Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
89
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
89 results for “Ergonomic”
Motion Capture Benchmark of Industrial Tasks for Ergonomic Assessment and European Historic Crafts
<p><strong>General Info:</strong></p> <p>This benchmark provides motion capture (MoCap) files in .bvh form. The recordings were done in the span of May 2019 to January 2020 for the needs of the <a href="https://collaborate-project.eu/"><strong>CoLLaboratE</strong></a> and <a href="http://www.mingei-project.eu/"><strong>MINGEI</strong></a> H2020 projects<strong> </strong>funded by the European Commission. The tasks included are:</p> <ul> <li>TV assembling</li> <li>Airplane component manufacturing</li> <li>High ergonomic hazard motions </li> <li>Silk-Weaving</li> <li>Glassblowing</li> <li>Mastic Cultivation</li> </ul> <p>The TV assembly and airplane component manufacturing tasks were recorded in real-world conditions inside the factory during the actual production of the items. The high ergonomic hazard motions were recorded in a controlled lab environment and serve as baseline/prototype motions for ergonomic risk assessment.</p> <p>The silk-weaving, glassblowing, and mastic cultivation data sets were created, corresponding to movements performed by skilled craftsmen and mastic farmers. These data sets were produced in order to extract the expert's gestural knowledge and analyze their dexterity while doing their crafts.</p> <p><strong>Naming Convention:</strong></p> <p>All files in this benchmark follow a strict naming convention to allow for easier parsing by scripts. The names have a total of 12 or 13 characters that convey the following information:</p> <ul> <li>The first three or fours characters label the <strong>recording session </strong>(e.g., LAB, PLN, GBBC, MCSN, etc.)</li> <li>The next three characters label the <strong>subject number </strong>(e.g., S01, S02, S03, etc.)</li> <li>The next three characters label the <strong>posture or gesture number </strong>(e.g., P01, P02, G01, G02, etc.)</li> <li>The final three characters label the <strong>repetition number </strong>(e.g., R01, R02, R03, etc.)</li> </ul> <p>For example, LABS02P03R01 denotes a lab recording of the second subject, performing the third posture for the first time.</p> <p><strong>Recording Sessions:</strong></p> <p>There are six recording sessions in this benchmark, the ergonomic risk motion recorded in the lab (denoted as "<strong>LAB</strong>"), the construction of an airplane component (denoted as "<strong>PLN</strong>"), and the assembling and packaging of TVs (denoted as "<strong>TV*</strong>"), the silk weaving (denoted as "<strong>SW*</strong>"), glassblowing (denoted as "<strong>GB*</strong>"), and mastic cultivation (denoted as "<strong>MC*</strong>").</p> <p>The postures are the following:</p> <p><strong>LAB:</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>Standing:</strong> <ul> <li><strong>P01</strong>: The subject stays in I-pose</li> <li><strong>P02:</strong> The subject rotates his/her torso to the left as far the person can</li> <li><strong>P03: </strong>The subject will laterally bend his/her torso to the left for 6 seconds</li> <li><strong>P04</strong>: The subject bends more than 20° but less than 60°</li> <li><strong>P05:</strong> The subject bends more than 20° but less than 60° while rotating and laterally bending the torso to the left</li> <li><strong>P06: </strong>The subject stretches his/her arms, and bends forward more than 20° but less than 60° while rotating and laterally bending the torso to the left</li> <li><strong>P07</strong>: The subject bends more than 60°</li> <li><strong>P08:</strong> The subject bends more than 60° while rotating and laterally bending the torso to the left</li> <li><strong>P09: </strong>The subject stretches his/her arms, and bends forward more than 60° while rotating and laterally bending the torso to the left</li> <li><strong>P10:</strong> The subject upright, raises the elbows above the shoulder level with the forearms bent 90° (</li> <li><strong>P11</strong>: The subject raises the elbows above the shoulder level with the forearms bent 90° while rotating and laterally bending the torso to the left</li> <li><strong>P12:</strong> The subject raises the elbows above the shoulder level with the arms stretched while rotating and laterally bending the torso to the left</li> <li><strong>P13:</strong> The subject upright, raises the hands above the head</li> <li><strong>P14: </strong>The subject raises the hands above the head with the arms stretched while rotating and laterally bending the torso to the left</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Sitting on a chair:</strong> <ul> <li><strong>P15: </strong>The subject sits upright</li> <li><strong>P16:</strong> The subject bends forward more than 60°</li> <li><strong>P17:</strong> The subject bends forward more than 60° while rotating and laterally bending the torso to the left</li> <li><strong>P18:</strong> The subject stretches the arms, and bends forward more than 60° while rotating and laterally bending the torso to the left</li> <li><strong>P19:</strong> The subject raises the hands above the head with arms stretched</li> <li><strong>P20:</strong> The subject raises the hands above the head with the arms stretched while rotating and laterally bending the torso to the left</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Kneeling:</strong> <ul> <li><strong>P21:</strong> The subject stays upright</li> <li><strong>P22:</strong> The subject