Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
3,427
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
3,427 results for “Electricity”
Soil moisture, temperature, and electrical conductivity data from the black sand extended growing season length experiment, 2018 - 2024, hourly.
As a result of climate change, the Rocky Mountain Front Range is experiencing warmer summers and earlier snowmelt. Due to the importance of snow for regulating soil temperature, growing season length, and available moisture in alpine ecosystems, even small shifts in the snow-free period could have large impacts. The focus of the Growing Season Length Experiment is to examine how terrain-related differences in climate exposure influence the way alpine habitats respond to climate change via earlier snowmelt. To simulate how changes in growing season length may affect biotic and abiotic components, NWT LTER researchers established 5 experimental sites each containing a pair 10 x 40m rectangular plots. These blocks include north and south facing aspects, subalpine and alpine tundra meadows in a range of hydrological conditions (e.g. dry meadows, moist meadows, wet meadows). We accelerated snowmelt in one plot of each block by adding chemically inert black sand, while keeping the second plot as an unmanipulated control (black sand was added to these plots after snow had naturally melted). This dataset includes measurements of soil temperature, moisture, and electrical conductivity.
Dataset of Concurrent EEG, ECG, and Behavior with Multiple Doses of transcranial Electrical Stimulation - BIDS
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
PsPM-RRM1-2: SCR, ECG, respiration and eye tracker measurements in response to electric stimulation or visual targets
<p>This dataset includes skin conductance response (SCR), electrocardiogram (ECG), respiration and eye tracker (including pupillometry) measurements for each of 29 healthy unmedicated participants (7 males and 22 females aged 23.5 +/- 3.6 years) in response to 10 discomforting electric stimulations to the forearm (RRM1) or 10 visual targets in a visual detection task (RRM2). The sample partly overlaps with data set <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1292568">PsPM-FR</a>. Some participants did not take part in RRM1 or RRM2 such that there are 25 recordings for RRM1 and 26 recordings for RRM2. Electric shock stimuli are 0.2 ms wide square current pulse repeated at 500 Hz for 500 ms and individually adjusted amplitude just below the pain threshold. Visual stimuli are red crosses (+) embedded in a white digit stream; each stimulus is presented during 200 ms and separated by a 800 ms blank interval. ITI is selected randomly on each trial from 40 s, 45 s or 50 s. A baseline period with distractors but no targets concludes experiment RRM2. (This is in contrast to the methods description in Bach et al. (2016), according to which the baseline period was randomly either in the beginning or at the end of the experiment. This discrepancy was caused by an error in the code that controlled the experiment presentation.)</p>
Acoustic noise radiation measurements of three disel-electric ferries
<p>This dataset contains measured noise radiation for three diesel-electric hybrid ferries, both in air and in water. The ferries have been measured in fully electric battery powered propulsion as well as in hybrid propulsion with the on-board diesel generator running.</p>
Dataset of "A Monte Carlo Approach for Simulating Electrical Conductivity in Highly Porous Ceramic Composites: Impact of Internal Structure"
<p>3D structure of lanthanum strontium manganite and yttria-stabilized zirconia composites is predicted based on conductivity measurements using Monte Carlo 3D equivalent circuit network approach. Validation experimental impedance spectra; scanning electron micrographs; cross sections of model simulation or prediction (MSP).</p>
PsPM-TC: SCR, ECG, EMG and respiration measurements in a discriminant trace fear conditioning task with visual CS and electrical US.
<p>This dataset includes skin conductance response (SCR), electrocardiogram (ECG) and respiration measurements. Also included are CS and US information, keypress responses and keypress response times from 18 healthy unmedicated participants (8 males and 10 females aged 23.89+/-2.52 years) participating in a classical (Pavlovian) discriminant trace fear conditioning task. CS were a red and a blue rectangle presented for 3 seconds. US consisted of 0.5 s square electric pulses with 0.2 ms duration and 10 Hz frequency. SOA between the CS onset and US was 4 s. The ITI was randomly determined on each trial to be 7, 9, or 11 s.</p>
PsPM-VC7B: SCR and PSR measurements in a delay fear conditioning task with visual CS and electrical US.
