Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2009View details →

Figure 2 in Alburnoides qanati, a new species of cyprinid fish from southern Iran (Actinopterygii, Cyprinidae)

Figure 2. Alburnoides qanati sp. n., radiograph of a paratype, SL 58 mm SL. Arrow shows first caudal vertebra.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2009View details →

Figure 3 in Alburnoides qanati, a new species of cyprinid fish from southern Iran (Actinopterygii, Cyprinidae)

Figure 3. Map showing the type locality of Alburnoides qanati sp. n.: Pulvar River system, 29°59'30"N, 52°54'E.

Fig. 9 in Morphometry and DNA barcoding reveal cryptic diversity in the genus Enteromius (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the Congo basin, Africa - Corrigendum

Fig. 9. Scatterplot of PC2 against PC1 for a PCA on 10 meristics (n = 36) of E. cf. atromaculatus (Nichols & Griscom, 1917): Epulu 2 (▲), and Ituri 8 (). Also shown are the type specimens of E. atromaculatus (Nichols & Griscom, 1917) (○).

Fig. 8 in Morphometry and DNA barcoding reveal cryptic diversity in the genus Enteromius (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the Congo basin, Africa - Corrigendum

Fig. 8. Scatterplot of PC2 against PC1 for a PCA on 10 meristics (n = 42) of E. cf. atromaculatus (Nichols & Griscom, 1917): Ituri 5 (◊), Ituri 6 (♦), Ituri/'Kisangani region' (∆), Epulu 2 (▲), and Ituri 8 (). Also shown are the type specimens of E. atromaculatus (Nichols & Griscom, 1917) (○).

Fig. 7 in Morphometry and DNA barcoding reveal cryptic diversity in the genus Enteromius (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the Congo basin, Africa - Corrigendum

Fig. 7. Scatterplot of PC2 against PC1 for a PCA on 10 meristics (n = 22) of E. cf. brazzai (Pellegrin, 1901): 'Kisangani region' 2 (◊), Ituri 3 (♦) and 'Kisangani region' 3 (∆). Also shown are the type specimens examined of E. brazzai (Pellegrin, 1901) (○) and E. tshopoensis (De Vos, 1991) (●).

Fig. 5 in Morphometry and DNA barcoding reveal cryptic diversity in the genus Enteromius (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the Congo basin, Africa - Corrigendum

Fig. 5. Scatterplot of PC2 against PC1 for a PCA on 10 meristics (n = 36) of E. cf. miolepis specimens from the Lower Congo: Inkisi (◊), Luki 1 (♦) and Luki 2 (∆). Also shown are the type specimens examined of: E. miolepis (Boulenger, 1902) (○), E. holotaenia (Boulenger, 1904) (●), E. eutaenia (Boulenger, 1904) (□) and E. kerstenii (Peters, 1868) (■).

Fig. 3 in Morphometry and DNA barcoding reveal cryptic diversity in the genus Enteromius (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the Congo basin, Africa - Corrigendum

Fig. 3. Scatterplot of PC2 against PC1 for a PCA on 17 log-transformed measurements (n = 177) of Enteromius Cope, 1867: E. cf. miolepis (Boulenger, 1902) (◊), E. cf. brazzai (Pellegrin, 1901) (♦), E. cf. pellegrini (Poll, 1939) (∆), and E. cf. atromaculatus (Nichols & Griscom, 1917) (▲). Also shown are the type specimens examined of: E. miolepis (Boulenger, 1902) (○), E. holotaenia (Boulenger, 1904) (●), E. eutaenia (Boulenger, 1904) (□), E. kerstenii (Peters, 1868) (■), E. brazzai (Pellegrin, 1901) (), E. tshopoensis (De Vos, 1991) (▼), E. pellegrini (Poll, 1939) (+), and E. atromaculatus (Nichols & Griscom, 1917) ().

Fig. 4 in Morphometry and DNA barcoding reveal cryptic diversity in the genus Enteromius (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the Congo basin, Africa - Corrigendum

Fig. 4. Scatterplot of PC2 against PC1 for a PCA on 10 meristics (n = 177) of Enteromius: E. cf. miolepis (Boulenger, 1902) (◊), E. cf. brazzai (Pellegrin, 1901) (♦), E. cf. pellegrini (Poll, 1939) (∆), and E. cf. atromaculatus (Nichols & Griscom, 1917) (▲). Also shown are the type specimens examined of: E. miolepis (Boulenger, 1902) (○), E. holotaenia (Boulenger, 1904) (●), E. eutaenia (Boulenger, 1904) (□), E. kerstenii (Peters, 1868) (■), E. brazzai (Pellegrin, 1901) (), E. tshopoensis (De Vos, 1991) (▼), E. pellegrini (Poll, 1939) (+), and E. atromaculatus (Nichols & Griscom, 1917) ().

Fig. 2. A in Morphometry and DNA barcoding reveal cryptic diversity in the genus Enteromius (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the Congo basin, Africa

Fig. 2. A. ML tree based on 558-bp-long Enteromius COI sequences with 1000 bootstrap replications, with node support shown as NJ/ML bootstrap (bootstrap values> 95% are shown; lineages <2% sequence divergence were collapsed), the label 'Kisangani region' contains samples from the Lomami/ Lobaye system and the Lobilo. B. Map of the Congo basin with the sampled river stretches indicated according to the phylogenetic lineages.

