Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
126
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
126 results for “Computational Detection”
GECCO Industrial Challenge 2019 Dataset: A water quality dataset for the 'Internet of Things: Online Event Detection for Drinking Water Quality Control' competition at the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference 2019, Prague, Czech Republic.
<p>Dataset of the 'Internet of Things: Online Event Detection for Drinking Water Quality Control' competition hosted at The Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO) July 13th-17th 2019, Prague, Czech Republic</p> <p> </p> <p>The task of the competition was to develop an anomaly detection algorithm for a water- and environmental data set.</p> <p> </p> <p>Included in zenodo: </p> <p>1. Original train dataset of water quality data provided to participants (identical to gecco2019_train_water_quality.csv)</p> <p>2. Call for Participation</p> <p>3. Rules and Description of the Challenge</p> <p>4. Resource Package provided to participants</p> <p>5. The complete dataset, consisting of train, test and validation merged together (gecco2019_all_water_quality.csv)</p> <p>6. The test dataset, which was used for creating the leaderboard on the server (gecco2019_test_water_quality.csv)</p> <p>7. The train dataset, which participants had available for training their models (gecco2019_train_water_quality.csv)</p> <p>8. The validation dataset, which was used for the end results for the challenge (gecco2019_valid_water_quality.csv)</p> <p> </p> <p>The challenge required the participants to submit a program for event detection. A training dataset was available to the participants (gecco2019_train_water_quality.csv). During the challenge the participants were able to upload a version of their program to out online platform, where this version was scored against the testing dataset (gecco2019_test_water_quality.csv), thus an intermediate leaderboard was available. To avoid overfitting against this dataset, at the end of the challenge, the end result was created from scoring with the validation dataset (gecco2019_valid_water_quality.csv). </p> <p>Train, Test, Validation dataset are from the same measuring station and are in chronological order. So the timestamps from the test dataset begin directly after the train timestamps, while the validation timestamps begin directly after the test timestamps. </p> <p> </p> <p>The competition was organized by:</p> <p>F. Rehbach, S. Moritz, T. Bartz-Beielstein (TH Köln)</p> <p> </p> <p>The dataset was provided by:</p> <p>Thüringer Fernwasserversorgung and IMProvT research project</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p>Internet of Things: Online Event Detection for Drinking Water Quality Control</p> <p> </p> <p>Description:</p> <p>For the 8th time in GECCO history, the SPOTSeven Lab is hosting an industrial challenge in cooperation with various industry partners. This years challenge, based on the 2018 challenge, is held in cooperation with "Thüringer Fernwasserversorgung" which provides their real-world data set. The task of this years competition is to develop an anomaly detection algorithm for the water- and environmental data set. Early identification of anomalies in water quality data is a challenging task. It is important to identify true undesirable variations in the water quality. At the same time, false alarm rates have to be very low.</p> <p><br> Competition Opens: End of January/Start of February 2019<br> Final Submission: 30 June 2019</p> <p>Official webpage:</p> <p><a href="https://www.th-koeln.de/informatik-und-ingenieurwissenschaften/gecco-challenge-2019_63244.php">https://www.th-koeln.de/informatik-und-ingenieurwissenschaften/gecco-challenge-2019_63244.php</a></p> <p> </p>
BRAIN Journal-New Computer Assisted Diagnostic to Detect Alzheimer Disease-Figure 19. Accuracy of classification using the three methods: KNN, SVM and our method for MCI subjects
<p>Whatever the patient condition, Normal, MCI or AD, our method has provided us with better results. Advocate Example precision for Normal Patients was found 96% as opposed to 88% for the SVM method and 84% for KNN. For MCI patients was found 88% as opposed to 80% for the SVM method and 72% for KNN. Also for AD patients were found 92% as opposed to 88% for the SVM method and 80% for KNN. Our classification method gave us the best results, finding overall accuracy of 92% as opposed to 84% for the SVM method and 78.66% for KNN. </p>
BRAIN Journal-New Computer Assisted Diagnostic to Detect Alzheimer Disease-Figure 20. The accuracy of classification using the three methods, KNN, SVM and our method, for AD subjects