<p>This dataset includes pupil size response (PSR) and skin conductance response (SCR) measurements. Also included are CS and US information, keypress responses, keypress response times, key correctness and shock ratings for each of 21 healthy unmedicated participants (6 males and 15 females aged 27.9+/-5.5 years) participating in a classical (Pavlovian) discriminant delay fear conditioning task. Four sets of CS+/CS- were used. Simple CS consisted of Gabor patches rotated to the left or to the right; complex CS consisted of plaids created from two Gabor patches that were overlaid on each other with a 230° angle, rotated to the left or to the right. US consisted of a train of electric square pulses delivered with a constant current stimulator (Digitimer DS7A, Digitimer, Welwyn Garden City, UK) on participants’ dominant forearm through a pin-cathode/ring-anode configuration. SOA between the CS and US is 3.5 s. The ITI is randomly determined on each trial to be 7, 9, or 11 s.</p>
PsPM-DoxMemP: SCR, ECG and respiration measurements in a delay fear conditioning task with visual CS and electrical US.
<p>This dataset includes skin conductance response (SCR), electrocardiogram (ECG) and respiration measurements. Also included are CS and US information, keypress responses and keypress response times for 20 healthy unmedicated participants (7 males and 13 females aged 26.15+/-4.15 years) participating in a classical (Pavlovian) discriminant delay fear conditioning task. CS were a red and a blue rectangle. US consisted of 0.5 s square electric pulses with 0.2 ms duration and 10 Hz frequency. SOA between the CS onset and US was 3.5 s. CS and US co-terminated. The ITI was randomly determined on each trial to be 7, 9, or 11 s.</p>
PsPM-FR: SCR, ECG and respiration measurements in a delay fear conditioning task with visual CS and electrical US.
<p>This dataset includes skin conductance response (SCR), electrocardiogram (ECG) and respiration measurements. Also included are CS and US information, keypress responses and keypress response times for 31 healthy unmedicated participants (09 males and 23 females aged 23.32+/-3.61 years) participating in a classical (Pavlovian) discriminant delay fear conditioning task. CS were a red and a blue rectangle. US consisted of 0.5 s square electric pulses with 0.2-ms duration and 10 Hz frequency. SOA between the CS onset and US was 3.5 s. CS and US co-terminated. During extinction phase, an auditory startle probe (ST) was delivered 3.8 s after CS onset via headphones (100 dB, 50 ms duration with 2ms on- and offset ramp). The ITI was randomly determined on each trial to be 7, 9, or 11 s.</p> <p> </p>
PsPM-PubFe: Pupil size response in a delay fear conditioning procedure with auditory CS and electrical US.
<p>This dataset includes pupil size response (PSR), skin conductance response (SCR), electrocardiogram (ECG) and respiration measurements. Also included are CS and US information, keypress responses, keypress response times and key correctness for each of 22 healthy unmedicated participants (7 males and 15 females aged 26.4+/-5.2 years) participating in a classical (Pavlovian) discriminant delay fear conditioning task. CS consists of two sine tones with constant frequency (220 Hz or 440 Hz, 50-ms onset and offset ramp). US is a train of electric square pulses delivered with a constant current stimulator (Digitimer DS7A, Digitimer, Welwyn Garden City, UK) on participants' dominant forearm through a pin-cathode/ring-anode configuration. SOA betwen the CS and US is 3.5 s. The ITI is randomly determined on each trial to be 7, 9, or 11 s.</p>
PsPM-SC4B: SCR, ECG, EMG, PSR and respiration measurements in a delay fear conditioning task with auditory CS and electrical US
