. Giant macrophagic cells are visible within granulomatous areas (white circle). Embryonated eggs and first-stage larvae of A. vasorum are embedded within these inflammatory foci (black arrows). Masson's trichrome.
Fig. 1 in Double trouble: Co-infection of Angiostrongylus vasorum and Dirofilaria immitis in golden jackal (Canis aureus) in Friuli Venezia Giulia, Italy
Fig. 1. Georeferencing of recovery sites of golden jackal infected by A. vasorum (red dots), D. immitis (yellow dots) and co-infections (black dots) in the period between 2020 and 2023 in FVG region.
On following pages: 4. Ethiopian Wolf (Canis simensis); 5. Golden Jackal (Canis aureus); 6. Side-striped Jackal (Canis adustus); 7. Black-backed Jackal (Canis mesomelas). in Canidae
On following pages: 4. Ethiopian Wolf (Canis simensis); 5. Golden Jackal (Canis aureus); 6. Side-striped Jackal (Canis adustus); 7. Black-backed Jackal (Canis mesomelas).
Supplementary material 1 from: Pyšková K, Storch D, Horáček I, Kauzál O, Pyšek P (2016) Golden jackal (Canis aureus) in the Czech Republic: the first record of a live animal and its long-term persistence in the colonized habitat. ZooKeys 641: 151-163. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.641.10946
Goledn jackal's howling record : Explanation note: Recording of an individual howling back to the recording of golden jackal. Recorded on 15 September 2015 around midnight.
Data from: Genetic structure and expansion of golden jackals (Canis aureus) in the north-western distribution range (Croatia and eastern Italian Alps)
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Figure 7 from: Stoyanov S (2020) Cranial variability and differentiation among golden jackals (Canis aureus) in Europe, Asia Minor and Africa. ZooKeys 917: 141-164. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.917.39449
Figure 7 Separation of groups by LDAA three taxonomic groups were included in the analysis: Eurasian golden jackals, African golden jackals and African wolves B specimens from Dalmatia were included in the analysis as a separate group.
Figure 5 from: Stoyanov S (2020) Cranial variability and differentiation among golden jackals (Canis aureus) in Europe, Asia Minor and Africa. ZooKeys 917: 141-164. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.917.39449
Figure 5 PCA ratio spectrum for the first and second principal component in shape space of the 14 craniodental measurements. See Material and methods and Figure 2 caption for the definition of the craniodental measurements.
Supplementary material 1 from: Stoyanov S (2020) Cranial variability and differentiation among golden jackals (Canis aureus) in Europe, Asia Minor and Africa. ZooKeys 917: 141-164. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.917.39449
: Data type: list of specimens.
Figure 4 from: Stoyanov S (2020) Cranial variability and differentiation among golden jackals (Canis aureus) in Europe, Asia Minor and Africa. ZooKeys 917: 141-164. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.917.39449
Figure 4 Principal component analysis. The first two principal components in shape space account for 53.6 % of the variance. Ellipses show 95 % confidence interval for each group. Specimens of Canis aureus are divided in two groups – Europe and Asia Minor, and Croatia (the Dalmatian coast). A separation between taxonomic groups along isometric size and second principal component B separation between taxonomic groups along first two principal components in shape space.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.