Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,205
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
2,205 results for “Dental”
Dataset Dental research data availability and quality according to FAIR principles
<p>This dataset contains open access publications in EPMC dental journals from 2016 to 2021 and 500 non-open access dental publications. We evaluated the level of compliance with the FAIR principles. The original dataset and codebook are attached. </p>
Dental, pathological, and UHPLC data from Middenbeemster archaeological site
<p>Datasets used in 'Multiproxy analysis exploring patterns of diet and disease in dental calculus and skeletal remains from a 19th century Dutch population' (<a href="https://doi.org/10.24072/pcjournal.414">https://doi.org/10.24072/pcjournal.414</a>).</p> <p><strong>Changes</strong></p> <p>v1.0.1: added <em>data-dictionary.md</em> file</p> <p>Newest v1.0.0: Upload the correct <em>LICENSE</em> file</p>
Tutorial and dataset for gigapixel-like imaging strategies for dental anthropology
<p>This tutorial and image dataset to accompany the following publication: Willman JC, Lozano M, Hernando R, Vergès JM. Gigapixel-like imaging strategies for dental anthropology: Applications for scientific communication and training in digital image analysis. Quaternary International, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2020.05.027">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2020.05.027</a>. Part of the Special Issue: Not Only Use.</p> <p><strong>Contains: </strong>tutorial,<strong> </strong>183 images files for reconstructing three examples of gigapixel-like images, and one “READ ME” file describing the images.</p> <p>The tutorial is meant to be used as a guideline for the creation of gigapixel-like (GPL) images of dental surfaces based on our experience. The methodology can be extrapolated to other types of materials and surfaces, but you may need to augment these guidelines according to the specificity of your own research needs. We hope that the inclusion of this supplement will stimulate other researchers to include specific guidelines and step-by-step processes for how they created their own GPL images. While this study concentrates on scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images, there are many other ways to acquire two-dimensional images (e.g., digital photography, optical light microscopy, etc.) that can be used to create GPL images. Likewise, the number of software packages and their numerous built-in parameters for creating extended focus and mosaic images vary greatly. Therefore, more tutorials/guidelines will surely improve the transparency and accessibility of the GPL methodology in the archaeological sciences, biological anthropology, and allied fields.</p>
GWAS summary stats in "Genome-wide association meta-analysis identifies two novel loci associated with dental caries."
<p>Summary stats of the genome-wide meta-analysis for dental caries and periodontal diseases in our study (population A and B).</p> <p>Article "Genome-wide association meta-analysis identifies two novel loci associated with dental caries."</p> <p>https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04799-1<br><br></p>
Dataset on the dental morphology and occlusal dental wear of pre-colonial societies of the South and Southeast Coast of Brazil
<p>This dataset compiles information on dental morphology and occlusal dental wear of 431 individuals exhumed from coastal and riverine sites of the South and Southeast Coast of Brazil, dated between approximately 10,000 to 1,000 years before present. Dental traits were scored according to the Arizona State University Dental Anthropology System (ASUDAS) (Scott and Irish, 2017; Turner II et al., 1991). Few additional mandibular traits were added following Hauser and Stefano (1989). Occlusal dental wear was scored according to the method described in Smith (1984).</p> <p>Sex and age at death estimations derive from previous studies (Estevam, 2020; Fischer, 2012; Neves et al., 2005; Silva, 2005; Tognoli, 2016; Wesolowski, 2007). When this information was not available from previous studies, it was assessed by the first author (Fidalgo, 2021) using standard protocol methods (Buikstra and Ubelaker, 1994). Further detailed information and description of each variable can be consulted within the “description” and “dental grades” sheets in the excel file.</p> <p>The dataset is part of a PhD project developed at the Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia da Universidade de São Paulo, carried by Daniel Fidalgo and advised by Veronica Wesolowski and Mark Hubbe (Fidalgo, 2021). Manuscripts have already been published using this data (Fidalgo et al., 2021a, 2021b). All research was funded by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), grants 17/20637-4 and 19/18289-3. It was also supported by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) grant 001.</p>
