Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
28
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
28 results for “General Medicine”
Dataset of "A multi-method approach to drafting candidate entrustable professional activities for a general internal medicine residency programme"
<p>The present Dataset is related to a study on "A multi-method approach to drafting candidate entrustable professional activities for a general internal medicine residency programme" and include :</p> <ul> <li>The "Voting sheet model" used for the 1st round of voting according to the RAND appropriateness method</li> <li>The tables of aggregate results after round 1 and after round 2 of the RAND appropriateness method, with subgroup analysis</li> <li>A document describing which items where chosen to be included in round 2 of voting and why (file name "Summary_Decisions_.....")</li> <li>The list of candidate EPA (Entrustable Professional Activities) selected after 2 round of rating by the expert panel. This list of 225 EPA had not yet undergone the quality check using the EQual-Criteria (DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001908)</li> </ul> <p><strong><u><span>Methods:</span></u></strong><span> We set up a multi-step approach including a systematic review of the international literature; four national focus groups; a national consensus process using a RAND appropriateness method and a quality check of the </span><u><span>selected candidate EPAs using Equal criteria.</span></u></p> <p><strong><u><span>Results:</span></u></strong><span> </span><span>These steps generated a final list of 247 candidate EPAs in GIM </span><span>that were submitted for the national consensus process. A</span><span>fter two rounds of rating, experts agreed on the appropriateness for the GIM postgraduate training of 225 of the candidate EPAs. Twenty-two of the proposed EPAs were deemed inappropriate and disagreement persisted only for two EPAs.</span><span> </span></p> <p> </p> <p><strong>General description of the data set :</strong></p> <p>o Nature: aggregated, analysed data</p> <p>o Mode of collection: experimental</p> <p>o Format: unstructured text, database</p> <p> </p>
Public availability of research data in General and Internal Medicine journals
<p>Metrics and Journals including supplementary material classification sorted by quartile of the JCR “Medicine, General & Internal” category (2019 Science Citation Index Edition)</p>
Does the white coat influence satisfaction, trust and empathy in the doctor-patient relationship in the general and family medicine consultation? - interventional study
<p>Objectives: To understand the influence of the white coat on patient satisfaction, opinions about medical clothing, perception about confidence, empathy and medical knowledge and the satisfaction and comfort level of physicians in consultation.</p> <p>Setting: An interventional study was conducted with a representative sample of the population attending primary care in central Portugal.</p> <p>Participants: The sample was composed by 286 patients divided into two groups exposed or not to a doctor wearing a white coat. The first and last patients in consultation every day for 10 consecutive days were included.</p> <p>Interventions: Every other day the volunteer physicians consulted with or without the use of a white coat. At the end of the consultation, a questionnaire was distributed to the patient with simple questions with a Likert scale response, the Portuguese version of the "Trust in physician" scale and the JSPPPE-VP scale. A questionnaire was also distributed to the physician.</p> <p>Outcomes: Planned and measured primary outcomes were patient satisfaction, trust and perception about empathy and secondary outcomes were opinion about medical clothing, satisfaction and comfort level of physicians in consultation.</p> <p>Results: The sample was homogeneous in terms of sociodemographic variables. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of satisfaction, trust, empathy and knowledge perceived by the patients. There were differences in the opinion of the patients about the white coat, and when the physician was wearing the white coat this group of patients tended to think that this was the only acceptable attire for the physician (p<0.001). But, when the family physician was in consultation without the white coat, this group of patients tended to agree that communication was easier (p=0.001).</p> <p>Conclusions: There was no significant impact of the white coat in patient satisfaction, empathy, and confidence in the family physician.</p> <p>Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov</p> <p>ID Number: NCT03965416</p>
General Practitioner (GP) Practice Based Pharmacist Input to Medicines Optimisation
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03241498. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Reducing Structural Inequities in Heart Failure Management: An Approach to Improve the Quality of Heart Failure Care on the General Medicine Service: Longitudinal Equity Action Plan (LEAP)
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03942978. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 10.
Use of Wearables in Hospitalized General Medicine Patients
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03646435. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 8.
Prevalence and Comorbidities of Dermatoporosis: a French Prospective Observational Study in General Medicine Consultation
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05699980. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 4.
Quality Improvement in Handover of General Internal Medicine In-patients
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01796756. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Study KBP-2020-CPHG Documenting New Cases of Primary Lung Cancer (PLC) Diagnosed in Respiratory Medicine Departments and Lung Cancer Units at General Hospitals From January 1st to December 31st 2020
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04402099. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Does the white coat influence satisfaction, trust and empathy in the doctor-patient relationship in the general and family medicine consultation? - interventional study
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Evaluation of an Online Application for Point of Care Ultrasound Training in General Internal Medicine Residents
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07372053. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Screening for Arteriopathy in General Medicine: a Preliminary Feasibility Study
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02037178. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Recurrent Collection By Medical Student in General Medicine
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05544617. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Peer Comparison Feedback As An Antimicrobial Prescribing Intervention To General Medicine Specialists
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07189364. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Validation of Fitbit Measurements in Hospitalized General Medicine Patients
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07229833. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Glucose Control With Multiple Daily Insulin Injections In Diabetic Patients Hospitalized In A General Medicine Ward
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00464854. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Analysis of Inhaled Corticoid Prescriptions in General Medicine
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03179826. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Analysis of EPA® (a Food Intake Assessment Tool) as a Screening Test for Malnutrition in General Medicine
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03555461. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Alleged Drug Allergies in Military General Medicine: Patients' Experiences and Beliefs
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06112470. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Self-help Lifestyle Medicine for Generalized Anxiety Symptoms
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05278455. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.