Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
31
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
31 results for “Falconiformes”
Fig. 2 in Spatial And Temporal Changes In Falconiformes And Strigiformes Nutrition: Causes, Significance, Consequences
Fig. 2. Possible factors affecting the feeding range of birds of prey (according to: Birrer, 2009, as amended).
Fig. 1 in Short Communication An aberrant coloured Southern crested caracara Caracara plancus Miller 1777 (Falconiformes: Falconidae) from Brazil
Fig. 1 - Female Southern caracara recorded in the municipality of Nossa Senhora Aparecida, Sergipe, northeastern Brazil. (A) Freeliving individual before capture; (B) yellowish plumage due to local dust; (C) same individual after being washed. / Femmina di caracara meridionale osservata nel comune di Nossa Senhora Aparecida, Sergipe, Brasile nord-orientale. (A) Individuo libero prima della cattura; (B) piumaggio giallastro dovuto alla polvere locale; (C) stesso individuo dopo essere stato lavato.
Fig. 2 in Short Communication An aberrant coloured Southern crested caracara Caracara plancus Miller 1777 (Falconiformes: Falconidae) from Brazil
Fig. 2 - Female Southern Caracara hosted in Parque dos Falcões, municipality of Itabaiana, Sergipe, northeastern Brazil. The images allow us to observe its previous and current white plumage, comparing (A) its first record in 2018 a few days after being rescued; (B) its back view in 2022; and (C) its side view five years later in 2023. / Femmina di caracara meridionale ospitata nel Parque dos Falcões, comune di Itabaiana, Sergipe, Brasile nord-orientale. Le immagini ci permettono di osservare il piumaggio bianco precedente e quello attuale, confrontando (A) la prima osservazione nel 2018, pochi giorni dopo il salvataggio; (B) la vista posteriore nel 2022; e (C) la vista laterale cinque anni dopo, nel 2023.
Fig. 3 in Detection of Eumonospora henryae (Apicomplexa: Sarcocystidae) from Falco columbarius (Falconiformes: Aves): Comparison of host-parasite phylogram and comments on the family Sarcocystidae Poche, 1913
Fig. 3. Phylograms of the genus Eumonospora on the left and core land birds modified from McClure et al. (2019) on the right. The boxes under Eumonospora spp. represent detected host species and the shaded boxes encompass the Afroaves. The lines connect parasites and hosts encountered, with the dotted line indicating host switching across order boundaries.
Fig. 1 in Detection of Eumonospora henryae (Apicomplexa: Sarcocystidae) from Falco columbarius (Falconiformes: Aves): Comparison of host-parasite phylogram and comments on the family Sarcocystidae Poche, 1913
Fig. 1. Optical (A, B) and differential interference contrast photomicrographs (C, D) of oocysts and sporocysts of Eumonospora sp. detected from Falco columbarius. Fig. 1A. Sporulated oocyst with stout sporozoites (SZ) inside a sporocyst (SP). Fig. 1B. A collapsed oocyst with a compact sporocyst residuum (SR) within an SP. Fig. 1C. Randomly diffused SR within an SP. Fig. 1D. Eight SZs with diffused SR. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Fig. 2 in Detection of Eumonospora henryae (Apicomplexa: Sarcocystidae) from Falco columbarius (Falconiformes: Aves): Comparison of host-parasite phylogram and comments on the family Sarcocystidae Poche, 1913
Fig. 2. Phylogenetic trees based on three concatenated datasets (A: 18S + cox1, B: 18S + 28S, and C: 28S + cox1). Phylogenetic analyses are performed via Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML) methods. Nodes are labelled with probability for BI method node support (left) and bootstrap value support for the ML method (right). Similar phylograms are illustrated with both methods in all datasets. Monophyletic clade of Eumonospora spp. branches off earlier than the clade of Besnoitia spp. and the clade comprising genera Hammondia, Heydornia, Neospora, and Toxoplasma. 18S: nuclear small subunit ribosomal DNA; 28S: nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA; cox1: mitochondrial Cytochrome C oxidase subunit 1; NA: not available.