Comparison of occlusal dental wear and degenerative alterations of the temporomandibular joint in two medieval populations from central Europe
<p>This repository contains the radiographs of the mandibular condyles published in the paper titled "Comparison of dental status parameters and degenerative alterations of the temporomandibular joint in central European medieval skeletal finds". The radiographs were obtained with a portable X-ray unit (Kavo Nomad-Pro).</p> <p>Selected CT reconstructions of the condyles are available for a sub-group of individuals.</p> <p>Files naming convention:</p> <p>- Files name start with the burial number (ex. B10; Z98);</p> <p>- R and L stand for "right" and "left";</p> <p>- AP: anteroposterior view; LM: lateromedial view.</p>
Dataset Worldwide Survey on the Impact of AI Chatbots and Large Language Models in Dental Education: Insights from Dental Educators
<p><strong>This dataset contains responses from participants regarding their awareness, knowledge, and perceptions of AI-powered tools in dental education. The data was collected during May-June 2023 to investigate the potential enhancement that AI can bring to dental education. The dataset includes variables related to participants' demographics, experiences, perceptions, and opinions.</strong></p> <p><strong>Details in the published protocol by Uribe, S. E., & Maldupa, I. (2023, June 2). Chatbots In Dental Education - Research Protocol. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/3BSG2</strong></p>
Genomic data suggest parallel dental vestigialization within the xenarthran radiation
<p><strong>Supplementary Material for:</strong></p><p>Emerling C.A., Gibb G.C., Tilak M.-K., Hughes J., Kuch M., Duggan A.T., Poinar H.N., Nachman M.W. & Delsuc F. (2023). Genomic data suggest parallel dental vestigialization within the xenarthran radiation. <i>Peer Community Journal</i> 3: e75. Recommended by <i>PCI Genomics</i>.</p><p> </p><p><strong>SCRIPTS</strong></p><p><strong>Script S1: </strong>Commands used for running CoEvol analyses on the 11 dental genes.</p><p> </p><p><strong>DATASETS</strong></p><p><strong>Dataset S1.</strong> Set of 5,262 baits used in the exon capture experiments of the 11 dental genes considered in Xenarthra.</p><p><strong>Dataset S2.</strong> ACP4 genomic alignment used for characterizing inactivating mutations.</p><p><strong>Dataset S3.</strong> AMBN genomic alignment used for characterizing inactivating mutations.</p><p><strong>Dataset S4.</strong> AMELX genomic alignment used for characterizing inactivating mutations.</p><p><strong>Dataset S5.</strong> AMTN genomic alignment used for characterizing inactivating mutations.</p><p><strong>Dataset S6.</strong> DMP1 genomic alignment used for characterizing inactivating mutations.</p><p><strong>Dataset S7.</strong> DSPP genomic alignment used for characterizing inactivating mutations.</p><p><strong>Dataset S8.</strong> ENAM genomic alignment used for characterizing inactivating mutations.</p><p><strong>Dataset S9.</strong> MEPE genomic alignment used for characterizing inactivating mutations.</p><p><strong>Dataset S10.</strong> MMP20 genomic alignments used for characterizing inactivating mutations.</p><p><strong>Dataset S11.</strong> ODAM genomic alignments used for characterizing inactivating mutations.</p><p><strong>Dataset S12.</strong> ODAPH genomic alignments used for characterizing inactivating mutations.</p><p><strong>Dataset S13.</strong> ACP4 codon alignment used in Coevol and PAML analyses.</p><p><strong>Dataset S14.</strong> AMBN codon alignment used in Coevol and PAML analyses.</p><p><strong>Dataset S15.</strong> AMELX codon alignment used in Coevol and PAML analyses.</p><p><strong>Dataset S16.</strong> AMTN codon alignment used in Coevol and PAML analyses.</p><p><strong>Dataset S17.</strong> DMP1 codon alignment used in Coevol and PAML analyses.</p><p><strong>Dataset S18.</strong> DSPP codon alignment used in Coevol and PAML analyses.</p><p><strong>Dataset S19.</strong> ENAM codon alignment used in Coevol and PAML analyses.</p><p><strong>Dataset S20.</strong> MEPE codon alignment used in Coevol and PAML analyses.</p><p><strong>Dataset S21.</strong> MMP20 codon alignment used in Coevol and PAML analyses.</p><p><strong>Dataset S22.</strong> ODAM codon alignment used in Coevol and PAML analyses.</p><p><strong>Dataset S23.</strong> ODAPH codon alignment used in Coevol and PAML analyses.</p><p> </p><p><strong>SUPPLEMENTARY TABLES (Supplementary_Tables_S1-S26.xlsx)</strong></p><p><strong>Table S1.</strong> Specimen information for newly generated sequences.</p><p><strong>Table S2.</strong> Sources for DNA sequences listed for each gene, indicating methodology used. In some cases, sequences were generated via two or three methodologies. Accession numbers are associated with NCBI-derived sequences.