Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 4 in caudata: Cyzicidae): a new clam shrimp from Western Australia

FIGURE 4. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of male paratypes of Caenestheriella mariae n.sp. (ZMUC CRU4854). A, whole view from right side; B, frontal view; C, caudal region; D, dorsal row of spines on telson; E, caudal claws (= furcae); F, head region seen from left; G, distal margin of rostrum seen from anterior; H, head region seen from right; I, occipital condyle.

FIGURE 2 in caudata: Cyzicidae): a new clam shrimp from Western Australia

FIGURE 2. Line drawings of holotype and allotype of Caenestheriella mariae n. sp. A, Male holotype seen from right side (WAM C34418); B, head (e.g. including occipital condyle and rostrum) and right antennule of holotype seen from right side; C, caudal region of holotype seen from right side; 19 limb bearing body segments are present; D, allotype seen from right side (WAM C34419).

FIGURE 1 in caudata: Cyzicidae): a new clam shrimp from Western Australia

FIGURE 1. Photographs of preserved Caenestheriella mariae n. sp. A, carapace of male holotype seen from right side (WAM C34418); B, allotype (female paratype) seen from right side (WAM C34419).

FIGURE 3 in caudata: Cyzicidae): a new clam shrimp from Western Australia

FIGURE 3. Line drawings of trunk legs of male holotype of Caenestheriella mariae n. sp. (WAM C34418). A, trunk leg 1 (clasper) of right side seen from anterior; B, trunk leg 3 of right side seen from posterior.

Figure 3 in Evolutionary systematics of the Australian Cyzicidae (Crustacea, Branchiopoda, Spinicaudata) with the description of a new genus

Figure 3. Median-joining networks of (A) elongation factor 1α (EF1α) and (B) internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2). For ITS2, three separate networks, each featuring closely-related species, were calculated because an alignment including all specimens was largely ambiguous. Main lineages are inidcated by continuous lines, and possible sublineages by dotted lines. Affiliation of specimens to respective main and sublineages based on prior analyses of COI (Fig. 2). All available sequences were included and each circle represents a specific sequence, with the size corresponding to its frequency (see scale). The colours code for the localities from which specimens were collected and correspond to Fig. 1. The vertical marks or numbers on the connecting lines represent the respective mutational steps.

Figure 4 in Evolutionary systematics of the Australian Cyzicidae (Crustacea, Branchiopoda, Spinicaudata) with the description of a new genus

Figure 4. Bayesian inference majority rule tree based on a combined analysis of cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI), elongation factor 1α (EF1α) and 28S. Each main and sublineage was included only once. Black vertical bars indicate those lineages whose specimens feature an elongated condyle (originally classified as Caenestheriella), whereas grey vertical bars indicate those with a short and rounded condyle (originally classified as Caenestheria). For each branch, posterior probabilities and bootstrap support of the Maximum Parsimony analyses are given. #, For support values ≥ 0.95 or ≥ 95; +, for support values ≥ 0.90 or 90, respectively (– indicates support <0.9 or <90, if both are lower, no support is stated).

Figure 6 in Evolutionary systematics of the Australian Cyzicidae (Crustacea, Branchiopoda, Spinicaudata) with the description of a new genus

Figure 6. Median-joining haplotype networks of cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI). Networks were calculated for each respective main lineage separately ('numbering' by letters corresponds to main lineages). Possible sublineages are indicated by dotted lines. All available sequences were included and each circle represents a specific sequence (= haplotype), with the size corresponding to its frequency (see scale). The colours code for the localities from which specimens were collected and correspond to Fig. 1. The vertical marks or numbers on the lines connecting haplotypes represent the respective mutational steps between haplotypes.

Figure 1 in Evolutionary systematics of the Australian Cyzicidae (Crustacea, Branchiopoda, Spinicaudata) with the description of a new genus

Figure 1. Map showing the sampled localities used in the present study. The larger map depicts the main drainage systems (red lines) and the catchments of individual rivers (black lines). Geographically closely associated localities were grouped together, and the colour coding corresponds to the networks shown in Figs 3, 5. The numbers correspond to the locality numbers in the Supporting information (Table S1).

Figure 5 in Evolutionary systematics of the Australian Cyzicidae (Crustacea, Branchiopoda, Spinicaudata) with the description of a new genus

Figure 5. Scales on the tip of the movable finger of male clasper. A, overview of typical spinicaudatan male clasper (lineage N [AM P.82401] first right clasper, posterior view), the arrow indicates the relevant scales at the tip of the movable finger. B–J, details of the scales of various cyzicid species (mostly in frontal view); B, lineage N (AM P.82401), second right clasper; C, lineage N (AM P.80859), first right clasper; D, lineage C (AM P.82576), first right clasper; E, lineage K (AM P.82540), second right clasper; F, lineage O (AM P.91628), second right clasper; G, lineage R (AM P.82538), second right clasper; H, lineage S (AM P.82536), first right clasper; I, Cyzicus californicus (Richter, private collection), first right clasper; J, Cyzicus tetracerus (Richter, private collection), first right clasper. AM numbers correspond to registration numbers of specimens in the collection of the Australian Museum (for details, see Table S2). Scale bars: A, 100 μm, B–J, 10 μm. lp, large palpus; mf, movable finger; pa, palm; sp, small palpus.