<p>This dataset includes pupil size response (PSR), skin conductance response (SCR), electrocardiogram (ECG), electromyogram (EMG) and respiration measurements. Also included are CS and US information, keypress responses, keypress response times, key correctness and shock ratings for each of 21 healthy unmedicated participants (10 males and 11 females aged 22.9+/-3.0 years; discrepancies to published studies are due to misprints and exclusion of a subject with incomplete data, which was excluded in all conducted studies as well as here) participating in a classical (Pavlovian) discriminant delay fear conditioning task. Two pairs of CS+ and CS-, either complex or simple, were delivered with headphones (HD518, Sennheiser, Wedemark-Wennebostel, Germany) at about 68 dB. Complex stimuli were a sequence of four rising (400 to 800 Hz) or falling (800 to 400 Hz) sounds lasting 1 s each. Simple stimuli were tones with constant frequency (400 or 800 Hz) presented for 4 s. US consisted of square electric pulses with 0.2-ms duration and 10 Hz frequency, resulting in a total US duration of 0.5 s. SOA betwen the CS and US was 3.5 s. The ITI was randomly determined on each trial to be 7, 9, or 11 s.</p>
Auxiliary Euro-Calliope datasets: Spatio-temporal data representing national cooking demand and electric vehicle characteristic profiles in Europe
<p>Output generated by the <a href="https://github.com/RAMP-project/">RAMP engine</a> for use in the <a href="https://github.com/calliope-project/sector-coupled-euro-calliope">Sector-Coupled Euro-Calliope model</a>. The three datasets in this repository are described briefly here and in more detail in the accompanying README files. Each dataset has an hourly temporal resolution spanning the years 2000 - 2018 (inclusive) and a national spatial resolution spanning 26* - 28** countries in Europe. All datasets are dimensionless; only the profile shapes are used in Euro-Calliope.</p> <ul> <li>Cooking energy demand profiles (<em>ramp-cooking-profiles</em>): Profiles of heat energy demand for cooking in buildings in Europe, stochastically generated using the <a href="https://github.com/RAMP-project/RAMP">RAMP model</a> [1]. These profiles are used to distribute annual cooking energy demand in the Euro-Calliope workflow. This dataset covers 28 European countries**.</li> <li>Electric vehicle plug-in profiles (<em>ramp-ev-plugin-profiles</em>): Profiles of the percentage of parked electric vehicles, stochastically generated using the <a href="https://github.com/RAMP-project/RAMP-mobility">RAMP-Mobility model</a> [2]. These profiles are used in Euro-Calliope to define the maximum number of electric vehicles that could be plugged in and therefore available to be charged at any given time, assuming controlled (or "smart") charging. This dataset covers 26 European countries*.</li> <li>Electric vehicle energy consumption profiles (<em>ramp-ev-consumption-profiles</em>): Profiles of the electricity consumption of electric vehicles, stochastically generated using the <a href="https://github.com/RAMP-project/RAMP-mobility">RAMP-Mobility model</a> [2]. These profiles are aggregated in Euro-Calliope to provide a required percentage of total vehicle electricity demand that must be met in each month. This dataset covers 26 European countries*.</li> </ul> <p>* AUT, BEL, CHE, CZE, DEU, DNK, ESP, EST, FIN, FRA, GBR, HRV, HUN, IRL, ITA, LTU, LUX, LVA, NLD, NOR, POL, PRT, ROU, SVK, SVN, SWE</p> <p>** (*) + BGR, SRB</p> <p>*** ALB, MKD, GRC, CYP, BIH, MNE, ISL</p> <p>[1] Lombardi, Francesco, Sergio Balderrama, Sylvain Quoilin, and Emanuela Colombo. 2019. ‘Generating High-Resolution Multi-Energy Load Profiles for Remote Areas with an Open-Source Stochastic Model’. <em>Energy</em> 177 (June): 433–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.097.</p> <p>[2] Mangipinto, Andrea, Francesco Lombardi, Francesco Davide Sanvito, Matija Pavičević, Sylvain Quoilin, and Emanuela Colombo. 2022. ‘Impact of Mass-Scale Deployment of Electric Vehicles and Benefits of Smart Charging across All European Countries’. <em>Applied Energy</em> 312 (April): 118676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118676.</p>
Survey data on households' use of smart home technology and their time of use of electric appliances (eCAPE)
<p>This survey data includes the responsed from a survey questionnaire which was used to collect information on smart home technologies and time of use of electric appliances in Danish households. The survey covers themes like adoption and use ofhousehold appliances, households’ division of everyday chores, timing of everyday activities, and everyday flexibility.</p> <p>The purpose of this survey is to gather information about Danish households and their everyday practices and flexibility related to electricity use. The intention is to combine questions from the survey with real time data of electricity consumption at household level with a time resolution of few minutes, and to do so for a large representative population. However, the electricity consumption is not allowed to share publicly, and therefore not included in this data upload. </p> <p>The survey includes questions of socio-economic factors.