</p><p><strong>Table S3.</strong> Primers used in PCR amplification experiments.</p><p><strong>Table S4. </strong>Results from PAML analyses (one ratio models) to determine the best codon frequency model fits. CF = codon frequency model; K = free parameters.</p><p><strong>Table S5.</strong> Inactivating mutations recorded in ACP4. The details in this caption also apply to Tables S6–S15. Taxa in bold are represented by whole genome assemblies. Exon colors code for the following: green = putatively functional; yellow = missing; pink = one or more inactivating mutations found. Abbreviations for mutations are as follows: del = deletion; ins = insertion; start = start codon mutation; stop = premature stop codon; ? = ambiguity whether the mutation is shared among all members of the clade; poly = polymorphism inferred by short reads. Abbreviations in brackets following an inactivating mutation indicate shared inactivating mutation. Key for each abbreviation follows: Bpyg = <i>Bradypus pygmaeus</i>; BRAD = <i>Bradypus</i>; Btri = <i>Bradypus tridactylus</i>; Bvar = <i>Bradypus variegatus</i>; CAB = <i>Cabassous</i>; Ccen = <i>Cabassous centralis</i>; Ccha = <i>Cabassous chacoensis</i>; CHAET = <i>Chaetophractus</i>; CHLAM = Chlamyphoridae; CHOL = <i>Choloepus</i>; Cnat = <i>Chaetophractus nationi</i>; Cuni = <i>Cabassous unicinctus</i>; Cvel = <i>Chaetophractus vellerosus</i>; Cvil = <i>Chaetophractus villosus</i>; DASY = Dasypodidae; Dkap = <i>Dasypus kappleri</i>; Dnov = <i>Dasypus novemcinctus</i>; Dpil = <i>Dasypus pilosus</i>; Dsab = <i>Dasypus sabanicola</i>; FOLI = Folivora; MYRM = Myrmecophagidae; PEUT = Tolypeutinae; PHOR = Chlamyphorinae; PHRAC = Euphractinae; PILO = Pilosa; Pmax = <i>Priodontes maximus</i>; TAM = <i>Tamandua</i>; TOLY = <i>Tolypeutes</i>; VERM = Vermilingua; XEN = Xenarthra; Zpic = <i>Zaedyus pichiy</i>.</p><p><strong>Table S6.</strong> Inactivating mutations recorded in AMBN. See additional details in Table S5 caption.</p><p><strong>Table S7.</strong> Inactivating mutations recorded in AMELX. See additional details in Table S5 caption.</p><p><strong>Table S8.</strong> Inactivating mutations recorded in AMTN. See additional details in Table S5 caption.</p><p><strong>Table S9.</strong> Inactivating mutations recorded in DMP1. See additional details in Table S5 caption.</p><p><strong>Table S10.</strong> Inactivating mutations recorded in DSPP. See additional details in Table S5 caption.</p><p><strong>Table S11.</strong> Inactivating mutations recorded in ENAM. See additional details in Table S5 caption.</p><p><strong>Table S12.</strong> Inactivating mutations recorded in MEPE. See additional details in Table S5 caption.</p><p><strong>Table S13.</strong> Inactivating mutations recorded in MMP20. See additional details in Table S5 caption.</p><p><strong>Table S14.</strong> Inactivating mutations recorded in ODAM. See additional details in Table S5 caption.</p><p><strong>Table S15.</strong> Inactivating mutations recorded in ODAPH. See additional details in Table S5 caption.</p><p><strong>Table S16.</strong> PAML results for ACP4. Model: BG = branch(es) grouped with background; fixed 1 = branch(es) fixed at 1. p-value: specific p-value only shown if lower than 0.05. Model Comparison: if model comparison yields statistically significant differences (p < 0.05), model comparison bolded and given green background. For most models, w only shown for branch(es) of interest.</p><p><strong>Table S17.</strong> PAML results for AMBN. See additional details in Table S16 caption.</p><p><strong>Table S18.</strong> PAML results for AMELX. See additional details in Table S16 caption.</p><p><strong>Table S19.</strong> PAML results for AMTN. See additional details in Table S16 caption.</p><p><strong>Table S20.</strong> PAML results for DMP1. See additional details in Table S16 caption.</p><p><strong>Table S21.</strong> PAML results for DSPP. See additional details in Table S16 caption.</p><p><strong>Table S22.</strong> PAML results for ENAM. See additional details in Table S16 caption.</p><p><strong>Table S23.</strong> PAML results for MEPE. See additional details in Table S16 caption.</p><p><strong>Table S24.</strong> PAML results for MMP20. See additional details in Table S16 caption.</p><p><strong>Table S25.</strong> PAML results for ODAM. See additional details in Table S16 caption.</p><p><strong>Table S26.</strong> PAML results for ODAPH. See additional details in Table S16 caption.</p><p> </p><p><strong>SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURES</strong></p><p><strong>Figure S1. </strong>Figure summarizing the various methodologies used to construct the various genes. Compare with Supplementary Table S2, which summarizes the methods used in the finalized constructed genes.