Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 12 in Systematics of the family Ocypodidae Rafinesque, 1815 (Crustacea: Brachyura), based on phylogenetic relationships, with a reorganization of subfamily rankings and a review of the taxonomic status of Uca Leach, 1814, sensu lato and its subgenera

Fig. 12. Photographs of some species of the genera Tubuca, Xeruca and Ucides. A, T. urvillei (Ranong, Thailand); B, X. formosensis (Taiwan); C, D, U. cordatus (Brazil).

Fig. 10 in Systematics of the family Ocypodidae Rafinesque, 1815 (Crustacea: Brachyura), based on phylogenetic relationships, with a reorganization of subfamily rankings and a review of the taxonomic status of Uca Leach, 1814, sensu lato and its subgenera

Fig. 10. Photographs of some species of the genera Minuca, Paraleptuca, Petruca and Tubuca. A, M. herradurensis (Panama); B, M. rapax (Brazil); C, Pa. chlorophthalmus (East Africa); D, Pa. crassipes (Donghsa, Taiwan); E, Pa. splendida (Penghu, Taiwan); F, Pe. panamensis (Costa Rica); G, T. arcuata (Hainan, China); H, T. bellator (Labuan, Malaysia). C, courtesy of S. Cannicci.

Fig. 8 in Systematics of the family Ocypodidae Rafinesque, 1815 (Crustacea: Brachyura), based on phylogenetic relationships, with a reorganization of subfamily rankings and a review of the taxonomic status of Uca Leach, 1814, sensu lato and its subgenera

Fig. 8. Photographs of some species of the genus Austruca. A, A. annulipes (Tioman, Malaysia); B, A. bengali (Selangor, Malaysia); C, A. iranica (Iran); D, A. lactea (Taiwan); E, A. mjoebergi (New Territory, Australia); F, A. perplexa (Dongsha, Taiwan); G, A. sindensis (Iran); H, A. triangularis (Cebu, Philippines). E, courtesy of P. Backwell.

Fig. 7 in Systematics of the family Ocypodidae Rafinesque, 1815 (Crustacea: Brachyura), based on phylogenetic relationships, with a reorganization of subfamily rankings and a review of the taxonomic status of Uca Leach, 1814, sensu lato and its subgenera

Fig. 7. Photographs of some species of the genus Gelasimus. A, G. borealis (Taiwan); B, G. dampieri (Northern Territory, Australia); C, G. hesperiae (Zanzibar, holotype); D, G. jocelynae (Penghu, Taiwan); E, G. neocultrimana (Fiji); F, G. tetragonon (Penghu, Taiwan); G, G. vocans (Labuan, Malaysia); H, G. vomeris (Queensland, Australia).

Fig. 5 in Systematics of the family Ocypodidae Rafinesque, 1815 (Crustacea: Brachyura), based on phylogenetic relationships, with a reorganization of subfamily rankings and a review of the taxonomic status of Uca Leach, 1814, sensu lato and its subgenera

Fig. 5. Photographs of some species of the genus Ocypode. A, O. ceratophthalmus (Taiwan); B, O. cordimana (Dongsha, Taiwan); C, O. fabricii (Northern Territory, Australia); D, O. kuhlii (Christmas Island); E, O. occidentalis (Panama); F, O. rotundata (Iran); G. O. sinensis (Dongsha, Taiwan); H, O. stimpsoni (Taiwan).

Fig. 2. A in Systematics of the family Ocypodidae Rafinesque, 1815 (Crustacea: Brachyura), based on phylogenetic relationships, with a reorganization of subfamily rankings and a review of the taxonomic status of Uca Leach, 1814, sensu lato and its subgenera

Fig. 2. A Bayesian inference (BI) tree of the family Ocypodidae and outgroups, based on the combined 28S, 16S and COI markers. The solid circle at the node means it is strongly supported by both BI (≥ 90) and ML (≥ 70); and the open circle means only one method is strongly supported. Name of species or genus quoted means it is suggested as a synonym in this study.

Fig. 6 in Systematics of the family Ocypodidae Rafinesque, 1815 (Crustacea: Brachyura), based on phylogenetic relationships, with a reorganization of subfamily rankings and a review of the taxonomic status of Uca Leach, 1814, sensu lato and its subgenera

Fig. 6. Photographs of some species of the genera Afruca and Uca s. str. A, B, A. tangeri (Spain); C, U. heteropleura (Panama); D, U. insignis (El Salvador); E, U. major (Bahamas); F, U. maracoani (Brazil); G, U. princeps (Peru); H, U. stylifera (Panama).

Fig. 3. The simplified phylogenetic tree modified from Figs. 1 & 2 in Systematics of the family Ocypodidae Rafinesque, 1815 (Crustacea: Brachyura), based on phylogenetic relationships, with a reorganization of subfamily rankings and a review of the taxonomic status of Uca Leach, 1814, sensu lato and its subgenera

Fig. 3. The simplified phylogenetic tree modified from Figs. 1 & 2, with number of species beside or below the taxa/group. The gray boxes mean the genera are not fiddler crabs.

Fig. 1. A in Systematics of the family Ocypodidae Rafinesque, 1815 (Crustacea: Brachyura), based on phylogenetic relationships, with a reorganization of subfamily rankings and a review of the taxonomic status of Uca Leach, 1814, sensu lato and its subgenera

Fig. 1. A Bayesian inference (BI) tree of the family Ocypodidae and outgroups, based on the combined 28S rRNA, 16S rRNA and COI markers, showing the three clades (three subfamilies), indicated in different colours. The subfamily Gelasiminae is composed of two groups, one is for all Indo-West Pacific fiddler crabs, the other for the American broad-fronted fiddler crabs.

