Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 7 in An unusually elongate endogeic centipede from Sardinia (Chilopoda: Geophilidae)

Fig. 7. Variation in the elongation of legs and the number of legs in a sample of species of Geophilidae, including Endogeophilus ichnusae gen. et sp. nov. The length/width ratio of a leg tarsus was measured at about 20% of the longitudinal series of legs. Full names of species in 'Material and methods'.

Fig. 2 in An unusually elongate endogeic centipede from Sardinia (Chilopoda: Geophilidae)

Fig. 2. Endogeophilus ichnusae gen. et sp. nov., holotype, ♀, forcipular segment, left half. A. Dorsal view. B. Ventral view. Scale bar = 100 µm.

Fig. 1 in An unusually elongate endogeic centipede from Sardinia (Chilopoda: Geophilidae)

Fig. 1. Endogeophilus ichnusae gen. et sp. nov. A–F. Holotype, ♀. A. Anterior part of the body, dorsal view, setae omitted. B. Head, without antennae, and forcipular segment, dorsal view. C. Leg-bearing segment 21, dorsal view. D. Leg-bearing segment 21, ventral view. E. Head, without antennae, ventral view. F. Ultimate leg-bearing segment and postpedal segments, ventral view, setae omitted. G. Paratype B, ³, ultimate leg-bearing segment and postpedal segments, ventral view, setae omitted. Line drawings based on photos taken at the microscope. Scale bars = 200 µm.

Fig. 6 in An unusually elongate endogeic centipede from Sardinia (Chilopoda: Geophilidae)

Fig. 6. Variation in the elongation of a single leg-bearing segment in a sample of species of Geophilidae, including Endogeophilus ichnusae gen. et sp. nov. The length/width ratio was measured on a metasternite at about 20% of the longitudinal series of leg-bearing segments, and the area of the metasternite (length × width, both in µm, log-transformed) has been taken as a proxy for body size. Full names of species in 'Material and methods'.

Fig. 8 in An unusually elongate endogeic centipede from Sardinia (Chilopoda: Geophilidae)

Fig. 8. Variation in the length of setae in a sample of species of Geophilidae, including Endogeophilus ichnusae gen. et sp. nov. The longest seta on the cephalic plate was measured, and the maximum width of the cephalic plate has been taken as a proxy for body size. Full names of species in 'Material and methods'.

Fig. 1 in Assessing troglomorphic and phylogenetically informative traits in troglobionts: a new cave-dwelling centipede illuminates the evolution of a soil-dwelling lineage (Chilopoda: Geophilidae)

Fig. 1 Hypothetical phylogeny with an evolutionarily relict species and different cases of character state reconstruction. Different shapes indicated different characters. Empty shapes indicate an ancestral state, black shapes indicate a derived state, and gray shapes indicate an intermediate (possibly transitional) state. For the circle-character, the relict species shares a derived state with the most closely related species (synapomorphy). For the square-character, it shares an ancestral state with the other more distantly related species (symplesiomorphy). For the triangle-character, it has an apparently intermediate state between an ancestral state and a derived state (possibly transitional)

Fig. 6 Comparison between Plutogeophilus gen.n in Assessing troglomorphic and phylogenetically informative traits in troglobionts: a new cave-dwelling centipede illuminates the evolution of a soil-dwelling lineage (Chilopoda: Geophilidae)

Fig. 6 Comparison between Plutogeophilus gen.n., Macronicophilus, and another Geophilidae: a–c forcipular segment, ventral view; d–f forcipular segment, dorsal view; g–i ultimate leg-bearing segment of adult ♀, without telopodites, ventral view; j–o, right leg of the ultimate pair, ventral view. Line drawings from photos, setae omitted: a, d, g, j PD-G 1359; b, e, m ISLA 11879; c, f, i, n PD-G 230; h, l ISLA 12866; o PD-G 1510. Redrawn from: k Pereira et al., 2000