</p><p><strong>Figure S2. </strong>Diagram showing the flow of models used in PAML dN/dS model analyses (Supplementary Tables S16–S26). This example uses real analysis results for the gene AMELX. Compare to Supplementary Table S18 and see manuscript for further details.</p><p><strong>Figure S3. </strong>Summary of the relative completeness of ACP4 for each species included in this study, within their phylogenetic context. In this figure, branch lengths are proportional to time and exon symbols are proportional to length. Bold species indicate species for which we had sequence data for this gene, and bolded branches show the nodes and branches for which we can reconstruct the gene's functional history. For each gene, all coding exons are numbered and colored according to mutation status: green = no evidence of inactivating mutations; yellow = missing data (i.e., not amplified and/or assembled); red = one or more inactivating mutations present. Note that a green exon does not necessarily mean the entire exon was recovered. Black boxes around exons of multiple species indicate the earliest shared inactivating mutations (SIMs) for a particular clade. For example, ACP4 shows exons 5 and 6 in chlamyphorids surrounded by a black box. This is due to SIMs being recorded in both exons within species in this clade, whereas there are no SIMs in common between chlamyphorids and dasypodids. To summarize the earliest examples of SIMs within a clade, we recorded the branch on which the mutational events happened. For example, in ACP4, we recorded at least 13 SIMs across five exons between <i>Dasypus novemcinctus</i> and <i>Dasypus kappleri</i>. Given that their relationships represent the basal split for all dasypodids, this suggests that ACP4 was inactivated on prior to the last common ancestor of Dasypodidae. See Supplementary Tables S5–15 and Supplementary Datasets S2-S12 for more details.</p><p><strong>Figure S4. </strong>Summary of the relative completeness of AMBN for each species included in this study, within their phylogenetic context. See caption for Figure S3 for more details.</p><p><strong>Figure S5. </strong>Summary of the relative completeness of AMELX for each species included in this study, within their phylogenetic context. See caption for Figure S3 for more details.</p><p><strong>Figure S6. </strong>Summary of the relative completeness of AMTN for each species included in this study, within their phylogenetic context. See caption for Figure S3 for more details.</p><p><strong>Figure S7. </strong>Summary of the relative completeness of DMP1 for each species included in this study, within their phylogenetic context. See caption for Figure S3 for more details.</p><p><strong>Figure S8. </strong>Summary of the relative completeness of DSPP for each species included in this study, within their phylogenetic context. See caption for Figure S3 for more details.</p><p><strong>Figure S9. </strong>Summary of the relative completeness of ENAM for each species included in this study, within their phylogenetic context. See caption for Figure S3 for more details.</p><p><strong>Figure S10. </strong>Summary of the relative completeness of MEPE for each species included in this study, within their phylogenetic context. See caption for Figure S3 for more details.</p><p><strong>Figure S11. </strong>Summary of the relative completeness of MMP20 for each species included in this study, within their phylogenetic context. See caption for Figure S3 for more details.</p><p><strong>Figure S12. </strong>Summary of the relative completeness of ODAM for each species included in this study, within their phylogenetic context. See caption for Figure S3 for more details.</p><p><strong>Figure S13. </strong>Summary of the relative completeness of ODAPH for each species included in this study, within their phylogenetic context. See caption for Figure S3 for more details.</p><p><strong>Figure S14.</strong> Visualization of PAML results for ACP4. Phylogram branch lengths optimized for substitutions per codon. Red bars represent minimum dates for pseudogenization based on shared or unique inactivating mutations. Blue branches = w statistically lower than 1; blue branches with asterisk = w statistically lower than 1 and background; purple branches = statistically higher than background and lower than 1; red branches = w statistically higher than background ; red branches with asterisk = w statistically higher than background and 1; black branches that pre-date inactivating mutations = not statistically distinguishable from background or 1; black branches that post-date inactivating mutations = no statistically analyses performed on these branches.</p><p><strong>Figure S15.</strong> Visualization of PAML results for AMBN. See caption for Figure S2 for more details.</p><p><strong>Figure S16.