rotates the torso to the left as far he/she can</li> <li><strong>P23: </strong>The subject will laterally bend the torso to the left for 6 seconds</li> <li><strong>P24:</strong> The subject bends more than 60°</li> <li><strong>P25:</strong> The subject bends more than 60° while rotating and laterally bending the torso to the left</li> <li><strong>P26:</strong> The subject stretches the arms, and bends forward more than 60° while rotating and laterally bending the torso to the left</li> <li><strong>P27: </strong>The subject upright, raises the elbows to the shoulder level with the arms stretched</li> <li><strong>P28:</strong> The subject raises the elbows to the shoulder level with the arms stretched while rotating and laterally bending the torso to the left</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p>The TV assembling tasks are further divided. The subtasks are: packing the TVs on a stack for shipping (denoted as "<strong>TVP</strong>" for medium-sized TVs and "<strong>TVL</strong>" for larger TVs), placing assembling and placing electronic circuit boards on the chassis (denoted as "<strong>TVB</strong>"), and screwing the boards on the TV chassis (denoted as "<strong>TV_</strong>"). Each task is comprised of a number of postures. </p> <p><strong>TV Assembling:</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>Assembling the board and placing it on the TV chassis (TVB):</strong> <ul> <li><strong>P01: </strong>Reaching high, above the shoulder level, to pick one component</li> <li><strong>P02: </strong>Reaching low, below the knee level, to pick up the second component</li> <li><strong>P03: </strong>Connecting the components and placing the board on the chassis to be screwed</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Screwing an electrical circuit board on the TV chassis (TV_) :</strong> <ul> <li><strong>P01: </strong>A screw is placed on a power tool and it is being screwed on the chassis. The process is repeated four times</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Preparing TVs for Shipping (TVP & TVL):</strong> <ul> <li><strong>P01: </strong>Placing TVs on a wooden pallet (bottom level)</li> <li><strong>P02:</strong> Preparing to wrap the bottom level with a membrane</li> <li><strong>P03:</strong> Wrapping the bottom level</li> <li><strong>P04:</strong> Placing TVs on top of the bottom level (second level)</li> <li><strong>P05:</strong> Placing TVs on top of the second level (third level)</li> <li><strong>P06: </strong>Wrapping the second level with a plastic membrane</li> <li><strong>P07:</strong> Wrapping the third level with a plastic membrane</li> <li><strong>P08:</strong> Placing TVs on top of the third level (fourth level)</li> <li><strong>P09:</strong> Wrapping the fourth level with a plastic membrane</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p><strong>Riveting of an airplane floater (PLN):</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>P01:</strong> Rivet with the pneumatic hammer.</li> <li><strong>P02:</strong> Prepare the pneumatic hammer and grab rivets. </li> <li><strong>P03:</strong> Place the bucking bar to counteract the incoming rivet.</li> </ul> <p>The tasks recorded for silk weaving, glassblowing, and mastic cultivation data sets were segmented by gestures (e.g., G01, G02, etc.) . The tasks recorded for these three data sets are the following:</p> <p><strong>Silk weaving (SW*):</strong></p> <ul> <li>The creation of the punch cards <strong>(SWPC)</strong>.</li> <li>Preparation of the beam <strong>(SWPB)</strong>.</li> <li>Wrapping of the beam <strong>(SWWB)</strong>.</li> <li>Jacquard weaving with small loom <strong>(SWSL)</strong>.</li> <li>Jacquard weaving with medium size loom <strong>(SWML)</strong>.</li> <li>Jacquard weaving with large loom <strong>(SWLL)</strong>.</li> </ul> <p><strong>Glassblowing (GB*):</strong></p> <ul> <li>Beak cutting <strong>(GBBC)</strong>.</li> <li>Blowing and shaping <strong>(GBBS)</strong>.</li> <li>Cervix refining <strong>(GBCR)</strong>.</li> <li>Cord laying <strong>(GBCL)</strong>.</li> <li>Finish details <strong>(GBFD)</strong>.</li> <li>Handle laying <strong>(GBHL)</strong>.</li> <li>Transfer to punty <strong>(GBTP)</strong>.</li> <li>Leg and foot laying <strong>(GBLF)</strong>.</li> </ul> <p><strong>Mastic Cultivation (MC*):</strong></p> <ul> <li>Scrapping with new tool <strong>(MCSN)</strong>.</li> <li>Scrapping with old tool <strong>(MCSO)</strong>.</li> <li>Sweeping <strong>(MCSW)</strong>.</li> <li>Dusting <strong>(MCDU)</strong>.</li> <li>Embroidery A <strong>(MCEA)</strong>.</li> <li>Embroidery B <strong>(MCEB)</strong>.</li> <li>Embroidery with an axe <strong>(MCEX)</strong>.</li> <li>Gathering <strong>(MCGA)</strong>.</li> <li>Harvesting <strong>(MCHA)</strong>.</li> <li>Wiping <strong>(MCWI)</strong>.</li> <li>Shifting A <strong>(MCSA)</strong>.</li> <li>Shifting B <strong>(MCSB)</strong>.</li> <li>Cleaning with the wind <strong>(MCCW).</strong></li> </ul> <p>The motion capture files were processed and segmented with a 3D character animation software (MotionBuilder, Autodesk Inc., San Rafael, CA. USA) and exported to Biovision Hierarchy (BVH) files.</p>
MOVMUS-UJI Dataset & ERGOMOVMUS: EMG and kinematics data of the hand in activities of daily living with special interest for ergonomics