</p> <p>The questionnaire was distributed in Danish but was developed in and translated from English because ofinternational cooperation.</p> <p>The survey was developed under the project eCAPE - New Energy Consumer Roles and Smart Technologies– Actors, Practices and Equality. The eCAPE project is financed by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the grant agreement number 786643 (https://www.ecape.aau.dk/). The project is led by Professor Kirsten Gram-Hanssen from Department of the Built Environment, Aalborg University. <br><em>See also </em> <a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373453718_Survey_questionnaire_on_households'_use_of_smart_home_technology_and_their_time_of_use_of_electric_appliances">https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373453718_Survey_questionnaire_on_households'_use_of_smart_home_technology_and_their_time_of_use_of_electric_appliances</a> </p>
Bidirectional and Unidirectional Charging Profiles of Electric Vehicles
<p>This dataset contains bidirectional and unidirectional charging profiles of Electric Vehicles (EVs) measured in laboratory environment at the Smart Grid Technology Lab of ie³ institute at TU Dortmund University. The dataset not only considers charging power and current but also harmonics/interharmonics emission of EV charging in both static and dynamic scenarios. Thus, it provides a solid foundation for the development of advanced EV charging algorithms and model validation. Raw data are available in csv format from the file <em>dataset_raw.zip</em> and a selection of merged measurements is provided in the file <em>dataset_merged.zip</em>.</p> <p>The following commercially available EV models are considered:</p> <ul> <li>Opel Corsa-e (2020)</li> <li>Fiat 500e (2022)</li> <li>Honda-e Advance (bidirectional, 2020)</li> <li>Nissan Leaf (bidirectional, 2020)</li> <li>VW ID.4 (2020)</li> <li>Hyundai Ioniq 5 (2021)</li> <li>Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV (bidirectional, 2022)</li> <li>Tesla Model Y SR (2022)</li> </ul> <p>The dataset is part of the deliverable D8.1 of DriVe2X project and is accompanied by a report including a description about data acquisition and measurement setup. The report is available from the project website's resources section. A more in-depth description of the tests and exemplary analysis is currently being prepared for publication.</p> <p><strong>References</strong></p> <ul> <li>DriVe2X project website: <a href="https://drive2x.eu/">Link</a></li> <li>CORDIS website: <a href="https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101056934">Link</a></li> <li>ie³ institute: <a href="https://ie3.etit.tu-dortmund.de/">Link</a></li> <li>Smart Grid Technology Lab: <a href="http://sgtl.et.tu-dortmund.de/">Link</a></li> </ul>
PsPM-FSS6B: SCR and PSR measurements in a delay fear conditioning task with somatosensory CS and electrical US
<p>This dataset includes skin conductance response (SCR) and pupil size response (PSR) measurements. Also included are CS and US information, keypress responses, keypress response times and key correctness for each of 18 healthy unmedicated participants (10 males and 8 females aged 25.7+/-5.0 years) participating in a classical (Pavlovian) discriminant delay fear conditioning task. Simple and complex CS are delivered to the intermediate phalanges of the index and middle fingers of the non-dominant hand. Simple stimuli are stimulations to either index or middle finger, complex stimuli are stimulations of different temporal structure to both index and middle fingers. CS intensity is set to a perceivable but not unpleasant level. US is a train of electric square pulses delivered with a constant current stimulator (Digitimer DS7A, Digitimer, Welwyn Garden City, UK) on participants' dominant forearm through a pin-cathode/ring-anode configuration. SOA between the CS and US is 3.5 s. The ITI is randomly determined on each trial to be 7, 9, or 11 s.</p>
PsPM-LI: SCR, ECG, PSR and respiration measurements in a delay fear conditioning task with auditory CS and electrical US.