</strong> Visualization of PAML results for AMELX. See caption for Figure S2 for more details.</p><p><strong>Figure S17.</strong> Visualization of PAML results for AMTN. See caption for Figure S2 for more details.</p><p><strong>Figure S18.</strong> Visualization of PAML results for DMP1. See caption for Figure S2 for more details.</p><p><strong>Figure S19.</strong> Visualization of PAML results for DSPP. See caption for Figure S2 for more details.</p><p><strong>Figure S20.</strong> Visualization of PAML results for ENAM. See caption for Figure S2 for more details.</p><p><strong>Figure S21.</strong> Visualization of PAML results for MEPE. See caption for Figure S2 for more details.</p><p><strong>Figure S22.</strong> Visualization of PAML results for MMP20. See caption for Figure S2 for more details.</p><p><strong>Figure S23.</strong> Visualization of PAML results for ODAM. See caption for Figure S2 for more details.</p><p><strong>Figure S24.</strong> Visualization of PAML results for ODAPH. See caption for Figure S2 for more details.</p><p><strong>Figure S25.</strong> Visualization of Coevol results for ACP4. The figure shows the Bayesian reconstruction of dN/dS across the placental phylogeny with focus on xenarthrans (armadillos, anteaters, and sloths). The variation of dN/dS was jointly reconstructed with divergence times while controlling the effect of three life-history traits (body mass, longevity, and sexual maturity). The tree is rooted with Afrotheria as the sister-group to all other placentals according to Emerling et al. (2015). Asterisks indicate non-functional sequences.</p><p><strong>Figure S26.</strong> Visualization of Coevol results for AMBN. See caption for Figure S13 for more details.</p><p><strong>Figure S27.</strong> Visualization of Coevol results for AMELX. See caption for Figure S13 for more details.</p><p><strong>Figure S28.</strong> Visualization of Coevol results for AMTN. See caption for Figure S13 for more details.</p><p><strong>Figure S29. </strong>Visualization of Coevol results for DMP1. See caption for Figure S13 for more details.</p><p><strong>Figure S30.</strong> Visualization of Coevol results for DSPP. See caption for Figure S13 for more details.</p><p><strong>Figure S31.</strong> Visualization of Coevol results for ENAM. See caption for Figure S13 for more details.</p><p><strong>Figure S32.</strong> Visualization of Coevol results for MEPE. See caption for Figure S13 for more details.</p><p><strong>Figure S33.</strong> Visualization of Coevol results for MMP20. See caption for Figure S13 for more details.</p><p><strong>Figure S34.</strong> Visualization of Coevol results for ODAM. See caption for Figure S13 for more details.</p><p><strong>Figure S35.</strong> Visualization of Coevol results for ODAPH. See caption for Figure S13 for more details.</p><p> </p>
Microbial Load on Dental Students' Hands: A Gender and Academic Stage Analysis
<p>This dataset supports a study investigating microbial contamination on the hands of dental students at Al-Hadi University College. The data were collected using impression sampling of the index and thumb fingers of 35 students (17 males, 18 females) from the third, fourth, and fifth academic years. Sampling occurred at the end of academic or clinical activities, and bacterial load was measured using colony-forming units (CFUs) cultured on MacConkey agar. Variables in the dataset include gender, academic stage, handedness, and CFU counts.</p>
The knowledge, attitudes and perceptions towards the Covid-19 vaccine among dental staff at the University of the Western Cape, South Africa
<p><strong>Background:</strong> Despite the well-known increased risk of exposure to the Covid-19 virus in a dental setting, vaccination rates among staff members are low. This study was aimed at understanding the knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of staff towards the Covid-19 vaccine. This information, as well as the possible associations to demographic profiles, are necessary for authorities to adequately address specific concerns and uncertainties<strong>; (2) Methods:</strong> A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted by means of an anonymous, online, validated questionnaire.; <strong>(3) Results:</strong> 105 staff members participated. Majority of staff have received the Covid-19 vaccine but stated that they would not take the booster vaccination. Significant associations between the level of education and the knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of staff were found.; <strong>(4) Conclusions:</strong> Majority of the staff members had a positive attitude towards the Covid-19 vaccine. However, specific concerns and uncertainties were identified and will need to be addressed in order to improve vaccination rates among staff members.</p>
JPG images from the publication "Corncob structures in dental plaque reveal microhabitat taxon specificity"