<p>A dataset of <strong>human hand kinematics</strong> and <strong>forearm muscle activation</strong> collected during the performance of a wide variety of activities of daily living (ADLs) is presented, with tagged characteristics of products and tasks. A total of <strong>26 participants</strong> performed <strong>161 ADLs</strong>, selected to be representative of common elementary tasks, grasp types, product orientations and performance heights. 105 products were used, being varied regarding shape, dimensions, weight and type (common products and assistive devices).</p> <p>The data were recorded using CyberGlove instrumented gloves on both hands measuring 18 degrees of freedom on each and seven surface EMG sensors per arm recording muscle activity. The products and their arrangement were the same across subjects, and tasks were performed in a guided way. Data of <strong>more than 4100 ADLs</strong> is presented in this dataset as <strong>Matlab structures</strong> with full continuous recordings, which may be used in applications such as machine learning or to characterize healthy human hand behaviour.</p> <p>The dataset is accompanied with a <strong>custom data visualization application (ERGOMOVMUS)</strong> as a tool for ergonomics applications, allowing visualization and calculation of aggregated data from specific task, product and/or subjects’ characteristics.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>v3.0 includes the following updates:</strong></p> <p>- Statistical summary of the recordings both in .xlsx and .ods file format (v1.1 only included it in .xlsx file format)</p> <p>- Updated experiment details in "MOVMUS-UJI DATASET GUIDE.pdf".</p>
Instances and corresponding solutions for the ergonomic tow train loading problem (ETTLP)
<p>The set of instances and corresponding solutions, which were used in the computational study of the paper “Loading tow trains ergonomically for just-in-time part supply”.</p>
Efficacy of a Combined Ergonomic Health Promotion Intervention on Employee Health
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02071420. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Suplement of Enhancing hypermarket competitive advantage through ergonomic elderly trolley design: an Indonesian-based design
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Usability, Acceptability, User Experience, Human-Device Interaction, and Ergonomics in Two Mobile FES-Cycling Systems for Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury
<p>This database originates from a study comparing two FES-cycling systems: the <strong>commercial BerkelBike Pro</strong> and a <strong>recumbent FES-bike prototype</strong> developed by the team at Politecnico di Milano. The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the <strong>usability</strong>, <strong>acceptability</strong>, <strong>user experience</strong>, <strong>human-device interaction</strong>, and <strong>ergonomics</strong> of these two devices for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).</p> <p>The study involved 15 participants with SCI, covering a wide range of ages (18 to 65 years) and injury types (both complete and incomplete, at acute and chronic phases). Each participant underwent three sessions with both FES-cycling devices:</p> <ul> <li><strong>First session</strong>: Dedicated to setting up the system for each participant. For both the BerkelBike Pro and the FES-bike prototype, the system settings were tailored to meet individual needs, ensuring optimal comfort and function.</li> <li><strong>Second and third sessions</strong>: Focused on actual training, where participants used the devices to engage in cycling activities.</li> </ul> <p>At the end of the <strong>third session</strong>, participants completed a series of questionnaires to assess the usability, acceptability, user experience, and ergonomics of both devices. These questionnaires form the core of the study’s data collection and are central to understanding participants' interactions with the FES-cycling systems.</p> <p>The database is organized as follows:</p> <ol> <li><strong>Demographic data</strong>: The first page contains demographic information, including participants' age, gender, height, weight, time after injury, injury type (ASIA grade), and injury level.</li> <li><strong>PGWBI scores</strong>: The second page includes baseline data collected using the <strong>Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI)</strong>, which assesses the participants' emotional and psychological state before engaging with the devices. The PGWBI consists of 22 questions grouped into 6 items: "anxiety", "depression", "positivity", "self-control", "health" and "vitality”. The responses are assessed on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 to 5. The score contributions for each question are then added together and transformed to achieve the final score that can range from 0 to 110.</li> <li><strong>SUS scores</strong>: The third page contains the results from the <strong>System Usability Scale (SUS)</strong>, a standard 10-item questionnaire that evaluates the usability of each FES-cycling system based on user ratings. The SUS is evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 corresponds to strongly disagree, while 5 to strongly agree. The score contributions for each question are then added together and multiplied by 2.5 to achieve the final score that can range from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better usability.