<p>Whatever the patient condition, Normal, MCI or AD, our method has provided us with better results. Advocate Example precision for Normal Patients was found 96% as opposed to 88% for the SVM method and 84% for KNN. For MCI patients was found 88% as opposed to 80% for the SVM method and 72% for KNN. Also for AD patients were found 92% as opposed to 88% for the SVM method and 80% for KNN. Our classification method gave us the best results, finding overall accuracy of 92% as opposed to 84% for the SVM method and 78.66% for KNN. </p>
BRAIN Journal-New Computer Assisted Diagnostic to Detect Alzheimer Disease-Figure 18. Accuracy of classification using the three methods, KNN, SVM and our method, for normal subjects
<p>We present three figures representing the accuracy of the classification using the three methods, KNN, SVM and our method for normal, MCI and Alzheimer subjects. </p>
BRAIN Journal-New Computer Assisted Diagnostic to Detect Alzheimer Disease-Figure 17. The results of calculating the Hausdorff distances
<p>The results of calculating the Hausdorff distances, Dice, PSNR, MSSD for the four methods<br> (Caselles Chan & Vese, Lanktom, our method) and the ground truth about a Normal subject following the<br> Corpus Calosum segmentation. </p> <p> </p>
BRAIN Journal-New Computer Assisted Diagnostic to Detect Alzheimer Disease-Figure 16. Results of calculating the Hausdorff distances
<p>Results of calculating the Hausdorff distances, Dice, PSNR, MSSD between the four methods (Caselles Chan & Vese, Lanktom, our method) and the ground truth about a subject Normal following segmentation of the Corpus Calosum.</p>
BRAIN Journal-New Computer Assisted Diagnostic to Detect Alzheimer Disease-Figure 15. The results of calculating the Hausdorff distances
<p>The results of calculating the Hausdorff distances, Dice, PSNR, MSSD for the four methods (Caselles Chan & Vese, Lanktom, our method) and the ground truth about a Normal subject following the Corpus Calosum segmentation.</p>
BRAIN Journal-New Computer Assisted Diagnostic to Detect Alzheimer Disease-Figure 14. A comparison between the results
<p> A comparison between the results. Each column shows the superposition of the corresponding results: Caselle (yellow curve), Chan & Vese (curve blue) Lankton (red curve), our method (purple line) and the ground truth (Curve Green) for a normal subject, MCI and AD.</p>
BRAIN Journal-New Computer Assisted Diagnostic to Detect Alzheimer Disease-Figure 13.The results of the Corpus Calosum segmentation.
<p> The results of the Corpus Calosum segmentation. The six lines present in order: image zoom on the hippocampus area, manually segmented image, the result of the Caselle method , the result of the Chan&Vese method, the result of the Lankton method, the result of our method. Column 1 shows a healthy subject, column 2 MCI (primary stage), and the third column corresponds to an Alzheimer's subject (advanced stage). </p>
BRAIN Journal-New Computer Assisted Diagnostic to Detect Alzheimer Disease-Figure 12. Results of calculating the Hausdorff distances
<p>The figure shows the calculation results of the four distances: Dice, PSNR, Hausdorff and MSS using the four methods (Caselles Chan & Vese, Lankton, our method), compared with the ground truth on three samples.</p>
BRAIN Journal-New Computer Assisted Diagnostic to Detect Alzheimer Disease-Figure 11. Results of calculating the Hausdorff distance
<p>The figure shows the calculation results of the four distances: Dice, PSNR, Hausdorff and MSS using the four methods (Caselles Chan & Vese, Lankton, our method), compared with the ground truth on three samples.</p> <p> Results of calculating the Hausdorff distances, Dice, PSNR, MSSD between the four methods (Caselles Chan & Vese, Lanktom, our method) .and the ground truth about a MCI subject following segmentation of the hippocampus.</p>
BRAIN Journal-New Computer Assisted Diagnostic to Detect Alzheimer Disease-Figure 10. The results of calculating the Hausdorff distances, Dice, PSNR, MSSD between the four methods
<p>The figure shows the calculation results of the four distances: Dice, PSNR, Hausdorff and MSS using the four methods (Caselles Chan & Vese, Lankton, our method), compared with the ground truth on three samples.</p> <p>The results of calculating the Hausdorff distances, Dice, PSNR, MSSD between the four methods (Caselles, Chan & Vese, Lanktom, and our method) and the ground truth about a subject Normal following the segmentation of the hippocampus</p> <p> </p>
BRAIN Journal-New Computer Assisted Diagnostic to Detect Alzheimer Disease-Figure 9. A comparison between the results
<p>In figure 9 we present a comparison between the manual segmentation, Caselle, Chan&vese, Lankton and our method. </p> <p>A comparison between the results. Each column shows the superposition of the corresponding results: Caselle (yellow curve), Chan & Vese (curve blue), Lankton (red curve), our method (purple curve), and the ground truth (Green Curve) for a normal subject, MCI and AD.</p>
BRAIN Journal-New Computer Assisted Diagnostic to Detect Alzheimer Disease-Figure 8. The results of the segmentation of the hippocampus.