Figure 7 in Phylogenetic biome conservatism as a key concept for an integrative understanding of evolutionary history: Galliformes and Falconiformes as study cases
Figure 7. Biome transitions in Falconiformes. The number of recent species is indicated inside the circles. Arrow thickness is proportional to the number of colonizations. The dashed lines indicate only one colonization event. The number of transitions that did not imply colonization (niche conservatism) is indicated as different areas of the circles, classified in four categories. For more details about absolute scores, see Table 3.
Figure 5 in Phylogenetic biome conservatism as a key concept for an integrative understanding of evolutionary history: Galliformes and Falconiformes as study cases
Figure 5. Ancestral biome reconstruction for Falconiformes. Coloured circles represent the ten different biomes implemented in the model (Walter, 1970; Hernández Fernández, 2001); those at the nodes represent the inferred ancestral biome(s); those at the tips correspond to the recent biome distribution of species. Along the time scale, geological and climatic histories are shown, in addition to intercontinental biotic interchanges. Abbreviations: Af, Africa; Au, Australia; EAs, Eurasia; LB, land bridge; NA, North America; SA, South America.
Figure 6 in Phylogenetic biome conservatism as a key concept for an integrative understanding of evolutionary history: Galliformes and Falconiformes as study cases
Figure 6. Colonization dynamics of Falconiformes. Each graph represents the rate of colonization by new lineages for each biome throughout the Cenozoic.
Figure 4 in Phylogenetic biome conservatism as a key concept for an integrative understanding of evolutionary history: Galliformes and Falconiformes as study cases
Figure 4. Biome transitions in Galliformes. The number of recent species is indicated inside the circles. Arrow thickness is proportional to the number of colonizations. The dashed lines indicate only one colonization event. The number of transitions that did not imply colonization (niche conservatism) is indicated as different areas of the circles, classified in five categories. For more details about absolute scores, see Table 2.
Figure 2 in Phylogenetic biome conservatism as a key concept for an integrative understanding of evolutionary history: Galliformes and Falconiformes as study cases
Figure 2. Ancestral biome reconstruction for Galliformes. Coloured circles represent the ten different biomes implemented in the model (Walter, 1970; Hernández Fernández, 2001); those at the nodes represent the inferred ancestral biome(s) occupancy; those at the tips correspond to the recent biome distribution of species. Along the time scale, geological and climatic histories are shown, in addition to intercontinental biotic interchanges. Abbreviations: Af, Africa; Au, Australia; EAs, Eurasia; LB, land bridge; NA, North America; SA, South America.
Figure 3 in Phylogenetic biome conservatism as a key concept for an integrative understanding of evolutionary history: Galliformes and Falconiformes as study cases
Figure 3. Colonization dynamics of Galliformes. Each graph represents the rate of colonization by new lineages for each biome throughout the Cenozoic.
Figure 1 in Phylogenetic biome conservatism as a key concept for an integrative understanding of evolutionary history: Galliformes and Falconiformes as study cases
Figure 1. Schematic explanatory example for transition categories considered in this study: transition with biome conservatism; transition with colonization; and transition with loss of ancestral biome occupation. Note that ancestral biome occupation (for node A) is the same above and below, whereas biome occupations for derived nodes B (above) and C (below) differ.
Рис. 1. Основная точка сбора материаΛа, окрестности Ростова-на-Αону. Fig. 1. Location of study area in Rostov-on-Don vicinity. in To the fauna of chewing lice (Insecta: Phthiraptera) of birds (Aves: Falconiformes, Strigiformes) in the Lower Don region, Russia
Рис. 1. Основная точка сбора материаΛа, окрестности Ростова-на-Αону. Fig. 1. Location of study area in Rostov-on-Don vicinity.