<p>This dataset includes pupil size response (PSR), skin conductance response(SCR), electrocardiogram (ECG) and respiration measurements for each of 20 healthy unmedicated participants (8 males and 12 females aged 22.8+/-3.3 years) participating in a classical (Pavlovian) discriminant delay fear conditioning task. (One additional participant in the initial sample in Korn et al. (2017) - but who did not finish the experiment and was not included into the analysis - is not contained in this dataset.) The acquisition data is separated into two sessions which were recorded consecutively with a break of approximately 5 min. CS consist of two sine tones with constant frequency (220 Hz or 440 Hz, 50-ms onset and offset ramp) and last for 6.5 s. US is a 0.5 s train of electric square pulses delivered with a constant current stimulator (Digitimer DS7A, Digitimer, Welwyn Garden City, UK) on participants' dominant forearm through a pin-cathode/ring-anode configuration. SOA betwen the CS and US is 6 s. The ITI is randomly determined on each trial to be 7, 9, or 11 s.</p>
Hydrochemical Data from a Tropical Andean Glacierized Catchment: δ18O, electrical conductivity, maximum fluorescence intensity, and dissolved organic carbon concentrations from short-term sampling campaigns, Ecuador (2022 and 2024)
Fluorescent dissolved organic matter (FDOM) quality, dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentration, electrical conductivity (EC), and stable water isotopes (δ¹⁸O and δ2H) were determined in water, snow, and ice samples from a tropical glacierized catchment in the Ecuadorian Andes. The sampling locations were selected to capture the major hydrologic inputs to the main stream channel (glacial melt, tributaries, wetlands, and groundwater springs) and constrain the in-stream spatiotemporal variation in DOM quality and other hydrochemical characteristics. Two sets of high-resolution time series were collected on Oct 13, 2022 and Jun 14, 2024. Time series samples were collected at various upper catchment locations and the outlet simultaneously. DOM quality was characterized via fluorescence spectroscopy and processed using parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC). The DOM quality data are expressed as %FMax values obtained through a 4-component PARAFAC model, where %Fmax 1– 4 are interpreted as terrestrial humic-like, tyrosine-like, tryptophan-like, and microbial humic-like fluorescent components, respectively. DOC concentrations were quantified using high-temperature catalytic combustion, stable water isotopes were analyzed using laser-based spectroscopy, and EC was measured in situ with handheld multiparameter water quality probes.
PsPM-SCRV6: Skin conductance responses to pain by electric stimulation
<p>This dataset includes skin conductance response (SCR) measurements for each of 20 healthy unmedicated participants (10 males and 10 females aged 21.8+/-3.3 years) in response to 10 discomforting electric shocks. Stimuli are 0.5ms wide square current pulse repeated at 500Hz for 100ms. Amplitude is varied (mean +/- SD: 0.78mA +/- 0.43mA). ITI is selected randomly on each trial from 29s, 34s or 39s.</p>
Public charging requirements for battery electric long-haul trucks in Europe: a trip chain approach
<p>Contact details:</p> <p>wasim.shoman at chalmers.se </p> <p>waahh7 at gmail com</p> <p><strong>Abstract of the research:</strong></p> <p>Heavy-duty vehicles (HDV) account for less than 2-5% of the vehicles on the road in Europe but contribute to 15-22% of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from road transport. Battery electric trucks (BETs) could be deployed on a large scale to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, they require sufficient charging infrastructure to support long-haul operations. Therefore, assessing the required charging locations, energy, and power requirements is critical. We use a trip-chain-based model to derive charging requirements for BETs in long-haul operation (travel times over 4.5 hours or over 360 km distance traveled) for Europe in 2030. We convert an origin-destination (OD) matrix into trip chains combined with European truck driving regulations to derive break and rest stops. We show that an average charging area (defined as a 25´25 km<sup>2</sup> square with each square that could include multiple charging stations and parking lots of multiple charging points) needs to have four to five times more overnight than megawatt charging points. We estimate that about 40,000 overnight charging points (50-100 kW, combined charging system, CCS) and about 9,000 megawatt charging system (MCS, 0.7 – 1.2 MW) points are required for 15% of trucks as BETs in long-haul operation. On average, 8 and 2 CCS and MCS chargers are required per charging area, and each MCS and CCS serve, on average, 11 and 2 BETs daily, respectively. Public charging entails about 110 GWh daily electricity demand in each charging area. The model can be applied to any region with similar data. Future work can consider improving the queuing model, assumptions regarding regional differences of BET penetration, and heterogeneity of truck sizes and utilization.