<p>The results show the hippocampus segmentation using both Caselle, Chan&Vese, Lankton and our method. </p> <p>The results of the segmentation of the hippocampus. The six lines present: image zoom on the hippocampus area, manually segmented image, the result of the Caselle method, the result of the Chan&Vese method, the result of the Lankton method, the result of our method. Column 1 shows a healthy subject, column 2 shows a MCI (primary stage) and the third column corresponds to an Alzheimer's subject (advanced stage)</p>
BRAIN Journal-New Computer Assisted Diagnostic to Detect Alzheimer Disease-Figure 7. Training for classification
<p>AMED measures the average distance while HD measures the maximum distance between the two vectors. The aim of our method is to classify the test subject in three classes (N, MCI or AD), so for each vector element E we look for the four nearest neighbors. </p>
BRAIN Journal-New Computer Assisted Diagnostic to Detect Alzheimer Disease-Figure 5. Improvement using variation
<p>In the figures below a constraint of the variation is used in order to show the limits. The contour may include more areas surrounding the hippocampus, which are not homogeneous with the desired area. Through the confidence interval of variation and priori knowledge can overcome these limitations. </p>
BRAIN Journal-New Computer Assisted Diagnostic to Detect Alzheimer Disease-Figure 6. Improvement using Surface
<p>In the figures below, a constraint of the surface is used to show the limits. The contour may include the hippocampus and more areas surrounding it, which are homogeneous with the desired area. Through the surface of the confidence interval and priori knowledge can overcome these limitations. </p>
BRAIN Journal-New Computer Assisted Diagnostic to Detect Alzheimer Disease-Figure 2. Three Corpus Calosum: Normal, MCI, AD
<p>The three figures above present the Corpus Callosum relating to three topics: Normal Topic by MCI (Mild Cognitive Impairment), Alzheimer’s topic. Secondly, we will present our clustering method to classify the test subject between 3 classes: N (Normal), MCI (Mild Cognitive Impairment), and AD (Alzheimer's disease). </p>
BRAIN Journal-New Computer Assisted Diagnostic to Detect Alzheimer Disease-Figure 1. Three hippocampus: Normal, MCI, AD
<p>In this context is our work: performing a diagnostic computer-aided system for detecting Alzheimer's disease. Like any diagnostic system, our system contains three parts: preprocessing, segmentation and classification. Initially, we will present a new segmentation method to segment the Hippocampus and Corpus Callosum regardless of the patient's condition. </p>
BRAIN Journal-New Computer Assisted Diagnostic to Detect Alzheimer Disease-Figure 4. Training
<p> A. Segmentation It seeks to establish a model that describes the shape and typical fluctuations. This requires first the preparation of a learning base to reflect the possible variations in shape of the structure. The preparation of the training set Each shape will be modeled by a vector X, built by concatenating the coordinates of the characteristic points placed on its outline: X=(X1, X2,…...Xn) (1) The training set can be modeled by a set of vectors: {Xi} Where i = 1. . N {N number of sample images} and {Si} surface, {Vi} standard deviation of the Area. The principle of this step is be illustrated by the figure below. </p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.