Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-zeroMar 2019View details →

FIG. 17 in Archaeochiapasidae n. fam., a new early Cenomanian brachyuran family from Chiapas, Mexico, new hypothesis on Lecythocaridae Schweitzer & Feldmann, 2009, and phylogenetic implications (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura, Eubrachyura)

FIG. 17. — Retroplumidae Gill, 1894 (Retroplumoidea Gill, 1894). Costacopluma maroccana Ossó-Morales, Artal & Vega, 2010, Calcaires à slumps de Taghit Formation, late Campanian, Merija, Morocco: thoracic sternum and pleon. AO39, Private Collection Àlex Ossó. Photography by Àlex Ossó and courtesy of À. Ossó. Scale bar: 10 mm.

Fig. 1 in Pseudocyclammina Sarvakensis Sp. Nov. And Pseudotextulariella Brevicamerata Sp. Nov.: Further Evidence For The Cenomanian Megadiversity Of Larger Benthic Foraminifera From The Sarvak Formation Of Sw Iran

Fig. 1 Number of agglutinated foraminiferal genera (small and large taxa) in each geological stage (modified from Kaminski et al., 2008, fig. 1).

Fig. 5 in Pseudocyclammina Sarvakensis Sp. Nov. And Pseudotextulariella Brevicamerata Sp. Nov.: Further Evidence For The Cenomanian Megadiversity Of Larger Benthic Foraminifera From The Sarvak Formation Of Sw Iran

Fig. 5 Lower and Upper Cretaceous (Cenomanian) species of Pseudotextulariella Barnard, 1953. a-i, k Pseudotextulariella brevicamerata sp. nov., middle Cenomanian Sarvak Formation of SW Iran, Tang-e Darbast section (a-i) and Arman well-1 (k), thin-sections RAP 188 and AMN 3173.49 m. a, h-i Tangential sections. b, d-e, g Subaxial section, holotype specimen in e. c, k Oblique sections. f Fragmentary transverse section. j, l Pseudotextulariella courtionensis Brönnimann, 1967, Valanginian of Switzerland (from Brönnimann, 1967, pl. 1, figs. 1 and 5). m-n Pseudotextulariella cretosa (Cushman, 1932), transverse and axial sections (from Brönnimann, 1967, pl. 3, figs. 2 and 5). Abbreviations: b = beam, cha = chamber, fo = foramen, ib = intercalary beam, r = rafter, s = septum.

Fig. 3 in Pseudocyclammina Sarvakensis Sp. Nov. And Pseudotextulariella Brevicamerata Sp. Nov.: Further Evidence For The Cenomanian Megadiversity Of Larger Benthic Foraminifera From The Sarvak Formation Of Sw Iran

Fig. 3 Lithostratigraphic log of the Tang-e Darbast section, the type locality of Pseudocyclammina sarvakensis sp. nov and Pseudotextulariella brevicamerata sp. nov., showing the distribution of some (larger) benthic foraminifera. a Neoiraqia insolita (Decrouez & Moullade), b Orbitolinopsis cenomaniensis Schlagintweit & Yazdi-Moghadam, c Conicorbitolina cf. conica (d'Archiac), d Mesorbitolina aperta (Erman), e Orbitolina ex gr. concava (Lamarck), f Rotorbinella mesogeensis (Tronchetti), g Nezzazata gr. gyra-conica (Smout), h Decastroia cf. serrakieli Vicedo & Piuz, i Myriastyla omanensis Piuz, Meister & Vicedo, j Chrysalidina gradata Orbigny, k Iraqia ultima Yazdi-Moghadam & Schlagintweit.

Fig. 3 in Upper Cretaceous Foraminifera Murgeina Apula (Luperto Sinni, 1968): A Methusalem And Cenomanian-Turonian Boundary Survivor Taxon

Fig. 3 Lithological log of the Maymand section with distribution of larger benthic foraminifera (including Murgeina apula Luperto-Sinni) (after Schlagintweit & Yazdi-Moghadam, 2020). a Nezzazata gr. gyra-conica (Smout), b Nezzazata simplex Omara, c Murgeina apula (Luperto-Sinni), d Orbitolina gr. concava Orbigny, e Rajkanella hottingerinaformis Schlagintweit & Rigaud, f Biconcava bentori Hamaoui & Saint-Marc, g Praealveolina simplex Reichel, h Chrysalidina gradata Orbigny, i Cisalveolina fraasi (Gümbel), j Persiconus sarvaki Yazdi-Moghadam & Schlagintweit.