Fig. 1 in Spatial And Temporal Changes In Falconiformes And Strigiformes Nutrition: Causes, Significance, Consequences
Fig. 1. Scheme of possible developments after the meeting of the predator and the victim.
FIGURES 1–5. Strigeids from Buteo magnirostris from Argentina. 1 in Strigeid parasites of the roadside hawk, Buteo magnirostris (Aves: Falconiformes), from Argentina
FIGURES 1–5. Strigeids from Buteo magnirostris from Argentina. 1. Ophiosoma microcephalum, entire worm, ventral view, scalebar: 200 m. 2. O. microcephalum, enlarged ventral view of forebody, scalebar: 100 m. 3. Strigea magniova, entire worm, ventral view, scalebar: 200 m. 4. Strigea falconis brasiliana, entire worm, ventral view, scalebar: 200 m. 5. S. f. brasiliana, enlarged view of terminal genitalia, scalebar: 100 m.
FIGURES 3–7 in Craspedorrhynchus linardii, a new species of chewing louse (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera: Philopteridae) from the Gray-headed Kite (Aves: Falconiformes: Accipitridae)
FIGURES 3–7. Craspedorrhynchus linardii sp.n.: 3, dorsoventral views of head of male. 4, male tergites. 5, dorsoventral views of the head of the female. 6, female tergites 7, female vulvar area (setae on the edge of the vulvar opening not drawn) (Bar = 0.4mm).
Figure 8 in Eigensurface analysis, ecology, and modelling of morphological adaptation in the falconiform humerus (Falconiformes: Aves)
Figure 8. Ordination of the falconiform species for which accurate flight speed information was available (47 species) within the space of the first two canonical variates axes of 21 eigensurface shape variables. Based on this result 97.9% of the training set species were assigned to their correct flight-speed groups on the basis of proximity of their projected positions to the group means. Shape models below the ordination plot represent along-axis coordinate locations through the canonical variates space for CV-1 calculated using the method of MacLeod (2007). Major differences can be seen in the size of the deltoid crest (DC) and the bicipital crest (BC), and in species with lower scores the bicipital surface (BS) is larger and more rounded, forming a dome. Note the CV-2 axis contains no information with regard to group discrimination and should not be interpreted. Species abbreviations are listed in Appendix 1.
Figure 6 in Eigensurface analysis, ecology, and modelling of morphological adaptation in the falconiform humerus (Falconiformes: Aves)
Figure 6. Models of the first three eigensurface (E-Surf) axes that describe the distribution of morphology among the 50 humerus specimens. Eigensurface axis 1 describes 41.8% of observed shape variation and shows clear differences in the shapes of the deltoid and bicipital crests between high and low scoring specimens. Eigensurface axis 2 accounts for 12.8% of morphological variation and describes more subtle variation in the shape of the deltoid crest. Eigensurface axis 3 includes 7.78% of surface shape variation and exhibits differences in the shape and position of the deltoid and bicipital crests between specimens. See text for further discussion of the shape changes and interpretation of the morphological variation described by these model axes.
Figure 9 in Eigensurface analysis, ecology, and modelling of morphological adaptation in the falconiform humerus (Falconiformes: Aves)
Figure 9. Ordination of the falconiform species for which foraging flight-style information was available (42 species) within the space of the four canonical variates axes established in a CVA using 13 eigensurface shape variables. The distribution of humerus shapes on the first two CV axes (above) together accounted for 73.7% of between-groups humeral shape variation, while CV-3 and CV-4 (below) together represent the remaining 26.3% of the variation used to distinguish between the five flight-style groups: perch-hunting, chasing, hovering, soaring, and low-flight. Based on this result 88.1% of training set species were assigned to their correct flight-style groups on the basis of proximity to the group means. Shape models representing along-axis coordinate positions through the canonical variates space are shown in Figure 10, highlighting morphological features that were particularly important in distinguishing between high- and low-scoring species on each CV axis. Species abbreviations are listed in Appendix 1.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.