</li> <li><strong>TAM-3 scores</strong>: The fourth page presents data from the <strong>Technology Acceptance Model 3 (TAM-3)</strong>, which measures how participants perceive the ease of use and the usefulness of the devices. . The TAM-3 consists of 50 questions grouped into 14 items. These items include “perceived usefulness”, “perceived ease of use”, “self-efficacy”, “perception of external control”, “playfulness”, “anxiety”, “enjoyment”, “subjective norm”, “voluntariness”, “image”, “relevance”, “output quality”, “result demonstrability” and “behavioral intention”. The items are investigated using a 7-point Likert scale, where 1 corresponds to strongly disagree, while 7 to strongly agree.</li> <li><strong>UEQ scores</strong>: The fifth page includes responses from the <strong>User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ)</strong>, evaluating participants' experience with the devices. The UEQ consists of 26 questions grouped in six items: “attractiveness”, “perspicuity”, “efficiency”, “dependability”, “stimulation” and “novelty”. Questions are scored using a 7-point Likert scale, where 1 corresponds to strongly disagree, while 7 to strongly agree. Then scores per item are transformed using a scale ranging from -3 to +3, with +3 representing the most positive value (extremely good) and -3 the most negative one (horribly bad). Values between -0.8 and 0.8 represent a neutral evaluation of the corresponding scale, values > 0.8 represent a positive evaluation and values < -0.8 represent a negative one.</li> <li><strong>Custom questionnaire scores</strong>: The sixth page contains data from a <strong>custom-designed questionnaire</strong>, created specifically for this study to assess the ergonomics of the two FES-cycling systems, with particular attention to human-device interaction at both the physical and psychological levels. It consists of 12 questions covering four items: the transfer from/to the bikes and the initial tuning, bike comfort, its accessibility, and the ease of interaction. Questions are evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 corresponds to strongly disagree/very uncomfortable, while 5 to strongly agree/very comfortable.</li> </ol> <p>This comprehensive data collection allows for a thorough comparison of the two FES-cycling systems in terms of user experience and overall acceptability in the SCI population.</p> <p>Please cite the following manuscript when using this database:<br>Nossa R, Biffi E, Sanna N, Diella E, Guanziroli E, Ferrari F, Ferrante S, Molteni F, Pedrocchi A, Tarabini M, Ambrosini E. Assessment of User Experience, Acceptability, Usability, Human-Device Interaction, and Ergonomics in Two Mobile FES-Cycling Systems for Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury. Artif Organs. 2025 Apr 16. doi: 10.1111/aor.15007. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 40237144.</p>
The Effect of Exercise Given to Cashiers Along With Ergonomics Training on Pain and Work Performance
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06407440. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 6.
Evaluation of the Relationship Between Neck Pain and Ergonomic Factors in Office Workers
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04821024. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 6.
Effectiveness of a Home-based Ergonomic Intervention Program in Caregivers of Chronic Post-stroke Patients
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03284580. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Exercise, Rest Breaks and Ergonomics Modification on Fatigue and MSK Discomfort in Static Workstation
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04857853. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 6.
Effectiveness of Ergonomic Intervention
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00791596. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 2.
Effect of Exercise Given to Factory Workers With Ergonomics Training on Pain and Functionality
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06004284. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 6.
Safety Voice for Ergonomics as a Preventive Approach for Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders in Masonry Apprentices
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02676635. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Effectiveness of Ergonomics Training and Exercise in Esports Players
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06415578. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 5.
Surgical Ergonomics Education During Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Skills Training
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06386601. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 18.
Effectiveness of Exercise Given With Ergonomics Training in Tea Workers
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06407453. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 6.
Effectiveness of Chiropractic Treatment Applied Together With Ergonomics Education in Factory Workers With Neck Pain
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06689722. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 3.
Improving Work Flow Through Cognitive Ergonomics. An Intervention Study
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03573674. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
The Relationship Between Ergonomic Knowledge of Healthcare Professionals and Musculoskeletal Disorders
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06843798. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 3.
Effectiveness of Exercises Given Along With Ergonomics Training in Construction Workers
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07157800. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 4.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.