Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
23
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
23 results for “Ficus krishnae”
Supplementary material 9 from: Mahima K, Umapathy S, Sudhakar JV, Sathishkumar R (2021) Systematic reinstatement of highly sacred Ficus krishnae based on differences in morphology and DNA barcoding from Ficus benghalensis (Moraceae). PhytoKeys 186: 121-138. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.186.74086
Figure S4. Maximum Clade Credibility (MCC) tree from Bayesian analysis using the ITS2 DNA barcode marker with posterior probabilities values in percentage that are shown at nodes
Supplementary material 10 from: Mahima K, Umapathy S, Sudhakar JV, Sathishkumar R (2021) Systematic reinstatement of highly sacred Ficus krishnae based on differences in morphology and DNA barcoding from Ficus benghalensis (Moraceae). PhytoKeys 186: 121-138. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.186.74086
Figure S5. Maximum Clade Credibility (MCC) tree from Bayesian analysis using the trnH-psbA DNA barcode marker with posterior probabilities values in percentage that are shown at nodes.
Supplementary material 8 from: Mahima K, Umapathy S, Sudhakar JV, Sathishkumar R (2021) Systematic reinstatement of highly sacred Ficus krishnae based on differences in morphology and DNA barcoding from Ficus benghalensis (Moraceae). PhytoKeys 186: 121-138. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.186.74086
Figure S3. Parsimony distribution of the morphological characters and their status on the MCC Bayesian tree
FIGURE 4 in Revisit the taxonomy of Ficus krishnae (Moraceae)
FIGURE 4. Ficus benghalensis: A. Habit; B. Leaf; C. Stipule; D. Basal bracts of the fig; E. Apical bracts of the fig; F. Inter floral bracts; G. Male flower; H. Gall flower; I. Female flower sessile; J. Female flower with pedicel; K. Achene. A, C from O. Bajpai & R. Tiwari
FIGURE 5 in Revisit the taxonomy of Ficus krishnae (Moraceae)
FIGURE 5. Ficus krishnae: A. Habit; B. Stipule; C. Basal bracts of the fig; D. Apical bracts of the fig; E. Inter floral bract; F. Male flower; G. Gall flower; H. Female flower sessile; I. Female flower with pedicel; J. Stigma; K. Achene. A from R. K. Srivastava & U. M. Singh 249704 (LWG); B–K from R. Tiwari & L. B. Chaudhary 264548 (LWG). A–K illustrated by Rinkey Tiwari.
FIGURE 3 in Revisit the taxonomy of Ficus krishnae (Moraceae)
FIGURE 3. Ficus benghalensis: A. Habit (Lower portion of plant); B. Close-up of habit with leaves and figs; C. Bark of the stem; D. Blaze of the stem; E. Close-up of habit showing arrangement of leaves; F. Stipules; G. Figs; H. Vertical section of a fig. A–H photos by L. B. Chaudhary.
FIGURE 6 in Revisit the taxonomy of Ficus krishnae (Moraceae)
FIGURE 6. Ficus krishnae: Variation in leaves. B–N photos by Rinkey Tiwari; R by J. V. Sudhakar; A, O–Q by A. K. Srivastava and A. K. Kushwaha.
FIGURE 1 in Revisit the taxonomy of Ficus krishnae (Moraceae)
FIGURE 1. Ficus krishnae: A. Habit; B. Close-up of habit with leaves and figs; C. Close-up of habit showing arrangement of leaves; D. Bark of stem; E. Blaze of the stem with latex; F. Stipules; G. Figs; H. Vertical section of a fig. A–H photos by Rinkey Tiwari.
FIGURE 2 in Revisit the taxonomy of Ficus krishnae (Moraceae)
FIGURE 2. Ficus krishnae: A historical collection (Royal Botanic Garden Sibpur, 14 January 1941, without collector and collection number,BM000951763).
Data from: Conflict between morphological and molecular data: a case study of Ficus krishnae (Moraceae)
Ficus krishnae, considered as highly sacred plant species in India, is well known for its peculiar nature of cup-shaped leaves. The species distinctly differs from its allied species F. benghalensis not only in the cup formation in leaves but also in the height of plants, aerial roots, stipules, petiole and its leafy appendages, ostiolar bracts of the receptacle and pollinator wasps, in addition to slight differences in the karyotype, DNA contents, stomatal and parenchymatous cells and nodal anatomy. In spite of having several morphological differences, F. krishnae is considered by some authors as a synonym of F. benghalensis, which does not seem to be convincing. Contrary to the morphological differences, the sequence analysis of nuclear and plastid regions of both the species conducted in the present study does not reveal any significant variations and thus infers no differentiation between the species at molecular level. This may be due to mutations at one or few coding loci or differences in gene expression associated with morphogenesis with significant phenotypic appearance.
