Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2024View details →

Fig. 1. Gnamtogenys pertusa Lattke, 2004 in First record of ant Stictoponera pertusa Lattke, 2004 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae, Ectatomminae) in Sumatra Island, with description of the hitherto unknown dealate queen

Fig. 1. Gnamtogenys pertusa Lattke, 2004: A, B – worker (individual code: SEMUT10iv22A); C, D – dealate queen (colony code: SU-2iii23A, individual code: SEMUT2iii23A); A, C – head in frontal view; B, D – profile in lateral view.

Fig. 11 in UCE Phylogenomics Resolves Major Relationships Among Ectaheteromorph Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ectatomminae, Heteroponerinae): A New Classification For the Subfamilies and the Description of a New Genus

Fig. 11. Lateral view of propodeum, showing: A) Propodeal spiracle separated from declivity margin by a distance longer than its diameter (Typhlomyrmex lavra); B) Propodeal spiracle close to the declivous face of propodeum (Holcoponera relicta—USNMENT00412058). Photos by Gabriela Camacho (A) and Jeffrey Sosa-Calvo; available from www.antweb.org (Antweb 2021).

Fig. 10 in UCE Phylogenomics Resolves Major Relationships Among Ectaheteromorph Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ectatomminae, Heteroponerinae): A New Classification For the Subfamilies and the Description of a New Genus

Fig. 10. Lateral view of gaster, showing: A) Second gastric segment (IV abdominal) relatively straight (Gnamptogenys acuminata—USNMENT00441095); B) Second gastric segment (IV abdominal) slightly arched ventrally (Poneracantha mecotyle—CASENT0281530). Photos by Jeffrey Sosa-Calvo (A) and Zach Lieberman (B); available from www.antweb.org (Antweb 2021).

Fig. 8 in UCE Phylogenomics Resolves Major Relationships Among Ectaheteromorph Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ectatomminae, Heteroponerinae): A New Classification For the Subfamilies and the Description of a New Genus

Fig. 8. Lateral view of gaster, showing: A) Second gastral (IV abdominal) sternite not strongly reduced in relation to the tergite; dorsal profile of gaster gently convex, so that the apex of gaster is only discretely directed ventrally (Gnamptogenys acuminata—USNMENT00441095); B) Second gastral (IV abdominal) sternite strongly reduced in relation to the tergite; dorsal profile of gaster extremely convex, so that the gaster is strongly directed ventrally and anterad (Alfaria minuta—CASENT0281213). Photos by Jeffrey Sosa-Calvo (A) and Estella Ortega (B); available from www.antweb.org (Antweb 2021).

Fig. 5 in UCE Phylogenomics Resolves Major Relationships Among Ectaheteromorph Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ectatomminae, Heteroponerinae): A New Classification For the Subfamilies and the Description of a New Genus

Fig. 5. Lateral view of pronotum, showing: A) Pronotal tubercles present; mesonotum prominent, separated from propodeum by a deep transversal suture (Ectatomma tuberculatum—CASENT0173380); B) Pronotal tubercles or projections absent; mesonotum not prominent, forming a continuous profile with propodeum (Holcoponera striatula—CASENT0173386). Photos by April Nobile; available from www.antweb.org (Antweb 2021).

Fig. 7 in UCE Phylogenomics Resolves Major Relationships Among Ectaheteromorph Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ectatomminae, Heteroponerinae): A New Classification For the Subfamilies and the Description of a New Genus

Fig. 7. Frontal view of head, showing: A) Expanded frontal lobes (Alfaria falcifera—CASENT0179971); B) Occipital lobes absent (Gnamptogenys continua— CASENT0173383). Photos by Erin Prado (A) and April Nobile (B); available from www.antweb.org (Antweb 2021).