</p> <p><strong>The methodology:</strong></p> <p>We develop a method to place charger locations in Europe that meets the demand of goods movements between regions while following EU driving regulations. The spatial resolution of regions is based on the Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics (NUTS)-3 regions. The annual flow of goods transported by HDV is identified using the ETISplus dataset. We develop a travel pattern for the HDV to convert flows into trip chains with the traversed LHT number. The traveled routes between the regions are mapped. Locations of short period stops, i.e., breaks, and long period stops, i.e., rests, are allocated/assigned along traveled routes to construct a trip chain for each moving HDV. Break and rest locations for all moving HDVs are aggregated to suggest energy requirements if assuming these HDVs are BETs. The aggregated energy to charge stopped BETs is used to identify the number and type of chargers within each suggested charging station.</p> <p><strong>Datasets details</strong></p> <p>The presented datasets contain spatial information for generating charger stations with specifications according to charging needs. The datasets contain information about: Transport network model and edges, Transported flows, routes and flow center information data, region centers, and Planned transport infrastructure. </p> <p>The first dataset titled 'ChargerLocations' contains information about the locations of suggested charging stations, the number and type of chargers, and the number of visited electrified trucks in 2030. It is a shapefile with the following details for its fields:</p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td>Name</td> <td>Description</td> <td>Data Type</td> <td>Unit</td> </tr> <tr> <td>DTN30/MainDTN</td> <td> number of electrified trucks in 2030</td> <td>integer </td> <td>number</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ChE30</td> <td> charged energy in Mega watt-hour from all charging (fast and slow)</td> <td>float</td> <td> Mega watt-hour</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ChERM</td> <td> charged energy in Megawatt hour with slow charging only (rest)</td> <td>float</td> <td> Mega watt-hour</td> </tr> <tr> <td>MDTN_R</td> <td> number of electrified trucks using slow chargers (rest)</td> <td>integer </td> <td>number</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ChEBM</td> <td> charged energy in Megawatt hour with fast charging only (break)</td> <td>float</td> <td> Mega watt-hour</td> </tr> <tr> <td>MDTN_B</td> <td> number of electrified trucks using fast chargers (break)</td> <td>integer </td> <td>number</td> </tr> <tr> <td>NSCh2pD</td> <td> number of slow chargers</td> <td>integer </td> <td>number</td> </tr> <tr> <td>NFCh30m</td> <td> number of fast chargers</td> <td>integer </td> <td>number</td> </tr> <tr> <td>TotCha</td> <td> Total number of chargers</td> <td>integer </td> <td>number</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <p>The second dataset titled (RestandBreaksPoints.shp) with information about the rest and break point locations. The dataset includes detailes about stop type, number of stopped trucks, and required charged energy. The dataset is a shapefile with "shp" format. </p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Name</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Description</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Data Type</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Unit</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>ID_origin_region</p> </td> <td> <p>Unique record ID with 9 digits decoding NUTS-3 region of origin. First 3 digits decode NUTS-0, first 5 decode NUTS-1, first 7 decode NUTS-3</p> </td> <td> <p>Integer (9digits)</p> </td> <td> <p>-</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Name_origin_region</p> </td> <td> <p>National name of NUTS-3 region of origin</p> </td> <td> <p>String</p> </td> <td> <p>-</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>ID_destination_region</p> </td> <td> <p>Unique record ID with 9 digits decoding NUTS-3 code of destination region. First 3 digits decode NUTS-0, first 5 decode NUTS-1, first 7 decode NUTS-3</p> </td> <td> <p>Integer (9digits)</p> </td> <td> <p>-</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Name_destination_<br> region</p> </td> <td> <p>National name of NUTS-3 destination region</p> </td> <td> <p>String</p> </td> <td> <p>-</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Rest</p> </td> <td> <p>A value of ”1” indicates a rest stop</p> </td> <td> <p>Boolean</p> </td> <td> <p>-</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Break</p> </td> <td> <p>A value of ”1” indicates a break stop</p> </td> <td> <p>Boolean</p> </td> <td> <p>-</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>ChaDisKM</p> </td> <td> <p>Charged