Fig. 2 in Assessing troglomorphic and phylogenetically informative traits in troglobionts: a new cave-dwelling centipede illuminates the evolution of a soil-dwelling lineage (Chilopoda: Geophilidae)

Fig. 2 Living specimen of Plutogeophilus jurupariquibaba gen.n. sp.n. in the Areias de Cima cave, 7.IV.2012 (photo by Robson Zampaulo)

Fig. 7 Comparison between Plutogeophilus gen.n in Assessing troglomorphic and phylogenetically informative traits in troglobionts: a new cave-dwelling centipede illuminates the evolution of a soil-dwelling lineage (Chilopoda: Geophilidae)

Fig. 7 Comparison between Plutogeophilus gen.n., Macronicophilus, and another Geophilidae: a–c labrum, ventral view; d–f, left pretarsus of second maxillae, ventral view; g–i, metasternite at ca. 20% of the antero-posterior series of leg-bearing segments, ventral view. Line drawings from photos, setae omitted: a, d, g PD-G 1359; b, e, h ISLA 11879; c, f, i PD-G 230

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2022View details →

Figure 2. A in Pushing the Limits: New Data on the Morphology of Geophilus impressus C. L. Koch, 1847 (Geophilomorpha: Geophilidae)

Figure 2. A – Apex of right forcipule, ventral view, B – Leg-bearing segment 9, ventral view, C – Last leg-bearing and postpedal segments of female, ventral view.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2022View details →

Figure 1. A in Pushing the Limits: New Data on the Morphology of Geophilus impressus C. L. Koch, 1847 (Geophilomorpha: Geophilidae)

Figure 1. A – Cephalic capsule and antennae, dorsal view, B – Maxillae I and II, ventral view, C – Forcipular segment, ventral view, D – Clypeus and labrum, ventral view.

opencc-zeroJan 2024View details →

Linked collectors and determiners for: Revision of the Neotropical species of Aphilodontinae (Geophilomorpha, Geophilidae), with eight new species and a first phylogenetic analysis of the subfamily.

Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "Revision of the Neotropical species of Aphilodontinae (Geophilomorpha, Geophilidae), with eight new species and a first phylogenetic analysis of the subfamily". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/1c94057f-64de-4f19-b047-2223e4d664e8">https://bionomia.net/dataset/1c94057f-64de-4f19-b047-2223e4d664e8</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/1c94057f-64de-4f19-b047-2223e4d664e8">https://gbif.org/dataset/1c94057f-64de-4f19-b047-2223e4d664e8</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.

Figure 7 in Stenotaenia Koch, 1847: a hitherto unrecognized lineage of western Palaearctic centipedes with unusual diversity in body size and segment number (Chilopoda: Geophilidae)

Figure 7. Microscopic images of a female specimen of Stenotaenia sturanyi (Attems, 1903) from Xiropotamos near Drama (Greece: Macedonia) (58-mm long, with 111 leg-bearing segments; 10-IV-1993, Beron lg, collection Natn. Mus. Nat. Hist., Bulgarian Acad. Sci., Sofia): (a) head, ventral; (b) clypeus and maxillary complex, ventral; (c) sternum of leg-bearing segment X; (d) forcipular segment, ventral.

Figure 6 in Stenotaenia Koch, 1847: a hitherto unrecognized lineage of western Palaearctic centipedes with unusual diversity in body size and segment number (Chilopoda: Geophilidae)

Figure 6. Microscopic images of a female specimen of Stenotaenia sorrentina (Attems, 1903) from Palmarola Island (Italy: Tyrrhenian Sea) (23-mm long, with 61 leg-bearing segments; 3-IV-1966 Consiglio lg, collection A. Minelli): (a) head, ventral; (b) clypeus and maxillary complex, ventral; (c) sternum of leg-bearing segment X; (d) forcipular segment, ventral.