Fig. 1 in UCE Phylogenomics Resolves Major Relationships Among Ectaheteromorph Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ectatomminae, Heteroponerinae): A New Classification For the Subfamilies and the Description of a New Genus

Fig. 1. In lateral view, workers of the Ectatomminae genera, showing the morphological diversity within the clade. (A) Acanthoponera mucronata (CASENT0173540), (B) Alfaria minuta (CASENT0281213), (C) Ectatomma planidens (CASENT0173379), (D) Gnamptogenys acuminata (USNMENT00441095), (E) Heteroponera panamensis (CASENT0106021), (F) Holcoponera ammophila (CASENT0281512), (G) Poneracantha mecotyle (CASENT0281530), (H) Rhytidoponera metallica (CASENT0172345), (I) Stictoponera biroi (CASENT0172380), (J) Typhlomyrmex rogenhoferi (CASENT0173390). See Fig. 3 for images of Boltonia microps. Images by April Nobile, Estella Ortega, Michael Branstetter, Zach Lieberman, and Jeffrey Sosa-Calvo; available from www.antweb.org (Antweb 2021).

Fig. 3 in UCE Phylogenomics Resolves Major Relationships Among Ectaheteromorph Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ectatomminae, Heteroponerinae): A New Classification For the Subfamilies and the Description of a New Genus

Fig. 3. Worker of Boltonia microps in A) frontal view; B) dorsal view; and C) lateral view. Images by April Nobile (CASENT0173544); available from www.antweb. org (Antweb 2021).

Fig. 2 in UCE Phylogenomics Resolves Major Relationships Among Ectaheteromorph Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ectatomminae, Heteroponerinae): A New Classification For the Subfamilies and the Description of a New Genus

Fig. 2. Phylogeny of the subfamily Ectatomminae based on phylogenomic analyses of the UCE 90% complete data set (150 taxa). Figure is based on IQ-Tree besttree searches with ultrafast bootstrap (UFB) frequencies of less than 100% mapped onto the respective nodes. UFB searches consisted of 1000 replicates.The eleven larger ectatommine lineages are indicated. Branch color indicates the biogeographical range of the species.Taxa marked with asterisk (*) were classified in Gnamptogenys prior to this revision and those with double asterisk (**) were included in Heteroponera prior to this revision. See Supplementary material for the 75% complete matrix (Supp Fig. S1 [online only]). Ant photos show heads in frontal view of, from top to bottom:Gnamptogenys acuminata (USNMENT00441095), Typhlomyrmex rogenhoferi (CASENT0004700), Holcoponera striatula (CASENT0106042), Alfaria simulans (CASENT0603729), Poneracantha rastrata (CASENT0281223), Stictoponera biroi (CASENT0281519), Rythidoponera metallica (CASENT0172345), Ectatomma lugens (USNMENT00445341), Heteroponera brounii (CASENT0172105), Acanthoponera mucronata (CASENT0173540), and Boltonia microps (CASENT0173544). Images by April Nobile, Jeffrey Sosa-Calvo, Zach Lieberman,Will Ericson, Michael Branstetter, and Estella Ortega; available from www.antweb.org (Antweb 2021).

Fig. 4 in UCE Phylogenomics Resolves Major Relationships Among Ectaheteromorph Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ectatomminae, Heteroponerinae): A New Classification For the Subfamilies and the Description of a New Genus

Fig. 4. Dorsal view of head, showing: A) Cephalic median longitudinal carina present, extending from the anterior clypeal margin to the vertex (Acanthoponera minor—CASENT0178699); B) Cephalic median longitudinal carina not extending from the anterior clypeal margin to the vertex (Ectatomma tuberculatum— CASENT0173380); C) Cephalic median longitudinal carina absent (Holcoponera striatula—CASENT0173386). Photos by April Nobile; available from www. antweb.org (Antweb 2021).