Fig. 2 a in Upper Cretaceous Foraminifera Murgeina Apula (Luperto Sinni, 1968): A Methusalem And Cenomanian-Turonian Boundary Survivor Taxon

Fig. 2 a Simplified geological map of Iran (modified after Schlagintweit & Yazdi-Moghadam, 2021) showing the main tectonic subdivisions. b-c Position of the studied sections. d Tectono-stratigraphic units of the Zagros belt (modified after Yazdi-Moghadam & Schlagintweit, 2021) with position of the Anneh section. Abbreviations: BF Balarud Fault, CEIM Central East Iran Microplate, HZF High Zagros Fault, KZF Kazerun Fault, MFF Mountain Front Fault, MZRF Main Zagros Revers Fault, MZT Main Zagros Thrust, SSZ Sanandaj-Sirjan Zone, UDMA Uromia Dokhtar Magmatic Arc, ZFTB Zagros Fold Thrust Belt.

Fig. 1 in Upper Cretaceous Foraminifera Murgeina Apula (Luperto Sinni, 1968): A Methusalem And Cenomanian-Turonian Boundary Survivor Taxon

Fig. 1 Nummofallotia cretacea (Schlumberger, 1900) from the Upper Cretaceous of Austria. a Equatorial section; Wegscheidgraben, Santonian Hochmoos Formation, Gosau Group (see Wagreich, 1988). b Slightly oblique axial section, same sample as a. Note the well-preserved light brownish porcelaneous wall. c Axial section showing test dissolution affecting the porcelaneous wall dissolution, while the radial fibrous umbo remains unaffected; Uppermost Maastrichtian Kambühel Limestone, Kambühel type-locality (see Tragelehn, 1996). Scale bars = 0.2 mm.

Fig. 7 in Upper Cretaceous Foraminifera Murgeina Apula (Luperto Sinni, 1968): A Methusalem And Cenomanian-Turonian Boundary Survivor Taxon

Fig. 7 Murgeina apula (Luperto Sinni) from the early-middle Campanian Pučišća Formation of the Island of Brač. a-b, f, h, j Axial sections. c-e, g Oblique sections. Note the presence of some kind of tooth plate in d (t. p.). i) Subaxial section.

Fig. 4 in Pseudocyclammina Sarvakensis Sp. Nov. And Pseudotextulariella Brevicamerata Sp. Nov.: Further Evidence For The Cenomanian Megadiversity Of Larger Benthic Foraminifera From The Sarvak Formation Of Sw Iran

Fig. 4 Upper Cretaceous species of Pseudocyclammina Yabe & Hanzawa, 1926; note the different scales. a-g Pseudocyclammina sarvakensis sp. nov., middle Cenomanian Sarvak Formation of SW Iran, Tang-e Darbast section, thin-section RAP 181 (b, d-f), and Shahneshin section, thin-section AKHS 97 (c, g). a Equatorial section, microspheric specimen? (from Sampò,1969 illustrated as Cyclammina sp. (?) in pl. XLV, fig. 2). b Equatorial section, holotype. c, e Oblique sections. d Subaxial section. f Oblique tangential section. g Oblique equatorial section, megalospheric specimen? h Pseudocyclammina massiliensis Maync, early-middle Campanian of Brač Island, Croatia. i Pseudocylammina rugosa (Orbigny), equatorial section, Cenomanian of W France (from Maync, 1952, pl. 12, fig. 10). j-m Pseudocyclammina sphaeroidea Gendrot, Upper Cretaceous (?Coniacian) of Austria (from Schlagintweit, 1992, pl. 1, figs. 13-16). Subaxial section (j), equatorial section of a specimen with uncoiling final stage (k), equatorial section (l), equatorial section slightly oblique (m).