<p>Images of bacteria in human dental plaque after fluorescence in situ hybridization, hyperspectral imaging with a Zeiss LSM 780 or LSM 880 laser-scanning confocal microscope, and spectral unmixing. Each image is presented as a color JPG. Cells hybridizing with the probe for <em>Streptococcus cristatus</em> are shown in cyan; cells hybridizing with the probe for <em>Streptococcus mitis, S. oralis, </em>and <em>S. infantis </em>are shown in red; cells of genus <em>Corynebacterium</em> are shown in magenta; cells of genera <em>Haemophilus </em>and <em>Aggregatibacter </em>are shown in yellow; and cells of genus <em>Porphyromonas</em> are shown in blue.</p> <p>Images labeled as "set 1" (probe set 1) include all probes; "set 2" (probe set 2) and "set 3" (probe set 3) include only probes for <em>S. cristatus</em>, the <em>S. mitis</em> group, the <em>Streptococcus </em>genus, <em>Corynebacterium</em> genus, and <em>Porphyromonas</em> genus. </p>
TIFF images from the publication "Corncob structures in dental plaque reveal microhabitat taxon specificity"
<p>Images of bacteria in human dental plaque after fluorescence in situ hybridization, hyperspectral imaging with a Zeiss LSM 780 or LSM 880 laser-scanning confocal microscope, and spectral unmixing. Each image is presented as a TIFF file. Cells hybridizing with the probe for <em>Streptococcus cristatus</em> are shown in cyan; cells hybridizing with the probe for <em>Streptococcus mitis, S. oralis, </em>and <em>S. infantis </em>are shown in red; cells of genus <em>Corynebacterium</em> are shown in magenta; cells of genera <em>Haemophilus </em>and <em>Aggregatibacter </em>are shown in yellow; and cells of genus <em>Porphyromonas</em> are shown in blue.</p> <p>Images labeled as "set 1" (probe set 1) include all probes; "set 2" (probe set 2) and "set 3" (probe set 3) include only probes for <em>S. cristatus</em>, the <em>S. mitis</em> group, the <em>Streptococcus </em>genus, <em>Corynebacterium</em> genus, and <em>Porphyromonas</em> genus. </p>
Unmixed images from the publication "Corncob structures in dental plaque reveal microhabitat taxon specificity"
<p>Images of bacteria in human dental plaque after fluorescence in situ hybridization, hyperspectral imaging with a Zeiss LSM 780 or LSM 880 laser-scanning confocal microscope, and spectral unmixing. Each image is presented as a stack of the individual unmixed fluorophore channels readable using FIJI (ImageJ) with the Image5D plugin. Channels are shown for <em>Streptococcus cristatus</em>; the <em>Streptococcus mitis </em>group including <em>S. oralis </em>and <em>S. infantis</em>; <em>Streptococcus gordonii</em>; <em>Streptococcus </em>genus; <em>Corynebacterium </em>genus; <em>Corynebacterium matruchotii</em>; <em>Porphyromonas </em>genus; and family Pasteurellaceae including genera <em>Haemophilus </em>and <em>Aggregatibacter</em>. A channel for the residual signal after linear unmixing is also included, as well as a transmitted light image (transmitted PMT). </p> <p>Images labeled as "set 1" (probe set 1) include all probes; "set 2" (probe set 2) and "set 3" (probe set 3) include only probes for <em>S. cristatus</em>, the <em>S. mitis</em> group, the <em>Streptococcus </em>genus, <em>Corynebacterium</em> genus, and <em>Porphyromonas</em> genus. </p>
Head and dental injuries among farriers and hoof care practitioners: a nationwide survey in Switzerland (dataset)
<p>(1) Data on occupational head/face and dental injuries gathered in a questionnaire-based, voluntary survey, which was mailed to farriers and hoof care practitioners in Switzerland.</p> <p>(2) Data of the Swiss National Accident Insurance Fund on recognized occupational injuries of farriers in the time window 2015-2019 (Klasse 11c AOK, DM03, Ergebnisse aus dem Versicherungsbetrieb der Suva, VTS-ID 25268 2020). </p>
INFLUENCE OF DENTAL IMPLANT INSERTION DEPTH ON STRAIN IN PERIIMPLANT BONE TISSUE
<p>Geometry models of cortical and cancellous bone tissue for the conference paper "Influence of dental implant insertion depth on strain in periimplant bone tissue".</p>
DATASET Estimating the Use of ChatGPT in Dental Research Publications
<p>These files contain the data and the research script for analyzing the use of ChatGPT in dental research writing from 2018 to 2024. The dataset includes various CSV files with publication details and analysis scripts to investigate trends and patterns in the usage of specific signaling words associated with ChatGPT.</p>
Fig. 5 in Enamel microstructure and dental histology in a heterodontosaurid dinosaur: Heterodontosaurus tucki
Fig. 5. Simplified ornithischian phylogeny depicting characteristic schmelzmusters and enamel types for studied clades. Note: Presence of enamel tubules in Heterodontosaurus tucki dentary teeth remains unknown. Modified from Hwang (2005).