Fig. 9 in Morphometry and DNA barcoding reveal cryptic diversity in the genus Enteromius (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the Congo basin, Africa

Fig. 8 in Morphometry and DNA barcoding reveal cryptic diversity in the genus Enteromius (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the Congo basin, Africa

Fig. 4 in Morphometry and DNA barcoding reveal cryptic diversity in the genus Enteromius (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the Congo basin, Africa

Fig. 7 in Morphometry and DNA barcoding reveal cryptic diversity in the genus Enteromius (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the Congo basin, Africa

Fig. 7 in Revalidation of Enteromius alberti and presence of Enteromius cf. mimus (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) in the Lake Edward system, East Africa

Fig. 7. (a) Lectotype of Enteromius alberti (Poll, 1939) (MRAC 64723) with 74.3 mm SL. (b) Fresh specimen of E. alberti (RMCA 2018.008.P.0248 HP 3246) with 62.4 mm SL.

Fig. 4 in Revalidation of Enteromius alberti and presence of Enteromius cf. mimus (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) in the Lake Edward system, East Africa

Fig. 4. Scatterplots of PC2 against PC1 of the PCA on (a) 24 log-transformed measurements (n = 69) and (b) on 15 meristics (n = 62). Specimens of group A, the filled circles (●) represent the genetically analysed specimens, the open circles (Ǫ) indicate the additional specimens. Specimens of E. alberti (Poll, 1939) (lectotype) (♦), E. alberti (paralectotypes) (◊), specimens from Tshambi (), E. cercops (Whitehead, 1960) (holotype) (▲), E. cercops (paratypes) (), E. mimus (Boulenger, 1912) (lectotype) (▼), E. mimus (paralectotypes) (▼), E. perince (R̹ppell, 1835) (syntypes) (+) and E. stigmatopygus (Boulenger, 1903) (syntypes) (×).

Fig. 6 in Revalidation of Enteromius alberti and presence of Enteromius cf. mimus (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) in the Lake Edward system, East Africa

Fig. 6. Scatterplot of PC2 against PC1 of the PCA (n = 83) on 24 log-transformed measurements. For group B, the filled squares (■) represent the specimens used for the genetic analysis, the open squares (□) indicate the additional specimens of the Lake Edward system and the two specimens from Tshambi. Specimens of E. mimus (Boulenger, 1912) (lectotype) (▼) and E. mimus (paralectotypes) (▼).

Fig. 2 in Revalidation of Enteromius alberti and presence of Enteromius cf. mimus (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) in the Lake Edward system, East Africa

Fig. 2. Scatterplot of PC2 against PC1 of a PCA on 24 log-transformed measurements on 71 specimens of Enteromius Cope, 1867. Specimens of the genetic groups A (●) (n = 21) and B (■) (n = 50) are indicated separately.

Fig. 5 in Revalidation of Enteromius alberti and presence of Enteromius cf. mimus (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) in the Lake Edward system, East Africa

Fig. 5. Scatterplots of PC2 against PC1 of (a) the PCA (n = 105) on 24 log-transformed measurements and (b) the PCA (n = 95) on 15 meristics. Specimens of group B, the filled squares (■) represent the genetic analysed specimens, the open squares (□) indicate the additional specimens. Specimens of E. alberti (Poll, 1939) (lectotype) (♦), E. alberti (paralectotypes) (◊), specimens from Tshambi (), E. cercops (Whitehead, 1960) (holotype) (▲), E. cercops (paratypes) (), E. mimus (Boulenger, 1912) (lectotype) (▼), E. mimus (paralectotypes) (▼), E. perince (R̹ppell, 1835) (syntypes) (+) and E. stigmatopygus (Boulenger, 1903) (syntypes) (×).

Fig. 1 in Revalidation of Enteromius alberti and presence of Enteromius cf. mimus (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) in the Lake Edward system, East Africa

Fig. 1. Haplotype network of 651-bp-long COI sequences (n = 137) of the specimens of Enteromius Cope, 1867 with a smooth, flexible last unbranched dorsal fin ray from the Lake Edward system. Each circle represents a haplotype, with the size of the circles indicating the number of individuals with this haplotype and the colour indicating the different parts of the basin. Each bar represents a mutation between two haplotypes.

Fig. 3 in Revalidation of Enteromius alberti and presence of Enteromius cf. mimus (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) in the Lake Edward system, East Africa

Fig. 3. Scatterplots of (a) interorbital width (IOW), (b) pre-pelvic distance (PrPelD), (c) body depth (BD), (d) maximum caudal peduncle depth (MxCPD), (e) minimum caudal peduncle depth (MnCPD), (f) head width (HW), and (g) head depth (HD) in % SL against SL (in mm) on 72 specimens of Enteromius Cope, 1867. The genetic groups A (●) (n = 22) and B (■) (n = 50) are indicated separately. The dashed lines indicate the size class used for the MWU tests.