Figure 4 in Stenotaenia Koch, 1847: a hitherto unrecognized lineage of western Palaearctic centipedes with unusual diversity in body size and segment number (Chilopoda: Geophilidae)

Figure 4. Microscopic images of a female specimen of Stenotaenia frenum (Meinert, 1870) from Baie de Tamanart (Algeria) (28-mm long, with 81 leg-bearing segments; 7-XI-1984, collection A. Minelli): (a) head, ventral; (b) clypeus and maxillary complex, ventral; (c) sternum of leg-bearing segment X; (d) forcipular segment, ventral. Abbreviations: ch, chitin line; cl, clypeus; co, condyle of forcipular coxosternum; cx, forcipular coxosternum; fb, forcipular basal article; fi, forcipular intermediate articles; ft, forcipular tarsungulum; la, labrum; pc, forcipular pleurocoxal margins; t1, telopodite of first maxillae; t2, telopodite of second maxillae.

Figure 2 in Stenotaenia Koch, 1847: a hitherto unrecognized lineage of western Palaearctic centipedes with unusual diversity in body size and segment number (Chilopoda: Geophilidae)

Figure 2. Geographical distribution of Stenotaenia species. The previously published and new records have been plotted upon a grid of 30′ latitude ¥ 30′ longitude. The type localities of all nominal taxa are indicated by circles (full circles for valid species, empty circles for synonyms), with the following abbreviations: ab, abbreviatus; ac, acuneli; al, albanensis; an, antecribellatus; as, asiaeminoris; bo, bosporanus; br, brevicornis; c, caldarium; cr, cribelliger; fi, fimbriatus; ff, forficularius; fv, foveolatus; fr, frenum; gi, giljarovi; gr, graecus; li, linearis; na, naxius; or, ormanyensis; pl, palaestinus; po, polyporus; pp, palpiger; rh, rhodopensis; ro, romanus; sl, silvestrii; sm, simplex; so, sorrentinus; st, sturanyi.

Figure 3 in Stenotaenia Koch, 1847: a hitherto unrecognized lineage of western Palaearctic centipedes with unusual diversity in body size and segment number (Chilopoda: Geophilidae)

Figure 3. Geographical distribution of Stenotaenia frenum, Stenotaenia romana, and Stenotaenia sturanyi. Both previously published and new records have been plotted upon a grid of 30′ latitude ¥ 30′ longitude.

Figure 1 in Stenotaenia Koch, 1847: a hitherto unrecognized lineage of western Palaearctic centipedes with unusual diversity in body size and segment number (Chilopoda: Geophilidae)

Figure 1. Main differential characters between Stenotaenia and related genera to which species of Stenotaenia have been assigned, to date. Drawings represent the type species of each genus (see Table 1): A, forcipular segment, ventral; B, sternum at about one third of the length of the trunk, ventral; C, last leg-bearing segment and terminal segments in the female, ventral. Abbreviations: ch, chitin line; co, condyle of forcipular coxosternum; cs, 'carpophagus' socket; cx, forcipular coxosternum; fb, forcipular basal article; fi, forcipular intermediate articles; ft, forcipular tarsungulum; go, gonopods; lc, claw of last leg; ls, sternum of last leg-bearing segment; op, openings of coxal glands; pc, forcipular pleurocoxal margin; po, sternal pore area.

Figure 5 in Stenotaenia Koch, 1847: a hitherto unrecognized lineage of western Palaearctic centipedes with unusual diversity in body size and segment number (Chilopoda: Geophilidae)

Figure 5. Microscopic images of a female specimen of Stenotaenia romana (Silvestri, 1895) from Isola del Cantone near Genova (Italy: Liguria) (12-mm long, with 47 leg-bearing segments; 5-XI-1978 Gardini lg, collection A. Minelli): (a) head, ventral; (b) clypeus and maxillary complex, ventral; (c) sternum of leg-bearing segment X; (d) forcipular segment, ventral.