range within a trip for stopped the truck</p> </td> <td> <p>Float</p> </td> <td> <p>km</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>ChaEnekWh</p> </td> <td> <p>Charged energy within a trip for stopped the truck</p> </td> <td> <p>Float</p> </td> <td> <p>KWh</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>MainDTN</p> </td> <td> <p>Number of stopped trucks for the main electrification scenario (15%)</p> </td> <td> <p>Float</p> </td> <td> <p>number</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>ChE30M</p> </td> <td> <p>Charged energy for all stopped trucks</p> </td> <td> <p>Float</p> </td> <td> <p>MWh</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>ChERM</p> </td> <td> <p>Charged energy for the trucks stopping for rest</p> </td> <td> <p>Float</p> </td> <td> <p>MWh</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>MDTN_R</p> </td> <td> <p>Number of trucks stopping for rest</p> </td> <td> <p>Float</p> </td> <td> <p>number</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>ChEBM</p> </td> <td> <p>Charged energy for the trucks stopping for break</p> </td> <td> <p>Float</p> </td> <td> <p>MWh</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>MDTN_B</p> </td> <td> <p>Number of trucks stopping for break</p> </td> <td> <p>Float</p> </td> <td> <p>number</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>geometry</p> </td> <td> <p>X, Y coordinates</p> </td> <td> <p>geometry</p> </td> <td> <p>-</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p>The following dataset titled 'flowFile' with information about the transported flow between regions and the transported routes. The dataset is in "CSV" format. Details for its fields are explained as follows (source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235234092101060X):</p> <table> <tbody><tr> <th> <p><strong>Name</strong></p> </th> <th> <p><strong>Description</strong></p> </th> <th> <p><strong>Data Type</strong></p> </th> <th> <p><strong>Unit</strong></p> </th> </tr> </tbody><tbody> <tr> <td> <p>ID_origin_region</p> </td> <td> <p>Unique record ID with 9 digits decoding NUTS-3 region of origin. First 3 digits decode NUTS-0, first 5 decode NUTS-1, first 7 decode NUTS-3</p> </td> <td> <p>Integer (9digits)</p> </td> <td> <p>-</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Name_origin_region</p> </td> <td> <p>National name of NUTS-3 region of origin</p> </td> <td> <p>String</p> </td> <td> <p>-</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>ID_destination_region</p> </td> <td> <p>Unique record ID with 9 digits decoding NUTS-3 code of destination region. First 3 digits decode NUTS-0, first 5 decode NUTS-1, first 7 decode NUTS-3</p> </td> <td> <p>Integer (9digits)</p> </td> <td> <p>-</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Name_destination_<br> region</p> </td> <td> <p>National name of NUTS-3 destination region</p> </td> <td> <p>String</p> </td> <td> <p>-</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Edge_path_E_road</p> </td> <td> <p>List of the <em>network edge IDs</em> of the shortest path between the O-D pair, determined with Dijkstra's algorithm</p> </td> <td> <p>String</p> </td> <td> <p>-</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Distance_from_origin_<br> region_to_E_road</p> </td> <td> <p>Distance from the geometric centre of the origin region to the closest network node</p> </td> <td> <p>Float</p> </td> <td> <p>Kilometres [km]</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Distance_within_E_<br> road</p> </td> <td> <p>Distance of the shortest edge path between the O-D pair</p> </td> <td> <p>Float</p> </td> <td> <p>Kilometres [km]</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Distance_from_E_<br> road_to_destination_<br> region</p> </td> <td> <p>Distance from the geometric centre of the destination region to the closest network node</p> </td> <td> <p>Float</p> </td> <td> <p>Kilometres [km]</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Total_distance</p> </td> <td> <p>Sum of <em>Distance_from_origin_region_to_E_road, Distance_within_E_road</em> and <em>Distance_from_E_road_to_destination_region</em></p> </td> <td> <p>Float</p> </td> <td> <p>Kilometres [km]</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Traffic_flow_trucks_<br> 2010</p> </td> <td> <p>Number of trucks that drive between the O-D pair in 2010</p> </td> <td> <p>Float</p> </td> <td> <p>Number of trucks</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Traffic_flow_trucks_<br> 2019</p> </td> <td> <p>Number of trucks that drive between the O-D pair after they had been scaled to 2019</p> </td> <td> <p>Float</p> </td> <td> <p>Number of trucks</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Traffic_flow_trucks_<br> 2030</p> </td> <td> <p>Number of trucks that drive between the O-D pair according to the forecast for 2030</p> </td> <td> <p>Float</p> </td> <td> <p>Number of trucks</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Traffic_flow_tons_<br> 