Supplementary material 4 from: Mahima K, Umapathy S, Sudhakar JV, Sathishkumar R (2021) Systematic reinstatement of highly sacred Ficus krishnae based on differences in morphology and DNA barcoding from Ficus benghalensis (Moraceae). PhytoKeys 186: 121-138. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.186.74086
Table S4. Vegetative and floral characters
Supplementary material 3 from: Mahima K, Umapathy S, Sudhakar JV, Sathishkumar R (2021) Systematic reinstatement of highly sacred Ficus krishnae based on differences in morphology and DNA barcoding from Ficus benghalensis (Moraceae). PhytoKeys 186: 121-138. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.186.74086
Table S3. List of Ficus sequences retrieved from GenBank
Supplementary material 2 from: Mahima K, Umapathy S, Sudhakar JV, Sathishkumar R (2021) Systematic reinstatement of highly sacred Ficus krishnae based on differences in morphology and DNA barcoding from Ficus benghalensis (Moraceae). PhytoKeys 186: 121-138. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.186.74086
Table S2. List of Ficus species collected from different parts of India
Figure 2 from: Mahima K, Umapathy S, Sudhakar JV, Sathishkumar R (2021) Systematic reinstatement of highly sacred Ficus krishnae based on differences in morphology and DNA barcoding from Ficus benghalensis (Moraceae). PhytoKeys 186: 121-138. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.186.74086
Figure 2 Maximum Clade Credibility (MCC) tree from Bayesian analysis using two DNA barcode markers (ITS2+trnH-psbA) with posterior probabilities values in percentage that are shown at nodes.
Figure 1 from: Mahima K, Umapathy S, Sudhakar JV, Sathishkumar R (2021) Systematic reinstatement of highly sacred Ficus krishnae based on differences in morphology and DNA barcoding from Ficus benghalensis (Moraceae). PhytoKeys 186: 121-138. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.186.74086
Figure 1 Typical morphology of Ficus benghalensis and Ficus krishnae. A1, A2Ficus benghalensis twig and figs (PC: Jana Venkata Sudhakar) B1, B2Ficus krishnae twig and figs (PC: Jana Venkata Sudhakar)
Supplementary material 7 from: Mahima K, Umapathy S, Sudhakar JV, Sathishkumar R (2021) Systematic reinstatement of highly sacred Ficus krishnae based on differences in morphology and DNA barcoding from Ficus benghalensis (Moraceae). PhytoKeys 186: 121-138. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.186.74086
Figure S2. Multiple sequence alignment of trnH-psbA in Ficus krishnae and Ficus benghalensis
Figure 3 from: Mahima K, Umapathy S, Sudhakar JV, Sathishkumar R (2021) Systematic reinstatement of highly sacred Ficus krishnae based on differences in morphology and DNA barcoding from Ficus benghalensis (Moraceae). PhytoKeys 186: 121-138. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.186.74086
Figure 3 Total evidence MCC tree from Bayesian analysis of the two DNA markers and morphology. The Posterior Probabilities values in percentage are shown at the nodes.
Supplementary material 6 from: Mahima K, Umapathy S, Sudhakar JV, Sathishkumar R (2021) Systematic reinstatement of highly sacred Ficus krishnae based on differences in morphology and DNA barcoding from Ficus benghalensis (Moraceae). PhytoKeys 186: 121-138. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.186.74086
Figure S1. Multiple sequence alignment of ITS2 in Ficus krishnae and Ficus benghalensis
Supplementary material 1 from: Mahima K, Umapathy S, Sudhakar JV, Sathishkumar R (2021) Systematic reinstatement of highly sacred Ficus krishnae based on differences in morphology and DNA barcoding from Ficus benghalensis (Moraceae). PhytoKeys 186: 121-138. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.186.74086
Table S1. The PCR reaction conditions for the barcoding loci
Supplementary material 5 from: Mahima K, Umapathy S, Sudhakar JV, Sathishkumar R (2021) Systematic reinstatement of highly sacred Ficus krishnae based on differences in morphology and DNA barcoding from Ficus benghalensis (Moraceae). PhytoKeys 186: 121-138. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.186.74086
Table S5. The data matrix of vegetative and floral characters
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.