Fig. 3 in Enamel microstructure and dental histology in a heterodontosaurid dinosaur: Heterodontosaurus tucki
Fig. 3. Enamel microstructure of heterodontosaurid dinosaur Heterodontosaurus tucki Crompton and Charig, 1962 (BP/1/9007), from Lower Jurassic upper Elliot Massospondylus Assemblage Zone of South Africa. A. Scanning electron micrographs: A1, simplified, thin, labial edge enamel with incremental lines in transverse view; A2, thick, mesio-distal edge enamel exhibiting poorly organized crystallites and extremely infrequent enamel tubules in transverse view; A3, mesio-distal edge enamel exhibiting three enamel layers in longitudinal view. Long, sinuous, and continuous enamel tubules are frequently observed in this sectioning plane. B. Schematic enamel block depicting how enamel crystallite complexity might differ in different planes of sectioning. Abbreviations: BUL, basal unit layer; CUL, columnar unit layer; EDJ, enamel dentine junction; OES, outer enamel surface; PC, parallel crystallite.
Fig. 2 in Enamel microstructure and dental histology in a heterodontosaurid dinosaur: Heterodontosaurus tucki
Fig. 2. Maxillary tooth histology of heterodontosaurid dinosaur Heterodontosaurus tucki Crompton and Charig, 1962 (BP/1/9007), from Lower Jurassic upper Elliot Massospondylus Assemblage Zone of South Africa. A. Histological sections: A1, primary ridge: thick band of translucent dentine lines the labial edge of the tooth, no enamel is present; A2, whole tooth: transversely sectioned at the base of the wear facet; A3, mesial ridge: histologically distinct dentine thickens and enamel is absent; A4, labial edge: on the mesial distal edges the enamel is extremely thin, resulting from wear and likely a natural thinning of the enamel, histologically distinct dentine is present, but thin; A5, lateral edge: the enamel is thickest with no distinct dentine present. B. Scanning electron micrograph of labial edge of tooth showing crest formation from differential wear from the last stage of polishing.
Fig. 4 in Enamel microstructure and dental histology in a heterodontosaurid dinosaur: Heterodontosaurus tucki
Fig. 4. Scanning electron micrographs depicting histologically distinct dentine on the outer labial edge of maxillary teeth of heterodontosaurid dinosaur Heterodontosaurus tucki Crompton and Charig, 1962 (BP/1/9007), from Lower Jurassic upper Elliot Massospondylus Assemblage Zone of South Africa. A1, shows the change in dentinal tubule orientation from radially emanating (below black dashed line) to longitudinally emanating (above black dashed line, circular cross-sections) to the atubular dentine present on the outermost edge (above white dashed line). Inset shows the position of the micrograph on the tooth cross section. A2, depicts the marked decrease in dentinal tubules in the outer ~20 µm of dentine. Inset shows that only intertubular dentine is present and the absence of occluded tubules which would be expected if this was derived from sclerotization of the dentine. A3, high magnification image of open dentinal tubules in the histologically distinct enamel (above black dashed line in A1). A4, close up showing the transition zone of tubule orientation. White arrow shows tubule cut along its long axis; black arrows show orthogonally sectioned tubules (circular). More circular tubules are present above the black dashed line than below indicating the zone of tubule orientation shift.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.