Fig. 4 in Systematics of the family Ocypodidae Rafinesque, 1815 (Crustacea: Brachyura), based on phylogenetic relationships, with a reorganization of subfamily rankings and a review of the taxonomic status of Uca Leach, 1814, sensu lato and its subgenera

Fig. 4. The distribution of 11 genera of fiddler crabs, mainly based on Crane (1975) and the website (http://www.fiddlercrab.info/index. html; Rosenberg, 2014).

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2004View details →

Figure 6 in A new species of Prosansanosmilus: implications for the systematic relationships of the family Barbourofelidae new rank (Carnivora, Mammalia)

Figure 6. Auditory region of Nimravidae, Barbourofelidae and Felidae. A, auditory region in juvenile Dinictis (UNSM 4051–81) from Nebraska (Hunt, 1987: fig. 5A). B, auditory bulla of Barbourofelis lovei (UF 55859) from Love bone bed, Florida (Hunt, 1987: fig. 9B). C, auditory bulla of Lynx rufus (UNSM 33–67) from Nebraska (Hunt, 1987: fig. 10B). D, auditory region of Sansanosmilus palmidens (MNHN Sa 3384) from Sansan, France. Abbreviations after Hunt (1987). E, ossified caudal entotympanic - Ea, anterior lamina, Ep, posterior lamina, Ev, vertical lamina; P, petrosal; PS, nimravid proseptum; Rs, septate lateral margin of rostral entotympanic; SB, septum bullae; SQ, squamosal; T, ectotympanic.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2004View details →

Figure 4 in A new species of Prosansanosmilus: implications for the systematic relationships of the family Barbourofelidae new rank (Carnivora, Mammalia)

Figure 4. One of eight most parsimonious trees obtained from the cladistic analysis. See text for discussion and Table 3 for character support.

zenodo36/100

Fig. 2 in Systematics of the family Ocypodidae Rafinesque, 1815 (Crustacea: Brachyura), based on phylogenetic relationships, with a reorganization of subfamily rankings and a review of the taxonomic status of Uca Leach, 1814, sensu lato and its subgenera

Fig. 2. cont'd above.

opennotspecifiedMay 2009View details →

FIGURE 1 in A new species of Depressizona and the family rank of Depressizonidae

FIGURE 1. Holotype of Depressizona axiosculpta n. sp. SE of Tongatapu, Tonga, 21.345˚S, 175.042˚W, 260 m, (AMS C.461464). Scale bar = 1 mm.

FIGURES 20–27 in Redefinition of Physciolagria Pic, 1930 (Coleoptera: Mycteridae) with a new family placement, genus-rank synonymy, new description, and a key

FIGURES 20–27. Male terminalia of Physciolagria Pic, 1930. 20—P. liturata Pic, 1930, tergite VII, dorsal view; 21—ditto, morphological sternite VII, ventral view; 22—P. singularicornis (Pic, 1935), ♂ from Sebele, Botswana, tergite VII, dorsal view; 23—ditto, morphological sternite VII, ventral view; 24—P. smithi sp. nov., paratype, tergite VII, dorsal view; 25—ditto, morphological sternite VII, ventral view; 26—P. singularicornis (Pic, 1935), ♂ from Sebele, Botswana, spiculum gastrale; 27—P. smithi sp. nov., paratype, spiculum gastrale [not to scale].

FIGURES 9–11. Physciolagria liturata Pic, 1930 in Redefinition of Physciolagria Pic, 1930 (Coleoptera: Mycteridae) with a new family placement, genus-rank synonymy, new description, and a key

FIGURES 9–11. Physciolagria liturata Pic, 1930, ♂ from Homa, Kenya. 9—Habitus, dorsal view; 10—Head, dorsal view; 11—Left antenna, ventral view [not to scale].

FIGURES 1–4. Physciolagria liturata Pic, 1930 in Redefinition of Physciolagria Pic, 1930 (Coleoptera: Mycteridae) with a new family placement, genus-rank synonymy, new description, and a key

FIGURES 1–4. Physciolagria liturata Pic, 1930, holotype ♀. 1—Habitus, dorsal view; 2—ditto, lateral view; 3—Forebody, anterodorsal view; 4—Labels [not to scale].

FIGURES 36–44 in Redefinition of Physciolagria Pic, 1930 (Coleoptera: Mycteridae) with a new family placement, genus-rank synonymy, new description, and a key

FIGURES 36–44. Median lobe of Physciolagria Pic, 1930. 36—P. liturata Pic, 1930; 37—ditto, apical portion (note apical pores); 38—ditto, gonopore armature; 39—P. singularicornis (Pic, 1935), ♂ from Sebele, Botswana; 40—ditto, apical portion (note apical spines); 41—ditto, gonopore armature; 42—P. smithi sp. nov., paratype; 43—ditto, apical portion (note apical spines); 44—gonopore armature [not to scale].

FIGURES 28–35 in Redefinition of Physciolagria Pic, 1930 (Coleoptera: Mycteridae) with a new family placement, genus-rank synonymy, new description, and a key

FIGURES 28–35. Tegmen of Physciolagria Pic, 1930. 28—P. liturata Pic, 1930; 29—ditto, parameres, apical portion (note moderately long apical setation); 30—P. singularicornis (Pic, 1935), ♂ from Sebele, Botswana; 31—ditto, paramere, apical portion, apical setation removed; 32—ditto, parameres, apical portion (note long apical setation); 33—P. smithi sp. nov., paratype; 34—ditto, paramere, apical portion, apical setation removed; 35—ditto, parameres, apical portion (note long apical setation) [not to scale].