Fig. 2 a in Pseudocyclammina Sarvakensis Sp. Nov. And Pseudotextulariella Brevicamerata Sp. Nov.: Further Evidence For The Cenomanian Megadiversity Of Larger Benthic Foraminifera From The Sarvak Formation Of Sw Iran

Fig. 2 a Simplified geological map of Iran (after Schlagintweit & Yazdi-Moghadam, 2021) showing the main tectonic subdivisions. b Road map of the Tang-e Darbast section (type-locality of Iraqia ultima Yazdi-Moghadam & Schlagintweit, 2022 and Simplorabanitina simplex Consorti, Schlagintweit, and Yazdi-Moghadam, 2022). c Road map of the Shahneshin section. d Position of Arman well-1. e Tectono-stratigraphic units of the Zagros belt (modified after Yazdi-Moghadam & Schlagintweit, 2021). The position of the studied sections is marked by an asterisk. Abbreviations: BF Balarud Fault, CEIM Central East Iran Microplate, HZF High Zagros Fault, KZF Kazerun Fault, MFF Mountain Front Fault, MZRF Main Zagros Revers Fault, MZT Main Zagros Thrust, SSZ Sanandaj-Sirjan Zone, UDMA Uromia Dokhtar Magmatic Arc, ZFTB Zagros Fold

Fig. 4 in Upper Cretaceous Foraminifera Murgeina Apula (Luperto Sinni, 1968): A Methusalem And Cenomanian-Turonian Boundary Survivor Taxon

Fig. 4 Lithostratigraphic column of the Upper Cretaceous strata of the Island of Brač, Croatia showing distribution of selected benthic foraminifera including Murgeina apula (Luperto Sinni).

Fig. 6 in Upper Cretaceous Foraminifera Murgeina Apula (Luperto Sinni, 1968): A Methusalem And Cenomanian-Turonian Boundary Survivor Taxon

Fig. 6 Murgeina apula (Luperto Sinni) from the Cenomanian Sarvak Formation of SW Iran. a-b, d, f-i, l, n, s, t Axial sections, partly slightly oblique. Note the double-layered septa in s. c, j, k, m, r, v. Oblique sections. e Slightly oblique subaxial section. q, s, u Equatorial sections. Note the double-layered septa in q. Abbreviations: fo = foramen, pr = proloculus, se = septum, t.pl. = tooth plate, um = umbo. Thin sections: DB 14550 (a), BF 86 (b-c), BF 37 (d, v), BF 56 (e, g), BF 70 (f), BF 48 (h), BF 33 (i-l, p, s), BF 82 (m), BF 40 (n), BF 37 (o, q, u), BF 46 (r), BF 56 (t).

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2016View details →

Fig. 5 in Parasitic gastropod bioerosion trace fossil on Cenomanian oysters from Le Mans, France and its ichnologic and taphonomic context

Fig. 5. Parasitic gastropod bioerosion and perforation trace Loxolenichnus stellatocinctus igen. et isp. nov., MHNLM 2015.2.244, holotype, Marnes à Pycnodonte biauriculata Formation, Upper Cenomanian, Lycée Bellevue earthmoving works, Le Mans, Sarthe Department, France; on LV of Rhynchostreon suborbiculatum (Lamarck, 1801). A. Entire LV shell with the arrow showing the perforation. B. LV (viewed from inside), the arrow shows the opening of the perforation on the inner side of the shell, diascopic illumination. Outer (C) and inner (D) sides of the shell, close-ups of the perforation, the dashed line delimitates approximately the course of the perforation through the shell, diascopic illumination. E. Positive X-ray print of the perforation.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2016View details →

Fig. 6 in Parasitic gastropod bioerosion trace fossil on Cenomanian oysters from Le Mans, France and its ichnologic and taphonomic context

Fig. 6. Parasitic gastropod bioerosion trace Loxolenichnus stellatocinctus igen. et isp. nov., MHNLM 2015.2.346 and MHNLM 2015.2.347, paratypes; lower Campanian Inoceramus lingua–Goniotheuthis quadrata Zone, quarry near Höver, Germany. A. Outer side of an oyster valve, accommodating two specimens of L. stellatocinctus (arrows). B. Close-up of the two specimens and the multiple perforations. C. Inner side of the oyster valve showing two of the perforations reaching the adductor muscle pad. Outer (D) and inner (E) sides of an oyster valve with a marginal L. stellatocinctus. F. Close-up of D, note the two concentric stellate rims and the marginal notch.