Fig. 9 in UCE Phylogenomics Resolves Major Relationships Among Ectaheteromorph Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ectatomminae, Heteroponerinae): A New Classification For the Subfamilies and the Description of a New Genus

Fig. 9. Dorsal view of mesosoma, showing: A) Promesonotal suture absent (Gnamptogenys acuminata—USNMENT00441095); B) Promesonotal suture feeble, never interrupting dorsal mesosomal sculpture (Poneracantha banksi—INBIOCRI001281007); C) Promesonotal suture well marked, totally interrupting dorsal mesosomal sculpture (Holcoponera moelleri—CASENT0173384). Photos by Jeffrey Sosa-Calvo (A), Estella Ortega (B), and April Nobile (C); available from www. antweb.org (Antweb 2021).

Fig. 6 in UCE Phylogenomics Resolves Major Relationships Among Ectaheteromorph Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ectatomminae, Heteroponerinae): A New Classification For the Subfamilies and the Description of a New Genus

Fig. 6. Dorsal view of pronotum, showing: A) Pronotum and mesonotum separated by a distinct suture (Rhytidoponera abdominalis—CASENT0281333); B) Pronotum and mesonotum continuous with a discrete groove (Gnamptogenys stellae—CASENT0281227). Photos by Cerise Chen (A) and Estella Ortega (B) available from www.antweb.org (Antweb 2021).

opencc-zeroJan 2024View details →

Linked collectors and determiners for: Additions to the taxonomy of Gnamptogenys Roger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae Ectatomminae) with an updated key to the New World species.

Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "Additions to the taxonomy of Gnamptogenys Roger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae Ectatomminae) with an updated key to the New World species". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/14d62a66-617b-4fa4-aab2-83b42280fbd0">https://bionomia.net/dataset/14d62a66-617b-4fa4-aab2-83b42280fbd0</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/14d62a66-617b-4fa4-aab2-83b42280fbd0">https://gbif.org/dataset/14d62a66-617b-4fa4-aab2-83b42280fbd0</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.

Fig. 9. Gastral tergite I and II in Genome-wide MIG-seq and morphometric data reveals heterospecificity of the Gnamptogenys taivanensis group (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ectatomminae) in the northern mountainous region of Vietnam

Fig. 9. Gastral tergite I and II of the worker of the Gnamptogenys taivanensis group, in dorsal view. A, Lineage A, cf. G. taivanensis (Wheeler, 1929), colony Dai11iii17-295; B, Lineage B, cf. G. dentihumera Chen, Lattke et Zhou, 2017, Dai15iii18-731; C, Lineage C, cf. G. taivanensis (Wheeler, 1929), Eg21ix17-299; D, Lineage D, cf. G. coccina Zhou, 2001, Eg13v17-1255; E, Lineage E, cf. G. quadrutinodules Chen, Lattke et Zhou, 2017, Eg21ix17-310; F, Lineage G = G. sp. 7 of NDD, Dai15iii18-726.

Fig. 8 in Genome-wide MIG-seq and morphometric data reveals heterospecificity of the Gnamptogenys taivanensis group (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ectatomminae) in the northern mountainous region of Vietnam

Fig. 8. Propodeum and petiole of the worker of the Gnamptogenys taivanensis group, in lateral view. A, Lineage A, cf. G. taivanensis (Wheeler, 1929), colony Dai11iii17-295; B, Lineage C, cf. G. taivanensis (Wheeler, 1929), Eg21ix17-299; C, Lineage D, cf. G. coccina Zhou, 2001, Eg13v17-1255; D, G. sp. 3 of NDD, Eg14v17-1287; E, Lineage E, cf. G. quadrutinodules Chen, Lattke et Zhou, 2017, Eg21ix17-310; F, Lineage G = G. sp. 7 of NDD, Dai15iii18-726.

Fig. 7 in Genome-wide MIG-seq and morphometric data reveals heterospecificity of the Gnamptogenys taivanensis group (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ectatomminae) in the northern mountainous region of Vietnam

Fig. 7. Posterior declivity of propodeum of the worker of the Gnamptogenys taivanensis group, in posterior view. A, Lineage B, cf. G. dentihumera Chen, Lattke et Zhou, 2017, colony Dai15iii18-731; B, Lineage D, cf. G. coccina Zhou, 2001, Eg13v17-1255; C, Lineage F, cf. G. taivanensis (Wheeler, 1929), Eg13iii18-091; D, Lineage E, cf. G. quadrutinodules Chen, Lattke et Zhou, 2017, Eg21ix17-310.