2010</p> </td> <td> <p>Number of tons that are transported between the O-D pair in 2010 according to ETISplus</p> </td> <td> <p>Integer</p> </td> <td> <p>Tons [t]</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Traffic_flow_tons_<br> 2019</p> </td> <td> <p>Number of tons that are transported between the O-D pair after they had been scaled to 2019</p> </td> <td> <p>Integer</p> </td> <td> <p>Tons [t]</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Traffic_flow_tons_<br> 2030</p> </td> <td> <p>Number of tons that are transported between the O-D pair according to the forecast for 2030</p> </td> <td> <p>Integer</p> </td> <td> <p>Tons [t]</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p>Description of variables used in the NUTS-3 regions dataset (02_NUTS-3-Regions). The dataset is in "CSV" format. (source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235234092101060X))</p> <table> <tbody><tr> <th> <p><strong>Name</strong></p> </th> <th> <p><strong>Description</strong></p> </th> <th> <p><strong>Data Type</strong></p> </th> <th> <p><strong>Unit</strong></p> </th> </tr> </tbody><tbody> <tr> <td> <p>Network_Node_ID</p> </td> <td> <p>Unique network node ID</p> </td> <td> <p>Integer (6 digits)</p> </td> <td> <p>-</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Network_Node_X</p> </td> <td> <p>Longitude of the location of network node</p> </td> <td> <p>Float</p> </td> <td> <p>Degrees</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Network_Node_Y</p> </td> <td> <p>Latitude of the location of network node</p> </td> <td> <p>Float</p> </td> <td> <p>Degrees</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>ETISplus_Zone_ID</p> </td> <td> <p>ID of the NUTS-3 region in which the network node is located</p> </td> <td> <p>Integer</p> </td> <td> <p>-</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Country</p> </td> <td> <p>Unique country code of the country in which the network node is located (country codes are defined by ETISplus)</p> </td> <td> <p>String</p> </td> <td> <p>-</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p>Description of variables used in the network edges list (Updated_04_network-edges). The dataset is in "CSV" format. (source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235234092101060X))</p> <table> <tbody><tr> <th> <p><strong>Name</strong></p> </th> <th> <p><strong>Description</strong></p> </th> <th> <p><strong>Data Type</strong></p> </th> <th> <p><strong>Unit</strong></p> </th> </tr> </tbody><tbody> <tr> <td> <p>Network_Edge_ID</p> </td> <td> <p>Unique edge ID</p> </td> <td> <p>Integer<br> (7 digits)</p> </td> <td> <p>-</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Manually_Added</p> </td> <td> <p>Determines whether an edge had been manually added to the network (1) or not (0)</p> </td> <td> <p>Binary-integer</p> </td> <td> <p>-</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Distance</p> </td> <td> <p>Length of the network edge</p> </td> <td> <p>Float</p> </td> <td> <p>Kilometres [km]</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Network_Node_A_ID</p> </td> <td> <p>Unique ID of the network node that defines one end point of the network edge</p> </td> <td> <p>Integer</p> </td> <td> <p>-</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Network_Node_B_ID</p> </td> <td> <p>Unique ID of the network node that defines one end point of the network edge</p> </td> <td> <p>Integer</p> </td> <td> <p>-</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Traffic_flow_trucks_2019</p> </td> <td> <p>Number of trucks that drive on the edge in 2019 (both highway directions combined)</p> </td> <td> <p>Float</p> </td> <td> <p>Number of trucks</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Traffic_flow_trucks_2030</p> </td> <td> <p>Number of trucks that drive on the edge in 2030 (both highway directions combined)</p> </td> <td> <p>Float</p> </td> <td> <p>Number of trucks</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <p> </p>
PsPM-FER01: PSR, SCR, ECG and respiration measurements from a discriminant delay fear conditioning task with visual CS and electrical US.
<p>This dataset includes pupil size response (PSR), skin conductance response (SCR), electrocardiogram (ECG) and respiration measurements. Also included are CS and US information and shock expectancy ratings at the end of the experiment for 30 healthy unmedicated participants (12 males and 18 females aged 23.9+/-4.4 years) participating in a classical (Pavlovian) discriminant delay fear conditioning task. Fear acquisition consisted of 10 CS- and 32 CS+ trials (16 CSa+/16 CSb+). Half of the CS+ trials were paired with an electric shock. CS were colored triangles (yellow/red/blue). US consisted of a 500 ms train of 250 square pulses with individual pulse width of 0.2 ms. SOA between the CS onset and US was 3.5 seconds. CS and US co-terminated. The ITI was randomly determined as discrete values between 7-11 seconds (mean 9 seconds).</p> <p> </p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.