Fig. 85 in "Larger" Benthic Foraminifera Of The Cenomanian. A Review Of The Identity And The Stratigraphic And Palaeogeographic Distribution Of Non-Fusiform Planispiral (Or Near-Planispiral) Forms

Fig. 85 Problems faced when attempting to evaluate the full biostratigraphic range of a benthic fossil species (based on Pearson, 1998 and Sadler, 2010 with modifications).

Fig. 68 in "Larger" Benthic Foraminifera Of The Cenomanian. A Review Of The Identity And The Stratigraphic And Palaeogeographic Distribution Of Non-Fusiform Planispiral (Or Near-Planispiral) Forms

Fig. 68 Representative illustrations of Pseudorhipidionina ex gr. casertana-murgiana: a Equatorial section P. casertana s.s, De Castro in Schroeder & Neumann (1985, pl. 44, fig. 10, Italy); b Equatorial section P. murgiana s.s., De Castro (2006, pl. 1, fig. 1, neotype, Italy); c Axial section, De Castro in Schroeder & Neumann (1985, pl. 44, fig. 1, Italy); d Transverse section (uncoiled), Consorti et al. (2016b, fig. 4d, Spain).

Fig. 74 in "Larger" Benthic Foraminifera Of The Cenomanian. A Review Of The Identity And The Stratigraphic And Palaeogeographic Distribution Of Non-Fusiform Planispiral (Or Near-Planispiral) Forms

Fig. 74 Representative illustrations of Pseudopeneroplis oyonensis: a Equatorial section, Consorti et al. (2018, fig. 5a, holotype, Peru); b Subaxial section, Consorti et al. (2018, fig. 6d, Peru); c Tangential section, Consorti et al. (2018, fig, 5f, Peru).

Fig. 64 in "Larger" Benthic Foraminifera Of The Cenomanian. A Review Of The Identity And The Stratigraphic And Palaeogeographic Distribution Of Non-Fusiform Planispiral (Or Near-Planispiral) Forms

Fig. 64 Representative illustrations of Pseudorhapydionina chiapanensis: a Equatorial section, Michaud et al. (1984, pl. 1, fig. 10, Mexico); b Axial section, Michaud et al. (1984, pl. 1, fig. 6, Mexico); c Transverse section (uncoiled), Michaud et al. (1985, pl. 2, fig. 1, Mexico).

Fig. 62 in "Larger" Benthic Foraminifera Of The Cenomanian. A Review Of The Identity And The Stratigraphic And Palaeogeographic Distribution Of Non-Fusiform Planispiral (Or Near-Planispiral) Forms

Fig. 62 Representative illustrations of Pseudorhapydionina dubia: a Equatorial section, De Castro in Schroeder & Neumann (1985, pl. 40, fig. 1, Italy); b Axial section, De Castro in Schroeder & Neumann (1985, pl. 40, fig. 10, Italy); c Transverse section (uncoiled), Consorti et al. (2016b, fig. 5d, Spain); d Equatorial section showing septula, Consorti et al. (2016b, fig. 5e, Spain).

Fig. 58 in "Larger" Benthic Foraminifera Of The Cenomanian. A Review Of The Identity And The Stratigraphic And Palaeogeographic Distribution Of Non-Fusiform Planispiral (Or Near-Planispiral) Forms

Fig. 58 Representative illustrations of Peneroplis parvus: a Equatorial section, De Castro in Schroeder & Neumann (1985, pl. 39, fig. 1, Italy); b Axial section, De Castro in Schroeder & Neumann (1985, pl. 39, fig. 13, Italy); c Oblique axial section, De Castro in Schroeder & Neumann (1985, pl. 39, fig. 5, Italy).