Fig. 5 in Genome-wide MIG-seq and morphometric data reveals heterospecificity of the Gnamptogenys taivanensis group (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ectatomminae) in the northern mountainous region of Vietnam

Fig. 5. Dendrogram of NC-Ward clustering based on 25 morphometric characters of the worker of Gnamptogenys taivanensis group. Association with MIG-seq lineages and singleton colonies are shown by coloured bars and letters. Black bars indicate clusters by NC-Kmeans clustering with K=8. Lineage A, cf. G. taivanensis (Wheeler, 1929); Lineage B, cf. G. dentihumera Chen, Lattke et Zhou, 2017; Lineage C, cf. G. taivanensis (Wheeler, 1929); Lineage D, cf. G. coccina Zhou, 2001; Lineage E, cf. G. quadrutinodules Chen, Lattke et Zhou, 2017; Lineage F, cf. G. taivanensis (Wheeler, 1929); Lineage G = G. sp. 7 of NDD.

Fig. 6 in Genome-wide MIG-seq and morphometric data reveals heterospecificity of the Gnamptogenys taivanensis group (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ectatomminae) in the northern mountainous region of Vietnam

Fig. 6. Head of the worker of the Gnamptogenys taivanensis group, in lateral view. A, Lineage A, cf. G. taivanensis (Wheeler, 1929), colony Dai11iii17-295; B, Lineage B, cf. G. dentihumera Chen, Lattke et Zhou, 2017, Dai15iii18-731; C, Lineage C, cf. G. taivanensis (Wheeler, 1929), Eg21ix17-299; D, Lineage D, cf. G. coccina Zhou, 2001, Eg13v17-1255; E, Lineage E, cf. G. quadrutinodules Chen, Lattke et Zhou, 2017, Eg21ix17-310; F, Lineage G = G. sp. 7 of NDD, Dai15iii18-726.

Fig. 1 in Genome-wide MIG-seq and morphometric data reveals heterospecificity of the Gnamptogenys taivanensis group (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ectatomminae) in the northern mountainous region of Vietnam

Fig. 1. Worker morphometric characters for the Gnamptogenys taivanensis group. Abbreviations of characters are given in Material and Methods. Yellow line indicates a primary baseline. Blue lines indicate secondary baselines that are parallel or vertical to the primary baseline. A, head in full-face view, with primary baseline passing the posteriormost points of vertex; B, head in lateral view, with primary baseline passing the posterodorsalmost part of mandibular insertion and the centre of eye; C, mesosoma in lateral view, with primary baseline passing the posteroventralmost corner of pronotum and the centre of propodeal spiracle; D, mesosoma in dorsal view, with primary baseline passing the midpoint of anterior margin of pronotum to the midpoint of a transverse line spanning the posteriormost points of metapleuron; E, petiole in lateral view, with primary baseline passing the petiolar spiracle and posterodorsal most corner of petiolar tergite; F, petiole and gaster in dorsal view, with primary baseline passing the anteriormost points of anterolateral corners of petiole; G, gaster in lateral view, with primary baseline passing the centre of the spiracle of gastral tergite I and the posteriormost point of tergo-sternal suture of the gastral segment I.

Fig. 4 in Genome-wide MIG-seq and morphometric data reveals heterospecificity of the Gnamptogenys taivanensis group (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ectatomminae) in the northern mountainous region of Vietnam

Fig. 4. Bayesian (left) and Maximum likelihood (right) consensus phylogenetic trees inferred based on 569 bp of the mitochondrial COI gene. Outgroups are not shown. Associations with MIG-seq lineages and independent OTUs are shown by corresponding letters and colours beside colony code. Supports by ultrafast bootstrap (UB in %) or posterior probability (PP) are given beside the nodes.