Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
6
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
6 results for “D3.3”
D3.3. Experimental Wave-Tank Validation Database
<p>This database is a deliverable of the FLOATECH project, funded under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No 101007142.</p><p>The aim of the accompanying document is to describe the experimental testing campaign C2 at the LHEEA wave-tank facility. The campaign took place between May and June 2023. The objective of the campaign is to test several FOWT control strategy, including a feed forward wave-based control, using the software-in-the-loop SOFTWIND system. The accompanying report on the E.U. portal describes the database created from these experiments and aimed to be shared for model validation. </p>
CURE Deliverable D3.3 Data
<p>Sample Products from the CURE project Copernicus cross-cutting applications focusing on climate change adaptation and mitigation; healthy cities and social environments; and energy and economy. Products for cities: Berlin, Germany; Copenhagen, Denmark; Heraklion, Greece; Sofia, Bulgaria; Bristol, United Kingdom, Ostrava, Czech Republic; Basel, Switzerland; Munich, Germany; San Sebastian, Spain; Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.</p>
D3.3 REPORT ON THE VIGNETTE STUDY- Dataset
<p>This supporting <strong>dataset of D3.3 reflects </strong>the results of a vignette survey study carried out in four European countries (Austria, Cyprus, Greece and Spain) with <strong>155 citizens</strong>. Our objective was to explore whether methods addressing societal mistrust in science that were identified in previous VERITY deliverable D3.2 (Focus groups with Stewards of Trust investigating and evaluating methods to guide trust in science) work differently for two citizen groups with varying levels of trust in science. Our main assumption was that four key methods identified in D3.2, namely science communication, co-creation, benefit sharing and social media, would work differently for Group 1, consisting of younger (18-30 old), more educated, urban citizens, and for Group 2, consisting of older (50+ old), less educated, rural citizens.</p> <p><span>Regarding <strong>limitations </strong>concerning the dataset</span><span> structure and content, while it is collected from 4 different countries (Austria, Cyprus, Greece, and Spain), we could not conduct a cross-country analysis due to the<strong> limited sample size.</strong> Since we were aware of this limitation while designing the study, we intended to choose similar country cases in terms of their general attitudes towards renewable energies and wind farms. While all four country cases are similarly positive about wind farms, we must also acknowledge that Austria scores slightly higher in terms of the perceived negative effects of wind farms. </span><span>Moreover, the vignette survey was conducted via an online link with Group 1 and </span><span>via</span><span> printed online copies with Group 2. These different formats might have some unaccounted impact on the D3.3 vignette study on responses. We adapted the survey format in a way that reached out to hard-to-reach populations like Group 2 (older, less educated, rural) and maximised the number of responses we collected. </span><span>Lastly, although we tried to control for the ‘recency effect’ by randomising the order in which vignettes </span><span>are introduced</span><span>, we still need to acknowledge that the previous vignettes might have an unaccounted effect on </span><span>the ways that</span><span> the later vignettes </span><span>are answered</span><span>.</span></p> <p> </p>
Dateset of results: yearly operation for AMTP and MAND - steady state simulation (D3.3 D5.1)
<p>Resuts of the steady state simulations carried out (in the frame of the ASTEP project) for the daily and yearly operation of the ASTEP concept. The dataset include data related to two reference cases and different options of design such as layout, locations, and demand variations. The results are related to the Deliverables D3.3 Design of the daily and yearly operation for AMTP and MAND and D5.1 Report on the integrated ASTEP model development and Conceptual Designs</p>
Data to D3.3 - Institutional arrangements of water supply, distribution and uses within and across case studies -identifying the barriers and drivers in place
<p>The transition towards a water circular economy (WCE) in the sense of water reuse may generate new water loops with additional challenges to water governance such as new and different types or qualities of water, new associated risks, new responsibilities,and new sets of actors involved. These challenges demand for clear-defined responsibilities, well-engaging of the various stakeholders, strong cooperation, and coordination among actors to prevent risks. Institutional arrangements, build the formal, and informal, design schemes to ensure adequate procedures and standards to better catalyse such transition. This deliverable analyses the institutional arrangements associated to the water management on the demosites, to assess their preparedness for the implementation of the new water loops as those foreseen with use of Project Ô new technologies. Using the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework, the analysis showed that the more water uses and users a new water loop involves the more critical the institutional arrangements become. Nevertheless, the institutional arrangements of the demosites do not always configure severe barriers. This is the case of Omis (Croatia) where the water reuse loop is located inside a textile company, and Eilat (Israel) where the water reuse loop is located inside amariculture centre. On the contrary, on Almendralejo (Spain) and Lecce (Italy), there are different players involved in the management ofthe water loop,andinstitutional arrangements appear more critical. Among the different institutional design principles, the clearly defined boundaries of responsibilities among stakeholders, the congruence between appropriation and provision rules and local conditions, raise more concerns on the case studies and call for the attention of future research on water circular economy. Fairly share of cost, benefits, and risks, dedicated graduated sanctions, conflict prevention and resolution mechanisms also deserve particular attention given the limited awareness of stakeholders of their features and influence for a successful implementation of demosites. Trust building, stakeholder empowerment and investment on transparency mechanisms related to water monitoring and sharing of communities and environmental benefits and costs of water reuse may be powerful approaches to implement water circular economy.</p>
Data to D3.3 - Institutional arrangements of water supply, distribution and uses within and across case studies - identifying the barriers and drivers in place
<p>The transition towards a water circular economy (WCE) in the sense of water reuse may generate new water loops with additional challenges to water governance such as new and different types or qualities of water, new associated risks, new responsibilities,and new sets of actors involved. These challenges demand for clear-defined responsibilities, well-engaging of the various stakeholders, strong cooperation, and coordination among actors to prevent risks. Institutional arrangements, build the formal, and informal, design schemes to ensure adequate procedures and standards to better catalyse such transition. This deliverable analyses the institutional arrangements associated to the water management on the demosites, to assess their preparedness for the implementation of the new water loops as those foreseen with use of Project Ô new technologies. Using the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework, the analysis showed that the more water uses and users a new water loop involves the more critical the institutional arrangements become. Nevertheless, the institutional arrangements of the demosites do not always configure severe barriers. This is the case of Omis (Croatia) where the water reuse loop is located inside a textile company, and Eilat (Israel) where the water reuse loop is located inside amariculture centre. On the contrary, on Almendralejo (Spain) and Lecce (Italy), there are different players involved in the management ofthe water loop,andinstitutional arrangements appear more critical. Among the different institutional design principles, the clearly defined boundaries of responsibilities among stakeholders, the congruence between appropriation and provision rules and local conditions, raise more concerns on the case studies and call for the attention of future research on water circular economy. Fairly share of cost, benefits, and risks, dedicated graduated sanctions, conflict prevention and resolution mechanisms also deserve particular attention given the limited awareness of stakeholders of their features and influence for a successful implementation of demosites. Trust building, stakeholder empowerment and investment on transparency mechanisms related to water monitoring and sharing of communities and environmental benefits and costs of water reuse may be powerful approaches to implement water circular economy.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.